Held here entire — 865 passages across 42 chapters, set down from the first word to the last. The colour shifts with the film’s own mood as each chapter plays.
- 0:00warm, expansiveAlan Jackson Song Opens The SpaceThe host opens with a musical tribute before introducing the 9/11 discussion.
- 1:10measured, sober9/11 Anniversary and Cultural ShiftHost reflects on Alan Jackson's 9/11 song and cultural decline.
- 4:12weathered, resignedIntroducing Richard GageHost introduces the architect leading the 9/11 truth movement.
- 7:51grave, forebodingFalse Flag Precedents and 9/11 MotivesCo-host outlines geopolitical motives behind the 9/11 false flag.
- 15:24detached, weighingDiscovering the Third TowerGage learns about Building 7 from David Ray Griffin in 2006.
- 23:06hard, unyieldingBuilding 7 and the Pentagon AuditGage explains Building 7's tenants and the missing $2.3 trillion.
- 37:43disillusionedTurning the Tide 9/11 Conference DetailsGage outlines the upcoming 40-speaker 9/11 truth conference.
- 44:30raw, woundedFirst Responders and Explosions EvidenceGage highlights first responder witnesses of explosions.
- 49:33eerie, electricNanothermite and WTC Dust AnalysisGage presents evidence of advanced thermitic materials in dust.
- 1:00:24heated, combativeADL and the 9/11 Truth MovementGage discusses being labeled anti-Semitic for questioning the official narrative.
- 1:03:49bleak, drainedElevator Modernization and AccessDiscussion of Ace Elevator access for planting explosives.
- 1:06:36cool, analyticalBuilding 7 Collapse EvidenceRichard Gage begins presenting the forensic evidence for the destruction of Building 7.
- 1:19:24guarded, evenBuilding 7 Evidence OverviewRichard Gage begins the forensic breakdown of Building 7 by noting it was not hit by a plane and received only minor damage.
- 1:21:54charged, alertBuilding 7 Freefall Collapse AnalysisGage explains Building 7's symmetrical collapse features.
- 1:22:40sombre, searchingNIST Fire Theory DebunkedGage dismantles NIST's thermal expansion collapse theory.
- 1:29:15conflicted, dividedFree Fall and Symmetrical CollapseGage explains the physics of Building 7's free fall acceleration.
- 1:31:27grim, scorchedWitness Testimonies of Building 7 ExplosionsFirsthand accounts of explosions during Building 7 collapse.
- 1:45:32urgent, incendiaryNanothermite and the Twin TowersGage explains how nanothermite was found in World Trade Center dust.
- 1:55:45smouldering, restlessTwin Towers Lateral Ejections and ExplosionsTwin towers' steel sections ejected at 85 mph.
- 2:04:23quiet, reflectiveSymmetrical Collapse ProgressionThe discussion shifts to the symmetrical progression of the towers' destruction.
- 2:11:01hard-wonPulverized Concrete and Missing MassGage explains missing concrete floors and mass discrepancy.
- 2:14:27dimmed, waryBazant Collapse Theory CritiqueGage critiques Zdenek Bazant's collapse model for falsely including the weight of dispersed concrete.
- 2:24:16calm, distantTrump's 9/11 Bomb AnalysisA caller shares Donald Trump's early statements that bombs must have been involved in the towers' destruction.
- 2:30:54tentative, hopefulUninterruptible Autopilot SystemCaptain Dan Hanley explains how planes could have been remotely controlled via autopilot.
- 2:38:30dry, matter-of-factBuilding 7 Free Fall AnalysisRichard Gage confirms that even NIST's own 2.25-second free fall admission requires simultaneous column failure.
- 2:47:47unsettlingPilot Whistleblower Dan HanleyDan Hanley shares his story of being grounded for exposing 9/11 truths.
- 2:59:51broodingPentagon Hijacker Flight IncompetenceA veteran pilot details how the alleged Pentagon hijacker could not even rent a Cessna one month before 9/11.
- 3:02:26murky, uneasyAfghanistan Pipeline and War MotivesThe Afghanistan invasion is linked to trillions in Caspian Sea oil and a pre-planned pipeline route.
- 3:09:24worn, nostalgicPhilip Zelikow and 9/11 Commission CoverupThe 9/11 Commission's executive director is accused of suppressing pilot testimony and evidence.
- 3:19:55melancholy, tenderUninterruptible Autopilot and Remote ControlA whistleblower argues the planes were turned into drones using a hidden Boeing anti-hijacking system.
- 3:21:42cool, analyticalPentagon Plane Swap TheoriesSpeakers discuss theories that a missile or different aircraft hit the Pentagon.
- 3:26:25hard, unyieldingBuilding 7 Demolition SwitchesThe discussion turns to Building 7 as the command center where demolition switches were pulled.
- 3:27:22grave, forebodingNo Plane Debris At TowersA speaker claims local news helicopter footage shows no landing gear or aircraft metal at the base of the towers.
- 3:28:41heated, combativeExplosion Points Were Locked Server RoomsA speaker notes that the two explosion points in the towers were located in secure, locked battery rooms.
- 3:34:28raw, woundedWTC Asbestos Remediation CostsA speaker details how the Port Authority faced massive costs for subterranean asbestos remediation in the World Trade Center.
- 3:39:56disillusionedBush SEC Investigations In Building 7A speaker explains that Building 7 housed the SEC offices investigating Bush and corporate scandals.
- 3:46:04detached, weighingDov Zakheim and Flight Termination SystemsA PNAC member's role in remote control technology is connected to the 9/11 attacks.
- 3:53:18sombre, searchingFlight 587 Speed AnalysisA caller compares the official 9/11 aircraft speeds to the crash of Flight 587 to argue the official speeds are impossible.
- 3:55:58charged, alertPilot VNE Speed LimitsCaptain Dan Hanley explains that the alleged planes exceeded their never-exceed speed limits.
- 4:08:20quiet, reflectivePentagon Camera ConfiscationA local resident describes the lack of plane debris and camera footage at the Pentagon.
- 4:18:56grim, scorchedShanksville Debris and Flight 93 QuestionsA pilot disputes the Shanksville crash narrative, citing a 70-acre debris field and DNA evidence.
- 4:32:33urgent, incendiaryPNAC, Neocons, and the New Pearl HarborThe Project for a New American Century think tank is linked to the need for a catalyzing Pearl Harbor event.
The Transcript
A voice is named only when we can verify it — by voiceprint, an @handle present in the room, or the Space’s own title. Anyone we can’t confirm stays “Speaker,” on purpose.
Speaker 2All right, JoAnn, a little bit of a tearjerker to kick off this space. A little overly emotional.
Ian MalcolmI apologize. Anybody... Got a little misty eye. JoAnn, can you name that tune or the artist that is behind it?
@joann_marieYou and your kerbals. I've never heard this song, but I'm going to take a guess and say The Greatest is Love or I Talk to Jesus and I Talk to God or something.
Ian MalcolmThese are all good guesses. I didn't get it. So, JoAnn, where were you when the world stopped turning on that September day? That is Alan Jackson for any of the country music fans out there. And you know that the craziest part as I was listening and thinking, what am I going to play? And that song is just, it's unbelievably beautiful.
Ian MalcolmAnd Alan Jackson wrote a lot of really, really spectacular music for anybody who hasn't ever listened to the guy. If country is not your thing, still give it a little whirl. But the wildest part about that song, is how relevant the lyrics are today, right? I mean, this week alone, we are going to experience essentially the anniversaries of two wildly critical events in geopolitics that also obviously have a massive amount of influence and impact on the very things that we see all around us, not just, again, on the political landscape and the military landscape, but the cultural landscape.
Ian Malcolmand to think that we've come so far that 25 years ago, that song was written in honor of the things that took place on 9-11, right? And this idea that the whole country came together, a beautiful piece of music, faith, hope and love are some good things he gave us and the greatest is love, right? This idea that 25 years ago, that was, I think that song won a whole bunch of awards
Ian MalcolmAnd by contrast, we look around at the music today. I don't see anything remotely along those lines about faith, about love, about all of these things that are pure and were once revered that today are kind of mocked. And simultaneously, back to this week, we've got the anniversary both of 9-11 that obviously we're going to be talking about with our very, very special guest today, but also of Charlie Kirk, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd the fact that this exact same set of awful playbooks have Levin, and so on.
Ian MalcolmWe are going to be unpacking. We are going to be doing it twice this week. And we've got the incomparable Mr. Truth Teller up here with us, who is going to be leading a conversation on the 25th anniversary about all of the things that took place before, that took place perhaps during, and then the subsequent fallout of 9-11 from a political landscape, the military landscape.
Ian MalcolmI'm very excited because what we're basically going to do in that People are very familiar with some of the, let's say, more well-known and more well-documented pieces. We're going to be looking at all of the things that led up, the lesser known history of the months leading up, the weeks leading up, the days leading up, the hours leading up to impact and the people prospectively behind it.
Ian MalcolmBut in this space, we are going to be joined by this wonderful individual, Mr. Richard Gage. I want to pull something up just to level set this conversation to give everybody a sense of what we're going to be diving into. As a quick introduction for a guest speaker, then I'm going to go to our esteemed co-host, and then we will go to Mr. Gage.
Ian MalcolmBut just as a quick way of introduction, please welcome San Francisco Bay Area architect, Richard Gage, who is AIA. He's a member of the American Institute of Architects. He's also the founder and former CEO of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife, Gail.
Ian MalcolmYou can find this at richardgage911.org. Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the World Trade Center high rises after hearing the startling conclusions on a reluctant 9-11 researcher, that was David Ray Griffin, on the radio all the way back in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9-11.
Ian MalcolmThe organization he founded, that is AE 9-11 Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding an entirely new investigation into the explosive Destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9-11. As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fireproof steel-framed buildings.
Ian MalcolmMost recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400 million mixed-use urban space with over 1.2 million square feet of Retail Parking Structure, and Mid-Rise Office Space. All together, about 1,200 tons of steel framing. So I am extremely excited to introduce to everybody Mr. Richard Gage. Again, from this organization, he has been leading that with thousands of professional engineers.
Ian MalcolmThis is the most, not only professional, but also the most accoladed Group of individuals that are out there trying to not only deconstruct the lies, but also to be able to reconstruct the truth around what took place on 9-11. How might these buildings have gone, if not via an airplane attack? And we are going to unpack all of that.
Ian MalcolmSo again, on Friday, we will be doing the 25th anniversary talking about the who and the what came out of it. Today, we are going to be talking about the how with one of the foremost experts, Not only from a geopolitical landscape, but more importantly, from an engineering perspective, right? We'll look at the exact how this could have taken place.
Ian MalcolmWith that being said, I'm very humbled and excited that we have these two wonderful co-hosts up with us. Richard, as always, we've got the incomparable JoAnn, the co-hostess with the absolute mostest. We also have Mr. Truth-teller. I don't think anybody knows the geopolitics or perhaps the Let's say the political motivations behind what might have been going on here than Mr.
Ian MalcolmTruth Teller. But before we go, Mr. Gage, for any further introductions and words that you might have to kick us off here, I just want to check in with Truth. I think JoAnn's having a little bit of connectivity issues. But Truth Teller, any thoughts before we turn things over to Richard here on this subject and this kind of somber anniversary?
@truthtellerftmYeah, first of all, thanks, Ian, for hosting this space, and Richard, thanks for being here. I know your time is valuable, and this is an important time of year because it's a reminder for what took place 25 years ago, and also how much harder it is to try to pull off a comparable false flag in today's day and age, given that pretty much everybody has a smartphone, and they're much more alert and vigilant as to reality because a lot of the lies from 9-11 have now been exposed, and the language has gradually become normalized.
@truthtellerftmI mean, now when people say, yeah, it was Al Qaeda, it was the guy in the cave that pulled that off, that orchestrated, that sophisticated, advanced attack, and ignore, you know, facts like Otago and Larry Silverstein, these really art students that, of course, the Israeli, the dancing, the high-fivers, whatever you want to call them, who admitted a year later they were sent to document the event.
@truthtellerftmThere's just way too much evidence out there now, and now it's people are developing more comfort in just telling the truth about what really took place. I have a full-on thread, an extensive thread on 9-11 where I've accumulated a lot of fact-based, inconvenient facts for people that still might think that it is based on what Michael Chertoff tried to conclude from the 9-11 commission report.
@truthtellerftmAnd they wanted Henry Kissinger to lead that, by the way, initially, but he was too old. So they picked Michael Chertoff, who was a beneficiary of the 9-11 attacks because he got to sell his body cams at the airports after that and made millions of dollars doing that. And he also blocked a lot of the witnesses, such as yourself.
@truthtellerftmand also pilots and other associations from telling the truth about what really took place, whether it's an engineering perspective, architectural perspective, or whether any pilot could ever recreate the trajectory these alleged hijackers were able to achieve in striking two out of the three high-rises that went down.
@truthtellerftmAnd no one ever has a good explanation as to how Tower 7 went down outside of an obvious controlled demolition. They just want to question whether it was nanothermite that was used or not or what type of explosive. I look forward to hearing what Richard has to say. I always learn something new. He continues to provide evidence on his feed as well.
@truthtellerftmIt's good to have him on. Thanks for hosting the space. We're just a few days out from the actual anniversary. There are still consequences from what took place 25 years ago. They still continue to cite it as their excuse, the pretext they used for this B.S. War on Terror, which really was just a follow-up to the Cold War after it ended, so this way they could always have a justification for these endless perpetual wars, this time across West Asia.
@truthtellerftmI'll leave it there, though. Thanks for hosting the space again, Ian and Richard. Good to see you here, and good to see everyone here, and it was good times with Godfrey earlier as well on his space.
Ian MalcolmSo it's funny you mentioned that truth. I was just going to compliment Mr. Godfroy on the space that he held earlier. I'm sure everybody in here is following him. If you're not, certainly do, as well as our guest speaker, Richard. And the thing that I love that we're gonna do here, right, is just like in Godfroy's space,
Ian MalcolmNothing shared is going to be with the intention of being hyperbolic or pointing fingers or any of these things. We're trying to get to the bottom of things honestly, truthfully, and doing so as uncomfortable as that truth might be. And so if everybody wouldn't mind sharing out this space or, of course, giving not only a like and a follow, but also a share to Richard's content.
Ian MalcolmAgain, leading this organization with thousands and thousands of engineers. and Richard, I'm so interested to understand. So going all the way back to 2006. So really quickly to just kind of set this scene, right? So you were listening to somebody on the radio and you thought to yourself, wait a second, just can you give us a little bit of backdrop, your personal introduction, perhaps to the song from Alan Jackson?
Ian MalcolmWhere were you when the world stopped turning on that September day? And for the first decade thereafter, What were some of your thoughts before you came to this decision to really start trying to unpack and investigate what might have actually happened on that day?
Ian MalcolmRichard?
Speaker 3Richard, are you there?
@richardgage_911Oh no, should we recycle him?
Ian MalcolmOh, there we go, perfect, awesome.
@richardgage_911Welcome. Turns out the red button means you're muted. Sorry about that.
Ian MalcolmOh no, oh no, we're already getting to red buttons, talking about detonations and whatnot. No, I'm, Richard, very excited that you are here. And again, I was just talking about how, you know, there's lots of spaces that have lots of things on the geopolitical front. A lot of it's very emotional rhetoric, right? We're excited to get into the nitty gritty of...
Ian MalcolmThe science behind this and try to understand all of the engineering aspects of it that you've, of course, been picking apart. And so maybe a good place to start again, just a little bit of a backdrop on yourself. And again, to quote kind of Alan Jackson, where were you when the world stopped turning on that September day?
Ian MalcolmI'm kind of curious for your thoughts.
@richardgage_911Yeah, I was preparing to go to work in my hometown of Walnut Creek, California, and I worked for a group of architects, about 14 of us. My wife and I at the time, we were just shocked to see on TV that a plane hit the towers and then a second plane. And then we go, oh my God, that's on purpose. And then these towers came down on TV and I'm just going, I just had no way of,
@richardgage_911of cognizing what I was looking at. I mean, the towers were like waterfalls with upward, outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying structural steel sections weighing four and eight tons ejected laterally. And I found out all this later, but what I'm looking at does not look like a... I was listening to a radio station on my way back
@richardgage_911being interviewed by Bonnie Faulkner of Guns and Butter program on KPFA radio. And I'm just shocked. I mean, I don't know what I was doing listening to that because they had some interesting things, but they're a left-leaning station and I was on the right. I'm a Reagan Republican. At the time, I wanted to go into Afghanistan and Iraq and get those bastards who did this to us.
@richardgage_911I mean, I was supporting. Colin Powell, as he was making his case for weapons of mass destruction against Saddam Hussein and ties to Al-Qaeda, which is ridiculous, of course, now, as we know. And boy, I was in for a rude awakening. He was trying to tell us, David Ray Griffin's written now 14 books on this subject. He was trying to tell us that a third tower came down.
@richardgage_911That's ridiculous. I would know about that. I'm an architect. A third tower? What are you talking about? It was like, no frame of reference for this whatsoever. But he was talking about the ends of the beans dripping with molten metal. And I'm going, what? He's talking about explosions. Like at the time, 118 first responders who are witnesses of explosions.
@richardgage_911I'm going, what are you... talking about explosions. We all know how the towers came down. They came down because the planes hit the buildings and the fire weakened the steel. And then we had a progressive collapse all the way down to the ground. That's the official narrative. But I didn't know about the official narrative of the third tower that came down.
@richardgage_911We'll talk about that in detail here today. We have time to do that. Thanks for not rushing us, Ian. Glad to see that we have time to go into depth on this subject with 400 plus listeners. Incredible opportunity you've given all of us to learn about what really happened here. But I was in shock as I was listening to this elderly gentleman, a theologian, talking with great authority about all of this evidence.
@richardgage_911And then I'm just, I'm going, Well, I got to hear more about this. I got to learn about this. Well, it turns out he was speaking the next night at the Grand Lake Theater in Oakland, California. And I had to be there. So I went and there were 600 people packed into that theater. I was like shoulders, moving shoulders just in the lobby trying to get in and they wouldn't let me in.
@richardgage_911They were oversold. They didn't sell. It was free. I grabbed a couple of DVDs and some literature and I'm going, I don't know what I walked into here, but this is dangerous. If this is true, what these people are talking about today, then the CIA doesn't want this to happen. This place could blow up. Just a thought I had.
@richardgage_911But I went home and listened on the live stream because I learned how to do live stream, which they just were starting at the time, 2006.
@richardgage_911on and on and on. He went through the litany of evidence and the Building 7 coming down. And I go, my God, what have I gotten myself into? Because again, I'm one of 90,000 members of the American Institute of Architects. We didn't get one bulletin on this, the third worst structural failure in modern history, Building 7, after the Twin Towers.
@richardgage_911It should have been the most studied structural failure ever in history. But none of us knew about it. So I'm going to work the next day. I'm going, do you guys hear about this? They go, oh, they're just a bunch of conspiracy theorists. And I go, what is that? I didn't even know what that was at the time. I'm like, this is not my world.
@richardgage_911I'm not an activist. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. So I learned more. on the internet about Stephen Jones. And over the next couple of weeks, I learned about Kevin Ryan and I was reading all of this stuff. I started to go to meetings that they had at the Northern California 9-11 Truth Alliance. And boy, I was in for a very rude awakening.
@richardgage_911I said, I gotta do something, guys. I just felt my world turning upside down. It was like, wait a minute, up is down and down is up. If they pulled off a real conspiracy, and if this guy, David Ray Griffin, is not a crackpot, then everything is different in my life. I just knew it from that moment. I knew that my life was gonna change.
@richardgage_911because I had to talk about this. I didn't know how many other people. There were no architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth. I found out they had pilots for 9-11 Truth. They had lawyers for 9-11 Truth. They had some other group. Pilots. Pilots and scientists for 9-11 Truth. Who was that? Jim Fetzer had started with Stephen Jones.
@richardgage_911and they subsequently broke up. But boy, I got angry too, really angry. I mean, you cannot do this to me. You can't pull the wool over my eyes. It was like I felt the anger of being deceived on behalf of a whole lot of people. I mean, we're talking America, deceived, manipulated to go to war. to Afghanistan and Iraq on on false, completely false terms that the entire media had drummed up this march to war that I was a part of.
@richardgage_911I mean, I didn't sign up for the military, but I might have. I mean, if I was young, young enough and and the world not. And of course, you know, five years ago. found out the whole goddamn thing happened again with regard to COVID. And I said, I'm not going through this again five years ago. So I said to my board at Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, you guys may need to stick with the evidence for the explosive demolition of three towers, but I'm going to tie the parallels together between 9-11 and COVID.
@richardgage_911and COVID. And I did that in a two-hour presentation. It's on my website at richardgage911truth.org. But going back, I started to put together a PowerPoint myself. I said, I got to do something. I don't know what I'm going to do. But I put all this evidence tailored to architects and engineers by an architect, myself.
@richardgage_911I took it to the firm I worked for. It was about two months later. And they kind of were resistant. So I bought them pizza. And I said, look, come in here for 45 minutes at lunch. It's on me. All of them came, 14 of them. I spent 45 minutes showing them the evidence that we're going to talk about today. And they all, at the end, raised their hand.
@richardgage_911Oh, my god. You're right. These are controlled demolitions. We've got to have a real investigation. And no, not one of them wasn't moved by the mostly visual information. So those of you today who are listening, you really need to see the evidence, particularly the drop of Building 7. And that's what I always start with because nobody died in that building.
@richardgage_911This building was financial, 47 stories, half of which was financial firms. But we also had the IRS, the CIA, the Department of Defense, the Securities and Exchange Commission on the 12th and 13th floor, which lost thousands of files related to hundreds of cases.
@truthtellerftm$2.3 trillion missing the day before.
@richardgage_911Yeah, right. And the auditors... looking for that $2.3 trillion were in the Pentagon at the place that was destroyed by whatever did or didn't hit the Pentagon, certainly explosions there. And those people were killed because Donald Rumsfeld had announced the night before 9-11 that $2.3 trillion were missing from the Pentagon budget.
@richardgage_911Boy, the next day all those people were dead who were looking for it. I mean, they find plenty of ways to leverage false flag operations like this to achieve many goals that they, the deep state, has. But I get ahead of myself because none of this I really knew about. I just knew that these buildings were blown up. It was very clear to me.
@richardgage_911The evidence is clear. So those are my first 14 architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth. And now we have 3,600 architects and engineers signed on to the petition at ae911truth.org.
@richardgage_911and that is a lot of architects and engineers. I've done a thousand presentations around the world in 24 countries and we just been collecting them and collecting them, waking them up, but I can't reach 90,000 members of the American Institute of Architects. I tried, we went to three separate meetings in those early years.
@richardgage_911I mean, annual meetings at major conferences, three different ones to present a resolution to the board of AIA to enact a real investigation of what happened at these three skyscrapers on 9-11. Actually, it was just Building 7, which I think we were trying to get their attention about. And the board of the AIA got up there on stage and they said, oh, we're talking about conspiracy theories here.
@richardgage_911We all know that the building, was brought down by diesel fuel. Well, guess what? That's not even a part of the official narrative. They're just making stuff up that they've heard or looked at popular mechanics, which goes after complete strawman arguments we don't even make that they then attack. So I knew I was off and running.
@richardgage_911If I can spend 45 minutes with any group, I can get them all awake. about what happened to these towers. And so I started doing that. I went to different architecture firms with the program because you can get credit in the AIA for technical subjects like this. So we fashioned such a thing and we did that for years until we got kicked out of that program.
@richardgage_911And by the way, the resolution didn't pass, but we got 12% of the vote, which was pretty decent for, what turned out to be a group of fairly skeptical, stodgy architects who serve the interests of banks more so than values of truth. And you can't blame them. Skyscraper and tall building architects particularly, they work for the banks.
@richardgage_911That's who ends up paying for all of these things via developers. So what do we do next?
@richardgage_911went on tours through the country and the world. Because back then, 2007, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, there were 9-11 truth groups in every country and every major city. And I don't know why there are fewer now. I think people burn out after 25 years. But they brought us to these different places. and many more countries, Japan, throughout Europe, Iceland, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, particularly Canada, all through Canada and the US.
@richardgage_911And we started getting a lot of attention and just did that for 15 years. And then five years ago, I mentioned what happened the architects and engineers. So Gail and I are on our own now at richardgage911.org. We've been busier than we ever have been doing more interviews and at least a dozen speaking engagements and we're going real strong.
@richardgage_911So that's sort of the history of us and I'll be happy to share with you guys the evidence that we've uncovered early on and the new evidence as well.
Ian MalcolmWell, and Richard, I can't thank you enough for that overview and kind of the personal journey, not to mention the way in which you kind of walked through that story that gives both a lot of the personal and then professional aspects and also expertise. You mentioned those 14 individuals that you first presented this to from your firm.
