Held here entire — 973 passages across 13 chapters and 2 named voices, set down from the first word to the last.
- 0:00Religious Overlay on SupremacyThe host introduces the topic of a supremacist system with a religious bend, specifically Judaism, and its opposition to Christianity.
- 6:22Gospel of John: Blind Man SeesThe host reads and unpacks the biblical story of Jesus healing a man born blind, drawing parallels to current societal blindness.
- 19:38Netanyahu's AI Videos & TruthDiscussion shifts to recent AI-generated videos of Netanyahu and the difficulty of discerning truth in a world of manufactured reality.
- 33:45Accountability and False FlagsSpeakers debate the accountability of figures like Netanyahu and the potential for false flag operations to escalate conflicts.
- 49:01AI's Impact on Truth and JusticeThe conversation explores how AI makes it harder to identify truth, demand justice, and the implications for political accountability.
- 1:08:46Digital Footprint & BlackmailThe host and guests discuss the vulnerability of digital footprints to surveillance and potential blackmail, and how to mitigate risks.
- 1:51:27Christianity as a DefenseThe host argues for Christianity as a defense mechanism against evil and a 'sword' of truth in a world of lies.
- 2:16:08Racial Animosity & PropagandaDiscussion turns to racial tensions, the role of propaganda in fueling animosity, and the disproportionate crime rates among certain demographics.
- 2:46:19Tribalism and Christian UniversalismA heated debate erupts over tribalism, the role of Christianity in white identity, and the historical context of Jewish influence.
- 3:20:53Jesus' Jewishness and TalmudThe panel delves into the historical and theological debate surrounding Jesus' Jewish identity and interpretations from the Talmud.
- 3:51:59Christianity's Historical Stance on JewsHistorical quotes from popes are presented to illustrate Christianity's past antagonistic relationship with Judaism, challenging the 'Jewish LARP' theory.
- 4:17:28Jewish Supremacy and Global ControlThe host argues that Jewish supremacy is the root cause of many global problems, including the undermining of Western civilization and Christian values.
- 4:44:59Future Debates and Call to ActionThe conversation concludes with plans for future debates on Jewish supremacy and a call for unity against the totalitarian machine.
The Transcript
Ian MalcolmWell, good day everyone out there. happy, happy Sunday! Hopefully a happy, fun day, and hopefully you will be enjoying it with your loved ones in some capacity. And to prospectively try and bring some additional, I suppose, joy, laughter, or maybe some inquiries to your live, I thought I would just start up a rather impromptu conversation with the world. And, and thought I would do so because, well, curiously, there's a number of things taking place in the world that, obviously are aligned with the topics that we normally cover, which, of course, would be towards the supremacist system that is obviously not only trying to conquer, but also in the process destroy much of the world that we love. And what is curious about it, at least for the purposes of today's conversation, is the overlay that we see with religion of all things. And obviously there's a religious bend, right? The forces that are trying to destroy the world, at least in my assertion, they are a supremacist system that is built on a cultural, genetic, and a religious sense of supremacy. Right? They believe themselves, I think anyway, entitled to lord over the world, both because I suppose it is mandated in their, what I believe to be perverted religious worldview. But also perhaps from a culture and a set of genetics that is infused with what I believe to be, sense of essentially narcissism, paranoia, and schizophrenia, which basically leads to a mentality where a group of people is not only superior to, but as a result of that superiority, is entitled to lord over, and of course, due to the paranoia, to essentially hate, reject, and/or define anybody that That stands in the way of that as being somehow bigoted or oppressive or evil or any number of other slurs. and yet I get lots of people that will challenge that worldview. They will often define it as mean, rude, or insert seven thousand different renditions of slurs. The thing that they often will not be able to do, though, is to merely call me incorrect in terms of how I'm looking at the world, the way in which I try to defend that, et cetera. But I do think that when it comes to religion, there's both the aggressor, which I think is the religion of Judaism. I think it is the people that are essentially the Jews, and I do think that it is in particular those who call themselves Jews but aren't, and that's a whole different set of conversations that would go into who are the biblical Jews and what were they of the day, what are they of today, and how do those things intersect? And on the other side We've got the religion of Christianity. Now, we could also talk about Islam and the Muslims, but for the purposes of this conversation on this Sunday, and in particular of this gospel, we are going to, of course, look at the world through a Christian lens, and in doing so, I think we find not only perhaps what you could think of as a shield, but also we could go to Christ, who said, of course, "Sell your cloak and buy a sword." And I say that because I think ultimately, not only is Christianity a defense mechanism against things like evil, ag-gr-against oppression, against hatred, animosity, and all that is essentially evil, but it's also a sword, and I say that because occasionally, the most valuable, most viable, and perhaps the most lethal of quote-unquote weapons that we could use is merely the truth. It's the ability to speak it. Right? It is the pen that is mightier than the sword, and we often see that these truths are of course obfuscated, they're lied about. And isn't it rather curious that we talk about this issue of truth in a world in which we are essentially lorded over by what appears to be liars, and we are also being fed by those liars things that we don't even know anymore if they are in fact real? And I say that because we now have a press conference of Netanyahu where it appears that he has six fingers, and it's now being responded to with Netanyahu casually walking through a cafe, just 'cause I guess that's what all world leaders do, where he is casually observed by an individual, I suppose, with a smartphone that records him, as if this is in any way, shape, or form a believable piece of just everyday life in, in that of Benjamin Netanyahu, right? I'm sure there's- Lots of videos of Donald Trump just casually walking into a cafe amidst a war, picking up his coffee, swirling it around in a way which curiously doesn't result in any of the foam or coffee spilling out of the cup while he also takes some sips from it, right? Not exactly what you would expect Donald Trump to do, certainly not Netanyahu amidst the war of his own nation. But nonetheless, we'll get into that in a moment, right? But this idea of truth The ability to hear, the ability to speak that which we know to be accurate, or even the ability to see and to believe the things that we are seeing, which brings us to the Gospel of John.
Ian MalcolmAnd in this passage, which I'll just read, I'll try and give a somewhat condensed version of it, and then we'll unpack it. As we do, feel free to request a mic if you would like to come up to add in some thoughts. And what we'll basically do is to read through this passage, we'll try to reflect on what it might mean in the day it was written, in the present that we find ourselves in, and how we might be able to learn from this to create a future that is more worthwhile. And so with that being said, I'll try not again to bore you. I'll try to read through this in a rather, let's see, expeditious fashion. And so the passage reads as follows: As Jesus passed by the man who was blind from birth, his disciples asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" Jesus answered, "Neither he nor his parents have sinned. It is so that the works of God might be made visible through him. We have to do the works of the one who sent me while it is day. Night is coming when no one can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world." When he had said this, he spat onto the ground and he made clay with the saliva, and he smeared the clay onto the eyes of the man and said to him, "Go wash in the pool of Siloam," which means "sent." So he went and he washed, and he came back now able to see.
Ian MalcolmSo they brought the one who was once blind to the Pharisees. Now Jesus had made the clay and opened his eyes on a Sabbath. So then the Pharisees said, "How was he able to see?" And the man said to him, "He put clay on my eyes and I washed them, and now I can see." So some of the Pharisees said, "This man is not from God, because he does not keep the Sabbath." At which point others asked How can a sinful man do such signs? And there was a division among them. So they said to the blind man again, "What do you have to say about him since he opened your eyes?" To which the man said, "He is a prophet."
Ian MalcolmNow the line goes on. It ends up talking about how, of course, the rabbis were furious, and when I say the rabbis, I mean the Pharisees, and when I say the Pharisees, I mean the Jews. Now, what did the Jews do to this man when he refused to suggest that he had never been blind from birth, that this was all an act? It was a ruse. Well, they threw him out of the synagogue. They cast him out. They said, "This man is evil. He is a liar. The man who did this must be evil. He must be
Ian MalcolmAnd why? Merely because along came this man who took a, an individual who was blind, gave him the ability to see. Now, isn't that very curious? Because we live, of course, in a world in which almost all are blind. And what are they blind to? What are the masses blind to? Well, curiously, it's the same system, the same set of power. That was furious that this man was now able to see in his day. And what was it that the man was able to see? Not only the world around him, but also the man who helped to open his eyes.
Ian MalcolmRight? He saw Christ, he saw the truth, he saw that maybe there is a higher power out there. And in doing so, who did he infuriate? Wow, what a weird set of circumstances. He infuriated the Pharisees. He infuriated the Jews, who cast him out of the synagogue, who said, "We need to go find this man who says he is Jesus, who perhaps claims, or others claim, that he is a prophet, perhaps that some would suggest, is the Son of God." What a curious overlap this story, right? Because again, we're living in a world in which everyone is blind. What are they blind to? To those in charge. Who was in charge of the day? You could say it was the Romans, but after all, wasn't the Romans that were forced and coerced by the Pharisees to kill Christ? How weird. It's almost like they were operating in the background, never necessarily outright in control, rather just working behind the scenes to get what they need to maintain their power. And so we see this exact same scenario today. We live in a world, again, where everyone is blind. How can we have our eyes opened? Well, merely by speaking the truth.
Ian MalcolmNow, we might not be able to literally repair someone's eyes in this process, although I suppose science is probably not far from that, but we can figuratively do precisely that. It doesn't matter if you're Christian, doesn't matter what spirituality you believe in The most important thing is merely calling out the truth that is the lie in which we find ourselves, because again, we're all blind, just like Neo at the beginning of the Matrix, and just like so many others throughout literature, throughout history, that have lived in systems of lies, oppressive ones at that. And so what a weird set of circumstances that the Bible mirrors today. That today mirrors tomorrow, and I say that because while right now we live in a world in which the liars have been able to lie about everything, and they've been able to largely keep that under wraps, but what gets so bizarre is this new AI-infused uncertainty, where we now have videos coming out about world leaders that we aren't able to decipher if in fact they are even true or real. And so now we have to look to the liars to see if the materials that they're sharing, even the video and audio, are in fact even real.
Ian MalcolmAnd what a weird world that we find, where the presentation that was given by Netanyahu, in which he had six fingers, which looked like AI, is now retaliated, and the proof that this man is clearly alive, because someone suggested he's dead, is a video that perhaps looks just as AI as the one that came before it. And so what, what is the, what's the critical relevance here of the story? What is the clay? Right? That's discomfort for what it's worth. I don't-- if anybody can think of, an individual, just imagine this, right? You've got somebody walking down the street, they spit on the ground, they reach down, they make some clay out of the dirt with their fingers and their literal saliva, they pull it up and they put it into your eyes, they rub it into your eyes, they say, "Go wash your eyes out." Sounds pretty uncomfortable. But the person does it, and they do it because maybe they have faith, faith in what? Faith in something that is optimistic. They had no guarantee, they couldn't even see the person they were talking to that was shoving literal dirt in their eyes, but they had faith that maybe something could get better. So they went and they watched and they saw.
Ian MalcolmAnd that is what we are all trying to do to everyone around us, because these are uncomfortable conversations. The truth is, I suppose, the clay We need to share that with the masses as much as they might try to reject that message, and in doing so, we can help them open their eyes. And the best part about this, we aren't ever going to be able to be Christ-like. We can try and imitate, but we'll never be able to be. But what we can do is our little parts in trying to share that truth, that message, that clay, proverbially speaking. Right? And everyone's eyes that we open perhaps will turn around and open the eyes of another person or two or three or five or ten or who knows how many. And I see a lot of people in this space that perhaps just a couple weeks ago, a couple months ago, a couple years ago, they had no idea about this truth that we discuss, which is essentially Jewish supremacy. It is the lies and those that will attack the truth tellers the same way that the Pharisees did all the way back in the days of Christ How dare you try and help this man? How dare you open his eyes on the Sabbath? And what a weird, curious piece that little line is. Because why is it that the Pharisees, the Jews, were so upset with Christ? Well, because he threatened the system of lies that they had built, that required the people of the day to be blind to them.
Ian MalcolmAnd when he did so, what did they say? They didn't say, "Hooray, look, this man can see." They weren't excited that truth was spreading, that someone's eyes were healed, that someone would have a better tomorrow as a result. No, no, no. They had to say, "But he did this on the Sabbath. Our law commands..." dot, dot, dot.
Ian MalcolmIsn't it weird? Again, the mirroring that we see of that story, because we're starting to share the truth. And what is the machine doing as a result? Sensoring, suppressing, shadow banning, suspending, and now you've got in the United Kingdom, you've got in Australia, you've got in some parts of the United States, rapidly evolving laws to prevent you from sharing the truth.
Ian MalcolmSo what is it that we find ourselves in? It is the same struggle. It is the same battle. It is spiritual. You know, in a metaphorical way, is intellectual, but this is at the end of the day, a battle that we have to take on. We are called to, by a higher power, I really believe that's the case. If you're in this room right now, it's not because the X algorithm has shoved this out to the masses. It's not 'cause you're gonna get any kind of, let's say, compensation for being here. X will probably just further suppress your account merely for sitting in this room, and I apologize if that's the case. But that's what we take on, that's what we shoulder. That is the mantle that we are accepting. And so it is, in a way, it is a spiritual battle of our age, one that perhaps is as old as the spirit itself, which is a spirit that ultimately this world can heal by speaking the truth. Right? And so I, I, I really thought, when I saw this passage, I thought, "Wow, could there be a better microcosm for the, the world in which that we find ourselves, or a better parable, perhaps, is the appropriate term? Right? Because what is it that he did? Again, he saw a man that was blind, he helped him see. Who is it that got really frustrated by it? The Jews. What did they do? They threw him out. They said, "You are a liar. Obviously, this is a ruse." Because those people didn't believe that anything could ever challenge their earthly controls.
Ian MalcolmAnd so we, in a sense, are precisely that. We are the Christ-like figures trying to share these truths. At times, it might be a little bit uncomfortable because the people that we might try to share it with might reject that truth that we try to share, just like this man didn't enjoy the literal clay being put on his eyes. But once washed away that friction, that animus, the man could see, and so too can the others that we take this message out to.
Ian MalcolmAnd so try to be as much as you can like Christ. Try and share those truths, try and wake up other people to open their eyes, literally and figuratively, to what's going on. Recognize that you are going to be hated, that you'll be attacked, and you'll be called all kinds of nasty slurs by the people in charge, and it's because they- Their world depends upon their lies being perpetuated.
Ian MalcolmAnd so on this Sunday, just take that little piece of what I suppose is a gospel, a homily, try to incorporate it into your world. And with that being said, try to explain to me what the hell is going on with Benjamin Netanyahu? Is he alive? Is he not? Are these videos AI? Am I a crazy person? Does it look like he has six fingers? What in the world is going on? So if you would like, feel free, request the mic, come on up. I'm gonna throw a couple out there in the event that anybody does, and if not, I will have no problem taking the space and wrapping it up and leaving it as just that concise little message and visualization, because I, I hope it was of interest, and I hope people can hear it, if not merely to recognize, again, the similarities of what we find ourselves in today, what they were like yesterday, and how we, as a result, are carrying the mantle of that same individual that was here today. Two thousand years ago. So that being said, I know we got Sharon up here, Sharon, any, any thoughts on the message? A little bit of, religious infusion here in the day?
Speaker 1No, I think it was a great message, and I'm thrilled that you have opened a spot, 'cause I haven't seen you in a space for a minute, so I'm really happy. But, I was just more thinking on the Benjamin Netanyahu thing. I see people cheering it on, which is fine, and then I see people, I've listened to a lot of spaces I'm kinda leaning to the opinion that if, if they're able to like make us think he's gone, then, then they can make the excuse that he was the bad guy, and then the ruse goes on. Nothing changes, you know? They, they still have Jewish sup-supremacy. So I'd rather, I guess, him not be, 'cause I, I want them held accountable. If that makes sense.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, it, it makes complete sense, and, and I do think there, there's obviously going to be an attempt as the world starts to wake up to what is going on. People are going like rats on a ship to try and flee from their accountability for being involved in this insanity. I think that's absolutely correct. And so one way that, that individuals could visualize this happening, of course, is by trying to encapsulate all of the, the crime, the sin, the evil, specifically just in Netanyahu as a sole individual. But the concerning part is there's actually, there's lots of individuals far more radical than Netanyahu. Right? We also know that two thirds of all Israeli Jews, when polled, supported the genocide. And so I don't mean to suggest that all Jews are anything, but rather that there are a whole lot of Israeli Jews that seem totally fine with what's been going on. The problem is now essentially, it, it, it feels like, and Sharon, I'm gonna be curious for your thoughts on this, it feels like The Israeli regime and Donald Trump's subservience to them, it feels like Iran is going to win this kinetic conflict if it is merely done with rockets and missiles. And as a result, Trump is now trying to stir up, I suppose, interest in getting American boots On the ground in Iran in a very large fashion, and in order to get there, it feels like the only way that they could do that is to have some kind of horror arrive at the footsteps of the American, let's say, the, the, the American spirit, literally and figuratively, and by that I mean some kind of attack on American soil. And so I, I do fear that a false flag is probably going to be imminent if it feels like the United States is going to have to re-withdraw, let's say, from the con- Conflict, and it feels like they can't go much longer,
Ian Malcolmin either of those two directions. So I'm curious for your thoughts on that, Sharon.