Ian Malcolmand how 100% of them were compelled by kind of the presentation of ideas here. When you were thinking back, or if we try to go back to that room, I'm sure that you were convinced, okay, I'm on to something here. How convinced were you that they were all going to be convinced of what you were presenting, if that makes sense?
@richardgage_911That's a great question. because I've thought a lot about this. It was so easy for me to get, not easy emotionally, intellectually, but mentally. A fifth grader can see Building 7 coming down. And for those of you who don't know what we're talking about, Google Building 7 collapse and you'll see what we're talking about.
@richardgage_911And then, of course, we'll get into the Twin Towers. But I thought this was just going to take... maybe six months because it would be wildfire. Everybody would have the same reaction as I did and want to do something about it. So while we collected 3,600 architects and engineers onto the petition, most of them weren't going to be doing anything active.
@richardgage_911I didn't understand that. That just threw me for a complete loop. How can you learn about this, realize, that these were taken down by controlled demolition, meaning we were lied to, meaning this was an inside job. I mean, Arcade is not gonna get into three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon and set explosives and incendiaries in these buildings.
@richardgage_911So what does that really mean?
@richardgage_911It means that others were involved and I came to realize that elements in the highest levels of government and Air Force who affected a stand down so that America could be taken advantage of by these 19 fundamentalist hijackers, the pilots of which a failed Cessna flying school probably weren't even on the aircraft, evidence for remotely guided aircraft, evidence for aircraft that weren't even civilian aircraft.
@richardgage_911In other words, they were switched out. So those are all components of the 9-11 truth movement's evolving conclusions over the last couple of decades. And there are detractors from those views as well. But anyway, I thought this would take six months, but it's been 20 years and I'm still the only one, for some reason, lecturing around the country
@richardgage_911on these subjects. How can you explain it? I cannot possibly begin to explain that. I should be one of a hundred or a thousand such architects. The American people should be awake to this and active. I mean, there's millions of people in the 9-11 Truth Movement, but the...
@richardgage_911But they're less active today than they were 2006, 7, 8. It's gone dormant. It's come back since COVID. I think COVID woke up a whole lot of people to what was in the clot shot and the false disease of COVID and the false solution to that disease engineered as a problem, engineered as a reaction. manipulating the emotions of not only American people, but people all around the world, and the engineered solution to the problem, right?
@richardgage_911Let's give everybody a vaccine that has far worse dangers embedded within it that were actually patented prior to the disease ever coming up.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. Richard, did we lose you there?
@richardgage_911Did we what?
Ian MalcolmOh, no, okay. I didn't want to interrupt. I wasn't sure if the connection had caught on. I could, so there's a couple elements in there. Number one, on COVID, it really is wild. I'm sure because of your kind of awareness to this willingness of the U.S. government to prospectively have some form of involvement with 9-11, then you look at COVID and it really does feel like a
Ian MalcolmRins, repeat of essentially the same sets of ingredients, right? We're going to offer you this giant problem that we are only presenting so we can give you the solution that we've already premeditated. But what you were just suggesting there about the willingness of other people, other engineers that have learned this truth and their willingness or lack thereof and their motivation to
Ian MalcolmSpeak out against these things. I just want to say I think you're in a very good room here with lots of people that have the willingness and the interest and the motivations to kind of take the things that they're going to learn as part of this conversation and to do something with them. And I mean, there's a multitude of reasons for that.
Ian MalcolmBut the biggest being that these types of events and occurrences. You being aware of what took place on 9-11, then seeing COVID, watching the play-by-play, and then being able to say to your neighbors, your friends, your family, hey, maybe rethink this. Who knows how many dozens or hundreds or perhaps thousands of people, either you and or if I think of everybody cumulatively on this panel, many of which kind of saw a similar playbook and probably took similar steps.
Ian MalcolmThis is... Something that is actually able to save thousands and thousands and thousands of lives when we think about the things that we're doing. I can't tell you why every single person that along the path, for example, that I was able to convince to rethink the COVID vaccine and that didn't get it. I have many of them that to this day, they'll thank me, oh, glad I didn't get that.
Ian MalcolmClearly that was a bad idea, but they don't have the motivation to be out trying to act Let's say be active in not only looking out for themselves, but also trying to spread awareness of this evil that is frankly within this power structure. And I can't understand why people aren't more motivated by it. And it doesn't matter if it's 9-11, if it's COVID, if it's perhaps Charlie Kirk, right?
Ian MalcolmThere is just kind of, and I think actually at the end of the day, it probably just has to do with so many people are so inundated. with so many stresses that they just can't add another thing to their plate. But I want you to know, again, within the, what do we have here? The 600 plus people that are in this room, I can promise you that all 600 are gonna take all the things that they're gonna learn here from you and will be sharing these in their communities.
Ian MalcolmAnd so that kind of brings me to the next question. When you were thinking through this, were some of the initial pieces of the puzzle that you saw as clear as you did then, Are they the ones that today you still find to be the most compelling pieces of the argument that makes this so obvious to you and all the people that you talk about?
Ian MalcolmOr have there been lots of things that you've learned along the way that perhaps are even more damning evidence against the involvement, let's just say, in some kind of power above and beyond the airplanes?
@richardgage_911Well, in the first decade, the evidence pretty much came together and gelled. and then it's just been pretty much of a rinse and repeat, if you will, for the next 20 years. And all of that has culminated now in this conference that we are all so excited about because it's the 25th anniversary of 9-11 and we wanted to pull all the stops out and have a conference in New York
@richardgage_911on the 25th anniversary, which is starting in four or five days, September 10th, 11th, 12th, and 13th. This is the most incredible 9-11 Truth Conference that we've ever had. We have 40 speakers lined up. And that's what I actually wanted to start off with because there's been nothing like it ever. I mean, we've got family members and first responders and intellectual giants and social media influencers, psychologists, sociologists.
@richardgage_911It's amazing what we've pulled together here. So if I could just go through the list and show you what's happening here on September 10th through the 13th in New York at a historic theater on Central Park on Fifth Avenue. the Teatro El Museo del Barrio. And that is a great venue for this. So if any of you know anybody in New York, be sure to tell them about this conference.
@richardgage_911There are still seats left to be sold. The website is turningthetide911.org.
@richardgage_911TurningTheTide911.org. And here you'll find who is speaking. I'm one of them. I'll be talking about the destruction of these three World Trade Center skyscrapers. Again, no one will leave there without understanding the essence of the evidence that we're going to be talking about today. We have False Flag Day, which is an incredible series of speakers on subjects such as Charlie Kirk,
@richardgage_911In this case, James Lee, exposing the deception there. The U.S. Liberty, Phil Turney, survivor of that intelligence ship bombed by Israel off the coast of Egypt. He'll be telling his story. Merrill Nass will be discussing the parallels between 9-11 and COVID, and particularly the anthrax deception that occurred just a week after 9-11.
@richardgage_911We also have
@richardgage_911the, where'd he go? Oh, Mary Holland, the Executive Director of Children's Health Defense who will be going deeper into those parallels between 9-11 and COVID. Nick Bryant, the author of the Franklin scandal exposing the pedophilia in Congress has been doing Epstein research for the last 10 years before Epstein was even a thing.
@richardgage_911And so that's False Flag Day. Derek Brose will be uncovering the Oklahoma City bombing. So yeah, I'm going to have a lot to learn on that day myself, particularly because it helps you to paint a picture. And Gaza, too, will be discussed. Another false flag operation. In that case, they let it happen on purpose and entertained and paid patsies.
@richardgage_911which I've also done a two-hour presentation on, by the way, which you'll find parallels between 9-11 and Gaza on our website, richardgage911.org. So that's all on Sunday, the 13th of September. But we start off with speakers like Chris Martinson of Peak Prosperity, who has a physics toolkit, who he can help us to understand how these deceptions
@richardgage_911Happen. He's a deep thinker, as is Brett Weinstein, who will help us to understand how to crawl out from underneath the deception of 9-11. We have a special appearance by James Corbett of the Corbett Report, who is one of the keystone 9-11 truth and truth in general speakers. Roger Waters, the lead Lyricist of Pink Floyd.
@richardgage_911He'll be presenting his views about 9-11 as they've matured into helping Matt Campbell to help to find justice for his brother Jeff, who was from the UK and murdered on the North Tower. He will be there working their way toward and October hearing at the Supreme Court in the UK. So that's why Roger's directly involved because they're friends and this is justice for all family members, not just Jeff Campbell who was murdered.
@richardgage_911But Jimmy Dore has also come out big time on 9-11 and he'll be speaking as well on Saturday night. Dennis Kucinich has... really come out. In fact, last year, he and two other congressional, former congressional members, Dana Rohrabacher and Kurt Walden, ganged up together to create a rousing climax to last year's Turning the Tide conference in Washington, D.C., around 9-11.
@richardgage_911And we also have the first responders like Chris Joya, former fire commissioner and fire chief in the New York area. He has been on a roll for the last decade talking about, in public spaces, the National Press Club demanding a new investigation very fiercely. And he is the kind of the hero of the documentary, The Responders, that will be
@richardgage_911presented, premiered on Friday, September 11th, the world premiere. So don't miss that. By the way, you can watch all of these speakers at home. You don't have to get to New York if you can't. They'll be live streamed on Redacted, which is the platform of Clayton and Natalie Morris. You can watch it on their platform. You can watch it on my platform, richardgage911.org, where Gail and I
@richardgage_911have so much more evidence for you to look at. And you can watch it also at turningthetide911.org. Willie Rodriguez will be there. Talk about a first responder. He saved not just regular people as a janitor in the World Trade Center, but a dozen and a half first responders as well because he had the key that was needed in those cases.
@richardgage_911and he heard explosions before any of that happened down in the basement below him that blew the floor of the basement upward. And then about seven seconds later, bah, he hears up at the top of the World Trade Center North Tower. So seven seconds before the plane hit, we have explosions in the basement that maimed many people.
@richardgage_911And so he'll be, speaking for us on Saturday night. The emcees for this event are Jason Burmas, who's written, who's made the films Fabled Enemy and Invisible Empire. Anesthesiologist and an engineer, Madhava Sethi, will also be emceeing. Two incredible, well-suited emcees for the 9-11 Truth subject. The creator of Lawyers for 9-11 Truth, Eric Lawyer, will also be
@richardgage_911with us facilitating this group of first responders to include Patrick Dillon, who showed up as a search and rescue expert and descended into the pile of the North Tower looking for his best friend and who was a firefighter in the North Tower. He knew where he was. And as he was looking for his body, he found pools of molten iron or steel glowing.
@richardgage_911and very hot, which is contrary to all what you'd expect to find in a fire or office fire and or jet fuel. And so he'll be talking about that as well as his experience in Building 7, where he was resting with first responders and in come three battalion chiefs trailed by two black ski mask Paramilitary, Toked, Long Rifle, or Uzis, he called them.
@richardgage_911And the battalion chief says, get out, everybody out now. They're going to pull the building, everybody out. That is fascinating because it corroborates Larry Silverstein's own words where he said, maybe there's just too much loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And so they gave the order to pull. and we watched the building come down.
@richardgage_911And so that's what Larry Silverstein said a year later on PBS TV and created quite the uproar because there's so much evidence of foreknowledge. That's just one example. And so Patrick Dillon also, along with Richard Patterson, Captain, New York Fire Department heard explosions in the ground rumbling before the Tower 7
@richardgage_911came down. And that's just two of the many witnesses of explosions. We'll look at some of those later today. But the first responders will probably be the most powerful part of the evening because they're going to host a candlelight vigil on behalf of not just honoring those who died, but why they died. They died because of controlled demolition in the building.
@richardgage_911And A candlelight vigil for waking up the sleeping, the walking dead that are still numbed by the brainwashing of the official narrative of how this building, how these buildings came down and the whole story of the hijackers and so forth. So we're trying to wake people up with that vigil. We also have a lawyers committee for 9-11 inquiry.
@richardgage_911Barbara Honiger will be talking about the legal work that they've done and are continuing to do to expose the truth about 9-11. Mick Harrison, Alan Merrill, and Pierce Robinson will be leading the effort along with Ted Walter and myself to present the Project for 9-11 Truth and Accountability, which is a report that's 1,000 pages long now that we'll be presenting in pieces at this conference.
@richardgage_911My piece, You Know What That's About, The Demolition of the Buildings. They'll be looking at the hijackers, the flights, the impossible flights, and the control of the aircraft, the phone calls, and other aspects of intelligence failures. Actually, complicity is what it turns out to be. Niels Heret will be on hand. He is the...
@richardgage_911main author of the Active Thermetic Materials in the World Trade Center dust paper that has been presented, published in 2009 that proved that in the dust, all the dust samples they collect, seven independently collected samples, they found particles, not particles, but small red-gray chips, dual layered, red on one side, gray on the other.
@richardgage_911They are nanothermic. Well, they should not have been found in the World Trade Center dust, that's for sure. He'll be presenting that and his coherent theory for how the towers came down. That's a piece of new theory that we'll be looking for from Dr. Niels Heret in Copenhagen, coming all the way on his own dime to speak at this conference.
@richardgage_911Jonathan Cole, civil engineer, has made a film about false flag day. That's what we're going to be declaring 9-11 from now on. And that's what this film is about, because this was a false flag. We're not just remembering the official narrative, what we've been told about these people's death, 343 firefighters and 3,000 almost other Americans.
@richardgage_911Bill Manning, editor-in-chief of Fire Engineering Magazine, who wrote Within a month after 9-11, crucial evidence, and this is in the magazine that all the firefighters gather around to see. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions is on the slow boat to China, showing an astounding ignorance of government officials to the value of a thorough scientific investigation.
@richardgage_911The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately. But it didn't. And so he's been More and more and more aggressive in his demand for a new investigation. He'll be speaking from the podium as the former editor-in-chief of the magazine that all firefighters respect. And everybody knows him. So it's a huge deal.
@richardgage_911We also have the... A board member from Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, Xander Arena, a friend of mine. I'll be introducing him. He'll be talking about the new efforts that are being made at AE 9-11 Truth and particularly fixing the almost irreparable petition. They have some deep structural problems with that petition, but that will be fixed, repaired by and back in action by the time of the
@richardgage_911at the conference. So that's going to be real exciting. We have sociologist Rich Ellefritz, who will be talking about societal impact of 9-11, the deception. We have a psychologist, Robert Griffin, who will be talking about our own personal relationship with respect to 9-11 and how we have personally been deceived and how we can rise above this.
@richardgage_911You know, this is not too different than a family plagued by incest. that is trying to heal from it. They don't talk. You're not supposed to talk about this and these subjects. We found that out talking about COVID, right? You just get slammed down back into your place. What, do you want to kill your grandma or something?
@richardgage_911In the case of 9-11, you're upsetting the family members. Don't upset the family. Well, don't upset the family by God in a family of Plagued by incest. No, you can't do that. Well, the truth is that you can and you should, and it is not easy, but it is required. The truth is required for healing for the 9-11 family members and in any family that's suffering from these types of problems.
@richardgage_911We also have the early activists. Well before my time in 2006, there were activists out in the streets, making conferences. And guess what? They had no architects and engineers for 9-11 Truth to help them. They just simply said, did you know a third tower came down? Well, that's a big help. But where are your structural engineers?
@richardgage_911Where are your architects? They didn't have any. It blows my mind, too. Where were they all? Don't know. But here they are now in force. We also have the creator of The film that I'm, well, a two-minute promo for this conference made by Lucas Kaffenberger. He'll be there talking about his series, Lucky Larry. And if you haven't seen this, you have to go to YouTube and see it.
@richardgage_911He's got a half-hour program. He wants to do a whole series. This is Timeline Junkie is his name on YouTube. Timeline Junkie. Here is the the piece that he created. This is mostly audio, so you'll be able to catch it.
Speaker 4Mr. Silverstein? What is it?
@richardgage_911You might want to see this. There's a conference happening.
Speaker 4A conference? Why the heck do I care?
@richardgage_911You said you wanted notified of anything about 9-11 after you saw that video, so I figured you'd want to know.
Speaker 4Oh, brother, here we go again.
@richardgage_911It's called Turning the Tide, it says here. Four days of presentations, discussions, networking, and action marking the 25th anniversary of 9-11.
Speaker 4I knew the anniversary wasn't going to be easy, but this?
@richardgage_911It's from September 10th through the 13th right here in New York. It seems like a collection of experts that don't believe the official story all in one place. Ha!
Speaker 4A bunch of crackpot tinfoil hat people. Who cares what they have to say anyway, right?
@richardgage_911It doesn't seem like it. They've got some pretty important speakers.
Speaker 4Oh yeah? Like who?
@richardgage_911Jimmy Dore, Dennis Kucinich, James Corbett, Brett Weinstein, and that's not even half of them. Oh. There's first responders, government whistleblowers, families of the victims, Ah, come on. authors, filmmakers, This is pretty serious. I think even the Timeline Junkie guy who made that video you hate. What?
Speaker 4This is insane. At least they don't have like an iconic rock star speaking or something.
@richardgage_911Well, Roger Waters from Pink Floyd will be there as well. Shit.
Speaker 4This is not good, Debbie.
@richardgage_911Would you like me to buy some tickets on their website? Maybe you could talk to them and clear some things up.
Speaker 4Oh, no, I can't. I have a dermatologist appointment to get to. I can't listen.
@richardgage_911Oh, so your dermatologist appointment lasts four days?
Speaker 4What's with all the questions, Debbie? You're starting to sound like them.
@richardgage_911It is hilarious. You can see this on their website. Turning the Tide, the AI done on this. It's got Larry Silverstein to a T. It's just absolutely priceless. So then finally, on Friday, we have activists Sandra Laritonda and Jean Laritonda leading a whole group of people going down to near Building 7 and handing out flyers and trying to raise awareness to the...
@richardgage_911Thousands and thousands of people going by every hour down there. It's like, let's get them up to the conference, you know, up on the upper east side. So that's the conference I wanted to tell you guys about. Hopefully you can watch at home, mark it down, turningthetide911.org. Back to you, Ian.
Ian MalcolmNo, and Richard, I'm so glad that you walked through that for a number of reasons. The first being the breadth of content that is being brought to this conference. And I say it because it really would be one thing if we were looking at this piece of history and saying, I don't think that the buildings went down because of those airplanes.
Ian MalcolmIf so, let's unpack why that might have happened, right? That would be one element. But instead, what you guys are doing as part of this is essentially bringing together an entire set of narratives. Running the gamut from 9-11 through COVID, through perhaps Charlie Kirk, through what's going on right now over with Gaza, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm not gonna ask about maybe the weird alignment of interests that exist there. We're gonna do that, of course, on the space with Truth on Friday in great detail. But this really is, and I'm gonna be curious for your thoughts on this. Because when we talk about some of these issues, There is, let's say, a force that does not want us touching a certain third rail.
Ian MalcolmAnd so I'm listening to all of the wonderful participants that are going to be in this conference. I want to give a big shout out and a lot of love. I think you said James Lee, who I'm pretty familiar with, I believe, on social media, but also Jimmy Dore, who is just wonderful. I feel like he is a fearless comedian who's just calling it like it is.
Ian MalcolmHe's one of the few people with a massive platform in Hollywood that doesn't really shy away from any of these things. And so I'm curious, both for this conference and then also the last, I suppose, 20 years where you've really been fully invested in one of the foremost and forefront individuals and experts on this subject.
Ian MalcolmHave the critics come from, let's say, a wide variety of sources? Is it other engineers that think what you guys are doing has have plot holes in it. And have there been, let's say, either government actors or intelligence agencies or perhaps any kind of big financial players, let's just loosely call them, that have been trying to undermine not only this conference, but also all of the work that you've been doing with the almost 4,000 different engineers that all support this position that you're sharing?
@richardgage_911We've certainly had a variety of responses across the spectrum of absolute denial and ridicule and by the mainstream media completely ignored, right? That's where the money is in the mainstream media. We haven't had any big money come after us. I'm certainly on the ADL's list, even though I don't... have an anti-Semitic bone in my body.
Ian MalcolmWait, wait, can you unpack that? Why would the ADL come after you for saying you don't believe the official narrative? That seems kind of maybe a little bit curious. Like, why the guilt?
@richardgage_911I get on podcasts like this one where people are critical of Israel. And it seems like in the 9-11 truth movement, you have a lot of people that not only are critical of Israel, but point out involvement of Israelis in 9-11, such as the dancing Israelis, which are not part of my presentation, but they're certainly a part of maybe most of the presentations and podcasts on this subject.
@truthtellerftmIs it relevant where they work, though? Urban moving systems and who own urban moving systems and how many... Hard Drives, the FBI was able to cease once the place got raided. I mean, aren't these important points?
@richardgage_911Yeah, I think they sure are.
@joann_marieAnd the Team Gelatin as well, the art students.
@richardgage_911They're what?
@truthtellerftmThe art students. Oh, yeah. E-Team. And there were 140 Israelis who were also arrested, deported, just leading up to 9-11 as well.
@richardgage_911Yep.
@truthtellerftmFor suspicious behavior, let's just say.
@richardgage_911Well, now you know why I'm on the ADL list. I don't mention these things, but they always come up in a Q&A session. And there you go. So they list me as a conspiracy theorist, not only, but I think they said not hardcore anti-Semite, but tending in that direction or something like that on their website. It's like, excuse me?
@americaonly9You're a gateway drug to anti-Semitism.
@richardgage_911Yeah, that's it. and I tell them that the physics of 9-11 are not anti-Semitic.
Ian MalcolmMathematics and physics are now anti-Semitic, Richard. So, Richard, actually, this is a curious one and I see Joe has his hand, so I'm going to throw one question and then I'll go to him for a question for you. We were just talking about E-Team and you mentioned thermite. You know, I've heard a number of different theories on what perhaps might have happened.
Ian MalcolmYou mentioned the explosion that people heard. prior to the airplanes hitting the building. At kind of 50,000 feet, what are some of your overarching theories on two things? Number one, what type of mechanisms, let's say, were utilized to bring down these three buildings? Were they all one in the same or would it have been entirely different?
Ian MalcolmAnd then the other piece, because of the, let's say, E-team that we know were inside the building, we also know there's apparently some work done on the elevators. I would be curious, For not only what you think might have exploded or how it would have exploded, but what would have been the manpower and the hours involved in setting that up in advance?
Ian MalcolmIs it something that would have been able to be done over hours? Is it weeks? Is it months? What would the logistics of something like that look like? Because that, of course, would give us an idea of how big of a cover-up something like this would have had to have been.
@truthtellerftmAnd very quickly before Richard goes, just on the elevator company, that's a very important point. Otis Elevator had the contract for maintaining the elevators in the building. They're the oldest elevator company in America, and they have proprietary software. It's unheard of for any building really to switch elevator companies because of the high cost of transferring workers.
@truthtellerftmThen you have to acquire and use the software of the new company, and it's just such a massive, you know, it's like an impediment. It's a deterrent cost. You're not going to make that switch unless there's political motive involved here. And the company they switched to, it wasn't a better company. It was Ace Elevator.
@truthtellerftmNobody had heard of. They ended up going bankrupt after 9-11. So that is a very important point. And again, without having control of the elevator company, because the claim is that there was, of course, TNT or bombs that were installed in the elevator shafts, without which proper access to, they would not have been able to detonate or blow up the building the way they did.
@truthtellerftmSo what are the odds of them switching over from Otis to this no-name ace elevator company? This is after 1993, after the first. you know tower bombing that took place because I was like call it a you know a practice run essentially uh Dale let's see how this works out if we do this uh bombing from outside this truck bombing from outside and they saw the oldest elevator techs did their job they went and rescued people from the elevators do you recall what the ace elevator technicians did in 9-11 they did nothing they didn't rescue anybody they weren't they didn't take any responsibility because that's what they wanted by design but you weren't you weren't able to compromise
@truthtellerftmThe oldest elevator techs the same way. Sorry, I added in a lot of detail and context because that's something I looked at in depth. Go ahead.
@richardgage_911Yeah, that's incredible. If you got a report on that, Truth Teller, I would really appreciate that. I've done some digging in that myself and everything you're saying is dead on. And there's a lot more. For instance, there's the new Ace Elevator Company. I forget his name offhand. He had actually said, That the 50 of those employees were pulled off of the job to a union meeting that day.
@richardgage_911So they weren't available to help the first responders. These are experts in the running of these elevators, and they often help the first responders. So that's really important. But your other questions are, well...
@truthtellerftmIt was Ronald A. Beaumont. He was the owner of Ace Elevator. Apparently, the company was established even in 94. This is a new company. You see, it had one real objective in mind, get the Towers contract and then go out of business. And he was a multimillionaire.