Speaker 1Yeah. I saw your fabulous post about there, there's like a bunch of events coming up for the two hundred fiftieth year celebration. And that, that makes sense to me, like something bad happening. So stay out of the, I think it's in Washington, D. C. Please stay away, all my friends on here. I don't want anything to happen to you guys, 'cause I could definitely see a false flag
Speaker 1I don't even know what to think about this war. It's, it's horrible, but I, I'm just an anti-war totally, so I just want it all just to be done. I don't wanna see anybody harmed, I don't wanna see soldiers harmed, I don't wanna see Iranians harmed, I don't wanna see innocents harmed. I want the Jews to stop their bullshit.
Ian MalcolmWell, I think that makes, I think that makes many of us, because, I, I feel as though a lot of individuals are arriving at that same conclusion, and, and for what it's worth, yeah, the, the number of events that Donald Trump is gonna be putting on, right in the heart of Washington, D.C. as a, let's say, a celebration of the two hundred and fifty-year anniversary of the United States, it is rather concerning. And I say that because they're gonna do a, a Grand Prix, they're gonna have a
Ian MalcolmThey're gonna have a big prayer that they're calling a jubilee, they're gonna have a concert, they're gonna have fireworks, they're gonna have all these things, and all of those are going to bring prospectively tens of thousands of people into a concentrated area right in front of some of the, let's say, most visually striking aspects of the United States, and you can very easily see a world in which an explosion in front of a monument, in front of a cathedral, in front of the White House, with thousands of people being impacted, which is then blamed on Iran. Of course, could be both the catalyst to get the United States more involved in the war, and simultaneously could be our biggest fear because it could be used to bamboozle the minds of the masses that are slowly starting to wake up to the world that we've, of course, been discussing. But, you know, maybe, maybe Sharon, you and I are, are blowing this out of proportion. Let's go to Mr. Fitka, six, if he wants to jump in and, and share his thoughts. Yes!
Speaker 2Yes, hi, how are you, Malcolm? So I wanna go back to your original question about Netanyahu and if he's alive or not. well, I think they're gonna play the Epstein game. Like, we don't know if he's dead or not, and I think that's for, for many reasons. those guys, they don't wanna be held accountable. For the crimes they did. So they kind of like wanted that death to be an escape, but at the same time they don't, they don't want the Iranians to be happy for him being deceased. So that's why we're not gonna get a real final answer, just like Epstein. So for what happened to Israel, it's, it's just disaster what's happening. It's, it's done. I mean, the country is like fully collapsed. So for that reason, he definitely will be held accountable if he's alive. So for me, I wouldn't believe he's dead unless I see a DNA results done by trusted people. Not just like when they did to Senor, they cut his finger to make sure that's his Senor to, to do the DNA test. And I think that action, I mean, if you-- what, what goes around comes around. So if you do that to others because- You don't trust them? W- I don't trust the Israel, Zionists. I don't trust them at all. So, and I think this is what's gonna happen. They're just gonna make you believe he's dead but not dead, and you will be in kind of like confusion, just like Epstein, because as I said, he doesn't wanna be held accountable. And you remember Trump, when he went to Israel, he asked that I can't. It was the Knesset or something. He said, "You need to pardon,
Speaker 2Netanyahu," and then they didn't answer him. So they really wanted to have a escape. Those guys, they don't wanna be held accountable, they don't wanna die, they don't wanna be-- They don't wanna go to jail for that. So I, I believe they're gonna play that game just like this. Thank you. Can I say something really
Speaker 1quick? Of course. In my lifetime, I've never seen a politician held accountable. So I think you're right. I think they'll, like, fake it, fake it, and just make us think that they've been held accountable, but no one really ever gets held accountable unless they're going against Jewish supremacy. So that's just my thought on it.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, and that's, that's the Very unsettling piece about this, right, is that it, it's going to become very difficult for us to understand what is real, what is true. therefore, it's gonna be even more difficult to demand, I suppose, justice, and it being conducted on individuals who have been part of this disgusting plan, right? You've got Netanyahu who, at, at his fingertips, who, who can even calculate how many millions of lives have been lost, either via Americans that were fighting wars that- They were clearly fighting for another, nation, or for the individuals that suffered at the hands, of that military incursion, right? we can also talk about the Palestinians and arguably the half million or so of them that they genocided, right? So this man should absolutely face, let's say, a, a, a trial. he should be held to account for those, those sins. and if he, I suppose, is, is alive, then that should take place. But it's gonna be very difficult to even understand if that
Ian MalcolmRight? Is, is that man dead? Is he alive? Is he somewhere else? And, and it feels like we're entering this very surreal world in which we don't know if Netanyahu is alive, we don't know if Jeffrey Epstein is alive. It feels like every week there's another video surfacing, the most recent of Epstein somewhere in like a convertible, if I'm not mistaken. And this feels like the new norm, right? Where we don't know what to believe with our own eyes, going back to this parable with Christ, we don't know what to believe. We therefore have no idea how to act, and we therefore don't understand if justice has been orchestrated. Right? We could find ourselves in this very confusing, very, very frustrating world in which the criminals are allowed to walk scot free because their actions are described as AI, while the people trying to honestly describe the world and to ask for those criminals to account for their crimes are now being arrested for crimes they weren't ever involved in because there's an AI video that suggests that they were. Right? So it's gonna be very- Very, very difficult again to understand what is real, to believe what you see or what you hear, but I do believe that even the blind shall see if we just continue to talk about this common problem, in which people will start awakening to the realities that they live in or the scam that that reality truly is. but let's go to Coco real quick.
Speaker 3Oh, thanks, Ian. that hand up, by the way, was that, that was just meant to be a big wave to you. But while we're on this subject, I'm English, I'm speaking from England.
Ian MalcolmI'm, Sharon, is it cutting out for you? Yeah, it's cutting out
Speaker 3for me too.
Speaker 1Yeah, it's cutting out for me as well. But it got better right there, so let's see. Sorry, can you hear me?
Ian MalcolmI think so. It's kinda cutting in and out intermittently.
Speaker 4Leon, can I talk to you?
Ian Malcolmsure, let's, and Koko, I'm gonna move you down, try to bring you back up, and see if that, if that fixes the microphone issue or the connectivity issue for you.
Speaker 4Yeah, so, Leon, what a humiliation of this, what we call the super duper power, the civilized world, right? Imagine how come they are changing their statements, one week, two week. Now, Israeli- Minister, he's saying they want to pick up the war in maybe three more weeks. So imagine, Iran is saying, "We aren't going to surrender, we will..." You know, from Khomeini to Khamenei to younger Khamenei. This is their slogan. On this slogan, this axis that Iran, they are standing. Simple slogan, what they used to call "No East, No West." Second thing, death to America, death to Israel. This isn't religion, this is what they're, what we call the axis. On this axis they are united, right? So Middle East is locked. It is like during the COVID-19 and now it is more. Even the oil production from KRG is stopped. So flights are stopped. I think this is what I don't have any word, but I want to listen Dr. Khateja, she is a very good speaker,
Speaker 4she can better, you know, yeah, reflect this, yeah, thank you, yeah.
Ian MalcolmYeah, of course, my, my absolute pleasure, and, glad to have everybody here. let's check in with Coco and see if that, fixed the connectivity issue here.
Speaker 3Oh, thank you. I don't know if you get me properly now, the audio. Is that all right? Oh, cool. What I was trying to say, I don't know how much of that share that you got there before, but, I'm speaking from England, I'm English, and all over the radio this morning they've been blasting out about how the British government is stepping up for Donald Trump, you know? and they're sending mines, minesweeper, sniffer things out there to the Strait of Hormuz, whatever. Not only last week, the British government were complaining that Donald Trump said, "Right, yeah, well, you didn't, you didn't wanna help, and we don't need you now because everything, we've won." The whole thing, we've won it, so we don't need you. And then they've been asked again to help and send these mines sweeping stuff out. Do you know what, Ian? I'm just seeing Vauderville all the time here now.
Speaker 3Vauderville, complete and utter nonsense. And if Satan Yahoo is that, well, fuck him. Because they're gonna be in the way to be in our space. So that's the scene. That's all I have to say about that. Thank you, darling.
Ian MalcolmNo, of course. And, and look, the, the obvious pattern that we're going to witness, unfortunately, is as more people start to notice the supremacy that we discuss, which is truly-- it, and it's worth noting, because I, I will see all of these different handles that will post all of these different problems And they will say, "Oh, it's the trans issue, it's the gay issue, it's the migrants, it's the Muslims, it's the dot dot dot." All of those things, in my assertion anyway, are problematic for the largely white Christian Western world, right? It's not that, it's not that I don't find these issues to be unsettling in different ways for different reasons, but rather the architect behind these problems, it's universal And the reason that it is universal is because it is pushing all of the things that are essentially anti-Christian, anti-Western, and that are demonstrably anti-white. And we know that this is the case because it is largely the white nations that are enduring all of the mass migration, the influx of all of these culturally, let's call it dysgenic, if not degenerate, aspects. And they're now, of course, flooding other nations as well. It's not as if that isn't happening. Japan absolutely is enduring migrants from Africa at the moment, right? But the West has been under assault for decades at this point. There's no way around it. And if we look at the, the choke points, if you will, of control, whether it's the media, the politicians, the tech, et cetera, it all universally points in that direction. And so we've got to keep pointing at that, that primary catalyst, and I bring it up because what they are going to do as more and more people have the clay rubbed in their eyes, they wash it out in the water, and they're able to see Seeing more clearly the matrix that we've been describing, well, the only response and retort from the matrix is to beget more chaos. Because if we are unified, it's very easy, it's just like Orwell used to say, "If the horse only recognized its strength, it could shake off the flies. The flies being those that were in charge." Right? But they, the flies, need to get more friction and more problems for the horse so that it can't do that. It can't shake off the shackles of this machine. And so we're gonna see an escalation one thousand percent. They're gonna push for racial violence, they're gonna push for religious violence, they're going to prospectively stage attacks On synagogues, so they can say, "Woe is us, the Jews." It's worth noting, I of course denounce any and all of that, violence is always bad, but it would be worth noting, 'cause if I'm not mistaken, the synagogue that was attacked, again, which I would critique, I would condemn, but if I'm not mistaken, that individual's children were some of the Palestinians that were mass murdered by the Israelis.
Ian MalcolmAnd so you can kinda understand, well, look, violence is never gonna be justified, but we can certainly wrap our head around the emotional state that that person might be under if that is actually what happened, right? Again, not, not celebrating in any regard, any violence, I always condemn that, right? But this is the problem that we face, which is that the group of people in charge, they're going to stir the pot more and more and more, they will pro-proclaim that they are the victims at every single turn. And unfortunately, they're going to be forced, if we do our job and we speak truth, they're gonna be forced to account for their crimes.
Ian MalcolmIt doesn't make us violent or radical or hateful, right? If somebody comes into your home, they steal all your things, they set your house on fire, they murder your children They don't get to walk outside, and then when you demand that the police arrest them and take them in front of a judge for a trial, they don't get to, to say, "Woe is me? Why do you hate me? Why did you destroy our country? Why did you undermine our leadership? Why do you have control of all of our tech and our media and our AI and all of the other aspects of our world? Why are you using those to destroy our civility, to undermine our economy?" To brainwash our children, to pervert them into believing that they're not even in the right bodies.
Ian MalcolmThese are crimes. This needs to be held to account, and we aren't hateful for demanding that. Our nation is being actively ruined, and the worst part about it is, as our country's being ruined, the same entity is using every last one of its resources. I just saw a post the other day talking about how the United States, well, our missile reserves We are just depleting them at an unfathomable rate for a foreign nation, for a foreign war that benefits the United States essentially zero.
Ian MalcolmYour economy is being outsourced and swindled, your military is being undermined and exhausted, your citizenry is being demoralized This is wrong. It has to end, and it won't be fixed by another Democrat or another Republican shilling for the same team. We have to have individuals that are gonna stand up and are going to say, "We will only vote for an individual who will outspokenly condemn Jewish supremacy and all of, of course, the weapons that it utilizes." We need to speak out against the demoralization via the media, the subversion of our economy, the theft that is- The Federal Reserve, all of those other things, obviously.
Ian MalcolmAnd if we do it, and we speak that truth, even the blind shall see. I see that we've got Mr. Uncensored in here. We're gonna welcome him into the conversation. Hopefully he can join us. If not, not the end of the world. If you can. and for anybody, by the way, that's, that's new to the conversation, Mr. Uncensored, oh, wonderful, I will send you a co-host, my friend. And Sharon, I'll send you one as well.
Ian Malcolmto, to give a quick recap, to reset the room, for anybody that looked at the passage today that I believe would have been part of the, the, the Gospel, the passage was about Christ essentially opening the eyes of a blind man, which then curiously is met with that blind man going and speaking to the Pharisees and saying, "Ta-da, look what happened!" At which point, the Jews- Throw him out of the synagogue, calling him a liar and calling the person behind him, AKA Christ, radical and dangerous.
Speaker 5So sorry, can you hear me now? I had to leave and come back. I don't know what just happened. I missed everything. I heard you say a quick recap, and then it just went dark.
Ian MalcolmHow, how wonderful! So I'll give a recap to the recap for those that weren't available for the original or for the recap. and so with that, so the passage is from John nine uncensored, and I'll actually, I'll just, I So Jesus is passing by a man who was blind from birth. his disciples asked, "Well, who sinned? Was it this man or his parents? In other words, why is he blind?" And Christ said, "Neither have sinned, but rather that the Lord will make His actions visible through this man." Christ proceeds to spit onto the ground, to use that saliva to turn the dirt into clay, to rub it onto the blind man's eyes, and then goes and, and says, "Go and wash this off in the water." At which point, not only can he see,
Ian Malcolmbut he then proceeds to go and meet with the Pharisees to say, "Look what happened! I can now see." At which point, the Jews, aka the Pharisees They claim that first, that this man can't be a prophet. He obviously has to be a sinner because he did something on the Sabbath. In other words, he i-ignored the Jewish law, so he can't be a good man. And then when this individual whose eyes were now fixed, when he says, "No, I was blind, and now I can see," they say, "You must be a liar. There's no way that this could have been done." And when the man refuses to recant his statement, the Jews cast him out of the synagogue and say, "How dare you? You must be dangerous and radical and violent." And what a curious story for the world that we live in today, where those that speak the truth are hated by the machine that has essentially all of the power. And oh, by the way, in a world in which we don't even know what it is that we are seeing and if we should believe that very thing, because we've got Netanyahu, who some would say are dead, in a video where he has six fingers, followed by a video now where he's in a cafe and his coffee doesn't spill and all these other things. So this idea of, of who is blind, what are they blind to, and how can we be Christ-like to try and open the eyes of those individuals who are yet to see these truths that we speak of, it felt like Very fitting little passage from the Bible. So starting with that, and uncensored, I'm curious if you're familiar with the story and if you see, I suppose, some relevance for the world that we find ourselves in today.
Speaker 4Hi, hi, Ian. You know, we are from another region,
Ian Malcolmso- Wait, I, I, hang on, hang on. Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, nope, uncensored. Do you have a- Not sure what that was about. but uncensored, do you have
Speaker 5Well, obviously, very famous Bible passage, but as far as how it would, you know, affect us and go to us today, it is relevant in a lot of, well, okay, you know, there's obviously the, the straightforward, how does it apply, and then there's the in the, in the text, what is, what's going on. And yeah, but how we can take that and look at it as, for us, is, yeah, like you said, everybody's blind. And I even, you know, the more that goes on, the more I feel like we're still blind, and what we're still blind to is like, what is truth at this point? And the more AI goes
Speaker 5It's like week by week, it seems like AI videos get more complicated. Like it's much more difficult to figure out what's actually going on in the Middle East right now. I, I think either... I don't think really either side knows what's going on, as far as us here in our own countries, I don't think we have any idea. It's almost impossible to know, 'cause you get AI videos on both sides. And it's all propaganda. It's all propaganda, what, you know, they're saying, "Oh, we, we sunk some carrier, or, oh, Netanyahu's dead, or, you know," and then there's also like the,
Speaker 5"Oh, we, who knows how hard Iran's getting struck, right?" Who knows how hard Israel's getting struck. Sorry, I'm at the zoo, so I'm walking a bunch, and having a, every now and then, probably, code word thing, you know? But I think that All we can do from here is just keep on keeping on, you know? I mean, we just kinda gotta keep on with the same rhetoric, because I don't know when or if we'll ever even have an idea of what's going on. So, as far as to back to the truth, right? Back to, circle back, let's circle the wag and back to truth. Push what's true that you can verify that you know is true, and the problems we've been talking about for two years now, or for you longer, but So that's all we can really do, is just keep, keep spreading word, keep pushing what we know, and then, you know, like all this AI stuff, I just try to not even, I'm trying to not even comment on the Middle East right now because, I don't know, I have no idea, I can't prove anything either way, I don't know what's going on.