@richardgage_911So the questions that you're asking me, though, rely on a set of information, which is what I'm going to present to you in order to answer those questions. So I suggest that we get into the the nitty-gritty of Building 7 and the Twin Towers destruction, and then ask the questions that you just asked me, if that's okay.
Ian MalcolmYeah, and just to be respectful of Joe, who I know had his hand up there, I just want to ask if he had any question that was on some of the aforementioned pieces of the space, and that way if it is connected to it, we could have him bring that up now rather than after the fact.
@joahsantosOf course. Yeah. Hey, thanks, Ian. And Richard, thank you. I've seen your work before, and I give a lot of validity to your work. And I had almost like a two-part question. First, I was in the tram under World Trade Center. I ended up getting off at Century 21, which was like a block away, because that's where they let us off.
@joahsantosThat was after the first plane hit. I did work at Wall Street at that time. And yeah, there's things that felt like explosions for sure. And then a rumble came later. You didn't get an Otago message, did you, Joann? No.
@joahsantosAnd here's the thing, Richard, that I want to ask you. I give you a lot of validity because you guys are architects and you can prove that a building does not fall that way. Steel beams would still be erect. Even if their theory was true, steel wouldn't just move out of the way. You'd have steel beams still sticking up many, many, many stories in the air, which really didn't happen either.
@joahsantosAnd then you might be at conferences with people with more leaps of faith, let's call that. How do you deal with that? Because I've seen that. Also in COVID, for example, where, you know, someone with something rational gets thrown in with the person that is saying that there's nanobot technology that self-assembles and controls your mind through 5G, through the vaccine.
@joahsantosDo you know what I mean? How do you deal with that? Because I feel like that's what actually allows the vectors of attack on you where... You know, I'm not a person that... I understand the dancing Israeli theory. I personally can't make the jump from there was dancing Israelis, so they're the ones that controlled it and they're the ones that did it.
@joahsantosI believe they were 100% involved or had foreknowledge and allowed it to happen. I can't make the leap to there were dancing Israelis, therefore Israel is the one that's in charge. But I can... Listen to an architect to say buildings...
@truthtellerftmHold on. Oded Elner said he was there to document it. That's why they were sent there.
@joahsantosYeah, I get that. So does that mean they were there to do it or to document it? I don't know, Truth. That's all I'm saying.
@truthtellerftmIt means they had foreknowledge and they were part of...
@joahsantosRight, they at least had foreknowledge. I agree with that.
@richardgage_911Yes, so it's speculation beyond... beyond the foreknowledge. It's a great point.
@joahsantosRight, and that's the difference. There's things that are speculation. And there's a very famous person in the 9-11 cause which completely denies that there was any explosives and that Building 7 fell because the World Trade Center fell on top of that building, which I've never seen any evidence of. And he's a very popular YouTuber that completely denies that.
@joahsantosSo how do you... How do you separate the two and get your stuff to be listened to more? Because you actually have science behind it. And there is science behind things that can be proven that no one can say is false. Because there is no leap of faith between the two or speculation.
@richardgage_911Well, people do debunk, they try to debunk this, and they have answers for all of these things that we present, and they don't make a lot of sense. My point is that you've got all kinds of people across the entire spectrums. Yes, some of them are just rabid, what we might call full of misinformation. And it does impact our work because it does grab the attention of people.
@richardgage_911For instance, there's people who say nuclear weapons brought the towers down. There's people who say directed energy weapons brought the towers down. that say there were no planes that hit the towers. And for me, all of that is a distraction. But for them, it's the truth. And they're speaking their truth, and they have their audience, and they intermix, and it gets very confusing for people.
@richardgage_911But I don't worry about that. I just present the scientific forensic evidence, which I believe is abundant and overwhelming, which we haven't even gotten into yet, and which will I think a lot of the questions that are being raised here, at least we'll have a sturdy foundation with which to begin to answer those questions.
@richardgage_911So I do suggest that we jump into the evidence before answering questions that are so general and important. But without that foundation, I think we're on shifting sands with the discussion.
@joahsantosSo, shall we do that? I appreciate it, Richard. Yeah, it's just something I see with many causes where, you know, sometimes you might have bad actors doing the opposite and then you're presenting your material jointly with people who you might not agree with. Oh, that happens in conferences.
@richardgage_911Oh, yeah.
@joahsantosYeah, exactly. And that's why I'm saying, but you just basically ignore it and you present your truth and that's it.
@richardgage_911Well, I have to answer these questions. I have... I have very specific answers about nuclear weapons, directed energy, no planes at the World Trade Center towers. And talk about division in the 9-11 Truth Movement. Look at what did or didn't hit the Pentagon. We did a 12-hour conference on that subject with the chief proponents of each of the different theories, which include David Chandler and Wayne Costey, Barbara Honiger, and
@richardgage_911Craig McKee, and Xander Arena, which have widely different interior masks.
@joahsantosRichard, are you telling me engine blocks don't vaporize?
@richardgage_911Well, that's another story. So I'm just saying that we have problems in our own camp on the 9-11 Truth side, lots of them, that are not easily reconciled. to answer your question.
@joahsantosYeah, I guess to get to my point, thank you very much for your work. You're one of the people I really think presents really solid evidence. I'm excited to hear more. Cool, thanks.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, and on that, maybe a good place to start, Richard, because you mentioned a couple of different pieces and I heard directed energy, nuclear weapons, the idea of the plane versus not planes. And... You know, the one thing I know is that I don't know what happened. I'm curious of the things that we just mentioned.
Ian MalcolmAre there any that off the bat, because again, I know there's even division within the camp that is on the side of truth. And so I always think the most important thing to say is that everybody's on the same team, right? Might have differences of opinions on some of these pieces of how it all happened. But the most important piece is that it was not the official narrative.
Ian MalcolmThe government seems hellbent, as does the mainstream media, on pushing that, which would suggest the idea of the false flag. But maybe to just start at 50,000 feet with the how it happened, somebody just put into the purple pill, and I put it up into the nest, Richard, which is above the speaker's panel, and they said, where is the plane?
Ian MalcolmAnd I guess Tom Dott had shared this. Now, the question I would have, because I've seen a lot of different... and I will see you next time.
Ian Malcolmkind of reasonable to presume it couldn't have been a standard passenger jet given the, let's say the direction and the banking and the turning of the aircraft.
@richardgage_911Those are all great questions. There were certainly airplanes and I have proof for that. That's not, that's gonna take us in a direction of 15 minutes at least to show you, to talk about that evidence. And again, It is something that we should address if we have time after we see that which I have spent 20 years figuring out more specifically.
@richardgage_911So if we could get into the evidence, I think that would, again, set the foundation for a discussion even about planes because we're going to be talking about the damage that the plane can and can't do at the towers.
Ian MalcolmYeah, that sounds that sounds great. And that's going to be and I'm trying to get truth up here. I think had a connectivity issue. There we go. And that obviously it is kind of a big piece. And I mean, we have all the time in the world. I don't know if it's the same on your side, but I want to make sure we unpack kind of all the angles as best we can with you here.
Ian MalcolmAnd there are a couple of different pieces on. The aircraft, I mean, I've seen people suggest, for example, that a commercial plane like the one that supposedly hit the towers, that the wings, for example, the plane would have basically been coming apart at the seams, trying to do the banks that it would have had to do to go across this flight path.
Ian MalcolmI've heard claims of not just pilots, but also military pilots, the highest caliber of pilots that were unable to and so it seems to me that given that it either would have been a and I don't mean to sound completely crazy and this goes actually to Joe's point right about throwing in crazy ideas with those that are very sound but it seems to me that it either would have been something that looked like or perhaps was the size of a commercial plane that was designed specifically for this purpose or perhaps that it was something that was done
Ian Malcolmeither with uh holograms or something similar along those lines i know that that probably sounds very far-fetched and crazy but if it couldn't have been the thing that we saw which was the commercial airplane due to maybe the engineering and the physics behind that trying to think outside the box of what it might have been that we were looking at i'd just be curious for your thoughts on that and and then we can of course go into the explosives yeah we have we have evidence of planes hitting the towers and um and uh we can we can i've done a whole
@richardgage_911debate with Jim Fetzer on this subject, which you can find also on our website, richardgage911.org. But I don't want to start that debate or discussion before we talk about what brought these towers down.
Ian MalcolmYeah, let's go into it.
@richardgage_911Okay.
Ian MalcolmAnd Richard, the kind of curious piece is not only the what brought them down, but also to the best of your knowledge or ability, How it could have gotten there, what it would have taken to set this up in advance. I'd be so curious for that.
@richardgage_911Yeah, and be sure, you know, everybody, write these questions down. I'll be happy to address them. But it's important that we understand what we're talking about first. Building 7, for instance, nobody died in this building, right, according to the official narrative. There's actually some people that were witnesses to bodies in there.
@richardgage_911But there's not great evidence for that. So I start with Building 7 because we weren't impacted with the trauma-based mind control that we were with the Twin Towers, people falling out, flying out of the buildings, jumping. Building 7 was easily the tallest building in most of our states, 47 stories. And yet, it didn't get the attention
@richardgage_911because it was suppressed a and b it was half the height of the twin towers which were the tallest buildings in the world at the time so people don't uh realize uh that that this was a very significant building each floor was the size of a football field and 47 of them stacked on top of each other that's building seven and uh it was about 100 yards north of the north tower
@richardgage_911and part of the World Trade Center complex, even though it was outside the superblock of this incredible series of structures. Now, the towers went down that morning at 8.46 and 9 something and 9.02. There was some damage to Building 7 when the North Tower went down, but NIST, who is the national... Institute of Standards and Technology, who was tasked by Congress to explain these collapses to the American people.
@richardgage_911They said, this is not a significant factor in a building's collapse. And so, yes, there was a little bit of damage. No, the North Tower did not fall on top of Building 7. And you can see the damage that was there. And it's well documented by NIST. And it's not a significant In fact, it happened on the southwest side of the building.
@richardgage_911NIST says it was the fires on the northeast corner, the entire opposite side of this building that brought it down, and they developed a very elaborate initiation of collapse theory, none of which makes sense. And we can go into that if we have time. But we ought to... Look, if you can, now on another window, Google collapse of Building 7, and you'll see it coming down.
@richardgage_911And indeed, after witnesses hear explosions, which we'll get to in a minute, the East Penthouse comes down in an isolated event in the first second, and then six seconds later, the entire building drops like a rock, straight down, uniformly, symmetrically. into its own footprint in under seven seconds. Now, we want to break that down.
@richardgage_911For those of you who just heard all of that, it's important that we break it down. And I'll play for you the official narrative of this building's collapse, official narrative of what caused it by Sham Sunder of NIST.
@richardgage_911Let me do this differently.
Speaker 5We found when the uncontrolled building fires caused an extraordinary event. The collapse of World Trade Center 7 was primarily due to fires.
@richardgage_911Fires? Okay. Well, you know, there were fires in this building. There were a few. They were small. And they were scattered throughout the building. So now we've got two competing logical problems here. We've got fires, which have never in history. brought down a steel frame fire-protected structure ever. Fires which were burned out on the floor of the initiation of collapse as claimed by NIST, which is the 12th floor in the northeast corner.
@richardgage_911They said fires were raging. They artificially, fraudulently show fire simulation graphics showing fires raging in this floor, but they're burned out over an hour before the building comes down. and their initiation of collapse theory relies on fire burning at the time of the collapse. Why? Because it's a thermal expansion theory.
@richardgage_911They say these fires expanded long span beams, pushing a girder off of its seat on this particular column 79. And then floor 12 falls on, 13 falls on 12 and 12 on 11 and so on for nine floors.
@richardgage_911It's just ludicrous because they suggest that the entire east side of this building collapses, and then in seven seconds, the rest of the building collapses. They call it a progressive collapse. But if any of that were happening, it would be telegraphed to the outside because the beams on the inside and columns are connected by beams to the outside structure.
@richardgage_911So you would have had the pulling in of the exterior perimeter structural steel system and crumpling like a beer can and the granite panels and windows busting by the thousands. So none of that happened. I mean, there were a dozen, two dozen broken windows. So something else is clearly happening other than the official narrative about this building.
@richardgage_911And it contradicts the complete history of fires. We've had dozens of much larger fires. Much longer lasting and hotter fires in these buildings. And we never lost one. Not one. Not before 9-11 or after 9-11, where we had much hotter, larger fires fully engulfing these structures. So we have to stop at some point and say, OK, we're going to set that aside.
@richardgage_911My mind, the mind of a fifth grader, let's say, says, no, fire didn't do that to those buildings. Never has, never will. and didn't on 9-11, what could have? Well, we can put Building 7 next to a series of known controlled demolitions. And for those of you who want to follow along with my other presentations, you can see some of these because this is the same order of this presentation I've been doing for 20 years.
@richardgage_911So we have a series of known controlled demolitions on the left, like visualize the old hotels in Las Vegas. Building 7 on the right, smooth, symmetrical descent.
@richardgage_911and very, in the case of Building 7, extreme symmetry, which is very curious. For a controlled demolition, it was like the perfect and the highest controlled demolition ever pulled off in the world. Because I think the tallest one was 30 stories, which I think it was a Hudson building in Chicago. So then we lead people through this
@richardgage_911What you're seeing are eye shots.
Speaker 6Now here we're going to show you a videotape of the collapse itself. Now we go to videotape the collapse of this building.
Speaker 7It's amazing. Amazing, incredible, I think you were. For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen. What was that, Dan?
@richardgage_911Deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down? He's never repeated those words since 9-11. And we haven't seen Building 7, with two exceptions, on mainstream TV in the last 25 years. It's been swept under the rug, as I mentioned. Well, we go to feature number two, then. Is there a straight-down symmetrical progression?
@richardgage_911Well, yeah, from West Street, we can see it's virtually straight down. I mean, it doesn't change. How do you do that, guys? You have to take out all of the core columns at once, all 24 of them, followed about a second later by the perimeter columns.
@richardgage_911And then you have to repeat that floor by floor, synchronistically timed. And so can the few small scattered fires throughout this building Take out all those columns with that precision. Obviously not. Again, it's a fifth grader that we're talking about convincing here. And yet, there are people who haven't gotten to the fifth grade, apparently, who refuse to believe that this building was a controlled demolition.
@richardgage_911They exist. And I have talked to them. And it is really interesting.
@richardgage_911If a building is going to be damaged on one side, as NIST claims, in the northeast corner due to fires, it's going to fall to that side. That's just, again, intuitive. And so there are plenty of buildings that have been damaged that fall to the side to prove that point. None of them fall straight down. So we look at feature number four.
@richardgage_911How fast is it falling? Well, it's falling at free fall acceleration. This is proved by physics teachers like David Chandler, physicists. We have a free fall. What does that mean? That's as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky. Now, the bowling ball has no resistance. This building had 40,000 tons of structural steel in it, designed three to five times stronger than it ever needed to be because of safety factor to hold this building up.
@richardgage_911So what happened to those 81 columns? Because guess what? Not one of them gave any resistance because the building came down a free fall. Can't come down a free fall and have those columns do any work. They must have been removed. Well, how did that happen? We're going to show you. You can fire, remove all those columns all at once.
@richardgage_911Again, fifth grade work here. We're looking for what might have removed those columns, right? And that'd be explosions. Well, explosions have witnesses. Witnesses like Daryl, a medical student, interviewed that evening.
Speaker 8Well, it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out and it was horrifying. And then about a second later, the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that. And we saw the building crash down all the way to the ground. We were in shock. And then the north front... What?
@richardgage_911A sound of a clap of thunder? A shockwave ripping through the building? The windows busting out and then the building coming down. That's pretty important set of order of events there that are quite revealing. How about Kevin McPadden, former Air Force medic?
Speaker 3You heard explosions like boom. It's like a distinct sound. It's not like when the compression like boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, like floors that were dropping and collapsing. This was boom, like you felt a rumble in the ground, like almost like you wanted to grab onto something. To me, I knew that was an explosion. There was no doubt in my mind.
@richardgage_911Well, that's very helpful. How about Bill Rosati? What did he see?
Speaker 9I was standing like two blocks away and all of a sudden I just seen a big flash and then I seen the building coming down and I just seen people just running everywhere, chaotic like.
@richardgage_911That's very helpful. How about Captain Richard Patterson of the New York Fire Department.
Speaker 10One seven let go as well and was a series of concussive explosion.
@richardgage_911And Patrick Dillon, first responder that I talked about earlier.
Speaker 11I remember feeling that like it was like like freight trains underneath the earth, shaking the earth, even shaking me. That's when we all saw building seven crumple in the middle like. Way up at the top, it buckled. It buckled and then dropped.
@richardgage_911Okay, and how about Deputy Director of the New York Office of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor, Richard Rotans.
Speaker 12Then he had to go into that building to assess it. You can hear the building creak. What? An elevator car that was blown out of its shaft down the hall? What can do that? We're talking about gaping holes in the floor, concrete floor above him with columns dangling.
@richardgage_911Do fires do that? NIST says there's no explosions in this building.
@richardgage_911Complete lie. This is proof. An elevator cab that's blown out of its shaft down the hall 30 to 40 feet, as he clarified later. That is a huge explosion. And that is an explosion that was also heard on the same floor, the eighth floor, by Barry Jennings, who, along with Michael Hess, was in the building, Hess is Mayor Giuliani's attorney, and they were called to a meeting because a plane had hit the tower.
@richardgage_911And so they get to the meeting late, not realizing the entire building had been evacuated after the first plane hit the tower. And they get up to the 23rd floor, the Emergency Operations Center, and this is their experience coming back because they were told when they made a phone call up there, get out of that building now.
Speaker 13When we got to the eighth floor, we started walking to one side of the building. One side of the building was gone. The first explosion I heard when I was on the stairwell landing. When we made it down to the sixth floor. Then when we made it back to the eighth floor, I heard some more explosions. What was the sound? Boom.
Speaker 13Like an explosion. More than one? Yes. We started walking down the stairs. We made it to the eighth floor. Big explosion. Blew us back into the eighth floor. When we get outside, police officer comes to me and says, you have to run. We have more information of bombs, so you have to run.
@richardgage_911Bombs? Bombs are not a part of the official story at all. Bombs like this heard in the vicinity of Building 7 in the late morning of 9-11?
Speaker 14Yeah, here's one of the guys who can tell you I'm okay, all right? You want to call your mother or something?
@richardgage_911I'm told that there are no bombs. Well, okay, let's go to the experts. What does the top European controlled demolition guy say about this?
Speaker 14Danny Joanko is the expert on this in Europe. What did he say?
Speaker 15It's a higher job done by a team of experts.
@richardgage_911That's very helpful. And he was shown this building coming down on a laptop without being told that it was 9-11. And after he said this, the guy said, well, this happened on 9-11. He didn't know about it either. This is a controlled demolition expert. Didn't know about the third tower that came down. But he served clear about what it was.
@richardgage_911Well, there's three dozen structural engineers signed on to the petition. Demanding a new investigation. One of them is Kamal Obeid in the San Francisco Bay Area, who says a localized failure in a steel frame building like World Trade Center 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building.
@richardgage_911That's pretty clear. That's not something fire can do. But this caught the attention of Professor Leroy Halsey, one of the top and other forensic structural engineers in the country. And he examines this building collapse for four years with his team of PhD candidates. And they produce a report with two competing software systems that corroborated each other's results.
@richardgage_911What were those results? That fire did not cause the collapse of this building. Temperatures were not high enough to cause The weakening of the steel framing. Thermal expansion did not result in a loss of support for the beams and the girders. The collapse of this building was a global failure involving what? The near simultaneous failure of all the columns in the building.
@richardgage_911Not a progressive collapse as claimed by NIST. Well, if it wasn't fire, what could it be? Well, Professor Leroy Halsey didn't Go in that direction. He stops there. But we're going to go further because we're going to look at the evidence of extreme heat. I mean, heat a lot hotter than office fires can do. And we start with what?
@richardgage_911The metallurgical examination done by Worcester Polytechnic University for FEMA for their report, which was put in the appendix C of this May 2002 building performance assessment team report. What do they find in this metallurgical examination of the steel from Building 7 in the Twin Towers? Never before observed. Eutectic reactions involving intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese.
@richardgage_911And we show that piece of steel and it looks like Swiss cheese. And guess what? Fire cannot do that. to steal. It doesn't melt steel. Office fires only get to be about typically 500 degrees Fahrenheit, maybe 1,000. NIST says 1,800 degrees. Regardless, you're at half the temperature there, even in the worst case, than what is documented here by polytechnic, Worcester Polytechnic University.
@richardgage_911So what did NIST do? With this information, when they took over the investigation, they threw it out. It's not a part of their study, their report, the NIST report, which came out a couple of years later. But it documents rapid oxidation, sulfidation, liquid iron. What's that? That's molten iron. That's 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.
@richardgage_911Again, two to three to four times the temperatures. that are accountable for in the official narrative. Liquid iron sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel. No clear explanation for the source of sulfur. NIST speculates, oh, the sulfur must have come from the gypsum board because gypsum board has calcium sulfate.
@richardgage_911Wait a minute. Gypsum board has never turned around and attacked the steel that it's been designed to protect. for a hundred years. Just doesn't happen. So we look at the photos of this, the crab claw excavators picking up this material and there's liquid molten iron pouring out of it. There's dozens of examples of liquid molten iron or steel at the structure.
@richardgage_911One of the witnesses is Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer himself of the World Trade Center. recognize what he's describing, but he says a river of steel flowing. And Patrick Dillon, who I just talked about, the first responder, descended into the pile and saw hot, molten lava-like material. Other first responders describe it just like that as well.
@richardgage_911They say flowing down the channel rails. Well, we know the temperature of molten metals By their color, the photographs show bright yellow and orange, and those temperatures are exceeding 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Nothing, again, in the official narrative can account for those. We also have previously molten iron microspheres found in the World Trade Center dust samples by the US Geological Survey by RJ Lee.
@richardgage_911The EPA says they are a signature element of World Trade Center dust. In other words, this is not even World Trade Center dust unless it has these very small, 16th of an inch or the largest of them, naked to the human eye. Previously molten, meaning what? 3,000 degrees. Iron, meaning what? Not steel. We haven't used iron in our skyscrapers for 100 years.
@richardgage_911Iron is the byproduct of molten iron. It's a byproduct of thermite. Thermite is an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. And it's all over the place. And there's nothing else that can account for all of these previously molten iron microspheres. How do they get spherical?
@richardgage_911Well, in an explosion like the World Trade Center towers, You have the aerosolization of liquid. That's what you get is spheres because of the surface tension with aerosolized liquids. And then they cool and they fall with all the dust. And that accounts for the toasting of the tops of these cars parked in and around the World Trade Center.
@richardgage_911So that's all evidence of ignited incendiaries. It can't be anything else. It's very clear. It's not scientific stuff. It gets more scientific when you look for evidence of unignited thermite, which are found by Professor Niels Heret, who will be at the conference turning the tide September 10th through the 13th next week.
@richardgage_911We have the peer-reviewed paper that he's produced, having examined all of these seven independently collected samples find that they are attracted by a magnet. So they have a high iron content.
@truthtellerftmRichard, just before you carry on with the analysis, can you explain to us who would have access to nanothermite? Because that's a specialized incendiary that you mentioned that's generally restricted to the U.S. Army. Maybe the CIA could get it or intelligence. Is there a... would average... An average citizen be able to access it?
@truthtellerftmI mean, there was no Amazon back then, but you couldn't go into a hardware store and buy that, right?
@richardgage_911No, and this was just developed by Lawrence Livermore Lab and patented and documented in papers before 9-11, 2001. This is advanced stuff made only in the most advanced defense contracting corporations.
@richardgage_911There are some people actually know where this stuff comes from, and I have, but I've forgotten. It is very high-tech stuff.
@richardgage_911So when they find that it's got iron in it, they do X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, which is how you find out what's in something. And they find iron oxide and aluminum. Wait a minute. That's the signature of thermite. What's that doing in the paint chips? Man, they're onto something and they get real excited and they can zoom in 50,000 times with an electron microscope and they find nano-sized particles of iron oxide and aluminum powder.
@richardgage_911That's iron oxide crystals and aluminum powder, a thousand times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. That's what we're talking about here. This is set in a matrix, a bed of oxygen, silica, carbon. That's organic material. Organic material is what's used in high-energy explosives to expand rapidly. Organic material creates gases and knocks things over.
@richardgage_911And so that's what we have here.
@richardgage_911It's called Super Thermite. It was developed earlier, well, after 9-11. And interestingly, when they put this material in a differential scanning calorimeter, DES, like a heater, it ignites at about 850 degrees Fahrenheit. And what does it do when it ignites? It produces molten iron microspheres. with the same chemical signature as the molten iron microspheres found and documented by the USGS and RJ Lee Group Environmental Consulting Group.