Speaker 5I got some buddies and- Decently high up in naval, and they'll say one thing, and then they'll say, "Well, it turns out this is a little bit more complicated than that." And so I don't even, I don't even like talking about it, 'cause it seems like people I know that generally know what's going on, they're still in America working in an office, so I don't think they even know what's going on. I think only people that know are the people that are over there, so we'll stick to the truth we know and go from there.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And, and that's-- it's such a wonderful comment there, stick with what we know, and, it's, it's why I continuously point at the common denominator, which I do know, and what I mean by that is, it's, it's hard to determine, I suppose, the exact motivations that, that inspire these individuals, whether it be Netanyahu or Trump or Biden or Kamala or Lincoln or Epstein, right? the thing we can easily identify is the commonality behind them that kind of unifies this group of people. Now, what, what is their, their deep-seated motivations, right? Do these people at night, they get down and they have a direct conversation with Lucifer or Satan or the Rothschild or aliens, right? Those things we, we can't determine, I suppose, but what we do know is there is certainly a massive Jewish influence in the media, in, technology, of the politicians, and the pres- Presently, that influence is bombing yet again, another Middle Eastern country, which they've done for essentially thirty years, while the media seems to uncover, while the tech companies seem to obscure and suppress and censor those that are critical of it. And so it's-- that seems pretty easy. But yes, there are, there are aspects of it that I'm su-- I'm sure do go deeper that we are missing. And curiously to your comment there on censored.
Ian Malcolmright? We think that we have our eyes open. I'm sure there's plenty that we are still blind to, and we'll, we'll keep trying to uncover this as best we can. and Sharon, to, to throw you a question, I'm kind of curious with this evolution of AI and the way that we're seeing this unfold, how do you try to determine, I suppose, what is even real at this point? And, and do you have any de facto solutions? Do you run to like an AI algorithm to try and assist you? how, how? How do you try to decide what you should believe with your eyes?
Ian MalcolmSo,
Speaker 5yeah. No, go, please. Alright. Thank you, uncensored.
Speaker 1Thank you. It's okay. Give me a follow back, too, uncensored. I'd love that you did the Hitler speeches, AI and stuff. I've always been quite a fan of yours, if you don't mind. You don't have to, but... Anyways, Ian. Already. Oh, thank you. Ian, with the AI stuff, I'm a little older, so I just, I don't trust anything. So I'm not that sophisticated. I try to listen to people that I respect in spaces. I, I don't trust any of the mainstream media people.
Speaker 1I literally trust you and Uncensored more than anybody else at this point. It's kind of sad, but it's true. I try to listen to reasonable, moral people that I believe are moral, morally upright people, and, Just take it from there and just think things through. But the, the videos, I, I tend to not even really watch them.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, it, it is, it's been very difficult to know what to trust with our own eyes at this point, which is a very strange dynamic because, of course we have that old quote from one of the CIA heads that basically said, "Our job will be complete when the American people don't know how to discern what is real." That was essentially his, his suggestion. Now, at the time, he was suggesting that they wouldn't be able to discern what was truth or real or what was taking place, right? That their whole world would be an illusion. He presumed that by using, I suppose, the media and academia and all these other mediums, that they would be able to craft an illusion just like the Matrix. That I, I refer to a lot. I don't think that he had a vision that in the not so distant future they would be able to make videos just out of thin air at a moment's notice. Which is a very curious kind of dynamic, 'cause we can look back at historical events, maybe the moon landing is an easy example, and question the authenticity of what we're seeing. But at least that would have taken, if faked, you know, Stanley Kubrick, a huge soundstage, and all of the other technology to bring that to life. With AI I suppose somebody can just go in and type in a couple paragraphs worth of details and bloop, outspots a, a video in a moment's time. And that ability is only going to get more and more, nuanced, more sophisticated, and as it does, it'll just become more and more difficult to discern what we're even looking at. And so that, back to that old idea of the American people having no idea what is in fact reality, well, we're quickly approaching a world in which that is very easily going to- Be the case. And again, I have significant fears. Right? We know that the intel community has prospectively put materials on people's computers in the past so that they could frame or blackmail them. Well, what happens when they can just snap their fingers and they have a video of you robbing a bank in a place you've never been, and you go before a courtroom to say, "That's not me," and they say, "Well, we just scanned our AI system which verified that that is in fact you." How are you going to oppose that? And who is going to run those systems? I think we probably know the answer to it. But, let's check in with Brandon and see what, what some of his thoughts are.
Speaker 6Hey, thanks for having me. I'm, nowhere near as smart as you, but I think I'll have like a good view on this stuff. the AI is really gonna be for like the social credit score, I think. It's really just about like getting all the data they possibly can on each individual human, which is like the Palantir thing, right? And it's like every scroll, every like, every, you know, everything will be, you know, a label creation for you. Like, I'm, I'm big with like accounting and numbers. I do like, take bank statements. I can basically what they're gonna do is like set rules right for that vendor or transaction and then allow you to, you know, purchase it or not by based on a rule. I mean, all this stuff is going to the digital AI. That's like the whole purpose of it is the You know, the control factor. and then I also wanna talk about like the security part, and I don't know if you wanna, bring it up, but like Tucker, you know, that's like a big thing right now with, his security and, like how we're all being spied on. But basically, I've said this in spaces before, but like, you know, if you're, you know, a power structure and you want in someone's device, it's like, it's not hard at all. It's basically like an update, you Like it's just a list that they put drivers on that are, you know, they, they say, "Well, this driver's vulnerable, so we gotta put it on the list and then market that, you know, that's not allowed." Kind of thing. Well, all they would have to do is, you know, update their driver and then allow it. So it's like anybody's devices can be hacked by the government. So it's like, I don't know, it's a scary world we live in. but I wanted to know what you thought on the Tucker stuff
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, it's such a great comment, and, and I'm gonna be curious for Uncensored's thoughts if, if he's able to share them, and I say that because, I know he knows technology very well, especially when it comes to the AI, and he was doing some of the early AI speeches for Adolf Hitler, which I think is one, one of the biggest digital nuclear weapons, in this arsenal of kind of, having individuals revisit World War II and what that was about. and I, I say that because the degree of vulnerability of
Ian MalcolmIs utterly frightening, and I think anybody who doesn't understand what I'm about to suggest, well please, please pay attention, which is that the vulnerabilities in our devices aren't vulnerabilities, they are trapdoors that are placed there by the people that have put them in place and provided them to us so that they can be exploited. And I really seriously believe that one of the greatest weapons of this system that we live under was blackmail, right? We know that that's the case through Epstein Island, for example. Right? But they don't even need Epstein Island anymore. They needed that in the present so that they could whisk off Bill Clinton and Bill Gates and everybody else and get them in compro mat that they could then use to say, "Well, Bill, if you don't support this thing with the vaccine program, well, then we might have to release the video." But think about it, in ten or twenty years, are they even going to need Epstein? Because after all, think of all the blackmail they're going to have on you, on everybody that's out there that uses any of these platforms in any capacity. Doesn't matter if it's something as, let's say, graphic and profane as OnlyFans, because on everybody's devices, right? Unless you are like Christ and you've really, let's say, lived an absolute life of piety, purity, right? The odds that there's at least one message, one search engine Right? That there's one calendar invite, that there's a, a message you sent on a dating app, perhaps. Think of all the different ways in which you now engage with your devices. Imagine all of that being searchable and scannable by an AI platform that plugs into all of those things, perhaps via Palantir, and that scours your entire lived experience in a matter of moments. And spits out at you, or the user, the five things that you would be most susceptible to be blackmailed by.
Ian MalcolmSo now there you are, the truth teller, and you're excited to go and you're gonna run in local office. You're gonna try and make a difference. You're gonna try and speak out against this machine. And lo and behold, a message comes up on your phone that it's gonna self-destruct like you're from Mission Impossible in five seconds, but just to notify you that it has these ten different data points gonna be really bad. If it just happened to share them with everybody in your immediate circle or with the entire world. And that's what we now find ourselves in, because at the top of, essentially, every one of these tech companies. Doesn't matter if it's Apple, if it's Google, if it's Android, right? The smartphone that you might be using to listen to this conversation likely compromised. If you're on a laptop, likely compromised. You're watching it on a television, likely compromised. And it's either with microphones, it's with cameras, and so please, whatever you guys do, when it comes to the digital footprint that you leave behind, right? Try and minimize, I suppose, the, the direct ingredients that could be used to prospectively blackmail you somewhere down the road. Right? That doesn't mean you shouldn't use it. Of course we have to. You gotta go through your lived life, and you gotta live it to the max, right? But take those little extra precautions. Put a, put a lens cover in front of your camera so that you don't have literally, let's see, Mossad spying on every single facial movement that you make when you scan a computer, right? But when on your smartphone. Be, be just cognizant of what I just suggested. Don't be fearful. But the last little piece of this is that I do believe that just like with Christ, ironically, 'cause we were talking about that individual at the offset of the space, for us to be able to oppose this system, we're ultimately need-- going to need to be able to endure the slings and arrows, literally or figuratively, of this system. And so even if we do find ourselves in a prospective future where people are blackmailed, I think the thing that we need to recognize is that let he who has not sinned throw the first stone. Right? Don't throw those stones from a glass house. Recognize that we're all flawed. We've got all kinds of ways that we could be embarrassed, that could ultimately be used as blackmail against us, and perhaps the thing that we would need to do in that instance is just like JFK with the Marilyn Monroe situation, say, "You know what? I don't care." Tell the masses.
Ian MalcolmSure, I was infidelous, I made a mistake, I did something wrong. I'm gonna keep on, keep on, trying to make the world right. Isn't it curious that the Marilyn Monroe thing, oh by the way, she was married to a Jew at one point? That, after that didn't work, well, something else happened to him. Weird. I wonder if that might be coincidental. So just recognize, again, try to minimize your digital footprint with things that you wouldn't want other people to see. Presume that everything you do on this application and on your devices, it's absolutely going to be scanned by the powers that be, and to recognize that when we find ourselves in that better tomorrow, where people are honestly, openly discussing this stuff, that they will have blackmail on everybody, so we should be, let's say, a little bit- More, not res-not cautious, but a little bit more reserved. We should recognize that all of us are flawed, and in doing so, not necessarily just throw the first stone at the person when we're guilty of just as much, if not far more, than the people that we throw the stones at. but, but Sharon, see your hand up and, and curious for your thoughts, and then we'll go back to, to Brandon uncensored on that one.
Speaker 1Yeah, I was just gonna, you kind of encapsulated what I was gonna say. Even on this app, there's people that have sort of passed, but I think when people are honest about it and just say, "Hey, yeah, that was me," I, I, my bad, I'm, I'm not gonna do that again, and just be honest about it, I think we're pretty forgiving people. I think we realize that
Speaker 1People make mistakes, people do stupid things, you know? It's, it's life, you know? And I think if people were just honest and didn't try to hide stuff, it would be a much better place, you know? I'm not saying to throw all your dirty laundry out there, but I'm saying if you're confronted with something, don't lie about it, just be honest.
Ian MalcolmNo, I couldn't agree with that more, and, and that's, that's inevitably going to, that's gonna be part of this process, right? Because when we do get to that point in time where this machine is really faced with sincere opposition of a political nature, I absolutely anticipate that that's going to be part of it. And so try to live the life that you can, that you would be most proud of, right? Try to recognize that we are being monitored, so just be a little bit conscious of it, but don't, in any way, let that Deter you from trying to speak the truth, and just recognize again that everybody falls, everybody falters, even Christ himself carrying the cross fell multiple times, right? And so again, just, just be a little bit conscious of that and, and when, when caught in those scenarios, unlike the usual suspects who will say, "No, I don't know what you're talking about. I'm gonna go on to Epstein Island," but it was, it was just to observe the birds in the aviary that he had, right? No, instead, acknowledge what you did. Acknowledge your faults. They're not gonna be nearly as bad as those that we speak out against, I can promise you that. And just recognize that the, the, perhaps the strongest thing that we can do when challenged in the face of things like that is to just be honest, be transparent. Yep, I failed. Yes, I'm flawed. Yes, I'm trying to make the world a better, better place in spite of all of that. but Yaya, any, any thoughts?
Speaker 7Oh, yeah. You know, yeah, and, and, and thank you, Ian, Sharon, y-you're always so professional. But coming as, being a-- and I don't wanna bore anybody with me being a truck driver, but I am a truck-driving dumpster fire. I'm so angry all the time. And, and I, and I don't know how to say this, and this isn't from me, this is somebody else that I heard in a morning space this morning, it, I want to use my middle-palmed superpowers against the dark forces. That's honestly how I feel right And I know there's not a lot of older women in here, but I'm telling you right now, it is so hard to be a truck driver out here and have to look at the, the invaders and how brazen and rude they are, and, and, and how brit-- you know, the world has changed so much since when I was growing up in the seventies and eighties. I mean, it's like, it makes me sad that the millennials and the Gen Xers and, or, no, well, really, I'm a Gen X, so the millennials and the Gen Z and
Speaker 7Oh. Oh, I mean, it's just, it's, it's heartful, it's heartbreaking to me, and I just want that world back, and it just, it just infuriates me with, with, with what's going on in our government right now and everything, but yeah, I don't, I don't, I don't really have too much smart things to say like, like y'all do, but, you know, I'm just a simpleton, I guess, but, yeah, I get a little dumpster fire angry, and, and I've gotta start, I'll
Speaker 1We love you, ya ya, you're fabulous. You're, you and your husband are truckin' and bringin' stuff to the world, bringin' us food and stuff. So don't, don't call yourself a simpleton, I think you're quite a smart lady. So, and I'm probably closer to your age than most of the people in here, so, yeah, I love ya!
Speaker 7Well, I love you too, and I love a lot of people in here. And I'm usually a loving, loving, loving person when I was a nurse, and then after five or six- I've been a truck driver for almost nine years now. And I- Oh, I'm sorry
Speaker 1to interrupt, Ian might be having connection problems. Are you okay, Ian?
Ian MalcolmI think, I think we're, I think we're back. Yep, had to reset it. And I apologize if I jumped in there, yeah, yeah, yeah, it sounded like it was cutting out, but it
Speaker 7No, no, no, it's okay. No, no, no worries. yeah, I just, I, I, it, it, it just, you know, I, I just, yeah, I used to be a loving, loving person and now I started trucking and then it seems like after COVID everything just went to hell in a hand basket and yeah, it's pretty, it's pretty rough sometimes, but I'll land there, it's no, no big deal.
Ian MalcolmNo, of course. And, and it, it, one of the things that's wild about what you just said, you were, you were talking about some of the days, days past, and what is crazy is the recognition that the media, which we know is owned by, you know who, that the media, we, we look at the commercials, we look at the programming, we note all the absurdity of the message that they infused into all of that, and whether it's the LGBT everything, the diversity of everything, the, the- Well, I always think the, it's ironic that they called the program Modern Family, and the modern family that they presented in that show that now is, I suppose, a decade old, consisted of the gay couple, the interracial couple, the nationalized citizen with the migrant couple, right? It, it was everything that wasn't the traditional family presented as the modern one. And I say it because the thing that's wild is recognizing that the media isn't merely there to gaslight and demoralize those Those of us that are watching it through the eyes of adulthood, it's rather to construct for the future generation, those that are growing up in that media, to normalize that perversion. And what's really crazy is talking to individuals that will say be a generation from now and them having zero ability to comprehend what the world would have looked like before, say, for example, September 11th. Right? In, in societies in which merely twenty-five years ago, you might have had cities that were eighty, ninety, ninety-five plus percent white, that were seventy, eighty percent Christian, and you've got an individual who presently might be three years old, if things don't change, by the time they're eighteen, they will have no idea
Ian MalcolmH-how they would even comprehend a city or a civilization that might look like that, because all they will know is the mix-up that is the diversity of everything everywhere, all at once, all the time, right? And so, so yeah, I, I can't relate with you more, and I'm sure that, especially being in the industry that you're in, where you see a lot of the world, I'm kind of curious, is my depiction there, is it isolated only to, let's say, the, the, metropolitan major city centers, or do you see that all across the
Speaker 7no, it's, it's usually in the metropolitan, the, the, you know, being from the South and not going out of the South, you know, just sticking to where you are and sticking to your hometown and sticking to the maybe you have, family in other states. When you-- When I finally got out and saw Washington, the state of Washington, Oregon, beautiful, beautiful, beautiful countries or states of, of Montana, all these, everybody thought like, you know, and I was like, in, in this group, in this little bubble of- My town and my surrounding areas, right outside of Birmingham, and in suburban, and, and I'm like, you know, they, they have-- We have the same mindset, and, and that's what's so awesome about these spaces, is there's so many-- We're so light-minded. When, when it comes to, you know, our morals and good moral character and all, all of what we believe in and, and don't believe in, and it's being pushed to us culturally. This, this isn't a melting pot. This-- I, I'm not, I'm not racist against other, other ethnicities, but just go back. Just don't push your culture on us, just go back. Don't-- You can work here if you want to, which I'm not really-- It's hard for me to say that because honestly, to be honest with y'all, I
Speaker 7They just need to go make their own countries better, don't come into our country and try to say it's a melting pot and that you're, you know, because it's just, it's disintegrating our ethnicity and our culture. It's disintegrating us, it's beating us down slowly. So when I'm out here and I see all these country people right outside the cities, when we deliver right out, right into the cities or right on the edge of 'em where the warehouses are usually, located, they, they're so angry. They're so angry in the cities and Around the edge of the cities, but once you get out in the open country and you get out into these small towns, you know, the, the, the mom and pop truck stops, and the, they're so-- Everybody, I mean, I know I sound country and-- But they, we, we think alike, and we're so nice to each other. I mean, it's almost to where we'd probably hug each other, you know, if it wasn't for me. I mean, and that sounds weird, but there's still so many people nice, good. You know, God-fearing people out there that are so nice, and, and it's just a shame, and, and a lot of 'em don't know what we know. A lot of 'em don't know what we know that our, our country's being infiltrated, our country's being divided. It's, it's nuts. It's just crazy what I've seen, and, and I've learned a lot, but now it's time to, you know, my husband and I, we're ready to come home. W- w-with what's going on right now, I--
Speaker 7It's predominantly white, by the way. I wanna get on the city board there. I wanna get, I wanna get serious when I go home and get, and start, you know, getting with my local sheriff, and we need to, we need to watch our backs, we really do, and we need to remember that there is good in humanity and that we still need to take care of each other. And, and you see that poor woman on the side of the road, white woman on the side of the road or whatever, just go help her, you know? Just change her tire, help
Speaker 7her And, and it's out there, it's just the inner cities are so angry, they're all angry. Okay, can I
Speaker 1ask you a question, Yaya? If you do get on the board and say you have something- So bad in your past, and it gets brought up by the, you know who's that want to blackmail you. Are you gonna be like, "Yeah, that was the past, I'm a different person now. So go, yeah, go f yourself, and I'm gonna do right by my people, my American people. I'm not gonna let you subvert me. And understand that the people in your town are gonna respect you for your honesty." Or will, would you do let them blackmail you? 'Cause that, that's my concern. I don't trust anybody who goes into politics. I, honestly, sorry.
Speaker 7Oh, no, no, that's okay. And of course, I mean, I'm notorious If some people in here know me, I'm notorious for putting myself down sometimes. Like, I'm a beer drinking, gun toting, chain smoking, you know, I do a lot of bad things and I eat a lot of stuff that I shouldn't eat. And, and you know, I mean, I'm, I'm sitting here, I, I proclaim to be a Christian, but I sit here and I'm shooting birds at the bejeeps and I'm screaming and yelling and, and cussing, and, yeah, I mean, I'm, I'm always gonna be me,
Speaker 7You know, I do have scruples about me, but, you know, in, in here, I've, I've began to, you know, a lot of some of the people that I'm, I'm affiliated with in here, they're like, "We're not here to make friends, we're here as acquaintances." But I don't look at it that way. I don't look at you, a lot of you people, like, just acquaintances that we're on the same team. I look at you like, if you needed me, and I was in your area
Speaker 7And, you know, I'm, I'm a loyal person. I try to be as loyal as I can, and, and, and, and, and like a lot of people, you know, you may not like a lot of people I don't like, or, or you may, or vice versa or whatever, but, no, I'm always gonna be, I'm always gonna be that person. And, and I, and believe me, I'm a lot better than I was in my early twenties. If, if anything in my early twenties, thank God the internet wasn't really available to
Speaker 7Beep, beep, beep, that's my internet when I was growing up. So, but, you know, yeah, they, you know, I could, I'll be honest, I mean, it is what it is, and, so, yeah. That's, that's, but, yeah, I would definitely do that, Sharon. I'm sorry I went on, on, on a little bit far right. No, you're
Speaker 1fine. No, I respect you very much. So if you run, let me know. I'll, I'll like root for you. And,
Speaker 1It's life, you know? So, no, I respect you. Thank you, Lala.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And, and, Uncensored, since I know you're, you're back up here, I'm curious for your thoughts as a, a technologist, right? A guy who really understands AI and how to utilize it. A- am I being overly hyperbolic when I suggest that, virtually everything that's done on, online via any of these apps is almost certainly going directly to Masad for the purposes of prospectively not only data- The collection, but also future blackmail operations.
Speaker 5You know, I don't even, I don't even know if you have to even say, you know, necessarily them, right? You could even just say, "Because for sure, it's all saved." And so then, if anyone wants to look into you, and they have a government willing to say that, "Hey, I need to look into this person. Here's X, Y, Z piece of paper," yeah, they're gonna be able to look into you.
Speaker 5I do think you should probably do everything on the internet with the assumption that they know who, like, you know, I'm anonymous, you're anonymous, most of us are anonymous, but that anonymity is more for At least in my view, it's more for not dealing with like bullshitters on the internet that are gonna do like annoying shit. I assume the government knows. Like, there's, you can't, like, people are like, "Well, use a VPN or use X or Y thing." It doesn't matter. Like, if someone wants to know who you are, they're gonna know who you are if they're in the government, right? Like, that's, that's gonna happen. You can't be anonymous. There's nothing you can do about it. But just do everything
Speaker 5Try to push for violence or whatever bullshit, you know, that they're gonna try to rope you in on. But, I did wanna say back to the AI thing a minute ago. I think the best thing that everyone can do and should be doing is you should be literate in AI. Like, you shouldn't just see it on the internet and, you know, do funny stuff with it. As new tools come out, you need to be using them. You need to be figuring out how to use it. You need to be comfortable with it. You need to be using it to
Speaker 5And picture, pictures, I'll be real, I remember when Midjourney came out, and it was very easy to see, like, "Oh, this is, this is AI." Then early Grok, "Oh, this is AI." Oh, early, you know, GPT, I still think GPT has a look to it, but it's, it's a smell. You can kinda smell that a GPT image is, is that. But Grok and some of these other, especially like some of the more higher end,
Speaker 5A, a model, you, you're not gonna be able to, with pictures. Like, there, you just don't know. You aren't gonna know if it's a picture. with, with people that are trying, right? Like, there's lazy efforts all the time where, oh, at the bottom of it, you can see, like, those pictures of Epstein in, and I'm not saying he's not, but there were those pictures of him walking on the street in Tel Aviv, right? Well, in the bottom right, there was the Gemini emblem, right? The big problem is people don't put any effort into seeing if something's real or not, they just assume if it fits whatever I wanna say, which I'm fine with to an extent because, you know, propaganda's great, whatever. But it's dangerous where we're headed, and video is right behind it. Video isn't far, there's already some videos that are kinda difficult, and then it's mostly slop, but there are some videos, and depending on how good the person is that made it
Speaker 5I would assume that there's some people that can definitely, with enough time and enough iterations, can make stuff that's, that's fake, look extremely real. But overall, people should just be using these things. You should go make some videos of shit you like, go make a short story, go do something that makes you familiar with it. And probably the biggest thing that's happened recently is Claude bought, And I, I got Claude bot, it's the most impressive AI thing I've ever used in my life. I think that everyone else should have Claude bot and should be using it,
Speaker 5especially on our side, and we gotta stop looking at these things as like, "Oh, AI is, you know, the Antichrist or something." And it's like, well Maybe someday, but right now it's a tool, and if you are scared of it, all you're doing is letting people that hate you use the tool because they created propaganda to make you scared of it. Don't do that. You need to know how to use it, you need to be able to use it. Claude can
Speaker 5We talk about all the H-1B's and all that, we talk about immigration, and, "Oh, we need immigration because jobs or something, tech jobs." No, you don't. Claude bot is an early iteration of what will replace millions of H-1B people that sit behind the desk, like it is. And if you have a company, you should be using it. But overall,
Speaker 5use, use AI, get comfortable with AI. That's, that's all I can say to that. There's no other way to know. That's very well said. Oh, go for
Ian Malcolmit, Sharon.
Speaker 1Oh, I just wanna say I want, Uncensored to be our good propaganda minister when we fix all this, 'cause I think he's, he's really good at all this AI stuff, and so I want him. So, you have my vote, Uncensored. And Ian can be the speaker.
Ian MalcolmWell, I'll do what I can. The, on the AI front, I'm, I'm out of my depth, and, and I suppose one of the, one of the most valuable things that we can ever do is to recognize our strengths and weaknesses, but uncensored, I think, the, the advocacy there to learn as much as we can of that capability, it's certainly a very, very wise, recommendation. And for anybody that's out there, I mean, do, do put your best foot forward with it for whatever purposes you can, let's
Ian MalcolmRight? So try to incorporate it as best you can into, I suppose either your social or your professional life. The only thing that I would advocate against is letting it use you rather than you using it, if that makes sense. And there was a study that came out recently that basically suggested when asked to put together a essay that they had three different categories of people. They had ones that were asked to do it just freehand with only their, I suppose, the keyboard, and/or a pen. They had one group that was asked to do it via, search engines, so they could use Google and similar, and then a third that was asked to do so with AI. And the wild piece is over a four-month window, they noted the, let's, let's say, the firing of the synapses within the human brain, and they found that over the four months where they- They did the study that those that were relying on AI, not only were they less able to recall what they were writing about, to recall the stories that they had previously written or the essays, but that their brain functionality was deteriorating. and what is perhaps creepiest about it is they returned to those individuals just a couple months later, only to find out that the damage that was essentially done seemed to be permanent. And so in other words, the more you rely on that AI, if it is used as a crutch to do the thinking for you, then you are going to find yourself prospectively having atrophy of the mind the same way that you would if you sat in a hospital bed for months on end, right? And so absolutely what Uncensored is suggesting, go out Learn to use those tools, apply them to your world, but again, don't become dependent on them for your intellect. Think through what you're trying to do, use them, again, rather than having the tools use you. 'Cause if you do, you're gonna find that the robot's gonna get stronger as your mind essentially gets weaker. But, let's go to Mr. Brandon.
Speaker 6Yeah, I just wanted to add what, Uncensored was saying, like basically the, the new AI, Claudebot, is like a translator for, like, humans to computers. So obviously, like, if we were in, like, you know, another country and we don't speak that language, it's gonna be hard to, like, communicate, like we do now with computers. Computers speak in, like, ones and zeros. But, with like the Claude bot, it's basically like you're translating to like another, you know, computer that actually is fully integrated with your computer, and it's like a, you know, a translator between the language. So it's, that's how effective it is with, like, you know, building stuff, coding in English Yeah, and I've basically like, I, I can, you can do pretty much anything you put your mind to, like within a day or two. I've, I've created like, tel-- like a Telegram scraping, map, conflict monitor kind of thing, and then the AI like can, based on like what, you know, instructions you give on like how you want your sources to be, how they, how good you want them to be. And I wanted to get with like Joanne on this 'cause she's always got the best sources,
Speaker 6Telegram, and, it scrapes them, and then it shows like, if like multiple sources are saying the same thing, it'll like show more high confidence, and like, if something's like actually confirmed, it'll show it confirmed. I'm, I've been working on that, and it's, I don't know, but yeah, you can do anything you put your mind to, pretty much. So that's kind of how,
Speaker 6you need to like, use these tools for our benefit too, to like, you know, fight the news sources that are giving straight war
Speaker 6Because of war going on, so like tools like this can really help us decipher between the bullcrap.
Speaker 1Well, I'm really happy we have smarties on our side that know how to do all that, so thank you, Brandon, that's awesome.
Ian MalcolmOh, absolutely, and let's, let's check in with Mr. Handsome Guy, the flashy, sparkling, elegant breath of fresh air, he says. That's, Mr. Mr. Handsome, any thoughts?
Ian Malcolmmaybe not.
Ian MalcolmPerhaps, Mr. Hanson, let, let's give three more seconds, take a breath of the, the fresh air and, share some thoughts or we can move to the next speaker.
Speaker 5Maybe we said AI too much and we summoned the bot.
Ian MalcolmWe summoned the Mr. Handsome Guy bot, the breath of fresh air, not exhaling and/or formulating words with said air. perhaps he's just full of hot air. but, nonetheless, welcome to come back up if there's an issue with the microphone. but otherwise, Brandon, any, any other final thoughts here? We'll see if anybody else wants to come up, and if not, we'll probably close out the, the space here.
Speaker 6Not much, I just, you know, Ian's probably one of the best people to follow, you know, he's a true Christian. yeah, that's really all I gotta say.
Ian MalcolmWell, much appreciated. And, and look, I, I do think on that idea of the Christianity piece, I do think that one of the most fundamental aspects of this intellectual and spiritual war that we are in is finding your grounding. Right? Find the truth that you can build your worldview upon, try to share that with anybody and everybody that you can. It, I guess fortunately, it makes us essentially invincible, right? We unfortunately will all one day pass away. We will leave this plane, we will find something else. I, I believe that we'll all be united in a afterlife, and there will be, I believe, a, a resurrection. There, there is something to come, and it's gonna be beautiful when it does. All we can do right now is to try and bring about the best rendition of this plane that we are able to. Right? We try to make the world a little bit better than it was yesterday, and unfortunately, there are some very powerful influences that are making it way worse. And we can't fix that overnight. It's unreasonable to presume such, and it's unreasonable for you to shoulder such. Right? So don't ever feel discouraged because we aren't able to fix something this substantial overnight, but rather try to just put one foot in front of the other each and every day. Try to wake up one person, whether it's a day, a week, an hour, a year, whatever you can do, right? Wherever you have the ability to share a little bit of influence, whether it's on social media, whether it's digitally, whether it's in your, your own communities, whether it's your family, your friends, your colleagues, your classmates. Right? Go out and try to find what you can to make a difference, and if we all can do that, we will inevitably be able to make a far better world for everyone. Right? So that's a little baby step. It's a little, little piece of truth that we should take each and every day. Try to take it with you, just like that little piece of clay that Christ grabbed off the ground, right? And then rubbed into that individual's eye. And like I said earlier, the truth can be uncomfortable for people that don't yet see it. And so think of those truths like that little bit of clay. It might be really uncomfortable to put that in front of the eyes, the ears, or the mind of the people that you're trying to share this with. Recognize that when they do open, when they wash that away, when they get rid of all the lies, and they see the Matrix for what it is, they will be eternally grateful for you. They will become an ally and an advocate for the truth, and in doing so, if we can build that little collection of truth-tellers, we will be able to make the world a far better place, right? So just like with Paul Revere, it's the final little analogy. Everybody remembers Paul Revere. The British are coming. The thing that's very curious is that Paul Revere didn't knock on the most doors, because there were multiple riders that night, he was one of a couple. But everybody remembers him, and why? It's not because he did the most knocking, it's not because he rode the most miles, it's because he knew the influential people in each community that would best be able to share that message. So try to find those influencers in your community. Right? If you're able to, to open the eyes of, let's say, a pastor who next week begins speaking to his entire parish about Jewish supremacy, well, then you have affected and impacted one person that will now impact hundreds, thousands, perhaps. So find those influential people, do what you can, shape their worldview, give them that little bit of clay in the eyes, as uncomfortable as it might be, that's a figurative comment. Right? But help them see that uncomfortable truth, help them share it with the world, and if we can all do that and influence just a couple people in a couple different ways, and they turn around and do that in repetition, then we will be able to find that better world tomorrow, and just know that as we do, just like the synagogue, just like the Pharisees of yesterday, the Jews Just like they hated Christ for opening that individual's eyes, they will hate on us for speaking these truths. So just know that that's going to come.
Ian MalcolmManage yourself as best you can in terms of the expectations. You won't get no, likely, no physical or monetary rewards for speaking out against this system. They have all the materialism. So try to find your comfort in the truth. Try to find your love for that which is your family. Your righteousness, your goodness, and the sharing of that, because if we, if we all base our existence on truth, on sharing that truth, and we are indifferent to the materialism and the vanity that they have to offer, then I can promise you that we will all ultimately win. So lots of love to everybody that's out there. I appreciate sincerely you all for being here, for this little rant. For anybody that didn't on here and wants to go back to the parable or the passage, feel free to replay the space, it will be recorded. And And for everybody that's out there, as always.
Ian MalcolmSo beautiful, so splendid, and, so blocked for what it's worth. And isn't it ironic? Try to share an opportunity, try to be open-minded. Who is it that's gonna come in behind this strange avatar? Let's give 'em a chance to share their opinions. I will never run and hide from anybody. People are welcome to come up and to say, "You're a crazy person. Here's why you're wrong." Say any of those things. Just be ready to defend it, because I promise, if you're not, you'll probably get embarrassed, right? But those individuals will come in, they'll, they'll, they'll try to disrupt, they'll try to derail. Isn't it curious that they infused it with what they thought was humorous kind of, let's say, inflammatory rhetoric? That's what they want us doing. They want us all emotionally unhinged. Oh, wow, Let me go out into the street with Tommy Robinson and his little Mossad marching orders. Let me scream about any number of things, the gays, the Muslims, the trans, the migrants. These are all problems. I agree.
Ian MalcolmBut to look at those problems rather than to look at the conductor behind them is ignorant. And there is a reason that the television, which is controlled by the same set of interests, is asking you to- Do that! This isn't a coincidence, folks. It's the guy in the boat that's filling up with water saying, "Oh my gosh, your feet are wet." And then you look at his hand and he's holding the drill. And you're like, "Well, well, look at the hole that's-- How did that get there?" "Oh, pay no attention, your feet are wet." "Oh no!"