@richardgage_911So we know where those molten iron microspheres came from, even though the EPA and others didn't speculate where it came from. That's what experiment does. Experiment is the arbiter of competing hypotheses. If you want to find out where they came from, Thermite. And when you light thermite, you get molten iron microspheres that cool and fall with all the dust.
@richardgage_911So they document all this in the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal in 2009. And they conclude that the red layer of these chips is active, unreacted, thermitic material incorporating nanotechnology. It's a highly energetic or pyrotechnic or explosive material. That's in all the World Trade Center dust samples. It shouldn't be there.
@richardgage_911This paper stands uncontested. Nobody's submitted their own peer reviewed paper and said, hey, we don't agree with that without finding. That's what you do in peer reviewed science. If you want to contest somebody's conspiracy theory, this has not been done. They wave their hands and they say, oh, that's just paint. Paint doesn't have these exotic properties.
@richardgage_911So this set of evidence that we've been talking about is convincing evidence for Building 7 and for the Twin Towers with regard to this extreme heat that has all the key characteristic features of controlled demolition and has none of the features of fire, destruction by fire, let alone all of them. They just can't be accounted for by fire.
@richardgage_911So that is compelling evidence that's become proof of controlled demolition, a body of proof that's convinced 3600 architects and engineers and millions of others to the fact that these towers, this tower, at least building seven so far, has come down by controlled demolition. Many of those experts do appear in our ongoing film series, 9-11, Crime Scene to Courtroom.
@richardgage_911We're taking the hard evidence of crimes to the court where Mick Harrison and I present with our experts to a grand jury The evidence. Here's just a two-minute taste.
@richardgage_911This historic investigation is ongoing, and there's a role for you in it. Yes, you can help us bring the real perpetrators to justice. Through this film series, we're bringing together 2,000 experts in our field. If they ignored any scenario involving incendiary demolition, you're going to send charges On each floor, in other words, all of the interior columns over eight stories came down, basically lost at once.
@richardgage_911I could make out what looked like from a science fiction movie, North and Wild, okay.
Speaker 10That'll be coming down around 5 o'clock.
@richardgage_911We'll be filming these evidence presentations, not only for filing with the jury, We're inviting you to serve as virtual brand during each episode.
@richardgage_911And yes, you can see those six episodes. You can see them at 911c2c.org. That's 911, letter C, number two, letter C,
@richardgage_911You can also see them on our website, richardgage911.org. And we've got six more to go on the Twin Towers. We've got through Building 7. We're going to do the extreme heat in much greater detail than you've been seeing here. If you want to see six hours of evidence on Building 7, you've got it right there. Don't miss it.
@richardgage_911And we have to turn our attention right to the Twin Towers once we realize that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. So at this point, I've got the attention of the architects that I'm presenting to in their firm or at the trade show. We've been to dozens of trade shows where we grab architects and we show...
@truthtellerftmSorry to interrupt. Just before you move on, could there be any other alternative explanation that could lead to what looks like a controlled demolition to me, free fall, that could have triggered what happened with Building 7 outside of... The nanothermite explanation you just provided in detail for the skeptics who still want to believe that somehow the building might have been taken down by either office fires or fires attributed to the neighboring buildings.
@truthtellerftmIs there any possibility it could have happened any other way?
@richardgage_911No. There were fires in the buildings, but no steel frame building has ever come down due to fire.
@richardgage_911Even if it was, you'd see a slow halting building top, say, and it would begin to tip and fall to the path of least resistance, the columns that go first. And you might see it break off, particularly in the case of the Twin Towers, and fall to the ground. You wouldn't expect or anticipate have the whole building come down.
@richardgage_911That's absolutely ludicrous. So, no, the answer to your question is a clear and unqualified no. Okay.
@truthtellerftmI just want to get that on record. Thank you.
@richardgage_911Yeah. And when we present to the hearings that we expect Senator Johnson to hold following probably after this year with the evidence that we presented to him and will present,
@richardgage_911at the big conference this next week, September 10th through the 13th in New York. We will be making that unqualified conclusion as well there. So we're going to turn our attention to the Twin Towers because at this point, we have their attention. The architects in the trade shows, we show them Building 7. and they say, oh, that's a controlled demolition.
@richardgage_911Everybody can see it. Again, the fifth grader can see it. And then we say, well, did you know this happened on 9-11? They said, no, no, that's not one of the twin towers. Well, no, it's not. As a matter of fact, it's the third tower that came down. What are you talking about? There's no third tower. So we have to walk them through the realization that there was a third tower, that this is it.
@richardgage_911And they're like, You could see the cognitive dissonance just spinning in their heads like it did mine when I first heard about this.
@truthtellerftmThis is in addition to Larry Silverstein presenting his plans for a full renovation, a takedown of Tower 7 a year and a half beforehand with Michael Bloomberg as mayor. You're aware of that one.
@richardgage_911That's a good one. It's true. April of 2000, he said he began the design for the replacement tower, Building 7. And wait a minute. You began the design before? This is another one of his famous slips, right? Before 9-11 even. Man, I'd like to hear some testimony from one of the architects who worked on this building for that firm early on, because they must be feeling something, right?
@richardgage_911Knowing that this was going to, well, after 9-11, realizing that, They did need a new building after all. But with the twin towers, you just look at them. What you're going to see is this. Upward, outward, arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying structural steel sections weighing four and eight tons, laterally ejected out of each tower at 85 miles an hour, clocked by physicists.
@richardgage_911landing up to 600 feet in every direction, trailed by thick white smoke clouds. Wait a minute. Why are steel sections trailing thick white smoke clouds? Steel is not flammable in office fire conditions. Can you give me one possible reason each of these steel sections are trailing? Well, yeah. Molten iron is one of the byproducts of thermite, but there's another one.
@richardgage_911Thick white smoke clouds of aluminum oxide ash, because thermite works that way. The oxygen jumps in extreme heat, 4,000 to 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit, from the iron oxide, which is essentially rust, over to the aluminum in this mix of powder. Richard, if you're curious, by the way, Stratastack, they had an $8.3 million contract in October 1996 to install and integrate World Trade Center's electronic security systems.
@truthtellerftmThey would have had access to the nanothermite, at least that's what's claimed. And in terms of ownership, it was by Kuam, a Kuwaiti-American corporation led by CEO Ward D. Walker III, a distant relative of George W. Bush. And Marwan P. Bush, the president's younger brother, served as Stratus-X board of directors from 1993 to 2000.
@truthtellerftmHow convenient. So, yeah.
@richardgage_911Yeah. Let's answer just a few questions. You know, how did they get into the towers? Well, if you had... All of these companies had control of the security company, like you mentioned, the two Bush family members there did. You could bring in all kinds of thermite, nanothermite, whatever you needed through the elevator systems and through the elevator modernization.
@richardgage_911Like you said, the largest elevator modernization in the world, Ace Elevator, had that contract.
@truthtellerftmOtis had the contract. They got fired. and replaced by Ace Elevator, a no-name company, which is unheard of for towers like this.
@richardgage_911Exactly. Yeah, remarkable point. And thank you. And so we've got to compare the features of controlled demolition, typical features, to what happened at the Twin Towers as well, like we just did at Building 7, beginning with, is there a sudden onset? Well, yeah. The towers are standing at rest and all of a sudden they are in uniform downward motion.
@richardgage_911No jolt, no hesitation upon impact of the cold, hard steel below the point of plane impacts. So no, we're told in fact that the upper part drove the rest of the building down to the ground and then destroyed itself. But we can see in, and you'll see this in our presentations, Just watch the point-of-plane impact and watch the upper part telescope in on itself before it ever drives anything down below the point-of-plane impact.
@richardgage_911It's gone, actually, in three seconds. This upper part has gone. After that, something else entirely is happening. Now, if that upper part were intact, you would see it. But none of the photos, none of the videos show an upper... If it were there, you would see it driving down and crushing. Well, you wouldn't see the few remaining steel columns of the core set of columns standing 900 feet in the air for a dozen seconds.
@richardgage_911They would have been crushed. By this part that drove the rest of the building down to the ground. But no, there they are in most of the videos. You can see them, but they don't show this very often. You've got to look at the few videos that actually show it. And what you'll see is a comparison between the North Tower that we make in a volcanic eruption.
@richardgage_911Again, with upward, outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks freely flying solid molten objects trailed by thick white smoke clouds. We now know what the smoke clouds are, but that's the analogy. It's not a building collapsing. It's a building blowing up. And we have witnesses. that hear those explosions. Actually, 156 of them personally talking about explosions, hearing explosions, seeing explosions, feeling explosions, many of them before the towers ever start to collapse.
@richardgage_911And I'm going to read you just a few of these. But these have come from the oral histories that Fire Commissioner Thomas von Essen required. of hundreds of his first responders to tell their experiences. He says before they became shaped by a collective memory. Well, Professor Graham McQueen read all 12,000 pages of this testimony, which they tried to hide from us, the city.
@richardgage_911This didn't get released until August of 2005. And it was a FOIA request that the New York Times actually made. And the New York Court State of Appeals forced The City of New York to release this. And then the New York Times put it on their website. And any of us can read it. I can't read all 156 to you, but I'll read some of the more common and poignant ones.
@richardgage_911We felt the ground shake. You could see the tower sway. And then it just came down. All of a sudden, the ground just started shaking. Felt like a train running under my feet. The next thing we know, we look up and the tower's collapsing. It shook my bones. shortly before the, excuse me, yeah, before the first tower came down.
@richardgage_911I remember feeling the ground shaking, heard a terrible noise, and then debris just started flying everywhere. Again, NIST says there were no explosions, except for the jet fuel explosions, which they talk about early on. But there's no explosions at the onset or during the collapse. They say, oh, if they heard explosions, is the building collapsing?
@richardgage_911No, these are before. I saw a flash, flash, flash. This one. At the lower level of the building, you know, like when they demolish a building? That's the assistant fire commissioner, Stephen Gregory. Saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15. He saw about six of these brief flashes accompanied by a crackling sound before the tower collapsed.
@richardgage_911I saw low-level flashes. I saw flash, flash, flash. And then it looked like the building came down. An explosion appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides. Materials shot out horizontally, and then there seemed to be momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse. There was an explosion in the South Tower, one floor under another.
@richardgage_911When it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb because it looked like a synchronized, deliberate kind of thing. Well, that was a... These are expert... Witnesses, these firefighters, one of them is a chief. Well, so we turn our attention to another feature. The next feature, feature number three of controlled demolition.
@richardgage_911Is there a straight down symmetrical progression? Well, the South Tower actually begins to tip over. In fact, it's tipping over at about 20 degrees. So we have asymmetrical damage from the planes. and the rest of the building, all the way around, just like the firefighters described, like a belt, all these explosions.
@richardgage_911Traveling Down. So this is one you have to see. And when you do, you'll see the looped video of 12 seconds showing close-up of about a dozen individual explosions leading this rhythm of explosions, every floor or so, this pattern of explosions. This is not a nuclear weapon going off. This is not directed energy weapons weakening the steel floor by floor.
@richardgage_911No, this is clearly pre-placed explosions in the exterior perimeter structural steel section. And again, if you're not seeing this and you want to, you can see it in most all of my presentations on our website at richardgage911.org because you'll also see there feature number four, isolated explosive ejections. occurring as far down below the zone of destruction that we just talked about, 20 stories, even 40 stories down below this advancing wave, which we're told is a gravitational collapse.
@richardgage_911Even up to 60 stories down, you have these pinpoint isolated ejections occurring at 200 feet per second. These are explosive speeds. This is not like air that's being forced and the rest of the building.
@richardgage_911So now we know why this top part didn't fall off the building. Its structural steel system is being systematically dismantled. Its rigidity is removed. It cannot continue its angular momentum and fall off the rigid body below it. So it just sort of settles half in and half out of it, almost like a liquid, if you will. Then we turn to feature number seven.
@richardgage_911We look at the lateral ejection of these structural steel elements landing and impaling these steel sections into the skyscrapers all around the World Trade Center, landing up to 500 feet away into the World Financial Building, 600 feet away into the Winter Gardens of the World Financial Center. Destroying the Deutsche Bank building had to be taken down floor by floor.
@richardgage_911These are structural steel sections, again, four to eight tons, which if you see how these are put together, they have four bolt holes at the bottom and top of three-story tall columns, a set of three, that are welded to spandrel panels, tying them together and then erected in place. So the bolts are four on the top and four on the bottom.
@richardgage_911So what did the plane have to do? It didn't cut through the steel. Going 500 miles an hour, all of that kinetic energy, with the jet fuel particularly, smashing into the side of the building, merely had to shear off these four bolts at the top and bottom of each of these three-story columns. That's how the plane could enter the building, and it did.
@richardgage_911and the steel was bent inward. That's how we know a plane hit, one of the ways, many ways, a plane hit this building in addition to plane parts that were found. It's been noted that these plane parts are in all likelihood not tied to the planes that were the civilian aircraft.
@truthtellerftmThat did the wrong jet engine on the ground for people to notice, for instance, yeah.
@richardgage_911Perfect example. These were probably military planes that were actually capable of hitting a 200-foot-wide target at 500 miles an hour because most pilots couldn't do it, much less the trajectory coming in, for instance, to the South Tower. So we're looking at these steel sections ejected out of the towers with great force, landing 300 to 600 feet away and trailed again by thick white smoke clouds.
@richardgage_911One about to hit Building 7 that you can clearly see that is freely flying. It's not like a banana peeling off the side of the building. These are ejected with great force, enough force to fire a 200-pound cannonball three miles. And there's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of them. and they're well beyond the boundary of ground zero, impacting, as I mentioned, skyscrapers all around them, including Building 7, which raises the question, right?
@richardgage_911If 100,000 tons of structural steel is ejected laterally, how is it available to crush the building underneath it? It's not. This is a third of the weight of each of these buildings that is in no way Available to crush the building since it's 100 to 200 feet outside the building. I mean, at the bottom, there's only a six-story pile of miscellaneous metal.
@richardgage_911Well, maybe it was a concrete. So that's feature number eight. We're looking for the pulverization of concrete. We're looking for 110 floors of concrete, each an acre in size. Wait a minute. This is four inch thick and eight inch thick concrete poured on metal decking supported by lightweight steel trusses. How in the hell do you not have a pile of floors like in a real earthquake, a pancaking collapse down at the bottom?
@richardgage_911You don't see 50 of these one acre size floors. You don't see 20. You don't see 10. You don't see one acre size floor. You don't see a half acre, quarter acre, sixteenth of an acre. They've been pulverized. And with these three-foot deep trusses, you should have seen a pile that's 30 stories tall, like you see in the Myanmar earthquake of this pile of this 33-story building compressed to pancakes to a third of its original height.
@richardgage_911That's 10 stories tall mammoth pile of debris that you can see how tall it is. Well, wait a minute. That's more than twice as tall as the pile at the World Trade Center. And that was only 33 stories tall. Here we have 110 story building that produced no pancakes and only a pile of debris up to six stories tall. See, it makes no sense.
@richardgage_911Something else happened to that concrete, but what? Oh, we see in the next slide, in all the videos and all the photos, what happened to that concrete? It's pulverized in midair. All the photos and videos show 90,000 tons of concrete that's been pulverized. What can do that? Well, high-energy explosives can do that. Turns out heat can do that as well.
@richardgage_911Concrete is powderized at only 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. What do you think would happen at 3,000 and 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit to the concrete? ASTM C856, a report by the American Society of Testing Materials cites that you get white powder decomposed hydration products at 1,500 degrees.
@richardgage_911Now we know what happened to the concrete. And we look at the photos and we see it. It's spreading out laterally. The US Geological Survey finds that 30% of this dust from river to river across lower Manhattan in a three square inch, excuse me, a three inch thick blanket across lower Manhattan, 30% of it is concrete. Well, wait a minute.
@richardgage_911If that's where the concrete is, and the concrete is another third of the weight of this building, then it also was not available to crush the building, was it? Well, guess what? The calculations provided to NIST by Zdenek Bazant of Northwestern University uses all of the weight of that steel. and all of the weight of that concrete in their calculations that to provide the key theoretical basis for NIST's column failure theory.
@richardgage_911And yet none of it was available. Not only that, they doubled the mass up above as engineers like Tony Zambotti, Richard Johns, Gregory Zudelinsky found out after they decoded this obscure paper by Zdenek Bazant. And they tried to show that this is some serious mistakes in this paper that was submitted just two days after 9-11, by the way.
@richardgage_911The rest of us are freaked out. What's going on? When's the next plane coming? Who did this to us? Not this guy. He's in his den creating the paper that became the theoretical basis for NIST's failure theory of how the towers came down. So when this new paper challenging the old paper was submitted to the American Society of Civil Engineers, they wouldn't accept it.
@richardgage_911What was the reason given? It was out of scope. Wait a minute. Why is it out of scope to challenge a paper previously published in that very journal, the Journal of Engineering Mechanics? That's what we do in peer-reviewed science.
@richardgage_911That's the whole point. So no, it's not out of scope. And there is an ethical violation that's been used in a lawsuit, actually, against the American Society of Testing Materials. But we've shown enough now here to indicate that, yeah, we have all 10 key characteristic features and some very uncharacteristic features with
@richardgage_911We have direct evidence of destruction with explosives and incendiaries, none of which can be accounted for by fire. Again, the official cause of the Twin Towers collapse. Airplane broke a few columns. Fires were started. with the jet fuel. Most of the jet fuel burned up, and then it's just normal office fires after that, bringing this building down.
@richardgage_911No, it's completely proven that it's controlled demolition. And that's a body of proof that paints a very, very dark picture for those of us who become aware of it, because it implies that our media is involved in this. They have no interest. They've been censoring the truth about 9-11 forever. and Tucker Carlson was part of this.
@richardgage_911He ridiculed scientists back in 2006 when they appear on this program. And now he's apologizing for it and producing his own four-part documentary on 9-11 Truth, which had the Leroy Halsey University of Alaska report in it. It had the active thermetic materials paper in it. So he is doing some good. He didn't have this evidence that we presented here today.
@richardgage_911But if any of you know Tucker, let's make sure that we get this evidence on his program like it has been on Jimmy Dore, like it has been on Clayton Morris' redacted program. We got to wake up, people. We're in a full-on descent into tyranny here with the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, which allows them to
@richardgage_911put us in jail without a right to a lawyer, a trial, a jury. We can even be tortured and assassinated. That's where we are today with these false flag operations to enact emergency measures which are renewed for the last two decades to be used against us in the next false flag operation. What is it going to be? A nuclear bomb going off blamed on Iran so that they can fulfill their dream to nuke Iran?
@richardgage_911Let's not wait. Let's expose the truth about 9-11 so that we don't have to walk into a deeper nightmare here in this country and around the world.
Ian MalcolmThat is some compelling information that you're certainly sharing there. And I love the fact that Tucker is starting to I remember that video of him essentially scoffing off this idea years ago. It's wonderful that folks like Jimmy Dore, so many others, and I wanted to make a special mention. I don't know if he's up here anymore, but Stew Peters was in here a little while ago, who I know is certainly the type that would absolutely cover this subject.
Ian MalcolmHave you been on his program in the past or no?
@richardgage_911Yeah, yeah, Stew had me on, and we went through, you know, 15 minutes of this. We can do it that way, we can do it this way, and I've got a five-hour presentation, too.
Ian MalcolmWonderful. Okay. I saw he was in here and thought I would make the connection if you guys hadn't already done so. But no, I mean, the pieces of this, maybe just to come full circle, and then I know we've got so many hands up here and so many people with questions that they're going to have on this subject. It feels to me at this point that what you just walked through, those elements in particular, for example, the molten lava that
Ian MalcolmAs best I understand, could not have been manufactured merely via the jet fuel and the airplane and all the other kind of things, right?
@richardgage_911No, they only burn up to 1500 degrees, maybe 2000, the absolute worst case.
Ian MalcolmYeah, so given that, I look at it and I say, okay, well, it couldn't have been that. It has to be something else. Is it reasonable at this point to conclude that... There is no other, not only possible way in which this could have been done, but the temperatures that you just mentioned, you know, Truth Teller was talking about thermite and the fact that you can't just walk into Home Depot and get that.
Ian MalcolmIs it reasonable to suggest that the level of not only precision of this, but just the extent of the destruction that it would have had to have been a group that is not just, let's say, You know, run-of-the-mill terrorists with some bombs. I mean, this is an incredibly precise, incredibly high level of explosive military operation that would have taken... Richard, do you think this was months in planning?
Ian MalcolmWas this years in the making? What do you think that the timeline would have had to look like to bring this about?
@richardgage_911Well, clearly years. I mean, look... Well, we can look at the ACE elevator that TruthTeller brought up. That contract has been going on chiefly the nine months prior to 9-11, but even before that. So we have like 80 examples of telegraphing what they're going to do in the media, on Hollywood movies and shows. where the Twin Towers are targeted.
@richardgage_911There's even an animation in one of them.
@joahsantosOr Netanyahu's own book.
@richardgage_911Well, Netanyahu's book. When would that come out? That came out... 1995. 1995, like five years before. We have planes flying around the towers with Muslims holding bombs in this animated movie. We have 9-11 appearing everywhere in the matrix of the expiration of NEO's license. Again and again and again, there's 80 examples that I cite in one of my presentations.
@richardgage_911They're programming us to subconsciously pick up these cues so that we're not as shocked and we can believe the official narrative when it happens.
@submission2tNot sure if you saw my DMs, but may I jump in really quick?
Ian MalcolmYeah, go for it.
@submission2tFirst and foremost, thank you so much, Richard, and host, co-host, for putting this insightful space together. Can't thank you enough. That being said, to corroborate Richard's position on explosions, there's a certain New York City real estate mogul who had a good understanding of New York City construction, and specifically Twin Towers.
@submission2tAnd he actually sent one of his structural engineers to inspect and analyze Ground Zero, the site of what happened. And shortly after 9-11, he went on mainstream media, and this was like a day or two afterwards, and he said some stuff that I'd like you all to hear. And by the way, he's the current president of the US.
@richardgage_911Yep.
@submission2tDon't forget, that took a big bomb in the basement. Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place, because that's your foundation. And it withstood that. And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place, because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour, because he did the building.
@submission2tAnd I said, I can't believe it. The building was standing solid, and half of the columns were blown out. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside.
@submission2tYou had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked at it, you had big, heavy I-beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it because there was a hole in the steel. And this is the steel that was, you remember the width of the windows in the World Trade Center, folks? I think, you know, if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow.
@submission2tAnd in between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747, or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously. Because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall.
@submission2tMost buildings are built with the steelers on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have. And it was almost just like a can of soup.
Speaker 16You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two. And when you see that approach the far side, and then all of a sudden, within a matter of a millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Right.
@submission2tI just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel, I think. Obviously, they were very big planes that were going very rapidly because... I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak.
@submission2tIt just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane. Because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used for the building. These buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing, amazing plane. This country is different today. Anyways, there you have it.
@submission2tHe basically corroborates what you were saying, saying that it could not have been those planes, the bombs were involved in bringing down those towers. And it's sad because, you know, I think mainstream media has been the biggest enemy of America and Americans in general for what they did with this story. I'll land it there.
@richardgage_911Yeah, good points. Absolutely. Of course, we're all looking for Trump to do something else. He said he would release the 9-11 files on, what was it, CBS 60 Minutes or something. But, you know, nothing's been released. Nothing's been done. So I'm not holding my breath for him.
@submission2tYeah, he said the Epstein files will be released as well. Nothing's going to happen.
Speaker 1Yeah.
@norselordlokiI mean, Rick... Richard, when they were removing the debris to Staten Island, the specific reason those trucks were going 24-7 was so that nobody would be able to get pieces of that and then test for what you talked about, the nanothermite. And so you could smell a rat from when that started. And I was actually in Hoboken.
@norselordlokiI watched as Building 7 fell at like 5 in the afternoon. And it was just like, how did that building fall? Like you said, It wasn't hit. It would be the only building ever in the history of the world to fall from a fire, which is just insane.
@richardgage_911Well, the only steel frame fire-protected structure.
@norselordlokiI'm sorry, yeah. To fall, yeah. To qualify, yeah.
@submission2tAnd Ian, I hope you don't mind, but I put the video up in the nest just for people to have for their own records.
@joann_marieThank you so much, Dr. Strange. And we have Dan, that he, Heidi, I don't know exactly.
Speaker 2Oh, no, he's dropping, no! Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. Sorry about that.
@ladyjustice9111Oh, he was up, wasn't he? Okay, get him back, get him back.
Ian MalcolmSorry, Joanne, I saw the follower count and I thought we got a troll past the goalkeeper or something.
@ladyjustice9111It's under Levant, it's under Levantwoman911, weird name, but it's just Dan. So I tried three accounts for him and one automatically got suspended. And he's not allowed on X. So hopefully he'll come back up.
@joann_marieCan you tell us a little bit more about him, Heidi?
@ladyjustice9111Richard knows him. Richard Gage knows him. He's back up here. He can tell you. He is the United Airlines 911 whistleblower. And he's the one that made the 911pilots.org demanding the truth about 911. We had him last year. Dan, can you open your microwave?
@richardgage_911Yeah, that's Captain Dan Hanley. Hi, Dan.
@levantwoman911Hi, Ian. How are you doing? Hey, Heidi. Thanks for getting me in.
Speaker 2I'm sorry. I saw the speaker come up. I was like, what is this account? This has to be a troll.
@ladyjustice9111No, no, no. Sorry, Ian. Heidi, are you there? Can you hear me? Yes, I can hear you. Can you hear me, Dan?
@levantwoman911Sure, fine. Thanks for getting me in, Heidi. Go ahead. I can hear you.
@ladyjustice9111You're welcome. And that was my last account, Levant Woman, so 9-1-1. So sorry about the name, but go ahead, Dan.
@levantwoman911Yeah, I got kicked off X last year with 83,000 followers. Dan, what was that for?
Ian MalcolmDid they even give you a reason?
@levantwoman911No, they didn't, but I said a lot of things about Zionist and connecting it to 9-11, and they didn't like it. I got kicked off Facebook and LinkedIn, too, so I'm banned and just out doing a lot of podcasts now to try to get the word out. If I could, Ian, I'd like to just explain briefly what 9-11 Pilot Whistleblowers is all about.
Ian MalcolmAbsolutely, and I know we got Richard up here who I know is familiar with you guys as well, of course.
@levantwoman911Yeah, okay, 9-11 Pilot Whistleblowers. created several years ago as a global grassroots organization. And our purpose is to show that there were no Muslim hijackers piloting the 9-11 aircraft, but that the aircraft were electronically hijacked and remotely controlled through a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and guide it to its target, whether that's to another airport,
@levantwoman911are into a building. Now, once the system's engaged, the pilots cannot disconnect as they're along for a ride. And we've got a patent on it. It was patented in November 2006. And you'll say, well, that was five years after 9-11. Not so fast. We've had informants come forward from Raytheon, Boeing, the military and civilian sectors saying, no, it was developed prior to 9-11 and installed on aircraft in the mid-1990s.
@levantwoman911We know the system existed on the airplane. We have profiles on all the hijackers, especially Hany Hanjur, the pilot that supposedly flew American 77 into the Pentagon. He flunked three check rides one month prior to 9-11 and assessed the aircraft between two flight instructors who went to the chief flight instructor at the airport and said, don't rent him an airplane.
@levantwoman911He can't fly. So we know. that the 9-11 Commission and the FBI concealed this fact from the public. And that's our smoking gun in all this, Ian.
Ian MalcolmWow, that's wild. And so the group that you are representing, are you guys going to be at this upcoming conference that Richard is part of? And if not, how can people support some of the work that you guys are doing?
@levantwoman911Okay, well, I'm not going to be, Richard knows that I live in Islamabad, Pakistan, and I guess they assumed that was too far for me to travel just to give a 15-minute talk, so I'm not going to be at that event, but if people want to get a hold of me, we've got two websites. You don't even have to type in www in the search box.
@levantwoman911Just put in 911pilots.us and 911pilots.org, and the latter is loaded with information. The One I mentioned first is a new site. And if you want to get a hold of me, there's a Contact Captain Hanley page on that website. And also, you can look at the other information. If you go to Important Interviews, I've got four interviews.
@levantwoman911I did two on Redacted, one with Sheikh Emran Hussain in Malaysia, and another one with David Icke in England. And it pretty much summarizes
@norselordlokiHave you read David Icke's book, The Trigger, where he talks about this event and who did it and who's responsible?
@levantwoman911kind of bad so I haven't been able to read the book but I've picked up excerpts from it and I've heard him talk so he's one of my heroes out there and I he put me on the year before last on a 9-11 special which I appreciated so and the same goes Stew Peters is out there he he let me come on and talk briefly about this as well and I thank him for that so yeah David Icke is doing fantastic work that's a powerful book trigger
@richardgage_9119-11 is a war trigger. That's how they get wars going. That's how they affect regime change. That's how they steal the resources of a country, which they've done now for seven countries that Wesley Clark heard from his associate, former person he worked for at the Pentagon, who got this message from Rumsfeld's desk and
@richardgage_911said, we're going to take out five countries, seven countries in five years. Well, they've done six of them so far. So we're on the seventh right now in Iran.
@norselordlokiAnd Richard, not to go at anybody else on stage, but if you follow what Mike is talking about, it makes perfect sense. They're talking about putting these low orbit satellites into, a million low orbit satellites into our space.
@norselordlokiThe thick clots they were pulling out of people. So it's funny when people say, oh, this is ridiculous to link the two. I'm not linking them with what you're saying. I'm just saying we're finding out all these things now later on. And people are like, oh, it was perfectly obvious. How could you not see that? But then you have people saying, oh, well, it's totally ridiculous to say these things like nanotechnology could exist and this could actually be happening with electromagnetism and graphene oxide.
@norselordlokiOkay, why don't we go back to exactly what we're talking about. And people were saying the exact same thing about what we're saying now is patently obvious. So I would just point that out.
@richardgage_911Those things have been proven scientifically. There's peer-reviewed papers and there's patents for all of that stuff you just mentioned. So it is happening.
@levantwoman911Ian, in August 2020, I... I found out about the uninterruptible autopilot system from another pilot in 2006. And him and I have petitioned government ever since then. Three different presidents we've approached on this in all relevant level and branches of the US government. In 2020, I filed a Federal Aviation Administration hotline report alleging that this system was employed to steer the 9-11 aircraft.
@levantwoman911And over the last six years, We have approached every relevant level and branch of the government up to the President, Biden, and Trump, and the Director of National Intelligence, the Attorney General, the FBI, the FAA, you name it. We've approached them and we've been stonewalled every step along the way. So just recently, I sent a
@levantwoman911Yeah, I don't know if I would... Yeah.
@levantwoman911Well, I'm over-impacted. Go ahead, Heidi.
@ladyjustice9111Dan, there might be some people in this space that are not, they don't know you, they're not familiar with your work. Is there a way you can just give a quick summary of how you whistle-blowed the 9-1-1 event, the 9-1-1 that day as a United Airlines pilot? Just a real quick summary for those that don't know.
@richardgage_911And that's really important, and I encourage Dan to do just that. I have to pack and get some sleep before we leave early in the morning. for New York. I owe you a call, Richard. See you all in New York. Richard, can I ask you a quick five-second question? Go ahead. Richard?
@joahsantosYeah. Yeah, the official narrative says free fall, even on Building 7 said free fall was 2.25 seconds, right?
Ian MalcolmYeah.
@joahsantosEven if that is true, that it was only 2.25 seconds, does that not still mean that all columns needed to be blown out even for those eight floors? which account for 2.25 seconds.
@richardgage_911It absolutely means that. But NIST obfuscates that reality. They didn't cover that.
@joahsantosSo even by their own narrative, they admit that there had to be no columns for at least eight floors that failed simultaneously. Absolutely. Even by their own standard.
@richardgage_911Absolutely. And that's a third of the seven-second fall. And guess what? In the other two-thirds, it was damn near free fall, which again means almost no.
@joahsantosfrom my memory, wasn't it like 0.3 seconds difference between freefall and not freefall or something like that on the bottom third?
@richardgage_911It was negligible, the difference between the freefall and the non-freefall, meaning it was practically freefall. It's accelerating. There's no slowing down to this building as it came down. There's no deceleration whatsoever. It's always accelerating faster and faster each second.
@joahsantosThey claim deceleration at the very end, which would be natural, right?
@richardgage_911Because you have material starting to pile up at the very bottom. That's irrelevant.
@joahsantosBut they use that to claim there's no free fall, which is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
@richardgage_911They spin it forwards and backwards. In our longer presentations, we go into this very deeply. especially on 9-11 crime scene to courtroom. The six series, six episodes already produced all on Building 7, one on just that topic that you mentioned. So I encourage everybody to take a look at that. Again, richardgage911.org.
@richardgage_911You can find the conference, Turning the Tide. You can find the episodes of 9-11 crime scene to courtroom and all of our other presentations. Thanks, everybody. It was awesome. Awesome to talk to you. We'll catch up again. Take care.
Ian MalcolmRichard, so many thanks for coming in here and we will all be cheering. The conference as you go out to it, as you put that on. And anything, I'm not sure if you're still with us, but if you are, if there's anything that anybody can do, if they're not able to be in New York to support digitally or in any other mechanism, anything that we can do from afar to support you.
@richardgage_911Oh yeah, you'll find a donate button on the site, turningthetide911.org because the ticket sales account for about half So donations are absolutely required. And if you watch on Redacted Platform for the four days of this conference for free, be sure to donate and support that effort because a lot of expenses. And so we'll see you from New York.
@richardgage_911Thanks, guys.
Ian MalcolmAbsolutely. And thank you so much, everybody. That is Richard Gage. So very excited and humbled that he came by today, spending three hours with us to go over the ins and outs of the engineering aspects. And truth, I've got to throw this over to you because I know you've studied this inside and out and up and down the who and obviously the geopolitical intent that we'll go into
Ian Malcolmon the day of the anniversary. But I'm sure there were some pieces that even for someone like yourself that were new to you about the engineering aspects of the impossibility of the airplanes. So any thoughts on Richard or any of the content in here?
@truthtellerftmI mean, the level of depth that he has on the engineering and the architecture of the building and what it would take to be able to create the free fall and the controlled demolition. And then now we know definitively there's no other alternative way without nanothermite to make that happen. You know, proves beyond any reasonable doubt that that was the only, it would have had to have been, you know, an inside job control demolition took place in Building 7.
@truthtellerftmI didn't know, when I looked at the 9-11 commission report back in the day, there wasn't even initially mention of Tower 7. They excluded it. I guess now if Joe says it's been added, okay. But so maybe it was updated, but the original version doesn't even mention. Building 7, because of course they seek to overlook that because that automatically injects doubt as to the initial theory that they proposed that, of course, it was taken down by these commercial airliners, which we know is physically impossible to cause any type of controlled demolition with hollow-tipped aluminum-framed airplanes striking concrete reinforced steel buildings that are built to withstand
@truthtellerftmMore than three times the impact of a commercial airliner going at full speed. It's just never happened before physically. Yeah, again, like Richard's level of depth in the engineering of the building is second to none. So you can't argue the science, right? That's the whole purpose of this exposé today was to prove to everybody beyond a shadow of a doubt that...
@truthtellerftmThere's no other way that these buildings could have been taken down without an inside job with multiple agencies in coordination with each other. I do believe, for sure, Mossad. We know Mossad for sure because Dominic Sutter owned Urban Moving Systems where Dancing Israelis worked. There's no moving company in the world that has a need for 18 different hard drives or however many it was that got seized.
@truthtellerftmAnd that's where, again, these Dancing Israelis worked. Again, we're sent down to document the event and they were going to take off to Israel the next day. He, of course, ran off to Israel and avoided prosecution. So, yeah, I mean, it was good to fill in the gaps on the physical end. And there's much more we'll discuss, you know, on the day of 9-11 to unpack all the evidence, including Larry Silver's, Lucky Larry, Lucky Larry's significant role in both, you know, owning Tower 7 first and then buying the towers, you know, just two months beforehand and doubling down on terrorism coverage a month before.
@truthtellerftmand then striking it filthy rich like he did after the attack. And he was also, of course, head of UJA, United Jewish Appeal, before. It was James Tisch during 9-11, but he was still a member of the United Jewish Appeal, which is the biggest fundraiser for Israel in the world, the fifth biggest charity in the world. It's massive.
@truthtellerftmThese are the same guys who raised $150 million towards providing arms smuggling for autopsies at the time, before 1948. So they have a lot of money. that they are able to obtain through these types of contributions. So you know that he kicked up a whole lot to UJA as well. What else can I say? Yeah, it was nice to listen and hear the perspective on something.
@truthtellerftmAnd his level of knowledge on nanotherm R2, I mean, he struck my curiosity because then I went and looked it up. This is specialized incendiary stuff that not just anybody can have access to, much less... Guys that are just entering flight school, just telling their flight instructor, I don't need to worry about landing, I just need a lot of takeoff, and yeah, that's it.
@truthtellerftmYeah, I'm sure they'd also have access now, except they don't. Only a specialized private contractor does, who, as it turns out, Marlon Bush, you know, brother of George W. Bush, was a board seat member of, and he was in the U.S. military. So there's just no other way. I mean, this is evidence beyond reasonable doubt that indicates...
@truthtellerftmAgain, all these entities were involved. But hey, they relied on people's ignorance at the time and just lied. And because they had the same powers as they'd be, they took charge of the 9-11 Commission. Michael Chertoff, who was both a judge, lawyer as well, and businessman, and head of national, what, homeland security, was able to both, not just circumvent, but obstruct justice by limiting
@truthtellerftmWitness testimonies and making inadmissible certain witness testimonies like individuals such as Dan, who wasn't able to speak freely, indicate that there's no way these so-called hijackers could follow through with the trajectory they were on, given all the towers and impediments in the way in a place like New York, full of skyscrapers, and then successfully strike the towers.
@truthtellerftmIt's just physically impossible. So, yeah, if Dan wants to speak more on that, on how he was...
@truthtellerftmHe was censored, suppressed for so many years and essentially forced to move. Yeah, they destroyed his life just because he was telling the truth about 9-11. And this is, again, one of the biggest shifts in history that led to, again, current state of affairs with all the wars in West Asia.
@levantwoman911Well, thank you. Yeah, let me just real quick tell you why I was grounded in 2002. for speaking out about 9-11 permanently for life. As a pilot, I lost my license as a result. I was reporting on holes in the safety and security system and I was flying with a bunch of scared air crew and passengers out of New York to London.
@levantwoman911who were saying to me, say something, Dan. You gotta tell the company or the union because we were made all these promises after 9-11 that they're gonna put cameras in the back of the aircraft, secondary barrier protections for the cockpit, federal air marshals, and none of it was happening. And when I did speak out, both to the union and the company, the union came back and said, watch it, Dan, these guys are nasty.
@levantwoman911If you take it to the next level, you're gonna get hurt. They think you're a big mouth, loose cannon whistleblower and they want you to go away. Well, they even told me the union, the head lawyer at the union told me, Dan, we've seen it happen before. They're going to take you out either professionally, medically, psychologically, or otherwise.
@levantwoman911Well, I had seen that happen too. So to protect myself, I established a long correspondence trail. Witnesses, and I went to, I was living in Atlanta at the time, I went to the best mental health professionals I could find there, both a psychologist and a psychiatrist, and said, here's where I am at United, here's what they're going to try to do to me, I'll come for counseling, testing, whatever it takes to prove I'm mentally stable, which I did.
@levantwoman911Well, long story short, because we were at an impasse, they put me on sick list. they wouldn't let me bring my attorney and they put me on sick list and I was going to go non-pay and I called my chief pilot and I said this is punitive I haven't done anything wrong and that's when he says well if you submit to the employee assistance program and it guarantees your pay will come in it's endorsed by the union the company and the FAA I said what do I have to do he says anything the company asks well what they asked me to do was go up and see
@levantwoman911A doctor in Chicago who asked me if I had seen mental health professionals. I go, yeah, as a matter of fact, I have. You want to talk to him? And I handed my cell phone to him. And he got off that phone call and said to me, would you be willing to go see our mental health professionals, the company mental? And I said, I knew you were going to ask this, of course.
@levantwoman911So I have to go along with what they asked. So I went over. And over a 15-minute consultation with a psychiatrist, decided she was going to diagnose me as being bipolar and I almost laughed in her face because I knew what that was. Unfortunately, that diagnosis stuck. The FAA backed her on it and that's why I lost my license.
@levantwoman911I lost my medical because you have to have two pieces of paper in your wallet to fly an airplane. One is your license and the other one is an FAA issued medical certificate. And they took my medical certificate and I lost it. Now, You might say, oh, this guy's just a whack job. No, this is very common in the airline industry to rid dissident pilots from the ranks, and that is to psychologically test them.
@levantwoman911There's another Delta pilot, a female named Carlene Pettit. Same thing happened to her. She fought her case for several years and spent several hundred thousand dollars, and finally, I couldn't find an attorney that would represent me because I was going up against the biggest airline in the world that was in Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the corrupt Chicago court system and was a victim airline of 9-11.
@levantwoman911Every lawyer I talked to said, give it up, you'll never win. And I fought it for five years and they were right, I didn't win. So what did that cost me? A 27-year marriage, which alienated my two kids, who blame me for the divorce, still believe the official story, think their dad's a whacked-out conspiracy nut, don't talk to me.
@levantwoman911I lost $4 million in paid pension and stock. It destroyed a 35-year sterling career in aviation and my reputation as a pilot, all just for speaking out on safety and security issues after 9-11. And that's what drove me down the road. and starting in 2003 with that tremendous blowback I had, I knew the official story was garbage and that led me down the road to where I am today as a 9-11 pilot whistleblower and investigator in charge of this group.
@levantwoman911Anybody there?
@truthtellerftmYeah, no, I've heard this before and it's still like, it's incredible how they destroyed your life with everything you had to go through just for standing on principle and how it affected you personally, financially, and you were also forced, you don't have to say where you are, but you were also forced to move as a result of them hounding you and just, well, coming at you.
@levantwoman911Well, that isn't exactly true. In 2009, I... I was never going to get married again, but then in 2009, I met, fell in love with, and married a Pakistani and moved to Islamabad, Pakistan. I've lived here the last 16 years. A lot of people think I'm hiding out here, running away from the government. Although when I enter and leave the United States, I'm stopped by the FBI and TSA for interrogation.
@levantwoman911So they know that I'm in Pakistan, living with a Pakistani woman, and saying amongst 240 million Pakistani Muslims that there were no Muslim hijackers piloting the aircraft. So I know it's controversial. Pardon?
@ladyjustice9111Thank you so much, Dan.
@levantwoman911Sure.
@ladyjustice9111They really are. Stefan, can you mute your mic, please? They really are onto him. Like when I was trying to get him into the space, I went through three different alt accounts and I could not use his full name. there's no way because as soon as I use his full name and put his picture you know just his real picture just so he can represent the space as when he came in my account got suspended and he's like it didn't work right away they suspended the account so I had to work on two other accounts just to get him in here he has a wealth of information but Dan just real quick for the people that don't know you
@ladyjustice9111Can you, because there's a lot of new generations and newbies, people that are just now waking up. If they don't know you, can you just get a quick synopsis of how you were a whistleblower for 911 as a United Airlines pilot? Just a quick, easy synopsis for the people in the room. We have about, how many people now? 883.
@levantwoman911Okay, well, I just mentioned it, Heidi, that I tried to report holes in the aviation safety and security system. in doing so it would prove that TSA and the whole security system was a farce and they couldn't have me out there saying things like that and I had all these reports that I submitted to the company internally were being stonewalled and I was going to write the CEO of United and say hey the pressure being exerted
@levantwoman911on the union by the bankruptcies precluding them from representing my interests. And they said, don't send the letter in. So instead, I sent the flight safety awareness reports in that implicated the Federal Aviation Administration. And the day I did it, they took me out of schedule. They couldn't have me out there saying among passengers and crew what I knew about the holes in the system.
@levantwoman911They had to remember.
@ladyjustice9111And was it you, Dan, that also was talking about how it was a remote-controlled demolition?
@levantwoman911Yeah, it wasn't a remote-controlled demolition, Heidi. It was remote-controlled airplanes. I was talking about this uninterrupted autopilot system. Yeah, that's our contention. Our whole purpose of 9-11 pilot whistleblowers is to show the hijackers couldn't have piloted the aircraft, period. People have different theories about...
@levantwoman911Well, it was a cruise missile that really hit the Pentagon or an A3 Sky Warrior or whatever. There was a swap out of airborne flight vehicles. But that goes beyond the scope of what we're saying. All we're saying is the hijackers weren't qualified. Hani Hanjo, the Pentagon hijacker, is a smoking gun and all this. He couldn't even fly a Cessna.
@levantwoman911And that's what we're demanding to be investigated, not just by the U.S. government. I told Biden in a letter in 2001, hey, we're finished bagging. We're going outside the United States. And I, living in Pakistan, approached the Pakistan government and spoke with the intelligence people here. And I also went to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which is like the UN of the Islamic world represents 57 Muslim nations.
@levantwoman911They're the ones that could establish an international Islamic Commission for 9-11 Truth, a Muslim 9-11 Commission that would take information, not just from me, but from people like Richard Gage, the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, 9-11 International Center for 9-11 Justice, bring them all together, let them tell their stories, and
@levantwoman911then take their findings to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, even though the United States and Israel doesn't recognize the ICC. That was our plan. And we went also to the Muslim World League, European Muslim League, the Council of Muslim Elders. We went to all these Muslim organizations, went to Muslim scholars, et cetera, but nobody will come forward because they are afraid because of who really
@levantwoman911called in the 9-11 hit. Now we talk about the United States and Israel. Yes, they planned and executed it along with the UK and others through collusion between Mossad, the CIA, MI6 and others. But there's a bigger, bigger organizations in that. And it depends upon your worldview. What do you want to believe? Who you want to believe actually controls the world?
@levantwoman911You can say, well, the bloodline families or the Vatican. Jesuits in the Vatican, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Council, the Committee of 300, the Bilderberg, Rothschilds. I could go on and on down the list, but if you want to believe there's 193 independent sovereign nations out there free from any external influence, then we really don't have anything to talk about because I believe that the most powerful, ruthless, wealthy,
@levantwoman911Subhuman Scum on the Planet Earth planned and called the 9-11 hit in. And why did they do it? To usher in the new world order. And if you look at what's going on right now in Iran, it's a continuation of the 1979 revolution in Iran. You go back to 1953, where the UK and the United States installed the Shah of Iran and they controlled the oil there well in 1979 with the revolution that was taken away from them and the United States though the globalists and big oil want total control of the global oil supply and that's really in my mind what's going on in Iran they're not after weapons of mass destruction they're after their oil and to wipe out
@levantwoman911Israel's biggest adversary in the Middle East. So that's my opinion. I'm sticking to it. And that's why I'm still at it today, because we can't let this scum get away with 9-11, given what's happened to all of us as a result.
@joann_marieI'm so happy that you're here, Dan. Could you talk more about why is it impossible for the planes to hit it the way that they did? Like you went through kind of like from the surface, but could you explain it a bit more?
@levantwoman911Well, I want to go back to the Pentagon hit. I already mentioned, Heidi, that he flunked three Cessna tech rides one month prior to 9-11 with two different instructors who went to the chief pilot, a guy named Marcel Bernard. as a freeway airport and said, don't rent him an airplane, he can't handle it. Now, I personally hunted down Marcel Bernard, and he definitely didn't want to talk to me because he is a key critical witness in all this where he could say, honey, Hanju couldn't fly.
@levantwoman911And I left him voicemail twice saying, my name's Dan Hanley, go to this website, this is who I am, such that when I finally did get in touch with him on the phone, I said, Marcel, he says, who is this? Hanley. He goes, I have nothing to say to you. Listen to me. Do you realize who you're dealing with here? And then I said to him, yes, the most powerful, wealthy, ruthless, subhuman scum on the planet.
@levantwoman911He goes, that's right. And you're going to get us both killed. And then he started reading me the riot act and his wife is in the background saying, hang up on him, hang up on him. And it only lasted about seven minutes. And I tried to call him back. He doesn't answer calls or emails, but he's a critical piece of evidence along with
@levantwoman911Two of the flight instructors that flew with them, a woman named Sheila Baxter and a guy named Ben Connor. Now, Ben Connor and Sheila Baxter and Marcel Bernard were all interrogated by the FBI and a staffer from the 9-11 Commission prior to 9-11. And as I mentioned, the only thing that was mentioned in the 9-11 Commission final report was that Hani Hondra was a good pilot.
@levantwoman911And that was reported by an Israeli named Eddie Shalev that flew with him and came back and said he's a good pilot. So we know that the 9-11 Commission and the FBI suppressed this key evidence that Hani Hanjir couldn't fly. And look at what happened as a result. American 77 could have just as easily hit the Capitol building or the White House, but they chose instead the Pentagon because of the military installation.
@levantwoman911And the US can say unequivocally that Al-Qaeda has tacked a military installation. This is an act of war. And they launch Operation Enduring Freedom, never mind that was wargamed 100 times long before 9-11, and go in and invade Afghanistan. and kill 100,000 people over the next 20 years. And let me just mention, this is getting off the aviation topic, but it has to do with why the United States really was going in to Afghanistan.