Ian MalcolmRight? Point to the problem. They want us crying about the water. They want us getting in fistfights with one another because of it. They wanna say, "My new Jordans are getting wet, oh no!" and scrambling to the top of the ship. No. We see you guys holding the drill, we know that you're responsible, we look over time and history, and we notice that you've done this literally for decades, if not centuries, if not since the days of Christ. You are liars. You hate the truth. You want everyone's eyes to be blinded to them. And as a result, we are going to sit here, we will be the clay that is uncomfortable. It's gonna bring friction, and as it does, we're going to get lots of Jews and Pharisees that will come in here and play little things to disrupt the conversation because they want you demoralized. Don't give that to them. Push out the love for one another, for the truth, for a better tomorrow, be willing to accept the slurs that they're gonna throw at you, and at the end of the day, have absolute indifference to them. With that being said, I know that Jake wanted to jump up here, so we will go to you, Mr. Jake, and then we'll, we'll likely close out the space, but feel free certainly to, to share some thoughts, my friend.
Speaker 8Yeah, like everything you guys have been saying is pretty spot on, like we need to be techno-technologically like aware of what's going on and being able to decipher between like actual like video and like what we're seeing and reality is going to be a huge thing coming up because they're already, they've already been like playing with, like, "Oh, is this real? Is this not real?" Like, and we've seen this since
Speaker 8The last summer basically with all those AI videos coming out of Israel, Iran, and all that stuff, and it's just gonna keep getting more and more advanced, and we just have to learn, as Uncensored was saying, to just learn the, literature of AI and all, you know, like how to basically understand it to keep moving forward, and that's just going to keep us like focused on the truth instead of focusing on the little things like- Like, oh, oh, there's a, there's a leaf blowing across the street, my day's ruined and stuff like that. We can't be focused on that when we got bigger, bigger fish to fry.
Speaker 8That's all I really wanted to say.
Ian MalcolmAbsolutely, we've got bigger fish to fry, so let's focus on that. Let's focus on the people with the drills that are doing all the damage. Let's certainly call out the weapons that they're utilizing to cause the friction. Let's note the mass migration, all the other problems that are coming with it. Absolutely, we should discuss those things, we should point to those things, we should call them out as being detrimental to our society, right? And we should ultimately be able to define what we believe is our nirvanas, which are probably gonna differ. From group to group, right? We might have some that are civvynats, some that are National Socialists, some that want all sorts of different futures. But the one thing that we can certainly agree on is the direction that things are going in right now is really bad. And until we can have an honest conversation around why we are going that way, well, then we have no ability to fix it. And so rather than infighting about the ideal future and how we might have differences of opinions on what that looks like Well, let's focus on first turning the direction of the airplane upwards so that we don't just crash into the ground. And then once we get back into some kind of normalcy and we remove the psychopaths from the pilot seat, well, then we can figure out where we take the plane, right? And so absolutely, call out the problems, call out those things that are creating, all of this friction. And it doesn't matter if it's mass migration, if it's the war with Iran, if it is the illegals, if it is the LGBTs, the gays, the Muslims, the Asians, whatever, the Africans, right? We can certainly talk about crime statistics. I get a lot of flack for that one, right? But note that you're allowed to talk about all those things and complain about them all you want. I never got community noted for suggesting that thirteen percent of the country that are blacks commit fifty-five percent of the murders. That never got community noted 'cause it's true. It also never got marked as hateful conduct, but it did when I said, "Look at all these Jews. I wonder why that might be." It's because that is the common denominator. It's also, for what it's worth, when it comes to black criminality, it's one of the large catalysts of that. They push a culture of degeneracy, they limit economic opportunity, they push drugs into the inner city. That's a, that's a, that is setting up a, a, let's say, a, a dynamite scenario, right? That is, that is building for a problem. And so we can certainly look at the genetic aspects of that, which I do not, in any way, shape or form, obfuscate from. I do believe that that's a big piece of the puzzle, right? But if you take a bunch of pit bulls- And you put them into a loving home, they're going to have far less violent attacks than if you put them in the junkyard and continuously beat them. And so we all need to recognize that there are genetic predispositions of all kinds of things, but the individuals living in the United States aren't genetically predisposed to be obese and lazy and stupid. And we know that 'cause you can go back forty or fifty years, everyone is essentially, compared to today, intelligent and healthy. So what happened? They were poisoned. White society's been poisoned. Christian society's been poisoned. Black society has been poisoned. All of us have been poisoned. And the people behind the poison, what do you know? It's always the same group of interests. Not always, every single time, exclusively, only, and solely a Jew. Obviously. But there is a massive overrepresentation of their interests, which also align to the Kollergi plan. Richard von Kollergi, not a Jew, but his wife was,
Ian Malcolmand he told us exactly what they were going to do, which was to build a mongrel race of low IQ slaves. That's what they're trying to-- Look around you, it's very obvious. And once you put the clay in the eyes, as uncomfortable as it is, you see the truth. Our calling is to go and to wake up others to it. So that's the gospel. The good news is that the awakening is upon us, and that we are all part of it. And if you think for a moment that we aren't absolutely winning, look at all of the cries, the screeching, and the, and the demands to criminalize antisemitism. That's only happening because we are winning. So don't ever be radical. Don't be violent. Don't call for all that nonsense, like Uncensored was just suggesting. I'm not-- that he was suggesting that we not suggest it, just to be very clear there, right? Don't push for any of that stuff. Because the moment that you do, you are just welcoming that group of people to criminalize the very act of speaking our mind, of trying to assemble, trying to get together. Protesting is good. Do so in a way that's intelligent, that's productive, that is peaceful. The moment people break the law, you open the, the entire playbook to this machine, right? So be smart, be clever, be convincing, and utilize those small opportunities that you get with influential pe- people to maybe open their eyes to these realities. Tucker Carlson is now talking about this problem. He carries a lot of weight with boomers. They aren't lost, they're just very, very, very heavily programmed. And so they will ultimately see the same truth and reality that we do. That is the good news. The younger crowd is awakening to these problems, that's why they had to get rid of TikTok. That is the good news. So just know that we live amidst endless amounts of good news. We should be optimistic, we should be righteous Really quickly, you're meant to be. Hopefully you're meant to be here, and I would love to get some of your thoughts before we wind up, the space. Yeah.
Speaker 9Can you hear me?
Ian MalcolmWe sure can.
Speaker 9Okay, I just wanted to say, Malcolm, that I, I love your, your channel, and I just wanted to say something really curious. So on Benjamin Netanyahu's post with the coffee, I posted the translation of what he said, and they keep on deleting it. Every time I go back to it, it's deleted of what he-- I transcribed what he said through AI, of course, but,
Speaker 9yeah, they keep on deleting it. And I just wanted to say that, so it makes me-- What did he, what did he, what did he say? Okay, what did AI say? Hold on, let me drop this down. It says, "Um, you know what?" I'm dead to my people. Look at how they behave, fantastic. Do you want me to count the number of votes? Protest near a protected area, area? Your stance is amazing. It gives power to me, the government, the IDF. We are doing things I can't share right now. But that makes Iran strong today. So I don't know what that also in Lebanon. You want me to continue? I tell all of you keep listening to, I don't know how to pronounce this, Ha- H A O R E Y S orders. Heads of state always near protected areas. We'll do as much as possible. Thanks for the coffee, it's excellent. I don't know about these calories. Thank you very much. And, I've, I've posted it like ten times, and every time I go back five minutes later, they delete it.
Ian MalcolmWait, so, so just out of curiosity, so you're saying you took the, the audio, you ran it through an AI asking for it to translate it, and now the translation is just automatically deleting from X every time you put it up?
Speaker 9Yeah, yeah. So I did it through Grok. And it translated on the post, and then it got deleted. So then I took a picture of the translation, and then I posted it back with the picture I took of the translation, and they keep on deleting it every single time. 'Cause I even put in the ca- above the picture I took, the post, I put, "This is, this is AI video," and then I said, "Here's the translation," and then I posted it. With the picture I took from Grok, because the first time when I had it translated on the post through Grok, they deleted it. So then I went and asked again, and then I made sure I took a picture of it before I posted it again. And every time I do it, they delete it.
Speaker 9So I thought that was weird.
Speaker 1Just wanted to say- Yeah, that's definitely- Odd. I appreciate you bringing that to our attention. Yeah, we had a post in
Speaker 9Ask Grok- To translate it and see if we can over-stimulate it, because they're not wanting that to be known for some reason.
Speaker 9But I just wanted to say thank you and God bless you all.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And, and, that, that is pretty wild. And, yeah. I, I, if you wouldn't, I guess send, send me via direct message the, the screenshot if you can of the, the text. That's, that's incredible. Okay,
Speaker 9I'll send it to you.
Ian MalcolmNo, thank you. Thank you for that. And, and with that being said, let's check in with, Marco real quick before we wrap up the space.
Speaker 10this, in the, this, cocoa was before me
Speaker 3Oh, thank you, Marco. I wasn't sure if you could see my hand. you know, if they're gonna be, putting the blocks on us, like, talking freely or whatever, surely they should be tagging an AI video to say, "Truthfully, now, this is AI. Get on my tits, that business." To let stuff go through full of disinformation, and then here, well, today, in England, here We had six armed policemen waiting at an airplane, airport terminal for a guy getting off a plane who made a joke on Facebook last week, waiting to arrest him. Armed policemen. The world is upside down, inside out, and the wrong way around, I reckon. That's all I got to say on that. Thank you.
Ian MalcolmNo, I, I, I'm much appreciated. Let's go to, Marco.
Speaker 10Yeah, I, I would like to hear your response, sir. I know you're wrapping up, so, you know, I, I'm infuriated, not, not with, not with this space or you, I'm, I'm, you know, with a lot of things going on, like other people are, I, I'm, I was, you know, I'm a Christian, Alabama redneck Christian. I see my sister, Yaya there, Alabama sister. here's the thing,
Speaker 10you know We know, and I know this isn't a racial conversation, but, you know, a lot of these people out here are talking about demographics thrown into wood chipper and on and on and on and all that stuff. And I, I heard, I heard your pitch on, and I, I'm not saying I disagree, I'm kinda looking for the solution here. So, but how do we sell the non-violent approach? I don't disagree with you, but how do you sell that to parents of kids, you know, all over this country? I'm not gonna bring up, I'm not gonna bring up demographics, you can go look at my timeline, of kids being sucker-punched and, you know, just the nauseating stuff that I see every single day, it's really hard to sell, you know, a non-violent approach to that or either
Speaker 10I'm trying to not make this a racial space, but like just white, white, white. You can
Ian Malcolmspeak free, freely. I, I take no offense to it.
Speaker 10Okay. So, You know, these spooks running around, sucker punching these kids. I mean, I can't tell you, I have two boys and they're both, giant white boys, you know, hockey players. They've had boxing lessons, they've had BJJ. They'll-- they're both missing teeth, not because they didn't go to the dentist, but because they played NCAA Division one hockey for a long time. So nobody wants any shit with them. But these other kids, man, it just nauseates me. To see these kids like when they're twelve and thirteen and fourteen, and they're getting sucker punched by these spooks and stuff. So I, I, I came in late and I apologize, brother, but, how do you sell the non-violent approach to the parents of watching this, this, this stuff? So I'm just, I'm curious, and I, and I apologize for coming in late. So anyway, thanks for letting me share.
Ian MalcolmNo, you're, you're, not an issue at all, and, and it's a very reasonable question, and for what Don't take umbrance with individuals being, not only angered, but also wanting some kind of, of retaliation or correction against what you're describing, right? It's perfectly reasonable for the entirety of the Western world to note the abundant amount of evidence that supports that. Sorry, this is offensive to anybody, but the Black community is disproportionately violent. If anyone wants to suggest otherwise, you are going to be spitting in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary. It is, it's crystal clear, and that holds for not only murder, not only assault, not only theft, not only carjacking, but all but nine percent of the categories of crime that are, let's say, categorized by the FBI. That's based on their data. You can look at the twenty nineteen or the twenty twenty three statistics on that. The only crimes that whites are disproportionate to in the United States anyway, relative to blacks, are DUIs. It is essentially alcohol related crimes. Now, we could try to understand and unpack why that might be, but every other day they don't,
Speaker 10they don't have cars, brother. They don't have cars. I was gonna say, you can, you can,
Ian Malcolmyou can dig into why that might be, and, and yes. But, but ninety percent, roughly, of the various-- I think there's twenty-seven, if I remember correctly, of the various categories of crime are disproportionately overrepresented by blacks. Now, what I would say is I've had the pleasure on this application of speaking with individuals like Saint Jim, who are black and
Ian Malcolmagainst black criminality, black culture, black behavior, right? They will call those things out. And when it comes to this subject, I, I don't advocate for some kind of kumbaya, let's band together with anybody and everybody regardless of their worldview, let's call it. And I say that because if you're a sociopath and a psychopath, or if you hate white people Or if you hate black people for no reason other than the color of their skin, either of those people aren't probably going to be a benefit to what it is that I'm hoping that humanity can ultimately orchestrate, which is people that are willing to live in the truth, coming together to speak out against the criminality that is clearly subverting everything about the country. And if we go back just thirty, forty, fifty years, what you're going to find is the presentation of, let's say it, the common black man In the United States, has basically gone from The Cosby Show, which showed the nuclear black family, to Family Matters, which showed the nuclear black family, to Modernity, where the hero of society, the cool guy, is the baby mama of the fifteen different black children with all sorts of different women. That's somehow now the thing to aspire to. Now, what's curious about that set of examples that I just used is, lo and behold, well, I referenced The Cosby Show. I think Bill Cosby was arrested for something, if I'm not mistaken. Isn't that weird? Almost like maybe there's a prevalence of certain criminality among certain sets of people, right? Now that doesn't mean that all black individuals are criminals or that they're out there using date rape drugs, which I believe is what Bill Cosby was accused of. Right? But you can see how across culture, the black nuclear family has been destroyed just as the white nuclear family has, and they also got there not only through culture, but also through drugs, which have not only infused the inner city through illegal and illicit drugs that were of course criminal, but they've also done the exact same thing via the Sackler family and Purdue, which pushed out drug and opiate epidemics largely to whites. Right? So they went about these things different ways, but you recognize that the goal and the intent is to further destroy and dismantle the nuclear family and the righteous moral compass that we used to all have, that before the poisoning of the well that is the JQ, everyone was better there within, right? And so the, the, the, the individuals that I, that I advocate to band together with, again, are those that speak truth, those that are honest about these realities, those that will point at the catalyst of the problems. That have undermined everybody, and inherent in that, we're going to find individuals that are black, white, Muslim, Christian, gay, straight, everything across the board that will be willing to accept what we are suggesting, right? So we'll band together with those black individuals like Saint Jim and Millie, that girl Casey, and so many others that are willing to speak against black culture and black criminality, right? And they will of course frown upon any of those videos like the ones that you suggested, and two To those people that will deny that that is a problem, well, unfortunately, we're gonna find black people that will defend it, we'll find white liberals who will defend it, we'll find a whole bunch of Jews who will potentially not only defend it, but also lie about it. Right? So we need to recognize that is essentially our enemy, the people that live in the lies, and some of those people are blinded by the propaganda, so we need to open their eyes to the reality that we speak, and others are, let's say, nefariously obtuse and are intentionally ignorant to them because they wanna further the degeneracy. And so, not sure if, if that's helpful or of interest, Mark. Curious to hear your
Speaker 10thoughts. Yeah, so if you listen to Thomas Sowell, which nobody wants to talk about 'cause he's- Black, right. And, he's actually an awesome author. I took a lot of heat in this, brother, spaces, but here's, you know, he, he, you know, he talks about, one of the things you left out, brother, is, fucking welfare, man. Right? When they started just handing out checks to people,
Speaker 10like, you know, Lyndon B. Johnson, man, you know, when he started handing out checks to people, they say, I don't know if it's true or not, and I don't wanna piss off all my white brothers and sisters here, that the Black nuclear family, they actually were like church-going people and, and they were, you know, were pretty tight, but then all of a sudden you start handing out checks- And
Speaker 5we're way more willing to stick to them, say,
Speaker 10right, right. All of a sudden they're handing out checks, right? So all this shit starts falling apart, which is, which is what was the plan all along. But to, to, to, only, only two more seconds and I'll, I'll end it. You know, the video assaults that's going on, they're, they're, they're rolling the camera when they attack these white kids, right? This is easily prosecutable. So what, what I'm after is, and I have a company called WhiteOakGroup dot org, you can find it in my timeline. I don't want any money from anybody. What I wanna do is what Eric Holder did and Obama, which they went out and they got all these lower court judges and they're getting all these fucking rulings, man. We need prosecutors that will put these niggers in jail. Forgive me, I shoulda said spooks. We need prosecutors that will put these fucking spooks in jail, dude. Put a, put a felony on 'em. Get 'em out, get 'em out, get 'em out of our lives, man. You know? And so that, that's kinda where I'm These people that are running around, they're videoing their assaults. How easy is that to prosecute? Anyway, thanks for putting up with me and letting me share. Yeah, yeah, I miss you. I love you.
Speaker 1I have a question for Marco. I noticed you're subscribed to Insurrection Barbie, so I would like to know if you've ever, addressed this with her. Yeah. I'd like to know. I'm actually
Speaker 10not. I can't. Okay. I can't. I can't, I can't get rid of it. I'm, I'm not subscribed to anybody, and it keeps showing it. And when I go to delete my subscriptions, it shows that I'm only subscribed to, I guess, my ex where I get my check mark, you know what I'm saying, that yearly thing. I can't get her off my thing. Not that I don't like her. I can't get her off my thing, man. Okay. Well, I was,
Speaker 1I, I was just curious what her answer was to your question 'cause you came here and asked us Never blocked, so I would like to know if she's had, she has an answer for this problem.