@levantwoman911And this is from a reliable source who talked specifically with individuals that worked for Brightest Corporation that was involved in this. But prior to 9-11, the Bush White House had the Taliban in because they wanted to talk about The fact that there was billions, trillions of dollars in oil and gas beneath the Caspian Sea Basin, and they wanted to run a pipeline from there through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, down to Gwadar Port in Pakistan.
@levantwoman911And the Taliban refused. So that's why they went into Afghanistan. The US knew full well, according to Congressman Kurt Walden, that Bin Laden was actually in a hospital in Iran suffering from kidney failure on dialysis and they knew that and yet sent troops into harm's way on this premise that they were going to track down Osama bin Laden.
@levantwoman911Carl Schwartz is the man that told me all this. He's a genius and knows a lot about 9-11 and I wish he was here now so he could expound on what I'm saying but It had nothing to do with that. As a matter of fact, afterwards, Eric Prince sent his Blackwater goons in trying to twist the arms of these landowners to give up their land for the pipeline.
@levantwoman911And if they didn't do it, they'd either kill them or ship them off to Guantanamo Bay. So it's all rotten. It's all dirty. It has to do with big oil. It has to do with US hegemony, which is fading quick. And I'm happy about that. That's what Iran's all about right now. And anyone has any questions or a debate on that, I'd be happy to talk to them.
Ian MalcolmSo, Dan, I've got a question. I'm not sure if you might be familiar with this, if not anybody else on the panel. But Anna Escobar was asking about Jackie McGuire. And I guess there's some crossover here between 9-11 and also Charlie Kirk. as she's the FBI agent who, I guess, was looking into the Pentagon aspect of this, if I'm reading her note correctly.
Ian MalcolmAre you familiar with this individual at all or no?
@levantwoman911No, I'm not. No, I'm not. I've never heard the name before.
@joann_marieAnd what about Judy Woods and the, I don't know, the EW theory?
@levantwoman911That... It goes against what Richard Gage says about nanothermite in some regards, but I haven't read her book, Where Do the Tires Go?, but I've watched a number of her YouTube videos on her. And when you look at the fact that both tires collapsed in less than 11 seconds at nearly free fall acceleration due to gravity, the actual debris field should have been 30 stories tall.
@levantwoman911and it was only three stories tall. So where did all this dustified steel and concrete go? That's what Judy Wood sets out to determine using the directed energy weapon belief. I actually tried to get a hold of her, but she didn't answer my email, so.
Ian MalcolmUnderstood. And that was actually a really interesting angle I had not thought about previously, that idea of... Where did all the rubble go, essentially, that would have come down with the building? And Richard's suggestion that it was basically being blown up in midair as it was coming off the building by design is a pretty interesting thesis there, Dan.
Ian MalcolmI know there's a lot of people with some hands up, but I'd be curious if they've got questions either for you or anybody else on the panel. But why don't we go to Mr. Hubbard, and then we'll check in with Joann.
@hubbard595628Hey, I just wanted to say this is a phenomenal space. This is like really like... something you don't get a lot on this app and it is such a treat and such an opportunity I think for so many people to learn and to share and I just wanted to say that but going into I'm going to end this in a question but I do think with like there's knowns and there's unknowns I think what happened how I approach 9-11 I approach what happened on the ground
@hubbard595628and I think with the hijackers and everything in the planes I feel like looking into that the more we know about that the more that I feel like this entire thing is going to fall apart but I when it did uh my question Dan was uh I I had heard a couple years ago about uh a fifth plane that never took off flight 23 and that uh
@hubbard595628there were pilots on there that uh they were grounded and they didn't take off but there were people on the plane that were suspicious and then they deboarded the plane and then they there was people in the plane after uh the pilots were looking in and they got back on the plane and the the the computer stuff in the bottom of the plane there's a hatch to get down there it was like open and the pilot
@levantwoman911I had heard about a separate flight but I didn't know the specifics of it so I really can't comment that much on it but you don't really have to physically have access to the flight management computer which is the brains of the aircraft this data this navigation data can be dumped into the
@levantwoman911I don't know because I don't know enough about the incident you're talking about, but let me just add something here. I'm not bragging when I say with my credentials that myself and my colleagues would qualify as expert pilot witnesses before A grand jury or in a federal court of law or before Congress, but we would. And I believe that the reason 99% of the global population fell for the hijacker story is that they're not pilots and they cannot conceive of the absurdity of this ludicrous notion that mainly Cessna-trained pilots were actually able to pilot these aircrafts.
@levantwoman911Not one pilot out of 300,000 airline pilots in the world was permitted to testify before the 9-11 Commission as to how ridiculous the claim was because of Philip Zelikow, the executive director of the 9-11 Commission. And he's the same person that oversaw the writing of the 9-11 Commission final report that excluded the fact that Hani Hanjer couldn't fly.
@levantwoman911So he's guilty on many counts of suppressing information. He was a filter for the 9-11 commission that decided what was going before them and what wasn't. And why did the people fall for it? Because the US government backed by the complicit Zionist-owned control mainstream media said, look, folks, there's nothing to see here.
@levantwoman911Let's move on. We know that hijackers, this is very shortly after the fact, we know the hijackers by name, their country of origin, what training they had, where they lived, so let's move on in our organization and say, uh-uh, not so fast. We've got witnesses, we've got people that actually worked on this system before 9-11, and we have Marcel Bernard, Sheila Baxter, and Ben Connor.
@levantwoman911As a matter of fact, Ben Connor, one of the pilots that flew with Honey Hunter, said he fully expected to receive A call from the 9-11 Commission to testify, but the call never came. So there's been a huge cover-up regarding the hijackers, and that's why we're out here 25 years later still talking about it. I was on a program...
@ladyjustice9111So, Dan, with everything that you've witnessed and everything that you've lost, which is over 4 mil, wouldn't it be safe to say, and for all those that are in the space, that... 9-1-1 was the inside job?
@levantwoman911Oh, absolutely. I go further than that. I'd say it was planned and executed by Zionist members of the governments of Israel, United States, UK, and others through collusion between their intelligence agencies. And the big hit was called in by the people I was just talking about. So it was all a global plan to bring us all into enslavement with the New World Order.
@levantwoman911and we've got to expose it before they're successful.
@truthtellerftmJust to add to your point on Philip Zelikow, so his critics, the critics of his work and the former investigators that were involved said that he obstructed the inquiry, this is again you mentioned he was the executive director of the 9-11 commissioner report, by limiting access to witnesses and documents particularly those
@truthtellerftmfor potential Saudi involvement and suppressed inquiries that could damage the Bush administration. Some claims suggest his close relation to Connolly's arise, but when you look deeper, you realize that he's of Jewish descent. It must be just another one of those coincidences, right, where a member of the tribe is impeding, obstructing, you know, an open and objective investigation of what took place on 9-11.
@truthtellerftmMust be just a coincidence, right?
@levantwoman911Absolutely. I interviewed a gentleman from Vancouver a couple years ago. named Ray McGinnis. And he had written a book entitled Unanswered Questions. What's the 9-11 next to Ken asked the 9-11 commission, but they failed to answer. That's the subtitle roughly, but you get the idea. And he was working with the next to Ken and he told me,
@levantwoman911the next of kin which is really the ones responsible for there even being a 9-11 commission because the pressure they exerted and it didn't start until November 2002 over a year later they had a whole series of questions they wanted answered by the 9-11 commission and of those questions 70 percent went unanswered and of the remaining 30%, only 10% were answered adequately.
@levantwoman911And I imagine if you lost somebody, know the government's lying to you and you get that kind of a stonewall response from them. It's disgusting.
@raycoelho12Mind if I jump in real quick?
Ian MalcolmLet's go to Joe and then we'll go to you, Ray.
@joahsantosYeah. Hey, guys. I wanted to bring up two things. One about the previous conversation. That's a strange place, something I think might have went over some people's heads that were listening. When Trump said about the bomb that went off, initially, he's talking about the bomb in the 90s that went off, which blew out a ton of columns in the World Trade Center, and it still didn't come down, okay?
@joahsantosBut later on, there was a building in Philadelphia called the Meridian Building, which was on fire for 19 hours. Also a steel structure. Nothing happened. And they said, oh, but the Meridian didn't have as much weight as the World Trade Center did. And that's why the Meridian didn't come down, but the World Trade Center did come down.
@joahsantosWhat they forget is that in the 90s, half the columns were blown out and that building still stood still after the bombing in the 90s. And that's what Trump was talking about. And I'm not sure everyone caught on to that. And then Dan, just out of curiosity, what aircraft were you rated to fly? Was it the same aircraft?
@levantwoman911Okay. I flew the 757 and 767, but I also flew the 737, 727, Airbus 319, 320, and I was retired off the Boeing 777. Those are the civilian airplanes I flew.
@levantwoman911I had 20,000 flight hours and 15 different aircraft when they terminated me.
@joahsantosOkay, now I know which Dan this is. Begins with an H, your last name, correct? Pardon? Your last name begins with an H? Yeah, Hanley. Yes, yes.
@ladyjustice9111We were explaining that you can't come on out.
@joahsantosYeah, yeah, I didn't want to say it. That's why I didn't want to say it, and I said H. Yeah, don't. So you were rated for the 767, so you would know. I've looked at things, and there have been, and I don't know if this is fake, and that's why I assume, because I've asked this, my father-in-law has an airport, he trains pilots, and he said he was not sure if it would be able to hold.
@joahsantosHe said the controls would be heavy, except these planes have hydraulics, but there have been, Pilots who supposedly have done this in a simulator and they showed it. And I'm wondering why in the beginning a lot of pilots were saying they couldn't and now there's pilots saying... And they even did a video showing someone who supposedly was junior aligning the plane in a simulator.
@joahsantosI think it's called a level four simulator. What do you think is going on? Do you think that's just propaganda or do you think...
@levantwoman911you know you could if you really train for it to do it or like what do you think's going on here because i'm sure this is some of the pushback you probably get normally yes of course uh there's two different groups uh years ago pilots for 9-11 truth another grassroots organization conducted simulator uh simulation of the pentagon maneuver
@levantwoman911and put highly experienced pilots in that crashed the simulator. And more recently, just maybe last month, the International Center for 9-11 Justice conducted a similar experiment with highly trained and lesser trained pilots. And the same thing, they couldn't hit the Pentagon. Either they'd missed the building or they crashed the simulator.
@levantwoman911So those to me are two true tests. that it couldn't be physically done by a private pilot. And if you go to that website, 911pilot.org, the intent of the website is to convince you that the hijackers couldn't fly it. And we've got a cockpit and an airplane page, remote control, pilot interviews, et cetera. If you go to the cockpit and look at the difference, the vast difference between, say, a Boeing 767 cockpit and a Cessna, you'll see,
@levantwoman911They wouldn't have, even if they had some training to get in there and interpret the instruments, the engine instruments and the avionics, et cetera, it wouldn't be possible. And especially at sea level doing 500 knots, if that is even possible, some people even argue that. So we contend that they couldn't have done it.
@levantwoman911and that this uninterruptible autopilot system could.
@joahsantosDan, could they have done the World Trade and not the Pentagon? Or are you saying they couldn't have done any of the four strikes?
@levantwoman911Well, according to the 9-11 Commission, the Pentagon hijacker, Ani Handra, was the most qualified of all the pilots that flew aircraft. But the same test done in a simulator, the south tower, you'll notice the second high tower that was hit by a United 175. About 15 seconds out, the aircraft rolls into a 20-degree angle of bang.
@levantwoman911Had that not happened, it would have missed building someone's computer by 800 feet. So even the people that did the simulator test said that it was next to impossible to precisely aim the airplane at the target and hit it the way that aircraft did. Because I'll say it again. Navigation technology on today's modern commercial jet aircraft is derived from cruise missile technology, and it's extremely accurate down to one or two meters.
@levantwoman911Now, you've got to realize that they couldn't miss. All three airplanes had to hit their building precisely for the story to hold true that they were destroyed by terrorists. And the only way they could do that one shot with guaranteed precision is this uninterruptible autopilot system. It was basically a cruise missile.
@levantwoman911They turned the airplane into a drone and flew them into these buildings precisely.
@joahsantosDan, you're also aware that one of the hijackers, his two cousins that they used to call each other brothers, were then found in Lebanon and they had been being paid by Mossad for years, being covert ops for Mossad?
@levantwoman911I was not aware of that. No, I wasn't. His first name's Saeed. That's true, yeah.
@joahsantosYeah, you can look up Saeed and look at his family. His family members worked for Mossad for, I think it was 20 years, Truth, or something like that, or 25? He was on the payroll of Mossad?
Speaker 17That's correct, yeah. And seven of the hijackers were found to be alive two weeks after the fact. Right.
@levantwoman911And we don't... Some people say they weren't on board the airplane. The other people say the hijackers were actually on board and were patsies. Other people say they were on board and they did take it. It's outside the scope of 9-11 pilot whistleblowers. We don't go there whether or not they were or were not on the board of the airplane.
@levantwoman911We're just calling the 9-11 stories that Muslim hijackers piloted airplanes into buildings as being untrue, which explodes the 9-11 official narrative.
@raycoelho12Mind if I jump in? Please. Yeah, I think it is important to know exactly who was in the planes, where the planes went. Well, I'll tell you this. I mean, I know Richard Gage personally. I know Christopher Boleyn personally, who solved 9-11. And there's a lot there. And I'll be honest with you. I think it was just like Oklahoma.
@raycoelho12The planes landed. Well, first off, the companies that did security screening at these airports where these planes took off from was done by ICTS. ICTS is an Israeli security company. So that's their first, and they've never released footage of any of these hijackers getting onto planes. Because what probably happened is Mossad agents got on these planes.
@raycoelho12They hijacked the planes. These planes were rerouted to Cleveland. And these planes were also very under filled in regards to the passengers on the planes. There were probably a lot of FBI agents on the planes and then these planes were called. The actual innocent people were put on one plane and that was the plane that blew over the forest in Pennsylvania.
@raycoelho12No plane hit the crash site in Pennsylvania. I speak with vigor and conviction because I know these things to be true. I've spoken to Bolin, I've seen all the evidence. The crash site in Pennsylvania was a reclaimed mine. that an A-10 Warthog dropped a bomb over. The actual plane's debris was in the forest that was run by some pastor.
@raycoelho12He got all kinds of money for his office and some of the buildings he was running. And the FBI came there and said, are you going to play ball with us or is it going to be hard? And he went along with it. So that's where the actual, it was look here, don't look there. And if you try to go near that reclaimed mine today,
@raycoelho12It's fenced off and you try to get there, there's guys in the woods watching. So you can't go there. I mean, you could. I mean, if, you know, if Jake Lang or one of these, you know, big influencers gave a shit, I'm sure, you know, they can go there, but no one does it. I'm sure if, you know, like, you know, a million people tried going there, you can go there.
@raycoelho12There is evidence that it's still out there. The actual planes, Philip Marshall revealed where the actual planes are. The actual planes are in Maranas Airfield. in Arizona. This is why some of these people don't like hearing this stuff. I'm not saying, I mean, I know this panel here, great people, the host of Coast. They want to know the truth.
@raycoelho12The actual planes were in Moranos Airfield. Philip Marshall got killed for saying that he, writing this stuff. He was suicided, you know, not suicide, but killed off, made it seem like it was suicide. His teenage kids were killed at the same time. And his dog was, it doesn't make any sense why someone would kill the family dog when they killed themselves.
@raycoelho12So he was taken out. FBI probably went there. Post office was compromised. That's a whole different story. So the planes are at Maranus Airfield. That's where Evergreen, that's a CIA weather modification company, they're based out of Maranus Airfield too. So that's where the planes are if ever someone wants to go find out.
@raycoelho12The final, what's also important is the final load. We know the buildings were taken out with thermite because all three impact, all three buildings that went down, one and two, and Seven. Seven was not hit by a plane. So it's clear that you can look at the pile of building one, two and seven. It took them until December to put out.
@raycoelho12And when firefighters were taking out all the debris at the bottoms of building one, two and seven, they were like lava. That's what you're seeing. It looked like lava down there. And the official FBI story as to why there was molten iron at the base of these buildings. And it literally took three months to douse with water
@raycoelho12to put out was paper that went down the elevator shafts. As I said, there was so much paper in the building and that's what caused the molten iron. We all know that's because of the super thermite. And I'm sure the super thermite was probably bought with the trillions of dollars that was missing at the Pentagon. And at the Pentagon, no plane hit the Pentagon because it's clear because the Hilton Doubletree Hotel sued the FBI.
@raycoelho12The first thing the FBI did, under Chertoff, Zionists. His mother was one of the first Mossad agents in Israel. She was behind operations to bring in Yemeni Jews in Israel. This guy's completely Mossad up, Israel first, you know? So he was destroying... Exactly, exactly. His whole thing was to... sent out all the dancing Israelis back to Israel, all these other people who were caught, urban moving system, all these guys.
@raycoelho12He was sending these people out, destroying evidence, collecting evidence, probably killing people later on. This is why you had Bloomberg running three terms in New York, because they needed to silence all these police officers and firefighters who were blowing the whistle. But yeah, I mean, building one, two, and seven.
@raycoelho12Well, that's it. I think what really happened, and this is said by Bolin, is where they were pulling the switches to blow up the building. That was in Building 7. There was an emergency bunker, I think, on the 23rd floor. If there was an emergency, if there was something like 9-11 that actually happened that was organic, this is where people would be in that emergency shelter.
@raycoelho12Reinforced, tall floor, thick windows, you got cameras, everything. This is where they were pulling the switches to blow up that building. Like I said, Building 7, had the same thermite reaction molten iron at the base of his building as Building 1 and 2. So that doesn't make any sense. He didn't get hit by a plane. So if you use deduction, you could easily tell that whatever was in Building 1 and 2 was in Building 7.
@raycoelho12And there you go. The official reason why Building 7 went down was because of office fires. It doesn't make any sense. What really happened, like I said, I don't think a plane hit Building 1 and 2. I just actually posted it. A video up there that shows, if you look at the debris, there's a lot of first-hand local news that had helicopters fly around, that had guys on the ground, and you don't see any wheel landing gear or pieces of metal or anything at the base of these buildings, at Building 1 and 2.
@raycoelho12In fact, the FBI went there and put a... Come again? That's it, the passport, the magic passport that just survived in the fire, probably planted by the FBI. Same FBI that went around the field at the Pentagon and planting pieces of debris. They really think America's a little IQ. I mean, they put pieces of aluminum on the lawn with a white and, what do you call it, the blue and red stripe and the white stripe to make it seem like it was by...
@raycoelho12There's BBC video as well where, again, forget that.
@truthtellerftmThe two explosion points in building 1 and 2 were secure battery rooms. They were server rooms. They always were locked.
@raycoelho12William Rodriguez, the janitor in the buildings, he even said that we saw guys bringing in boxes, but the boxes were never connected. So that was boxes of thermite. Because if you look at, you know, the explosion goes off, and then you literally see molten iron pouring off the corners of these explosion points. And then if you look at the explosion points too, they really think, again, Americans are low IQ or something, because the, it looked like a plane hit, it looks like a plane impact, but
@raycoelho12Like Donald Trump said, the frame is on the outside. So it's like, and it looks like something out of Super Mario Brothers. You know, like if a plane hit a building in Super Mario Brothers, it's all like pixelated like that. It's like, they really think we're stupid. There's no plane in there. People actually poke out of there and look, and I guess they jump out of there.
@raycoelho12It's the real Holocaust. People jumped out of these holes shaped like planes. It was the Israelis that, you know, the Israelis that were camping out in the buildings. There's a famous picture of them with fuse boxes. They were working on an art project to extend a window, a little box out the window. But I think they were also putting these charges to make this shape.
Speaker 18That's it.
@raycoelho12They made these fuse boxes. That's it. So when this explosion happened, which... Some helicopters captured. They're like, look, they don't mention any planes. The whole thing was a stunt. Arnon Milhan had a film back in the 80s about this called The Medusa's Touch where he was priming people. A lot of movies were priming people.
@raycoelho12What's his name? Rupert Murdoch had a movie on Fox News like a month before 9-11 about planes hitting the building. They were priming people. I guess it was priming the boomers because, you know, I don't remember watching any of these sorts of things. There were cartoons too, priming kids to, you know, about buildings blowing up.
@raycoelho12But the point is, if you want to know what was really in the buildings, well, first of all, I had not, you know, I had not flyers. I tell people about this because there was thermite. There's a University of Copenhagen paper, which if you go to any university, you can source these papers by your library. You can find this on any university JSTOR library.
@raycoelho12You have University of Copenhagen. Thermite in the buildings. Ray, if you could wrap the point.
@truthtellerftmAnd also, Ian, can you bring JoAnn back up? We got some other people waiting, Ray.
@raycoelho12Go ahead. Sure. I'll just finish the point. So essentially, the final load of Building 1 and 2 was brought to Model City, North New York State, near Niagara Falls. And it was poured in a concrete cell and buried. So if ever you get a JFK president, someone who cares, not like Donald Trump. If Donald Trump gave a shit about draining the swamp,
@raycoelho12The first thing you would have done was open up that cell and had a university or the FBI investigated and see how much you're going to see is thermite because that was what took firefighters four months to pour and put out. And you know how many, and about 1,200 firefighters died because of all the stuff coming out of that stuff.
@raycoelho12So the evidence is out there.
@raycoelho12Well, let's say the buildings were worthless. I mean, the buildings literally were full of asbestos. Half the buildings weren't even vacant.
@joann_marieYou've been rambling for a second, but thank you so much. I loved everything you said.
@truthtellerftmGood points, too. Can I speak to that for a second, Truth? You can in one second. So I just want to... Correct, two things I said. So two relatives of the hijacker, Ziad Jarrah, he was convicted, they were convicted, his family was convicted of spying for Israel's Mossad over the course of 25 years. Just a coincidence, I think.
@truthtellerftmBy the way, it was Building 7 that was predicted to get dropped 20 minutes in advance, reported by BBC. And I put that video up in the next for people's reference. How could they possibly know? Last point real quick, that you had Daniel Luhmann, who's... Not just a regular Mossad agent, this guy was part of Sairat Mikhal, which is Israeli special forces that the likes of Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu, his brother were all members of.
@truthtellerftmYou got to be special for that. And this guy was also founder of Akamai. He supposedly was the first guy killed in the 9-11 stage, of course. He was killed by Sataf Sukami, who was sitting behind him. They already had their little story prepared that... is specialized, not just regular, you know, Intel asset with all kinds of training.
@truthtellerftmWho's a genius, by the way. He's a ComSci. He had a PhD, actually, I believe, in computer engineering or ComSci. And he's the founder of Akamai, which, again, was one of the most technologically advanced companies that were out there. It was specialized in content delivery, cybersecurity, DDoS mitigation, all the rest, ahead of its time.
@truthtellerftmAnd this guy supposedly gets killed first? I don't think so.
@raycoelho12I'll say something else, Truth, to compliment what you're saying, is that any Epstein files, The majority of files that are missing are between, like, year 2000, 2002. It's the 9-11 files. So that's the, I mean, if they released the entire Epstein files, I don't know if you've seen that when the episode... Oh, it was going around during that.
@truthtellerftmLike 3 million Epstein plus footage. And they say the reason why they won't release footage, imagery, all the rest is because there's child porn in there.
@sagecutterSo it doesn't have much... Yeah, no shocker there. Yeah, hang on. Let me just speak to the asbestos for a moment, right? Because it's well documented that they had an asbestos problem, right? My uncle was working with the FBI when this happened. Well, in 93, my uncle was working with the FBI, and he was called into the building after they bombed out the basement, right?
@sagecutterAnd he came back with photos and stories about... Seven stories were blown out of that building by that bomb, that truck bomb. Seven stories up and down, 150 feet wide. Greater. The building did not fall. That's number one. That in itself is amazing. Most of their asbestos problems were below grade in one building. Because in 1972, when they were building that, it was...
@sagecutterI won't say mid-project, but during the project when they switched gears on the insulation on the building because they knew that they stopped using the asbestos partially up the building. So they had this remediation issue subterranean. They had cleaned up a lot of it. I think there was like 39 or 40 stories worth of asbestos.
@sagecutterThey had cleaned up like some of that and the majority of the stuff that they had not cleaned up, meaning the Port Authority because they're the ones that had the lease, The stuff they had not cleaned up was subterranean. It was a bitch to get to. It was very, very difficult to remediate, costly. So I say all this to point out that they all knew.
@sagecutterThe DEC knew, the EPA knew, Port Authority knew, the City of New York knew. They all knew about the asbestos in World Trade Center. It's these same agencies that told tens of thousands of first responders that it was okay to work the pile, right? So for the people that are suspending reality and still hanging onto this official 9-11 story about how it went down, I would point out to you that those organizations that told you that story about how 9-11 went down, they were also, it's the same organizations that told everyone that it was safe to work on the pile, right?
@sagecutterSo they've demonstrated in this event That they will lie, that they will cost people their lives. Over $30 billion has been paid out in federal tax dollars, meaning our fucking money has been paid out to cover these families or whatever. In other words, they papered over it with our dollars. But it amazes me, we almost have like a... And this was my main point.
@sagecutterPeople have suspended reality for whatever reason. The evidence, all the stuff we're talking about tonight is pretty well documented for the people that want to go look for this information. It's not hard to find. We didn't talk about the bee thing. We didn't talk about the 150 Israeli students that were wandering around governmental buildings around the United States that got shipped out in the middle of the night.
@sagecutterWe mentioned that earlier. Oh, you did. I'm sorry. I missed that. My bad. So there's a lot of stuff. This stuff's all really well documented. and yet we still have a majority of Americans walking around calling us conspiracy theorists. So to me, I just want to point out that with the asbestos, they had no problem letting those people die on that pile and they knew damn well what was in there.
@sagecutterAnd it was also the EPA, it was Bush's EPA that massaged the reports because the EPA wrote a report about whether or not it was safe to work on that pile. Bush's administration actually modified those reports and then after everything went down who was his first pick to head up the 9-11 commission? fucking Kissinger it's like hello the reason that Kissinger did not head up the 9-11 commission is because that fucker wasn't willing to open there was a conflict of interest did you guys talk about this already?
@truthtellerftmYeah, I mean...
@sagecutterOkay, my bad. My bad. I apologize.
@truthtellerftmEnded up being the main lead and then we mentioned Philip Zelikow as well.
@sagecutterFair enough. Appreciate it.
@joann_marieAlso, on Friday, we're going to have a space that is about all of these things and more specifically because we were talking more about the architecture, like about Richard Gage and now with Dan. So, on Friday, get ready because it's going to be another amazing 9-11 space.
@sagecutterOne last thing, real quick. You guys didn't bring up the fact that... Not even 20 seconds. There's a PBS documentary. Did you guys talk about that? The Men Who Knew?
@truthtellerftmJohn O'Neill? Remember, this is just one space that covered just specific aspects, architecture, engineering of the building. And Dan, of course, spoke about, you know, from the pilot's perspective, whether it was even feasible that these so-called hijacked planes could have even achieved that trajectory to strike the buildings in the first place.
@truthtellerftmAnd it's physically impossible. He, of course, mentions uninterruptible autopilot. That, you know, whereby the planes could be, well, essentially, the operation could be superseded by, again, remote operators outside of the pilot's discretion. Fair enough. It was meant to be narrow, but on Friday, we'll go into more detail about other stuff.
@joahsantosWhat do you want to say, Joann? Yeah, there's something that almost never gets brought up, which is Bush was being investigated by the New York SEC office, which was in Building 7. The main prosecutor at the SEC
@truthtellerftmThe SEC used to investigate presidents, but not Trump.
@joahsantosWell, yeah, not just Trump. They invested in Bush as well. It was a joke. Trump never gets invested.
@joann_marieThere was a lot of CIA offices in Building 7 as well.
@joahsantosWell, Bush got bailed out by the bin Laden family, and he was being investigated for it. And that got blown up on 9-11. because all the evidence was inside Building 7. And the guy, the lead guy that was going after Bush, he got put into Bush's government, into his cabinet. And that rarely, rarely gets brought up.
@truthtellerftmBut he was busy reading storybooks to kindergarten kids or primary school kids. Totally caught off guard. Didn't even know what happened, right? So yeah, and of course they recorded them.
@joahsantosThe Bin Ladens were major investors in Bush Sr.'s oil field business.
@truthtellerftmYeah, look, I mean, the Bin Laden, it's not just Bin Laden himself, the family, they have the biggest construction firm in Saudi Arabia. And so, you know, Bin Laden himself was just supposedly a rogue agent who led the Mujahideen. Somehow he managed to survive eight, nine years of Soviet attacks, but three million Afghans were still killed, go figure.
@truthtellerftmAnd then he served greater purpose afterwards. So for other so-called... Once Mujahideen got rebranded to Al-Qaeda in the 90s to then be used as the excuse, right?
@truthtellerftmWe'll get into all that stuff on Friday. That's like extensive. Let's cover that. So I'm not doing it justice. I know that. Okay. Ian, I'm not sure how much longer you want to go. We can do like another round of hands. You tell me.
Ian MalcolmYeah, let's do it. And then, Truth, are you going to be open on the space after this?
@truthtellerftmYeah, I will, yeah.
Ian MalcolmAll right, wonderful. Yeah, let's, JoAnn, do you have the roster? I know Celtic and a couple other folks are up here.
@joann_marieI don't see any. I only see Big T, but if there is other hands, I think Mandy is up here as well.
@truthtellerftmGuys, if you want to speak, just raise a hand. Yeah.
@celticpersian9Is it cool if I just get this out?
Ian MalcolmGo for it. And Celtic just wanted to call out the wonderful space that we did with you. I guess it was about a week or two ago. It was fantastic for anybody that wasn't able to attend. So very excited for your thoughts on this one.
@celticpersian9Yeah. No, thanks, guys. Well, I probably mentioned this to you before. I was a stockbroker when 9-11 happened in New York, and I actually had one of my best friends as a survivor. So I spent a lot of years looking into this. Joe, what you were referring to with the corporate stuff, if anybody is old enough to remember, in about the spring of 2001, there was all these corporate scandals like Enron and Galoob, I think was another one.
@celticpersian9It was all these, or no, I'm sorry, not Galoob. It was another big toy company, Tyco. There was a guy called Dennis Kozlowski and there was all these big corporate cronies. All those files and all were in...
@celticpersian9The World Trade Center No. 7, which is also what Ray was talking about earlier. That was Rudy Giuliani's Y2K bunker was there.
@celticpersian9They may have. I don't know that one specifically. Truth, a lot of them didn't. Like JoAnn mentioned, the CIA had offices there and the FBI and everything. But I know that's basically where they were keeping all the paperwork. And on a side note... With the Oklahoma City bombing, that was also that federal building was where they were keeping all the paperwork for the investigations into whitewater, as far as I know.
@celticpersian9So this is like they always kill multiple birds with one stone when they do these kind of operations. But one of the things I want to ask Dan about was, I don't know if you've come across this, Dan, with those instructors you were mentioning. Was that with Agape Flight, Rudy Decker's flight school in Venice, Florida?
@levantwoman911No, that was at the freeway airport in Bowie, Maryland.
@celticpersian9Okay.
@levantwoman911Less than a month prior to 9-11. Okay.
@celticpersian9Because I don't know if you've looked into the whole Agape thing. So Agape Flight was this guy, Rudy Deckers, who was a Dutchman. He basically owned this flight school in Venice, and that's where Muhammad Atta was living. And it kind of came out later. People should look into a guy called Daniel Hopsicker. Daniel Hopsicker was a great journalist.
@celticpersian9So that was basically this guy. Rudy Deckers was like a CIA. He had this flight school. It's called Agape Flight. I don't know if it's still there, but at the time it was in Venice, Florida. And Muhammad Atta was basically a psychopath who he had this stripper white trash girlfriend that he killed all her cats. And he used to fight constantly with her with money and everything.
@celticpersian9That's basically how he met her, was at a strip club. He loved to hang around in strip clubs. And this is where he was getting all that money. I know you guys were talking about this a little bit. The flight termination system is basically what you're talking about with, I guess that was that Rabbi Dov Zakheim, the controller of the Pentagon, was in control of that?
@celticpersian9Is that what you were saying?
@levantwoman911Controlled the planes? He was the CEO of a company named Flight Termination System, and they were involved in remote control. it used to the Wikipedia article used to say Boeing Honeywell uninterrupted autopilot and maybe because we were on to them they got rid of the Boeing Honeywell now if you google uninterrupted autopilot the only thing you get is a Wikipedia article that says uninterrupted autopilot but yes Dov Zakheim some people believe was a mass one of the masterminds behind 9-11 he was the one that wrote about the need for a new Pearl Harbor with the
@levantwoman911Project for a New American Century, one month prior to 9-11, one year prior to 9-11, calling for the need for a new Pearl Harbor. So he's a strong suspect as to who was involved with the development of a remote control.
@celticpersian9Right, and that system was only available, I think, on 757s and 767s, is that right?
@levantwoman911No, actually, years ago... Lufthansa was taking delivery on new aircraft. I don't remember specifically what type. And they ran across this system doing an inventory check to make sure they got everything they paid for. Then they got a hold of Boeing and said, what is this? And they said, oh, yeah, it's this anti-hijacking system.
@levantwoman911They said, get it out of the airplane, which cost them a lot of money to do so. I believe it's also on Airbus products. And maybe I mentioned it, maybe I didn't, but we've gone to the Chinese government regarding China Eastern 5735 that took a nosedive out of 29,000 feet a couple of years ago. And I was actually invited over to China.
@levantwoman911They were going to pay my way, but COVID prevented that. And there's another one, a Russian Metrojet 9268 that supposedly blew up from an ISIS bomb over the Sinai several years ago. Christopher Boland did an excellent I had an interview with Richie Allen on that one. It's on our 9-11 Pilots YouTube channel. But we've got four airplanes, at least, maybe German wings that went down the Alps also, that we say we want investigated regarding the uninterrupted autopilot system.
@levantwoman911And we brought this up in our correspondence. And it's not just the 9-11 aircraft. It's these other ones. Someone's snatching airplanes out of the aircraft. and doing bad things with them and we don't get a response.
@celticpersian9Okay, the other thing I wanted to ask you about was, if you had heard this also, was I remember when this happened. I was living on the South Shore of Long Island. This was in like November, like maybe two months barely after 9-11. There was a plane that crashed in the Rockaways right after takeoff from JFK. And later on, I was reading in different 9-11 research that
@celticpersian9Supposedly the pilot of that plane had been in the control tower at JFK on 9-11 and he was going around telling his family and friends and all that what he witnessed in the control tower on 9-11 did not jive with what the news media and the government were saying. And then it was later on his plane crashed. Do you know anything about that or have you heard anything about that?
@levantwoman911No, I have not and I'm sorry.
@celticpersian9Okay, no worries. Well, I appreciate your input and I'll land it there.
@joann_marieThank you so much for coming up, Celtic. Sorry, Ian.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, no need to apologize. I'm just, Celtic, the space that we did for anybody, I'll make sure to put that into the purple pillar of the nest. Just fascinating individual. He's always got some interesting questions up his sleeve, so just glad that he's in here. And we'll make sure to get that space so that people can go back and listen to that if they would like to.
Ian MalcolmWe're going to have to do another one with him because there were so many questions that came out of it. But let's go down to, I think, Keith and then Big T.
@joann_marieYeah, and also, guys, I posted the space for Friday in the Jumbotron, so set your reminders, and let's try to ask questions to Dan, not go like in ramble, like, don't ramble about your theories and stuff, because we have a literal expert in here. So, yeah, let's try to ask him questions, and then we can ramble about theories on Friday.
@joann_marieGo for it, Keith.
@americaonly9Alrighty, thank you. Great, great, absolutely. Awesome space. And yeah, everybody retweet and bookmark that. I just said a reminder that's great that we're going to have another one, a follow-up one. So yeah, Dan, I just got a couple questions for you. I think it must have been Heidi that introduced me to you like a year ago.
@americaonly9I think you came on one of my spaces and we were talking about these similar topics and stuff. And I just wanted to kind of ask you two things. You might have kind of already hit on them, but I was coming home from work, so I missed a little bit of it. So obviously, first of all, like you were talking about, I mean, they did, I forget what the number was.
@americaonly9It's over like 300, 500 something reenactment flights or whatever of the Pentagon hit. And like every time they crashed miserably into like, you know, neighborhoods way before and stuff. So that one's kind of not really kind of rhetorical if you want to get into that after. And then it's because that one's pretty obvious.
@americaonly9I mean, what was going on there? But the one that's fascinated me and Like I said in a post I just made below Ian and Anna's question, I never really, to be honest, was a no planes guy and stuff. I'm still really not. I don't know what... I don't profess to know what I don't know. I don't know what it was. It's very weird that there was no NORAD jet scramble that day, which is protocol.
@americaonly9As soon as planes stop responding and stuff, that was obviously... One of the weird things. And then...
@truthtellerftmSo, like, I don't know exactly what it is.
@americaonly9Yeah, exactly. That, and then also, just a quick note on the Pentagon, Goyim, whoever knows, is full of awesome facts, and he is the one that always told me that, just luckily, for the Pentagon, the day before 9-11, they scheduled maintenance on the whatever the air defense basically that's on top of the pentagon or around the pentagon or something but that one like I said it's kind of obvious so the question is like um yeah it's crazy just the day before and going like I said is always full of these little nuggets just like at Waco Timothy Leary or no not Timothy Leary uh the Timothy McVeigh was handing out bumper stickers at Waco when everything was going on interestingly enough but the the question I have for for Dan is I I'm looking at it right now I'm just going to read this this off so it's
@americaonly9It's extremely interesting to me because, like I said, was there planes or not? I don't really know. But it doesn't seem feasible from everything I've researched. And like it says right here, number one real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative is the crash of Flight 587 in New York City.
@americaonly9On November 12, 2001, so shortly after, the plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot, and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10,000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off. Researchers called, so that's a different, that's basically like case law, you can say, almost, two months after.
@americaonly9Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 miles per hour at 700 feet altitude, and the reply was no. I remember listening to one of the things I put in that thread I was talking about. They called, like, dozens of, you know, 20-, 30-, 40-year pilots, and they're like, hey, could you have a 747 or whatever it was, 756, whatever it was, one of those three, go, you know, 500 miles per hour at 700 feet altitude, and due to, you know, the thickness of the air...
@americaonly9All that stuff. The engine, they say, and the tail fins would shear off just like that one, which is very interesting. It's basically a case law, like I said. And that was only going 240 knots, which I believe is like just under 250 miles an hour, if I'm remembering that right. So they all said no, it could not go 500 miles an hour.
@americaonly9It would shear off the tail fin, it would shear off the engine. Never mind, they wouldn't be able to maneuver it the way they did. And then it says this was also confirmed by... Dozens of aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots. If you bother reading at-plans research work, you'll also come to find the official NTSB data and a care is proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that both Flight 11 and 175 were still airborne well after they allegedly crashed.
@americaonly9That's kind of a separate thing. So if you don't mind answering that, Dan, that'd be awesome, just on your thoughts on all that stuff, like, you know, the planes flying that low and if they could. And again, I just want to say as well, because like I said, I remember meeting you last year and I remember you explaining in my space what you went through and stuff.
@americaonly9And I just want to say I'm still sorry about what you went through and all that for speaking the truth and being a true hero. So thank you for everything.
@levantwoman911Well, thank you for your condolences there. It was rough. But to answer your question, I get asked this all the time. As a matter of fact, I don't get asked. I had people, when I was on Twitter, cuss me out on Messenger saying, you idiot planes can't fly that fast at sea level. And there's all kinds of arguments as to why they can't, because the air density wouldn't allow enough thrust on the engines to attain that speed.
@levantwoman911There's something called VNE, or never exceed speed, where the plane can start coming apart if you exceed that speed and someone told I'm not an aeronautical engineer so don't quote me on this but someone told me that they were exceeding VNE by about 120 to 140 knots and to me I go right to the source U.S. government I don't believe a word out of their mouth so whatever they put out with regard to that and that's where it came from is highly suspect to me but again I'm not a an aeronautical engineer so I can't comment on it as far as
@levantwoman911Plains, No Plains, that gentleman a few speakers back was talking about Mossad pilots getting on the airplane and flying them out west as what Philip Marshall said. I've heard all of what he said and really I get people so angry with me that I don't accept Plains, No Plains or whether or not the planes could exceed the speed because the only thing we're claiming is the pilots couldn't have flown it, which blows the holy hell out of the official story.
@levantwoman911That didn't answer your question, but that's where my stand is on things.
@ladyjustice9111He dropped down to listener Dan, but I'm sure he got it.
Ian MalcolmNo, I'm back.
@americaonly9I just get rugged as always.
@americaonly9I heard most of it. I don't know if Dan's on, but yeah, that was the other thing I was going to say too. I know, and I don't know if you know about it, Dan. I'm sure probably Jo and other people do and stuff and Truth and stuff. I know there was, well, Truth joked about it earlier. I know there was like a An FBI... I think it was an FBI agent or something in Minnesota, or someone basically called the FBI in Minnesota, I believe, if I'm not mistaken, or Michigan, but I think it was Minnesota, like, weeks or months before, saying, like, hey, FBI, like, these fucking guys are, you know, learning how to fly planes, and they're like, we don't care about landing or taking off or anything, so we just want to learn how to fly in midair or whatever.
@americaonly9And then that, and that's kind of a separate question, then that's, uh... And then it just got squashed, obviously, by probably the powers that be, you know, Cheney and whoever and Rumsfeld and all them. And they just put that to the side. And I believe those were the alleged, quote unquote, terrorists and stuff. But yeah, like I said, I agree with you.
@americaonly9I don't I don't profess to know what I don't know.
@joahsantosWhen we do the case, they were they were under watch by the FBI the same way Lee Harvey Alvarez was under watch by the FBI. It just so happens that these people who commit atrocities in America. Just always seem to be under watch by the FBI.
@americaonly9Yeah, just so when we get into Do It Friday and stuff, I'll get into the other stuff that I wanted to ask. What's his name? Richard and stuff. But thank you, Dan. It is interesting. And I agree, like, who knows how fast it was flying and stuff. Just that case law is very interesting to me that the plane going 240, you know, it's tail fin sheared off an engine and stuff did, but...
@americaonly9I don't know what the hell it was
@americaonly9I wish I knew about the JQ about two years earlier and met people like Ian and Truth and other people in JQ Radio and stuff and figured all that out so I could maybe ask my emphasis on step-grandfather, who was Jewish and was a top insurance salesman in Boston, went to the World Trade Center all the time and had a ton of connections and
@americaonly9My grandmother, just quote-unquote, and she's 100% Irish, they flew her out on weekends from Massachusetts where I grew up and stuff, and, you know, she's worked her ass off, she would never miss work, but somehow on 9-11, and for 33 years of my life, and 33 and a half until I found the JQ last year, I was told that she had too many slices of pizza, or the pepperoni pizza was bad or something like that, and she had a stomachache, and called in and said that she couldn't go in until lunch or whatever, and unfortunately all 26 of her co-workers in the second building on Lake
@americaonly9I wish I could ask my grandfather or her, like...
@americaonly9It'd be a tough one though. Hey, did Grampy call you and tell you not to go into work on 9-11 because he got the Otagal message or whatever? But who knows? It's a weird one. But thank you, Dan. And again, thank you for everything you went through because I know you've gone through an absolute ton and I can only imagine.
@americaonly9So again, I appreciate it.
@levantwoman911Thanks, guys. Thank you.
@joann_marieThank you.
@levantwoman911Thank you, Keith. Being a pilot with my experience, I can only speak with authority with regard to that. pilot issues, having flown Cessnas in the 757 and 767, I feel very strongly that it couldn't have occurred. And the people that attack me, planes, no planes, or what hits the Pentagon, that's outside the scope of what we're talking about.
@joann_marieAll right, thank you so much, Dan. All right, Mandy, go for it. And guys, also, please repost this space. And if you guys go to it, I will also repost it and follow Ian and Truth and Richard Gage and Dan and everybody on the panel. So thank you so much. Mandy, go for it. Sorry.
@mandyarthurHey, I just found out with JoAnn that I've been a ghost today. Every time I put up my hand, it's not showing to anybody else. So that's why I haven't been talking very much today. Sorry for just hanging out on the speaker's panel without having anything to say. I did take a minute to have dinner so I'm not sure if this stuff has been discussed but there were just a couple of things three things that I wanted to mention really quick to anybody in the space and just hear what people have to say about them maybe they've already been discussed I don't think so because I've been here most of the time but number one a few days before 9-11 somebody made and it's like an unknown group there were a couple of them made
@mandyarthurUnusually Big Bets that United and American Airlines stocks would crash. The volume was up to 100 times normal where there was no negative news. So there would be no reason for them to do that. And this was just a few days before. And then only those two airlines that happened to be the airlines that hit the towers showed that spike.
@mandyarthurSo none of the other airlines had that same action.
@truthtellerftmIt was Alexander, Alex Brown and Kent Fitzgerald. bought most of the options, put options, yeah, and again, that's avant-garde's old company, against those two airlines specifically, and they made a small fortune on 9-11, betting correctly on which way the airline stocks were going to go. Sorry, go ahead.
@mandyarthurYes, and then there was no investigation into it, and it was something, I mean, the reports say, and of course there was no investigation into it, but the reports say it was at least $16 million. Anyway, and then... In the Epstein files, which I'm sure a lot of you have combed through, I know Truth was talking about this earlier, Ghislaine Maxwell was invited, and I did not know the name of the journalist, which is even more wild.
@mandyarthurThe name of the journalist that invited Ghislaine Maxwell to be on a, quote, shadow commission on 9-11 is named Edward J. Epstein. I don't know if he's related, but that's kind of wild. And then he wrote that the membership list was secret. She apparently said no, but I don't know if I believe any of that. It's just wild.
@mandyarthurThen also the Epstein files during that time period are missing. So there's like a lot of gaps in the Epstein files and the emails that are available. And that's one of them is the whole time during 9-11. There's just nothing there. And then I'm sure it's been talked about, but Luttnick skipped work. because he said he was taking his son to his first day of school, but it was later revealed that his son actually didn't start school that day.
@mandyarthurHis son's school did not start that day. So there's a lot of weird things going on. I just thought I'd mention those few.
@americaonly9Yeah, that one was weird. I saw that like a month ago. People looked up SAI. It was like the eighth day of school, not the first, which is just more interesting.
@joann_marieIt's insane. There are so many coincidences that day. Sorry, JoAnn.
@joahsantosThat trading volume thing? I used to repeat it myself. I then looked into it. It's actually not true. There wasn't any real significant volume if you look it up. And I implore anyone to look it up just because I got called out on it and then I looked it up and I had to take it back.
@joann_marieAll right. Thank you, JoAnn. I will check it out. All right. Big T, welcome. Go for it.
@autofix4405Hey, good evening, good day, and good morning to some of you guys here in the space.
@autofix4405Well, you know, just to add on to what you guys are speaking about. So, I mean, I grew up in the area within five miles from the Pentagon all my life, man. And then, of course, I know the area very well. And... You know, one of two things. I mean, one thing is it was rush hour, right? And that area is very, very congested, especially during rush hour.
@autofix4405To this day, it's always the worst, you know, driving in to D.C. during rush hour. And, of course, there's the GW Parkway, where the area where...
@autofix4405The plane supposedly hit the Pentagon, right? So, like, there's a... It's called GW Parkway, which is a small highway, which is maybe a few yards away from where the plane hit.
@truthtellerftmApparently it wasn't a plane that was a missile and it hit the accounting department.
@autofix4405Well, I mean, I'm just... I'm just going... I'm just painting a picture now, you know? I'm just going with the flow, but I'm with you, you know what I'm saying? I'm just telling you what, you know... How I took that time when I was 20 years old, of course, a young knucklehead, and I wanted to know what was going on. I wanted to see it in person.
@autofix4405But anyway, just to paint you guys a picture. So for that to happen, right, during that kind of time, and this is what always boggled me, was because it's always bumper-to-bumper traffic, right? So and I remember that day because... I'm listening to the radio and a few people were calling, you know what I mean, a few days later and they're sharing their stories.
@autofix4405And I remember this one guy who was like, man, I was sitting in traffic and I sat here and watched a plane go right over me, you know, and go into the Pentagon. And there was a few callers that said that. But, you know, to look back at it, I mean, especially when time went on, you know, of course, those could have been, you know, just...
@autofix4405Decoys, right? To just, you know, just to taint the airways. But there should have been, and I know that there are at least, you know, four or five hundred people at least on that highway that should have seen that plane go into the Pentagon. And not just that, right adjacent to it, you know, especially back then, there were CCTV cameras.
@autofix4405Even back then, It was a very, very, I mean, there was cameras everywhere because it was just known to be that way. I mean, of course, we would ride around, smoke, you know what I mean? Me and my friends, and we were young, and we knew, you know, where cameras were, where security is, you know, within that area, you know, just riding up and down the highway.
@autofix4405And adjacent to it is called Pentagon City shopping area. You know, I mean, there's a bunch of high-rises within... A mile across the highway. And there were CCTV cameras there on top of the buildings. There's a big Macy's that's called Pentagon City Mall right across the street from it, adjacent to it. Of course, there was cameras there, rotating cameras back then.
@autofix4405And to this day, it doesn't make any sense. And just to recap of what you guys are saying, that it's amazing how there is not one footage that's ever come out that's ever been told that we have footage or shown footage that, I mean, they could have showed it in 100 different angles just from that corner, you know.