Speaker 10Yeah, no ma'am, no ma'am. So I, in earlier days, didn't know what I was doing and subscribed to a couple of people that had some pretty big audiences, and I have tried as hard as I can. What I can tell you is that I'm not paying her anymore, but it's, it's a glitch in the G-DAP or something.
Speaker 5I can, I can vouch that at least that much is true 'cause I've had that happen where like Somebody and now I'm not, but it still shows it. So I do know that that can happen. So that's- The only reason I don't blow- I can't- So, yeah, the only reason
Speaker 10I don't blow that subscription up is because when I go in to actually manage it, it shows that it's my checkmark account for, for Grok or something. So, I don't know, maybe I blow it up and then just restart. But, you know, that's, I'm not subscribed to her anymore. I don't do the whole, "Hey, what
Speaker 1I didn't want to be confrontive, I just thought it was odd that you'd be talking with Ian and then subscribing to her. So, thank you for clarifying it, and I, I'm, I'm sorry if I made you feel uncomfortable. I'm sorry.
Speaker 10No, I'm not uncomfortable. It's, it's not, it's, I'm an engineer, I'm a software engineer, it's a fuck-up. I can't, I can't even believe that it continues to-- And, you know, I go through my Apple Pay or whatever it is, I'm not sending
Speaker 10And, and my, my, I guess my, my grok thing, where, where I pay yearly. So anyway, it's okay, sweetie.
Ian MalcolmNo, and, and, and look, the, the last little thing that I'll say on it is I, I do think that the, again, it's perfectly reasonable to be very frustrated by these assaults, by the aggression. I just saw a post earlier today, if I'm not mistaken, a guy, a black individual attacked a white guy with a knife, I think it was, yelled out some racial slurs while doing so, went to court, it was deemed not a hate crime, despite the fact that obviously if it was, if the roles were reversed, the races were reversed, obviously it would. That same individual then got booked, got sent into prison, and then, if I remember correctly, choked out his white inmate to death while yelling out racial epithets. And so you, you start to look at something like this, and it's like, how on earth do we live in a world where this is the normality? And you're, you're exactly right, the, the racial animus is being fueled. It's-- I, this will be offensive to people, but I think that the, not only is it being fueled by the "you know who's," but I think they are tapping
Ian MalcolmIn the demographic, and what I mean by that, is there are a lot of individuals that are of the Black community that are economically downtrodden, they don't see a lot of prospects for opportunities for them to have, oh, Mr. Massad, thank you for... I'm sorry, I'm gonna remove that guy 'cause he's throwing things up into the jumbotron.
Ian Malcolmand actually we'll go, no, we're going to
Speaker 10Hey, hey brother, here's a newsflash for you. If I kill you, he's a pump guy, so
Speaker 5he's pushing some crypto products. If I
Speaker 10kill you, I either hate you or you've attacked my family. That's, there's no, there's nothing else, right? So
Ian Malcolmno, and it's, it's just, it is very obvious the bias that exists, and we also see, every attempt by the mainstream media to pervert reality. We saw this with, Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin, we saw it with George Brown, we've seen Over and over again, we've seen these things, right? The media tries to fuel this, and if you think about it, you've got the, let's say your average black individual in the United States that is economically downtrodden, statistically speaking, four out of five of them born into single parent households where they're likely raised, respectively, by a grandparent, maybe by a parent, maybe by the system. They have very little opportunity, and they're told at every turn by the media that the cool thing is for them to essentially be gangbangers and drug dealers. Right? So what is inevitably going to come from that? Well, it's gonna be degeneracy. And so they are one thousand percent responsible in the sense that they are the ones electing to raise their hand, to pull a trigger, to rob the store, whatever. Those are individual actions that individuals have to be held accountable for. The animosity that they clearly have. I tried for a long time to go into FBA spaces and to speak with these individuals reasonably and to say, "Hey, guys, I think you're pointing fingers at the wrong problem. I think the issue is actually Jewish supremacy. I think the people behind the slave trade were largely Jewish. I think you guys are, in fact, in the FBA world, being led by a black guy who's married to a Jew. Weird." Almost like you are just following another Pied Piper. That's what the FBA community is. It's another extension of the same control apparatus. That's what all of these spaces, like Insurrection, Barbie, and all of these other propagandas. That's why they are shoved to the masses. That's why Insurrection, Barbie will have fifteen shares, seventeen comments that say you are a Mossad spy, and yet it'll be seen by three million people, because X shoves all that content out to anybody and everybody that they can. Meanwhile, the people on this panel can get a thousand shares and yet their content's seen four thousand times. It's like, how does that make any sense to anyone? Right? It doesn't. So they are going to use that animosity, they're gonna use the poverty, they're gonna use the anger that that begets, they're gonna push a culture that is gonna make them more radical, more hateful, and anyone that wants to suggest that it's not clearly boiling beneath the surface, go into any of those FBA rooms. Oh, I'm gonna go get that white man! And it's crazy 'cause you, you go into these conversations and you say, "Okay, let's just level set. Blacks conduct more crime than whites, true or false?" "Oh no, that's a lie. FBI statistics aren't being clearly per capitalised. They aren't being properly represented 'cause of the races." No, it's insane. Those people are either subversive or they're incompetent intellectually. Ignore them, they aren't worth our time, not because of the color of their skin, but because they're not capable of seeing the world for what it is. And if that's the case, why try to explain it to them?
Speaker 10So I, so brother, I've been on a, a, a mission to try to figure out, 'cause I'm from Alabama, and I've, I've been on a mission to try to figure out why they hate us so much, right? And I'm talking about Northerners, primarily in the Northeast, and then over in the California area, I'm trying to figure it out. I've been on a mission for a long time. But you think they
Ian Malcolmhate-- You're saying that blacks hate whites?
Speaker 10No, the fucking liberals, man. Oh, no, no,
Ian Malcolmno, that was just my comment, 'cause the- is that while there is black animosity towards whites, there's also a lot of anti-white animus from liberal whites. No,
Speaker 11that's, no, that's, that's the one that, that's the one I, that's the one that stuns me, and I've been trying to fucking figure out, why do you think that is? Well, so, for- Well, I'll tell you, that's what I'm gonna tell you.
Speaker 12I I'm 135.
Speaker 11I'm a hundred and thirty, I'm a hundred and fifty, brother. Six million. I'm a hundred and fifty-one. I'm a hundred and fifty-one. So, anyways, so check this out. So, the Massachusetts people are the worst. You've got the Los Angeles, the, the California people are, are, are terrible, but you've, you've kind of got 'em. You got the Chicas, you got all that shit. But what I found out was,
Speaker 11I, I, I ran into a man here in South Florida that's from Massachusetts, and what I finally-- I was married, listen to this, y'all, y'all, I was married to a California girl. How is that gonna work out? An Alabama guy married to a California girl, right? So I was trying to figure this shit out. So I started, it's been my, it's been a journey for, for years now, and I asked this Massachusetts guy who moved down here 'cause he hated Massachusetts. Now I'm not, I'm not, I'm not, you know, I'm not throwing shade on all northerners here, but I'm gonna tell you what he told me. I always thought And that it was because we made 'em fight the war. Nothing else made sense to me, that we made 'em fight the war. He told me, he said, "They just think they're better than you." It's not that you-- They just think they're better than you. So check this out. If you go-- And I learned this ten years ago, if you go read Thomas Sowell's book, "Vision of the Anointed." Or, or, any of those good books he wrote about intellectuals and society, if you go read any of those books, what you'll find out is that they don't think that Southern people are just, that we're not just wrong, we're morally bad people, and this guy from Massachusetts who, who moved down here 'cause he was sick of them A long time ago, he moved down here. He was actually older than me, which is hard to believe. He actually said, "Mark, they just think they're better than you." And I was like, "God damn, I read a book." Forgive my, forgive my, blasphemy and profanity there. I said Good Lord, man, I read, I read a book ten years ago by Thomas Sowell that told me that. So they just think they're better than you, man. They think that you're, you're, we're morally wrong, and it's like this, it, it's unbelievable to be honest with you.
Ian MalcolmHey, don't, don't throw
Speaker 11shade on all the California people or all the West Coast people. There's some decent ones there. Just saying. I was born in, I was born in San Diego, girlfriend. I was born in San Diego, so I certainly wouldn't do that. It's on my birth certificate.
Ian MalcolmYeah, and for what it's worth, the-- and that's why I was asking, why do you think that is? 'Cause the, I mean, the answer should be rather obvious, and I, I say that because all of this is downstream from the culture, from the academic institutions, from the media, right? And, and from the politicians, for what it's worth, right? They have normalized-- and, and this is social Marxism, is they have basically normalized animosity against themselves. And that's why I brought this up because the animus that you see from blacks against whites Well, ironically, it's not all that different from the animus from the liberal whites who say, "Oh, white, white privilege. I'm so sorry for my privilege, please," and all this other nonsense, right? It's why you see white individuals living in white lands, holding devices largely created by white individuals on networks largely powered by white invention that are largely downstream from white intellectualism, the white renaissance, the white enlightenment, that are willing to say, "In the midst..." Of buildings and architecture and music largely created and downstream from white Europeans that will say white people don't have any culture. Those,
Speaker 11a hundred percent, a hundred percent, brother. And those same people are the ones that were spitting on the Vietnam veterans coming back, are the ones running the universities right now. Those are the exact same people. You're one hundred percent correct, brother. Well, and
Ian Malcolmso that's, that's why it's worth noting, where does all that come from? And that's the thing that a lot of people, I think, can't wrap their head around, and it's, nobody can paint exactly what this picture will look like. But when you remove the poison from culture, politics, technology, and everything else, and you get a society where people are actually encouraged to be moralized, not demoralized, what we're gonna be capable of as a Country as a people, it's unfathomable. It'll be spectacular, and people say, "No, that's crazy." And then you go back and you look post-Feymar, and you realize that the German people and the German economy, out of absolute inferno, they rose like a phoenix. They took incredible pride in their past, in their present, they begot incredible art, architecture, and engineering, and they constructed an economy that literally was taking over the world, so much so that the Rothschilds and central banking and, quote unquote, Judea, global Jewry, had to declare war on Germany because their idea of a national socialist system, which had a labor-backed currency Was completely antithetical to the one that they wished to build, which is essentially the enslaving, the demoralizing, and all of the other insanity. Right? So we are gonna keep all of that, and it's worth keeping that in mind, 'cause otherwise people don't feel like they have something to fight for.
Speaker 11To, to piggyback on that, brother, there's a book called The Controlling Arcs. It's, and I'm sure one of these brilliant, white females in here can post it somewhere. It's called The Controlling Arcs, and it talks exactly about how the Rothschilds, Rothschilds, the Re-Roth, Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, the Rothschilds, how they, you know, that's where Bill Gates got his,
Speaker 11the whole, the whole, the whole, V When oil became unpopular back in the, at the First World War, he switched to vaccines, dude. And that's what Bill Gates has done. I mean, that's how he's making his money. He, he tried to remove himself from, from other things. It's called the control oligarchs. And I apologize, I don't have it in front of me, but it is so enlightening and it's all factual. I know one of these gorgeous white women here could post something, but- Do you have that on your page? I see my brother, I just wanna say I see my brother
Ian MalcolmYou know, and, and thank you for coming up and sharing and, and lots of, lots of good, content there, and, and for sure, we should always critique and condemn the violence. We should be able to comfortably say, "Yes, in the United States, the media is disproportionately controlled by Jews, so is technology, so are the academic institutions at the highest level, in particular the Ivys," and just like Jews are overrepresented in positions of power there, blacks are overrepresented Presented in ninety-ish percent of all categories of crime monitored by the FBI. That's their data. That's not bigoted to say, it's not hateful to say, it's just reality. And so we need to build a coalition of people willing to speak the truth, as uncomfortable as it might be at times, and for what it's worth, the people that are receptive to that are going to be of all sorts, all forms, of colors, of creeds, of sexualities perhaps, right? And we should be able to be not open In arms in the sense that we're care bears and we're all gonna try to build global diversity together, right? That's not what I, let's say, advocate for, but rather that for the time being, we band together with anybody willing to oppose the liars and the psychopaths that control everything and are currently destroying the Middle East by outsourcing all the remaining prosperity of the West, which in turn destroys the West as well. Right? And so we need to band together with anybody and everybody because they've got essentially everything, and only through a loud enough unified voice will we be able to bring enough attention that ultimately we'll be able to bring down a machine that controls, again, essentially everything. That doesn't mean that our nirvana needs to look like the one that they build for us, which is the clergy plan, but rather that by opposing that with everyone, we can find ourselves removed from being underneath the boot of that tyranny and then able to build something better. But we can't do that until we have, of course, get rid of or intellectually eliminate the current paradigm that we're under. That's not advocating for violence, of course, merely a suggestion that we shouldn't live as slaves to a system. But, but Agent, I, I saw that you came up here, and I also see that we've got Mr. David Nietzsche, if he wants to hop up. so we'll cycle through a couple more hands, see if David wants to join us, and, then maybe we'll wind down the space if not.
Speaker 13Hi, thank you, Ian, for having me. can everyone hear me okay? We
Ian Malcolmsure can.
Speaker 13Okay, great. I, I, I feel like I'm in really great company. It's really nice to be in the same room with you and Marco and all these other wonderful people. I wanted to follow up on some of the things that Marco had said, the violence against- Whites, including women and children in the US, is escalating, and every day I see videos too of the children and women who are being sucker-punched and, and just absolutely taken down on the streets every day, and no one's going to, to jail for it. I mean, Irina Zhirutska is one example.
Speaker 13part of the reason I believe is Is the propaganda machine, which we all know who leads the propaganda machine, has perpetuated this idea that, that whites have done all the damage to the blacks and that,
Speaker 13it's, it's all of our fault, and I think The Jews, especially, have, are using in many ways the blacks to turn them against the whites, and it's really, really ugly. I mean, I've seen videos that are just an outright cry for white violence, blacks saying on video to kill white women, white children, and it's, it's seem-seemingly getting worse, and I'll land there.
Ian MalcolmNo, it's, it's only going to get worse, until it gets way better, and, and the reality is that we only get there by doing two things. Number one, we are able to take the reins of control to slow the propaganda that begets the violence, right? And number two, in order to get there, we have to be able to first and foremost wake up everybody to that paradigm, 'cause otherwise we can't do that. Right? And for anybody that thinks otherwise, or you'll have Jews that will come in here and say, "Well, why don't you just create your own tech platform if you don't like this oppression?" And it's like, "Oh yeah, how'd that work out for TikTok? How does this work out for all other media that goes in opposition to this machine that either gets bought out or gets criminalized?" That's basically what they did to TikTok. They had the US government come in and say, "Nope, you don't get to operate here anymore 'cause we don't like what you're doing." Right? Every single day they further illustrate the absurd amount of control that they have, and we do have to get rid of this. I saw that Tom Hennessey, I'll put this up into the nest, and he said You can, you can have a family friendly Houston rodeo or you can have blacks. Pick one, you can't have both. Now, I think you can have both, for what it's worth, I will, I will advocate that that is totally possible. But what I would say is, you can't have your family at a peaceful event and have a bunch of people that are prospectively low IQ and have been programmed by the media to hate you in that same environment. And the reality is, as uncomfortable as this might be, the propaganda is clearly in the hands of One set of interests that clearly are weaponizing it against whites, and they are utilizing a group of people that disproportionately have low IQ. That's not me being a racist, that's just the data. In the United States, something like eighty-three to eighty-six is the average IQ of Black Americans. It's actually about a standard deviation higher, for what it's worth, than Sub-Saharan Africans, which many would say are, I suppose, the ancestry of those African Americans. The reason I find that curious is because- If you take sixty or seventy, and then you take one hundred, which is roughly the IQ of your average Western European, it's actually a little bit higher, it's about one hundred and three to one hundred and five, if you take those two numbers, let's just say seventy and a hundred for easy math, what's the average of the two of 'em? I think, wow, it's right around the mid-eighties. Well,
Speaker 11brother, brother, we're, we're all adults here, right? Do you watch any shows when you see a spook in the beginning, you just turn the shit off, right? I mean, it's like, you know, the, the judge is always black. Do you watch Denzel
Ian MalcolmWashington movies?
Speaker 11No, he's a nigger. You don't want any
Ian Malcolmmovies with Denzel Washington?
Speaker 11I have seen one or two before I was awake, but- Do you think he's a
Ian Malcolmtalented actor?
Speaker 11No, I listen, hold on, I'm not, so let me just explain this. If I see, you know, if I, if we, if we log, if we try to watch something and, you know, the, the prosecutor is a black woman and the-- nothing against our gorgeous white women here, and the judge is, you know, a black woman, and, you know, it's like some, some black, even commercials, it's like some black financial advisor telling white people how they should, you, you don't watch any of that shit, right?
Ian MalcolmI, I would agree with you, and the propaganda is very heavy. My, my advocacy there with Denzel is that there are certainly talented people and smart individuals of all walks of life. Well, you,
Speaker 11you picked, you picked a hard one for me to say no to, but I, I'm just gonna say-- And, and that's
Ian Malcolmwhy I went to him. He's, he's-- I've seen him in interviews. He's a very smart guy. He advocates for the nuclear family. He speaks out very aggressively against kind of the black culture of the present. So there
Speaker 11are-- And You're
Ian Malcolmcertainly entitled to that, and I would, I'd advocate for the same on my end, and I do that because I love my people, which is the view of, of all people. Muhammad Ali, who said that people should want their kids to look like them. Right? The great one or what are they saying?
Speaker 11100%,
Ian Malcolmthe greatest. 100%. whatever is, his little euphemism there. But, but I, I do-- the, the challenge is, right? The control mechanism, the Jews, are going to try and weaponize the current Friction so that we can't band together against them, and it should be very obvious to everybody if you look around that the Bolsheviks in Russia, who was it that they used to weaponize against the Russian Christian empire? It wasn't Russians! It was individuals that were rejects from the society, those that had been expelled, those that came from neighboring countries, those that had a hatred for the ethnic Russians. There's actually a very famous line from Solzhenitsyn. He talked about the Bolshevik Revolution. It wasn't by ethnic Russians, it was by those who hated the ethnic Russians. And he goes on to say the very fact that nobody learns about this tells us that the people that were in charge of that are still in charge of the world today. And curiously, you've got literal descendants of some of the most prominent Bolsheviks that are currently working in high ranking positions of the US government, right? So they're gonna use that difference, they're gonna use the othering to get us to fight with each other.
Speaker 11I, I know you would agree with this, brother. I knew a woman in Colorado, she was six foot four, white woman, fucking gorgeous Her nickname was the Queen. She was so beautiful, she wouldn't date anybody. We actually wondered if she might be a lesbian, right? Turns out, she finally, fuckin', married a guy who was six foot six. Her answer was, "My whole family was tall. My, my, I'm tall. My mother's taller than me. I want tall kids in my family." And this was like, you know, seriously like nineteen ninety-two, dude, so that's how old I am. But the point is, what's wrong with one? Wanting your, your kids to look like you or your family, there's nothing wrong with it. And she was just a, you know, the, the, the subject of race never came up, which I'm pretty sure she didn't want tall nigger kids in her family. But the bottom line is, you know, what we're talking about here is we want our kids to look like us. There's nothing wrong with that, man.
Ian MalcolmWell, two things. Now, one, let's, let's just watch the, the language. I try to keep this, PG if not G, and I do, I, I, I do think, 'cause here's, here's the challenge, and, and this is where I would push back. I, I'm with you. I want, my children and their children and their children to look like and hopefully think somewhat like I do, and that's because I love my people, I love my heritage, I love my country, I love my race. There's nothing wrong with that. Every group is advocated to do that, except of course, the white race. but I also recognize that it's not just other races of people that behave in the way that you perhaps are, are describing, right? That all races are capable of good, and unfortunately at times- Of evil, right? There are white Christians who have done terrible things. Now, there might be far more black criminals in the United States than there are white Christians proportionally speaking, right? But that doesn't mean that we should-- and I, I really sincerely believe this-- we shouldn't throw the proverbial babies out with all the bathwater just to say we're not going to have anything to do with anybody that fits any of these categories, because unfortunately, what's going to happen is we will find ourselves in an intellectual circle with very few Perspective people. We are in a, at least if you're in the United States and presently even in Western Europe, if you're in any of these nations, you live amidst mass diversity, and we live against a system that's oppressing all of us uniformly, regardless of our diversity. And so as a result, the, let's say the, the narrower our perspective audience is for our message, the more difficult it becomes for us to win. So we have to get anybody and everybody that's willing to speak out against this system, and when you do throw around certain rhetoric, even individuals like Saint Jim or Millie or that girl Casey or so many others that I'm happy to speak in these spaces with, well, they're gonna run out of the room, as will, for what it's worth, not only allies that, that might be black, but also some that are white. Because there's probably lots of individuals, even those that aren't blue-haired liberals, there are probably lots of moderate white people that look around and say, "I don't like the way the world is going," but if they come into a room where people are discussing Jewish supremacy and they hear individuals throwing around certain inflammatory rhetoric that they're not accustomed to hearing, well, they might walk right out of the room. So, and never get to hear the rest of the message. Forgive me for that,
Speaker 11brother. Forgive me for that. Right, right, right. I've got my hand up,
Speaker 12Marcus
Speaker 12I'd like to get in here at some point.
Ian MalcolmOh, I recognize that voice, and I, I saw that you were on, was it Jake Shields or, The Fight Back podcast, HD? Jake Shields. Well, congratulations for it, it's a very prominent, conversation, and for everybody that's not familiar, Handsome Truth, long time. I, I think the right term would be maybe social commentator and, internet provocateur, and does a lot of very, let's say animated, colorful commentary, which I do find some of it very entertaining. certainly have differences of opinions, especially these days around Christianity, but, would welcome some of your thoughts on this HT, and maybe if you wouldn't mind, it might be curious to kind of see you and David go back and forth, 'cause I feel like, it'll be two very different approaches on the
Speaker 12I, I think, well, appreciate, and I'll, I'll watch my language, I know the rules. okay, so here's, you know, and Ian is kinda like my, my enemy in a way, because what I'm trying to do is I'm trying to tell you that you as a white person need to be tribal, right? You need to only care about your own people and focus on that. The reason why we've lost this country is because we've been taught not to be tribal. Now, what the Jews do is they- Highlight certain people that are outliers like blacks, they put 'em in tuxedos and they put 'em in, you know, they put 'em in three piece suits and they make you tell the news and they sound articulate, and that is a very small percent of black people, because if you look at the majority of black people, they are violent, dangerous, and they have small brains, okay? And this is all backed by racial science. Now, Ian, the reason why I'm against Ian is because Ian wants To find outliers, which drops our tribalism, right? And that's similar to what Jews do with their propaganda, would you agree, Ian?
Ian MalcolmI would agree that they try to divide us based on tribal aspects, yes.
Speaker 12Do they highlight intellectual blacks or do- They ab- They absolutely
Ian Malcolmdo. I would agree with you on that.
Speaker 12Is,
Ian Malcolmis that what you're doing? Is that what I'm doing in, in which capacity?
Speaker 12Working with intellectual blacks when you know the majority of them are violent criminals.
Ian Malcolmif you're gonna say the majority, I don't know if I would agree that the majority of blacks are going to be more inclined to be violent criminals than to be, let's say, propagandized individuals just like whites are in America.
Ian MalcolmWhat percentage of black men are felons? Aaah! That's a tough number to, I, I, I don't know off the top of my head. I can tell you it's far more than whites per capita, thirty-three percent. You're, wait, you're gonna say thirty-three percent of all blacks have been incarcerated? Men, men, black men. You're, you're gonna say thirty-three percent of black men have been incarcerated? That's the suggestion?
Speaker 14No, being charged with
Ian Malcolma felony. Being charged with a felony, you're gonna say thirty-three per, so one in three black men, is that your suggestion?
Speaker 14Charged Yeah.
Speaker 12I'm with one of my racial buddies here, but here's my issue. Wait, no, no, no, real,
Ian Malcolmreal quick, HC. So I'm gonna ask you a question 'cause is-- Am I mistaken? So you're talking about the dangers of tribalism and that we need to band together as white individuals, but is-- Am I mistaken or is it you who's tried to pick kind of endless wars because of my religious tribalism?
Speaker 12Well, no, I see your religious tribalism, you want nationalism, correct?
Ian MalcolmI do want the ability for people to be national
Speaker 12Okay, so and you want all the other, you know, countries to remain what their, their heritage was originally, right? That,
Ian Malcolmthat would be my avocation, yes.
Speaker 12Okay, so here's the problem. You believe in a nationalist, you know, ideology, but, you know, your, your, your religious views are universalist, and this is, this is another problem where you don't- But you don't speak out
Ian Malcolmagainst and critique me for being a Christian, right?
Speaker 12Well, absolutely. Okay, so, so you want tribalism,
Ian Malcolmdevoid of race, you want, I guess white individuals to only band together with white individuals, but you then want to tribalize based on white non-Christians, is that right?
Speaker 12I, I am for tribalism, for the record, in case you-- No, no, I understand
Ian Malcolmthat, but you're suggesting, I suppose, that whites should tribalize, but with white non-Christians. So you're doing the very thing that you're suggesting that I'm doing the antithesis of. Well,
Speaker 12this is the problem is because you are a white Christian telling whites to not be tribal. W-where have I said that? Well, because you want to work with non-whites.
Ian Malcolmcan you work with other things to work in your own interest?
Speaker 12no.
Ian MalcolmYou can't?
Speaker 12No, no. No, no, hang on, pause, pause. If
Ian Malcolmwe're on a sinking ship with individuals, hang on, I will mute you. If we're on a sinking ship with five individuals that are of five different races, can it make sense for us to universally work together?
Speaker 12Those aren't the numbers that we have.
Ian Malcolmwell, it's about, okay, so, so there's two individuals, and it's one white guy and one other. Would you wanna work with that person or against them?
Speaker 12It, it all depends. Why does it all depend? Because you don't
Ian Malcolmwanna work with me because I'm Christian. So why, why, why are you now going back on the logic you're trying to utilize to present an idea?
Speaker 12Okay, listen, listen. Here's, here's my problem, okay? I don't, I don't wanna get caught in these traps. No, it's not a trap. You're getting
Ian Malcolmcaught in what is an illogical set of suggestions.
Speaker 14No, the, the reason the ship's sinking in the first place is because of the other guy. The other guy was brought on the ship to make the ship sink. No, the ship isn't sinking
Ian Malcolmbecause of the Jews with the drill. Because of the captain.
Speaker 14The captain's the Jew sinking the
Ian Malcolmship. He's bringing in the Nazis. Who is In the first place, and then weaponizing it against whites via the media.
Speaker 12that would be, Christians and Jews. Wait,
Ian Malcolmwait, it's, it's Christians that are pushing anti-Christianity.
Speaker 12Catholic, Catholic, no, Cath-Catholics are responsible for bringing almost in more than than the Jews. No, no, they
Ian Malcolmaren't, HT. That is laughable. So who- Was
Speaker 12it a Catholic? Catholic charities.
Ian MalcolmHT, was it a Catholic that was in charge of Homeland Security under the Biden administration that brought in twenty-five million migrants, as effectively more migrants than were brought into the United States at any point prior combined?
Speaker 12the answer is yes. When you look at Hart- No, he was a Jew. It was the Sephardic Jew, Alejandro Mayor. The root of it, the root of it was the Hart-Cellar Act when non-whites couldn't come in here. Yes, and of those two individuals,
Ian Malcolmwas one of them Jewish, and, and, and Hart was- See, this is the problem. This is a low IQ suggestion. Hart-Cellar was pushed by- Two individuals, one of which was Jewish, the other was funded by a Jew. Now, what's very curious is you could look at that legislation, you could go back to it, and you could look at JFK, and you could say, "Well, JFK was actually helpful in the pushing of that," and JFK was against the Jews. I thought that doesn't make a lot of sense. And then you look at who was behind that push, what do you know? It's Jewish money and Jewish interests. That is why there is a massive problem. You can't look at Alejandro Mayorkas and say it was the Catholics. He literally, prior to that role, was at HIAS as one of the most prominent members doing the exact antithesis of protecting the border. Now it's very curious because you come in here and you say, "Whack people need to tribalize," unless, I guess, they believe in Christ. So what is that? That's a fracturing of the tribe, so to say. And you know what ends up happening? So this is the move from the HT ideology. And I told you and Joel Davis this, which was that if you try to isolate yourself with just people that look like, think like, act like, and talk like you, you're gonna find yourself with a very small perspective audience. Because after all, if you just, let's say, push yourself into the echo chamber of, let's, let's call it straight, white, in this case now it's non-Christian, even down to a smaller identity there, it's only exclusively going to be largely Republicans, 'cause no liberal's gonna remotely agree with any of your ideology. It's gonna only be those that don't either date or have anybody in their social circle that is of diversity. It's probably only gonna be people that don't work for any piece of corporate America. You're talking like One or two percent of the entire country that you think are somehow going to take on the two percent that control everything, which are the Jews, and simultaneously are gonna oppose the ninety-seven other percent of the country that view your ideology as radical or violent or hateful or any other number of things. That's the problem, and I told you that that isn't irrelevant position. Now, what has happened since we had that conversation about two years ago? You're largely irrelevant. Your conversations are rather small. Now, I get that you went on Jake Shields' podcast. Congratulations, that's a good thing. The last time I checked, I think Joel Davis was in prison, and you aren't relevant. Now, what has happened with the JQ? It's gone mainstream. This idea of talking about this issue with anybody and everybody that's willing to have the conversations has reached the microphone of Tucker Carlson. And Candace Owens, who is black, and other individuals, some of which was a Dave Smith, who's a Jew. They're discussing Jewish supremacy. Now, some of those people might be subversive, but I don't care, 'cause they're having the conversations. That's waking up more and more people, which inevitably results in more genuine, serious people from having these discussions. So we are winning irrefutably. You know what's not going to win is the infusion of radical racism, which I guess is only racist when it is a benefit to you and when it is antithetical to progressing this conversation. Because how weird? You wanna isolate yourself with whites, but you wanna talk with Donnie Darko, a black guy, and Adam Green And Dr. Garland, which is the funniest addition to your circle, right? Which all four of these individuals, I suppose, want to take an anti-Christian approach or something like that, 'cause I thought Donnie Darken was a big-time Christian, but you wanna sit in a room with non-white, non-men, and you wanna discuss these issues and, and consider them your allies. It's all very baffling, for what it's worth. I, I don't-- And you're welcome to share your take. You're welcome to, I suppose, present how that makes any sense or how
Ian MalcolmLike, guys, 'cause the last time I checked, a lot of your activities led to the criminalization of, quote, unquote, anti-
Speaker 15Okay, so can I get in here without being interrupted? Sure, go for it. Okay, so what I'm trying to tell people is, oh, look, for, for the record, you know, irrelevant, okay? I'm actually like mask off. I've been doing activism for coming up on a decade. I have organized white men in the streets. I've been thrown in jail four times for not doing anything illegal. So when I hear people that are ain't on accounts saying that I'm irrelevant, when I just had twenty people at my house that are pro-white, anti-Christian, that are rev-revolutionaries, it's laughable. But I will say this, our forefathers who- Created this country, created this nation, okay.
Speaker 15said that if you haven't, we-- Do, do you agree that we have a tyrannical government, Ian?
Ian MalcolmHey, can you tell me about the Federalist Papers, HT?
Speaker 15Wrote, wrote, I, I don't know much about it. I'm wondering, do, do you know who wrote the Federalist Papers? W-what does that have to do with me asking? Do you know,
Ian Malcolmdo you know what names were on the Federalist Papers?
Speaker 15You just,
Ian Malcolmyou
Speaker 15just went on
Ian Malcolma ten-minute
Ian Malcolmrant Federalist Papers were written by some of the founders of this nation, the people that you just revered. They were written anonymously because their conversations were essentially viewed as treason by the people in charge. Isn't it very curious that that's essentially exactly what we're doing here, in this conversation, which has a smaller audience than many of the ones that I host, for what it's worth, but you are here, ironically, because you wanna have a voice on my space because it draws an audience. So perhaps it would tell something about the relevance of either of the two of us that you are even in this room And perhaps it would suggest that the idea of being an anonymous author of ideas, that you can have an incredible impact, not only on the zeitgeist, but you can literally change the future of a nation that led to the nation that you supposedly advocate for as a result. And I think that that is what we are doing, people like David Neeche and myself. I think we're having a tremendous impact, and so we can talk about relevance, and you can have twenty individuals in your room who I suppose at this point wanna talk about how they hate nuns and Christians. I guess that's the,
Ian Malcolmthe As far as I can tell. But I don't think that makes nearly as big of an impact as having millions and millions and millions of people reading the question, "Is it the Jews?" Which I suppose is my hallmark at this point. But yes, you're welcome to your take. But the Federalist Papers, again, founders involved, and they wrote behind a pen name, and so I do think that the anonymous pen can have a massive impact on the present that we find ourselves in.
Speaker 15Can I not be interrupted? I was trying to make a point. Can I just make a point without being muted?
Speaker 15Can I- Yes,
Speaker 16yes, our government's tyrannical.
Speaker 15Okay, our government is tyrannical. Okay, so that would mean that our forefathers told us to- But, and this is again, Ian saying that we can't use dirty words, we can't talk about violence, when our forefathers said if you have a tyrannical government, your duty as an American is to overthrow them. But Ian, being a Christian, and saying that we gotta turn the other cheek and pray for- Our enemies, okay, and, and wait, vengeance is for the Lord. Hold tight, Goy, hold tight. Okay? You are antithetical to being an American. You don't think our forefathers
Speaker 16were Christians?
Speaker 15No, a, a lot of 'em weren't. They were Deists. Yeah.
Speaker 16Well, that, those are Christians. Deists aren't Christians. No, they're not. Yes, correct.