@joann_marieYeah, because they can't show it big time. They don't have it.
@autofix4405Well, that's my point to you, JoAnn. You know, yeah, yeah. And I'm with you, you know what I'm saying? Like, but to me, it doesn't, how would you be able to just mask it, you know, this whole, and I've always asked this question and it's been, You know, the question of the day, like, oh, you know, it's security, you know, maybe they're investigating.
@autofix4405But I'm just letting you know, you know, being from here, and I know the area very well, there's no way you can hide it, you know what I mean? Especially back then, like I said, there's CCTV cameras, they were everywhere on top of those buildings. Again, you know... That just points to what you guys are saying, and I'm just retracting to what the gentleman was saying before, Ron.
@autofix4405It doesn't make any sense, you know. Why isn't there at least somebody saying, hey, we can't show this because it's under investigation. And by the way, when I drove by there, just to put the icing on the cake, I never saw a plane, Truth, okay? All right, let me answer that for you. Because we must have rode by there at least 100 times, man.
@autofix4405Yeah, you see the buildings collapse. You know, the pillars collapsed in the Pentagon. But never did I see anything to do with a plane over there. So that's where I rest at, man.
@joann_marieAmazing. Thank you so much, Big T. Yeah, go for it, Dan.
@levantwoman911Yeah, maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought that the FBI went out and confiscated all the cameras around the Pentagon, including... a highway patrol, a Virginia Highway Patrol car that had a camera in it, the Sitco gas station, and the Doubletree Hotel. And the reason they claimed they had to confiscate it and not release the footage was due to national security reasons.
@levantwoman911Has anyone else ever heard that?
@autofix4405That's my point to you, Dan. And I don't mean to just jump in, but that's exactly my point to you. As you know, the Doubletree Hotel, the rotating restaurant that's on top, and then right across the street from it is the Macy's. All those places, they had CCTV cameras. And of course, I think there's a DEA building there.
@autofix4405I mean, every single building that's there had massive cameras back then. You know what I mean? Yeah. This is what, again, and I agree with you, and of course, yes, there is a gas station there, so I know you're familiar with the area, but a lot of people don't know this stuff, and it doesn't make any sense.
@levantwoman911Yeah, as far as there being a plane or no plane, we don't get into that, my organization doesn't, but there are at least two individuals I know of that have photographs of the remnants of an A3 sky... Sky Warrior, which was an old Navy attack airplane that had two engines slung beneath the wings. So it vaguely resembles what a 757 would look like, only much smaller.
@levantwoman911And they claim they have pictures of the canopy rotor from the engine, et cetera, there. So in that instance, you would have had to get rid of American 77. And we say, well, if that happened, then maybe they remotely guided it somewhere else, and I've heard also a 737, or like the one gent said, a missile hits the Pentagon.
@levantwoman911In all those instances, what happened to American 77?
@autofix4405And I don't mean to cut you off, but yes, so I remember, of course, they had the canopies and they had the big tents covering that area, but one thing is, and I did miss out on it, there was a tail. That I do have to say, there was a tale, now that I remember, because they had that over the canopy and they had it covered.
@autofix4405But, of course, you know, again, I'm 20 years old and I'm not, there was no internet. All I saw was a tale. A tale of what? God knows. I mean, you're the expert, right?
@levantwoman911Well, the A3 they claimed was painted with American livery, red, white, and blue. But, again... We don't go there. We just say the pilots couldn't have flown the profile. These are just things I've heard along the way because people, some people are vicious in the 9-11 truth. They attack you.
@americaonly9Oh, they're very vicious. And you're spot on, Dan. The guy I was talking about earlier, Goyim, who was talking about the Pentagon stuff the day before the air defense being shut down, you're spot on. I forgot about that. They literally, he said that as well because I said, what about all the cameras around, you know, around the Pentagon?
@americaonly9And he said, well... Luckily for the powers that be, the FBI went around and snatched up all the camera film and all the cameras and everything and took all that stuff and like I think Big T said and stuff, there's that one video that we have where that sheriff's car is going through the gate that lifts up and stuff and you can see something in the background but barely see it and stuff.
@americaonly9But yeah, they went around and snatched all the cameras and all that. I never heard that theory you just said, though, about a possible Navy something plane. That's crazy. And Big T, you're looking good, by the way, Big T. Hey, well, thank you.
@autofix4405First off, and guess what? Right where it's at, just to add on to Dan's explanation, and you can confirm it if I'm wrong. I mean, let me know if I'm wrong. There is a helicopter pad, landing pad. Right where that crash site was. Am I wrong or am I right, Dan? Like, right a few feet away.
@levantwoman911No, you're right. There was a helipad there.
@autofix4405Yes, there's a helipad right there. And I'm like, were they trying to hit, like, I mean, of course, I'm saying this out loud now, but were they trying to land at the helipad? Like, you know, they missed the, like, I mean, that's the joke that we used to say, but there's a helipad right there. So that makes sense to what, you know, now you start piecing out the puzzle.
@autofix4405How would you bring in a tale or something like that from the hell? I mean, I'm just, we're speculating.
@americaonly9I could probably do that one easy, to be honest. Dan, would you mind repeating one more time that theory on the Navy something you said plane? I'm going to write it down in my notes. It's very interesting.
@levantwoman911Navy A3 Sky Warrior, the airplane. It was an old Navy attack aircraft. And according to the people that subscribe to this belief, the A3 had a missile on it. and Moments Before Impact that fired this bunker buster missile that went through that many rings and blew up. And they're claiming they have the photos of the canopy and engine part, et cetera, at the crash site.
@levantwoman911And I agree with those who believe that plane parts were placed around the area. Are you familiar with Adam Eisenberg? One of the guys that was in the army that was one of the first soldiers at the Pentagon that day who claims he didn't see any airplane parts, any big airplane parts.
@americaonly9Yeah, I've heard that name before. Yep, yep, I have.
@levantwoman911Yeah, yeah. So I know him. He's interviewed me before. Here's the one thing you talk about, the few frames or footage. of something flying towards the pentagon you got the nose of the airplane sticking out that's all they gave us was two or three frames there that to me tells me there was a flying object heading towards the pentagon if that camera footage is accurate so then it gets down was it american 77 the cruise missile and a3 or some people even think it was a 737 that was swapped out so there's all kind of theories but uh
@levantwoman911Nothing except the parts from the A3 that I've seen will prove it to me that it wasn't American 77.
@joann_marieThank you so much, Dan.
@americaonly9I just looked up the A3. I'm going to just toss in the notes real quick so people can see. It does, like, kind of resemble, like, I mean, it's big enough.
Ian MalcolmIt is vaguely. It is vaguely.
@americaonly9Crazy. Real quick, too, just one last question. What's your thoughts since, again, you know, and obviously you don't know everything on all this, but, like, the whole Shanksville situation, that one also is very weird, like, you know, the fact that they said a, you know, plane hit and went through the ground and left, like, this, you know, image of a, you know, basically like you would think in a movie or whatever, like an image of the plane and the wings slicing through the ground, but...
@americaonly9I've seen memes and other stuff joking around, but you would actually probably know way more than me on this, obviously. The front of planes are made of, not plastic, but something pretty... Like a bird can dent the front of a plane, I think, sometimes. What are your thoughts on that?
@levantwoman911The nose of the airplane houses the radar. It couldn't have metal... A metal nose because the RF energy would reflect off the nose of the airplane and bounce back to the radar screen. So that's why it isn't made of metal. But getting back to the Pentagon, that gent that said there was no planes and that they went out west and landed, according to Philip Marshall, the fact of the matter is the debris field was scattered over a 70-acre area.
@levantwoman911which would indicate to one that it came apart in the air.
@americaonly9That's at Shanksville or the Pentagon, you're saying?
@levantwoman911At Shanksville.
@americaonly9Okay, you said Pentagon a second ago. Yeah, yep, yep, yep. That's what I heard as well, and somebody theorized that they shot it down. Yep.
@levantwoman911Yeah, that's what I believe, and this is just a pure guess on my part. I said if there were fighters in there and they fired shots, maybe one of them missed and hit the ground and created a crater. I don't know.
@americaonly9Yep, thank you, Dan. Yeah, exactly. There was the debris was spread out like over like 70, 80 acres and stuff and that's what people have theorized. Again, Goyim as well and he knows a ton of stuff.
@levantwoman911Also, two of Richard Gages and my friends that were with the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, they went out to Shanksville shortly afterwards and there were human body parts there and a forensic pathologist did a DNA sampling with the passengers and confirmed there were body parts from the passengers on Flight 93. So for people that said that there was no airplane there, I would dispute that their findings on the two grounds that there were body parts and airplane parts indicating 93 was there.
@autofix4405Dan, let me ask you this. And as you know, Andrews Air Force Base I don't know if they had F-16s there or not. They did scramble F-16s and they were vectored out over Long Island.
@autofix4405Well, that's the thing, though. I mean, Andrew's Air Force Base is always loaded. I mean, I'm here, you know what I mean? And even back then, it's always, that's just where they hang out at. You know, that's like their main post. I'm just stating what I know. I don't know what's true or not. But that's what had me boggled, especially at that age.
@autofix4405And again, I'm going back over 20 years ago, and it just, it doesn't make sense to me. I mean... It would have took them, you know, literally two minutes for them to be there, if not less.
@levantwoman911Well, think about who was calling the shots that day.
@joann_marieExactly.
@americaonly9I just found something on that big T. I just looked it up and I'm asking Grok one other thing. So it says, and see, this is exactly to Dan's point and everyone else's point, you know, it says there were ongoing command posts and training exercises, parentheses, Vigilant Garden, Global Guardian, Northern Vigilance, and some aircraft at Andrews Air Force Base were flying scheduled training missions on the morning of the 11th.
@americaonly9And I didn't get to finish. I said, so the jets, so there was jets that could have been, could have been scrambled. To Big T's point, I mean, it's literally a stone's throw away, so it makes no sense. Well, it says, yes, Andrews Air Force Base is only about 10 to 15 miles away from the Pentagon and had F-16s from the D.C. Air and National Guard's 113th Wing.
@americaonly9Those jets existed and could fly. They were not, however, part of NORAD's air defense alert force that morning. Well, still, NORAD's two relevant alert sites were Otis Air Force Base in Massachusetts and Langley, Virginia. Andrews did not keep armed fighters sitting on... 24-7 Strip Alert for Continental Air Defense. 9-11, the unit was treating it as a normal light, normal slash light flying day after recent training.
@americaonly9Some, so of course, some aircraft were even participating in scheduled exercise. The first Andrews F-16 launched well after the Pentagon was hit around 1038 to 1042 a.m. Wow, the earliest ones went up with training rounds. They were not in position or configured to intercept flight 77. So jets were physically present nearby, but they were not on alert due to NORAD scramble chain, and not in the NORAD scramble chain this morning.
@americaonly9So there's just more suspicious stuff.
@joann_marieThat's crazy. Thank you, Keith and Big T. And I want to say hi to Stew Peters that came up. Hey, Stew, how are you?
@realstewpetersHey, thanks a lot. I'm well. Just popped back in. I know that Richard was here earlier. I always enjoy listening to him. As a matter of fact, I intend to have him back on, you know, this week in light of the anniversary. He's always just so great and interesting to listen to.
@ladyjustice9111We have Dan. Have you met Dan still? We have Dan. You have Dan Hanley here, Stu. You can talk to him.
@realstewpetersWhat's up, Dan? How are you? How are you doing? I'm well, thank you.
@levantwoman911I'm doing good, you know. Do you know anything about me at all, Stew?
@realstewpetersVery, very little. Educate me.
@levantwoman911Oh, okay. I'm the director of a group... Global Grassroots Effort called 9-11 Pilot Whistleblowers. And we got two websites, one at 911pilots.org and the other one at 911pilots.us. And the purpose of our organization is to show there were no Muslim hijackers piloting the aircraft, but that they were remotely controlled.
@realstewpetersYeah, actually, Dan, you were on with me. You were on my show. This is several years back now. So I'm sure that you've done a lot of them, but it was... It was, I think, during, like, the COVID times when it was, like, the height of that, 21, 22.
@levantwoman911Okay, who am I speaking? Oh, maybe you don't want to mention your name, but... No, it's Stew Peters. Oh, Stew, yeah, I remember being on. I didn't know it was Stew Peters. Yes, I thank you again for having me on the program, Stew. I do remember the event.
@realstewpetersYou got to come back on, Dan.
@americaonly9I was just speaking of you, Stew, I just tagged you in one of the things I posted about how you had someone on, it looks like probably years ago, about thermite and stuff, and Ian's doing another Space Friday we can get into and stuff, but thermite and how bright it burns and how it would have lit up the sky of New York City on the day if there was thousands of pounds of thermite and stuff on it.
@americaonly9I just tagged you in it in one of the videos. Like I said, it looks like probably from a couple years ago because you look slightly younger, although you're... I just look like I'm not sucking down the juju's, right?
@realstewpetersYou know, nowadays, because we have 910 and 911, man, I hate these people.
@realstewpetersNo, I don't. I don't hate anybody. But it's, you know, it's just interesting and very coincidental how all of the same people are at the center of all of these things. So now we have 910 and we have 911.
@joann_marieit's absolutely insane but thank you so much for coming up so and if you have anything to add just jump in yeah yeah i'm here i'm here really just to listen so i appreciate that thank you for inviting me to to to a mic i'll be here and chime in you know me i'm not shy about that amazing all right um acutely awake welcome go for it yeah hey thank you it's great to be here uh good conversation a lot of
@aqutelyawakeA lot of really good ground being covered. I wanted to bring up kind of a different vein on it all. But the insurance policy that Larry Silverstein took out on the Twin Towers days before this orchestrated thing occurred was facilitated or it was enabled by the Lloyds of London. I think that's really significant on a global level.
@aqutelyawakeIt's great to hear everybody talking about this, but the Lloyds of London didn't just insure Larry Silverstein and 9-11. If you go back in time to 1912, the Lloyds of London provided the insurance policy on the Titanic.
@americaonly9Oh my God, no way.
@aqutelyawakeWow. which wasn't the Titanic, it was the Olympic. So if that's not enough, the insurance policy that Larry Silverstein had with them, then that ties right into Rockefeller, Rothschild, and all of the fuckery. Which also, by the way, the Olympic, which was sunk, wasn't just a massive insurance fraud just like Larry Silverstein in 9-11.
@aqutelyawakeBut they killed the three men who were going to oppose the founding of the Federal Reserve in 1913, Isis Strauss, Jacob Astor, and Benjamin Guggenheim. So that's how deep that fuckery goes. And we would be amiss to not take note of that involvement. and you know it it's always been the same people so i mean that you know this is a great conversation i know it's centered around 9 11 but i'm a 40 000 foot view truth seeker uh truth truth truth uh disclosure so yeah um i mean i've never heard that one what i'm just gonna write that down too you said it's called lloyd's
@aqutelyawakeThe Lloyds of London, which also, they were insuring the straight of her moves until recently. Get the fuck out of here. Which is interesting, too, because this all ties to, you know, the founding of the Federal Reserve, Jekyll Island, Rothschild, Rockefeller, fake Jew, fuckery, right? I mean, it's all the same thing. If you really want to get
@aqutelyawakeSuper deep into it, then you have to dig up the true history of the Kazarian Mafia and how the identity of the so-called Jew has been co-opted for a very long time.
@aqutelyawakeThe difference between...
@joann_marieAcutely, we have Dan who is literally a 9-11 whistleblower right now and we don't want to let go into it.
@aqutelyawakeI digress.
@americaonly9I just want to ask you one thing, Acutely. Have you heard, because it makes sense now about this Lloyd Delondon thing, because I don't know if you heard, I think from my research and I remember it took like two weeks or like 20 lawyers or something to get together to ensure the It was a massive undertaking that almost seemed impossible, but somehow they got it done.
@americaonly9And that kind of makes sense with the whole fuckery you're talking about with Lloyd's London and all this stuff that they figured out a way to give him an asbestos-filled building insurance.
@aqutelyawakeYeah, it's an inside job, in and out, like the whole thing.
Speaker 7We have some planes. 100%. Just stay quiet and we'll be okay. We're returning to the airport. Nobody move. Everything will be okay. If you make any moves, you endanger yourself and the airplane.
@joann_mariePlease stop it. Don't jump in, okay? If you interrupt one more time, I'm going to drop you. And Ian, if you're there, can you give TruthTeller the co-host again, please? Thank you.
@levantwoman911Yes, I'm here. I'm here, Heidi. I got kicked off for a minute. They dropped the call.
@ladyjustice9111That was JoAnn talking. Okay, good, good that you're there. Okay. Well, I mean, any other questions for Dan, guys, since he's back up?
@americaonly9I see Long Island's hands up. That's it.
@joann_marieYeah, no, I'll go to him. Thank you so much, Keith. Long Island, welcome. Go for it.
@chris177689Yeah, I'll be quick. Yeah.
@chris177689Yeah, you know, you guys were talking about earlier, you know, was it Thermite, was it DEW? I just wanted to throw in there, well, you know, maybe it was both. You know, there was some anomalies there with vehicles that were consistent with what happened in Lahaina, Hawaii. So I just want to throw that out there. Why wouldn't they?
@chris177689And, you know, why wouldn't they go for broke and use both? And this goes back to something very important that Dan, an issue he raised. And I don't think it's talked about enough is the PNAC document project for New American Century. The think tank from the 1990s. And Dan already cited the paper from the think tank about, you know, the reference to a Pearl Harbor event.
@chris177689So you know that. And I would just like to throw in that who was part of that think tank? Well, it was founded by Robert Kagan, okay? The husband of Victoria Nuland, and we know her shenanigans going back to 2014 in Ukraine. Okay, so we know he's a winner, right?
Speaker 18Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz. Yeah, all neocon Jews.
@chris177689Right. And Fife, and Pearl, and Rumsfeld, and Cheney. So if anybody is new to that topic... There's plenty of info on YouTube regarding the PNAC think tank. So I just wanted to back Dan up on what he said that. And Dan, God bless you for staying with us for all these years, buddy.
@levantwoman911Oh, thank you. I won't let up, everyone. I'm 77 years old, and I'm still fighting. And I'll fight to my grave to try to help bring this to public light.
@joann_marieGod bless you, Dan. Sorry, God bless Long Island.
@chris177689Yeah, I'll give you a big salute. I'm from Long Island. I miss the towers. I won't get into all that, but it's awful. I just want to say to Stew real quick, I'm thoroughly enjoying the based report with Frankie. Thanks for having him part of your crew. And again, to the co...
@chris177689Host, the co-host, just thank you for giving me a mic. I just I don't want to pick up Dan's time. Thank you.
@levantwoman911Thank you.
@joann_marieThank you so much for coming out, Long Island. Tom, welcome.
@transformer444Hey, Heidi, great conversation. I have a question for people on the panel, and it has to do with something I don't understand. Recently, it's always been pretty common. To hear the last name Rockefellers mentioned when discussing a lot of these agendas that have been extremely destructive to the United States and the West and to the broader world as well.
@transformer444And what I wanted to know is, do you guys also get the sense that that last name is kind of one that represents a family who's not really involved in the actual implementation of these agendas as we speak? They were probably more involved in the development of a lot of these agendas. Because right now, as I understand it, the puppet master, the people that control Trumpstein the clown completely, the people that control Mark Carney in Canada, and the people that control the person that we have managing the country for BlackRock on our southern border, who, as I understand it, are in place because at some point in time, they're going to open up these porous borders and give whatever order they have to in order for massive numbers of migrants to overwhelm the United States from the north and south, potentially.
@transformer444And I just see this as a play that they're working toward. And I wonder, could it be that the Rockefellers is just a term that's conveniently used to kind of throw people off the trail of who's actually running the show right now?
@levantwoman911Thank you. It isn't President Adelson.
@transformer444Yeah, she certainly has influence. I love that. Yeah, she certainly has influence, but I think she's lower down on the totem pole, so to speak, if you know what I mean.
@levantwoman911Well, then you've got... The Vice President, J.D. Teal, if you get my drift there. And you'll know what's really going on in the Oval Office and who's running the show.
@americaonly9It's an interesting point, though, Tom. I agree. The Rockefellers are a nice buzzword nowadays. I mean, they set the blueprint for a lot of things. Obviously, like Truth's covered a ton, you know, switching over to petroleum and all this stuff and all the petroleum products and all the shit. I'm sure they're still involved, but, you know, whether it's
@americaonly9I think it was Dan or Richard earlier, one of the two, I think it might have been Dan that was saying you've got obviously the Council on Foreign Relations, Club of Rome, Committee of 300, Bilderberg, WEF, all these groups and I'm sure the Rockefellers are still somehow in those white papers somewhere and stuff, but they definitely seem to have yielded their, not their power, but at least their front person status to the Rothschilds and
@americaonly9Other powers that be, like we were talking on MySpace the other day, that to be honest, I don't even know who's pulling the Rothschild strings, and I don't think we'll ever know, to be honest. That's obviously the true message.
@transformer444I'll be honest, I don't think there is anybody higher up on the totem pole right now. That's what I'm interested in hearing, what other people think about.
@joann_marieThe Flexner Report is one of the worst things that can happen to the entire world, and we need to revert that. Well, we have Ian back. Ian, would you like to have any closing remarks or anything?
Ian MalcolmYou know, I just want to thank everybody that's here, in particular of course, first and foremost, the incomparable Miss JoAnn, the co-host of The Absolute Most, Mr. Truth Teller. And folks, this is one of two... Spaces that we're going to be doing on this obviously not only incredible important both this this event that took place almost 25 years ago not only covering all the ins and outs today of the engineering of what exactly took place and how as Richard Gage went through it is impossible to chalk this up to those two airplanes
Ian MalcolmBut then more importantly, on Friday, not just to look at the engineering, but also all of the social, the geopolitical, and essentially the engineering of everything that is our world, right? For 25 years now, the West has been at war with not only all of these various nations that, what do you know, just happened to align with the clean break memo, but we've essentially utilized that to upend the whole world.
Ian MalcolmTo go back again to that idea of engineering, to engineer all of it. So we now look around the world and we see all the disaster that's come from this. We'll be talking about it more on Friday with Mr. Truth Teller himself. We're going to go over all of the months, the years, the weeks, the days, and the hours leading up to impact and pulling out some of those little known facts of that piece of history.
Ian MalcolmI'm so thankful, not just for Richard Gage, for everything that he did today, But also, for Dan who came in here, for anybody that was not here throughout this conversation, the information that was shared, absolutely incredible. So please go back, listen in, share it with your friends, right? Because this is one of those moments, 9-11 and the ins and outs, today anyway, of Charlie Kirk, right?
Ian MalcolmIt's one of those moments where when you start to really figure out, wait a second, the government lied to everybody in the... Didia went along with it. It's like Richard was saying, no different than COVID, right? So this is one of those watershed moments that we will continue doing everything we can to bring all the attention to it.
Ian MalcolmAnd I appreciate all of your efforts and endeavors in that adventure. Speaking of adventures, for anybody that's not on this platform, if you want to share things with them, I just want to bring special thanks to Allegedly Dank. who of course has been putting all of this content onto Apple Podcasts, Rumble, Spotify, and ianmalcolm84.com.
Ian MalcolmSo please feel free to use those as well. If you've got friends and family, they might not be on X, but they are on those other portals. Feel free to utilize that. Folks, at the end of all of this, this is an information battle. It is the eighth front of this war. There's one group that basically controls everything, all of our mind, all of our media.
Ian MalcolmWe're putting an end to that. We're going to be having a space specifically on that. That is going to be with Dr. Strange. So we're going to be having that later, actually tomorrow. And then, like I said, on Friday, we're going to be having that space with Mr. Truthsteller on the 25th anniversary of 9-11. I look forward.
Ian MalcolmTo all of you and all of the way that we are going to continue, not only this week, not only these conversations, but everything on our adventure to making the world a better, better, better place. Mr. Truthteller is going to be opening, so I look forward to seeing all of you in there. And as always, I just want to wish everybody certainly good morning, good evening, good afternoon, wherever you might be in the world.
Ian MalcolmCertainly, God bless for everything that you are. Godspeed. We're going to continue winning. I look forward to seeing you guys in that next space a big thanks again to everybody that was up here all of our speakers all the panelists and a huge thank you to Richard Gage I wish him nothing but the best in his conference later this week do not forget you can tune into that digitally right and all it takes you don't even need a dollar if you can't spare one if you can you certainly go to his page you can access that on the title at the top of it feel free to donate not just to him but also to that conference if you can't
Ian MalcolmShare the content, like the content, do everything you can. It's totally free and it's helping to change the world. So lots of love to all of you. We will see you in that next space. Thank you so much, everybody. God bless. Godspeed.
@levantwoman911Thank you.