Speaker 15No, they're not.
Speaker 16Incorrect.
Speaker 15Oh, Tom Paine wasn't a Christian. Tom Paine was a Christian?
Speaker 16I don't know about Thomas Paine, but the rest of them were Christians.
Speaker 15Oh, George Washington. You weren't a
Speaker 16fan, for everybody else in the room. My point,
Speaker 15my point is this, tell me what the
Speaker 16unlettered,
Speaker 15like yourself,
Speaker 16I will say, you can be a deist and a Christian, right? So basically, you're saying the gods of clock, gods, gods of clockmaker. Not,
@uncutspeechnot, not according to the Bible.
Speaker 16Okay, well, no, I, I understand that there can be contradictions, and of course, everybody that interprets the
Speaker 16Every since Martin Luther, each man is his own priest, right? So it's a bit of a-- it's anarcho in the right way. You're supposed to sound the depths of your soul when you read the Bible and come to your own conclusions. Our forefathers did that. They weren't Christian renunciants. They didn't self-proclaim as, as atheists, okay? So if you wanna say, you know, that they, that they're not according to oil based on what you think in terms of the Bible, but they were Christians. I mean, come on, they were
Speaker 15Supremacy, okay? So here's, and we agree on that, everyone agrees on that, okay? We do. And now instead of finger pointing, okay, at the nones and the Jews and everyone else, okay, part of being a racist, which is to love your race, okay, part of being a racist is looking inwards and going, "How did we get in this mess? What was the reason that made white people became..." Not tribal anymore. And when you have verses like Galatians 3:28, and you have, you know, this ideology of waking up every morning and telling yourself that you're a sinner And you have other places like Japanese, Japanese people, where they rejected Christianity 'cause they didn't want Jews coming in their country 'cause they looked at it as a slave religion. And then you have our racial forefathers like Lincoln, I mean, excuse me, Rockwell, Metzger, David Lane,
Speaker 15Pierce, et cetera, all saying that Christianity is poison towards our race because it's foreign to us, and the SS agreed with that as well. So this is like the second part, the second act of the movie is how How did we get here? Because essentially, this is our fault as white people. I can sit here and, and hate non-whites all, all, all, all forever, and it's not gonna change anything. The only thing that's gonna change anything is go, "Okay, I gotta look inwards." 'Cause when I got sober, I stopped blaming the dope dealer, I stopped blaming the guy that was selling me alcohol, I started going, "Hey, you are the retard here. You're the dumbass buying the drugs. You're the one participating in this. This is your fault."
Speaker 15The white question, how did white people lose their tribalism? And it is because- It's the answer is
Ian MalcolmJews, HT. Well,
Speaker 15no. Yeah, and also
@uncutspeechI'm a white person, and I don't- There are other reasons. And I don't think you're a white person, HT. So, like, leave it to us white people to figure it out,
Ian Malcolmyo. That's not the point. Let's, let's, let's stick with the ideas. But, HT, the, the whites have lost their tribalism because of Jews. I don't know how you could
Ian Malcolmsuggest Being pumped into the masses, and that the last thirty years has been all about making sure all whites are Christian, is that right? The, yeah,
Speaker 15the Age of Enlightenment. Wait, wait, wait, you actually are gonna
Ian Malcolmsuggest the last thirty years that the media has pushed Christianity on white culture, is that right?
Speaker 15No, I'm saying that it was, it was the, Wait,
Ian Malcolmthey, they haven't pushed Christianity or they have? You're now doing double talk. They, no, they did, and it was, it was the
Speaker 15primer on the wall to allow more of this Marxist crap
Ian MalcolmSee, let me ask you, what percent of, of Chris- of whites are Christian in the United States over the last thirty years? Has it gone up or down?
Speaker 15I believe it's about two hundred to three hundred million.
Ian Malcolmit's gone down drastically according to just about every study. Yeah, she's gonna be a Christian. Like, like, w- if you're gonna try to have this conversation, we need to be honest.
Speaker 15It's going down, but you have guys like- It is going down. Okay, so it's being pumped by the masses, but it's going
Ian MalcolmHero is certainly not legit, but you're going to actually suggest that the media and pop culture is trying to mainline Christianity over the last thirty years. The
Speaker 15Super Bowl wasn't mainlining Christianity. The Christian revival. The Super Bowl? That
Speaker 17wasn't Christianity. What
Speaker 15is the real Christianity, no true Scotsman? What is it? There's forty thousand sects, pick one.
Ian MalcolmOkay. What are you-- It's, it's, so you're dodging my very direct question, which is that obviously the last thirty years has seen an absolute demoralization of anything and everything Christian. Now, that has been happening through the mainstream media, which demoralizes anybody that is even religious. They try to propagate and to program the idea of essentially atheistic hedonistic materialism. That is the new god. It is Andrew Tate. That is what they are pushing. Anyone that suggests- Yes, otherwise it's laughable, and you just suggested, yes, of course, Christianity is on the decline. Now, simultaneously as they are doing that, they are also trying to de-root all of the things that would keep people together, which is what I'm trying to fix. And you're sitting here saying, "We all need to band together." Together by having a divisive conversation over the benefits of Christianity. Not divisive. It's not
Speaker 15divisive. Of
Ian Malcolmcourse it's divisive. What are you talking about?
Speaker 15It's not divisive. It's just a normal- It's true or
Ian Malcolmfalse. You made an image with my avatar's likeness on the crucifix, if I'm not mistaken. Is that right?
Speaker 15Bro, that was,
Ian Malcolmlisten, man, they
Speaker 15made a- Wait, was that divisive or not?
Ian MalcolmZipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zipper, Zip How would you define that?
Speaker 15Some of this stuff is com- Listen, man, some of this stuff is comedy. Like, do I wanna like beat you up? No, but- No, I don't, and I
Ian Malcolmhave no physical animus towards you. I, I actually don't even have the animus at all. I think you're colorful and entertaining. I do think that it is counterintuitive.
Speaker 15I don't think so because I think- It clearly is. No, it's not because there's people listening to two sides of an argument, right? Unless you wanna smell your own f
Speaker 16I, I do understand this concept that,
Ian Malcolmand I apologize to everyone on the panel, Dustin Nemos is requesting, and I will let him up as long as he can behave himself. And HT, I think that you'll even find this, comical. You know what you're doing. You're just, you're creating chaos. Well,
@uncutspeechhe says he knows what you're doing. HT, the chaos creator, ten thousand over here, you're creating chaos. Give it a rest, bro. Come
Ian Malcolmon. Can
@uncutspeechyou let
Ian Malcolmyour, your, your- No, I, I don't think I just want to stick specifically to reason and logic, and I'm trying to discuss the ideas rather than you as an individual. I think that's a great way to do it. Can I ask you
Speaker 15something directly? Of course. Can I just ask you something directly? Okay. And, and just answer this honestly. You are pro-white.
Ian MalcolmI, I think, absolutely, and I think my content would suggest that. And Jesus is Jewish in your mind? Jesus, the, the prospect of Jesus and his Jewishness, I think there's a, a lot of ways that we could take that conversation. What I could say is zero evidence for that. He's certainly antithetical to Judaism, let's say. Jesus hates Judaism. Jesus
Speaker 17hated the Jews, yeah, he was so anti-Semitic. Hold on, let me, let
Ian Malcolmme get back to it.
Speaker 15I just wanna ask you,
Ian Malcolmthis conversation's about to go off the rails with all these voices. No, no, it doesn't need to.
Speaker 15HT never
Speaker 18lets me speak in his face, he always has
Speaker 18No, it didn't even say that under his call. I, I have the Bible reference. That Jew, the word Jew was made up fourteen hundred years later. So Judea wasn't real? No, there's no Judeo back then.
Speaker 15Oh, there wasn't
Speaker 18a Judea. There wasn't even the letter J. There wasn't Houdiites? There wasn't Houdiites. There weren't even the letter J back then, Oh, so Houdiites, not a
Speaker 15real thing. No,
Speaker 18what happened is the fourteen hundred years later, the name stealers wrote
Speaker 18The Jews of today, which were Edom and Amalek in the Bible, did kill Jews. I thought we were Amalek. After, you know, inverted it because they're the name that's if you believe in
@uncutspeechJewish philosophy, HJ, you believe in Jewish prophecy. All of that, I don't care what you say. What you do? You're Edom,
Speaker 18you're a Jew. I'm white, I'm Amalek to the Jews, but actually, you're Amalek, pretending to be. They are human, you're not. Let's put it that way. Are they? Where are your kids at all age? Where are your kids at all age? You, I think you aborted all your
Speaker 15Chinese kids. Pretty
Speaker 18sure you
Speaker 15forced my mother to abort her baby. Yeah, you just got your titties cut off,
Speaker 18that's, you know, no, no kids, no titties. You never had
Speaker 15a woman. You
Speaker 18probably
Speaker 15just stick to the gay. Yeah, you're right, guys. Gay, Mexican, Jewish vet, let's go on. Let's talk about
@uncutspeechthat. No No, no, I'm, you're saying that. I don't know about your man pussy. I'm just telling you about the titty surgery. That's all. That's the stuff that there's proof of.
Speaker 18Look, surgery aside, he also in, out, oh, outside of being a tranny, also grooms children in his part time. Wait, wait, wait, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. I'm
Ian Malcolmgonna have to pause here for a sec. Okay, so two things. One, I apologize to the audience that we were trying to have Also agree on. He's always been, very level-headed. I think he did a very nice job sharing his, not antagonistic, but antithetical viewpoints, right? That's a good thing. we've now created a panel with a bunch of very colorful individuals. And so I just want to give lots of love to everybody that is up here, regardless of where we agree and disagree. Dustin Eames, I'm very curious and glad that you came into the room for this conversation because on the Bible, I think it's gonna be very, very helpful. Colin, I Well,
Ian Malcolmsomebody suggested bottom surgery. I, look, I, I don't, I-- How do I wanna say this? I don't believe that HT is a, a, a gender re-assigned individual. I'm just going to throw that out there. I don't know where that would come from. I want him just to be able to very clearly state that that is not the case, and, then we can have a dialogue and a debate. But everybody, if you could, try just to be somewhat controlled with your deliveries, we will go Go to HT first, he's welcome to share his, his take on both the trans accusation, I don't know where that's coming from, but also to maybe set things up. And HT, here's how we're gonna do this. We will do, this will be like tag, where HT is gonna share his sentiments. He can either end with a question directed specifically at a person, or he can throw it out to, let's just say, the ether that is this entire panel. But we'll try and keep this direct. So HT, if you have thoughts or a question for Dustin
Ian MalcolmAnd then we can have everybody go around in an orderly fashion. But HC, again, I don't believe that you were born as HTS or some other effeminate rendition. I just wanna call that out.
Speaker 15Okay, I just wanna put this out before I get interrupted. no name calling before he brought up all these people, and I told you what he was gonna do. He was gonna make this into a name calling thing because this is a way for them to divert the questions that I'm trying to ask. And he's gonna use these people to dogpile and try to discredit. Okay, yeah, I got a pass, I was a wigger, drug addict, all that stuff, okay? You can call me a tranny, a gay man, a confederate, all this stuff. But what I'm trying to get down to is serious business, right? I'm asking you a serious question about your faith, whether or not you believe Jesus is Jewish, and I have Bible verses such as this one,
Speaker 15John 4:22.
Speaker 17Jesus tells the Samaritan woman that salvation comes from the Jewish people. This verse emphasizes that the Jewish tradition contains the complete and accurate revelation of God, including the prophecies about the Messiah, which Jesus-
Speaker 15So what I'm saying is that you're promoting your supremacy with your religion by believing Jews are God's chosen people. Can I add one? Well, I, I just wanna direct that to Ian, not to you. Oh, I bet. And what's, if salvation-- Well, is it a question? My, my question again is, if salvation comes from the Jews, are you helping Jewish supremacy or fighting against Jewish supremacy?
Speaker 18There was no work. I'm asking
Speaker 15Ian. I'm asking Ian. I'm asking Ian. Just like, hang on,
Ian Malcolmhang on, Dustin, I'm gonna throw you the question. He-- So here's how we'll do this. Again, it'll be a round robin. so HT, I think it's a reasonable question, is Jesus Jewish? It's going to depend
Ian MalcolmQuery into that and examination of it. I think Dustin can probably offer a more comprehensive answer. What I will say, and the one that I find very curious, is the fact that Jesus is supposedly Jewish because of what? Well, because of the mother. Now, I've always learned that Judaism is passed and derived through the mom. But the curious part is that came long after the birth of Christ, because Judaism was a, not matriarchal, it was a patriarchal society. Meaning it came from the Father. Now, who is Jesus' Father? It's not Joseph. That's the whole point of the Immaculate Conception. Jesus' Father was God. And so actually, if you take that approach to it, well, then unless God- God is either a genetic or a religious or a cultural Jew, well then the only reason He would have been Jewish is because He was adopted by Joseph, who may have been of Jewish either religion or ancestry, right? But even that is up for, I suppose, debate, because then you can look at where these people came from. We can redirect and rediscuss what it means to be
Speaker 15Jewish. No, no
Speaker 18Okay, so church fathers didn't have genetic
@uncutspeechtesting genius. Are you happy? Go
Speaker 15tell your orthodox, so first of all, the church
@uncutspeechfathers were before the Talmud was written.
Speaker 18Dumbass. You can't wait. Oh wait, H-T is like new to the Bible, he doesn't know what he's talking about. The modern Jew-edited versions of the Bible say the word "Jew," and that's the easy, you know, mistake to make if you trust the Jews, which I don't. And if you just trust the Jews, then they're God's chosen people, and the white people have to be killed, and like, raping babies is okay, and everything in the Bible is inverted by Judaism. But I don't trust the Jews. Actually, I checked it out, and it turns out there was
Speaker 18And he was Irish, before there was an Irish people. And he hated the Jews. He told them, "Where I go, you cannot follow. You are of your father, the devil. Generation, which means genetics, of vipers. tares amidst the wheat." Okay? He called them devils, and they killed him for it. And that is what they are, and they are still doing it today. God promised us war with Amalek, every generation, including ours. He promised us war with the seed of the serpent, same thing, in Genesis 3:15. He got, he told us that they would do everything that they're doing to us, like they would be our deep state and judges too. The same bloodline, they're gonna be your deep state. What are they gonna do to you? They're gonna have all these curses and blessings that are listed in Deuteronomy. If you follow his law, you get the blessings. If you don't follow his law, you get the cursings, including they will be the head, you will be the tail, they will lend to you, you will not lend to them, et cetera. So who
Ian MalcolmWhose law? I didn't hear it, he interrupted me.
Speaker 15Whose law? You're talking about law, and I'm asking whose law.
Speaker 18Why I was still answering the first question. So Yahweh's law, the God of the white people.
Speaker 15Okay. Okay. So, yeah, we agree on that. Can I just tell you why I agree on that with you?
Speaker 18I, I mean, I was still trying to answer the first question that, that Jesus isn't a Jew, there wasn't no Jew word, there wasn't no J. Well, that's, let's let him respond. that
Speaker 16was a good explanation. Let's let him respond. Let's keep it
Speaker 15to like two minute response, though, okay? Just so it's not, okay. Go ahead. Okay. I'm just gonna give you my response. Matthew 5:17.
Speaker 17In Matthew chapter 5 verse 17, Jesus says He didn't come to undo the Law or the Prophets, but to fulfill them. He clarifies His purpose isn't to destroy the Old Testament, but to bring it to its intended completion.
Speaker 15So He came to fulfill the Torah, correct? The Hebrew no, the word, the original
Speaker 18word was pleru, which means bring back to fullness. So the context in a time of Talmud and the Jews infiltrating with Rome's help, like Herod and Caiaphas, the baby killers and Jesus killer, they were actually teaching Talmud, just like today. They were inverting Christianity, they were pushing all of this inverted doctrine, satanic doctrine, pretending to be of God's chosen people. Justin, I have a, I, I have a question to finish real quick, just ten seconds. Sure, go ahead. Iota will pass from the law until heaven and earth pass. Jesus died to remind us of the law, to bring it back to fullness, to klerou, and they teach you, the Jews teach the, the pastors, and the pastors teach the sheep, the goyim, us, that He died to nail to the cross, don't murder, and all these other sins. No, they're still against the law. You're still supposed to follow the law. He died to remind you of the eternal law.
Speaker 16Well, my question for you is this Isn't there, isn't this a little bit of a moot point? Aren't we talking about Trans-Semites? I mean, the Ashkenazi aren't really even the same people, right? I mean, the Phoenicians founded the, the Phoenicians founded the city of Byblos, which is why we call it a Bible. The reason why we call it books is because the, the book was the thing in the jar, and then they concatenated that. And this is all over there near the Anatolia peninsula or in, or in that end of the Mediterranean. So I, I
Speaker 16So
Speaker 18you follow it back basically from today through the, through the Ashkenazi, which is a made-up Japhetic name from Ashkenaz, not of Shem, Shemetic, not even of Ham, which they're Hamitic, but of Japheth, the third, their third son. They don't even know what they're talking about. It's a made-up lie that don't make any sense. So Ashkenaz came from the Khazarians. The Khazarians, where we find a lot of those, that region, the Black Sea region, where we find
Speaker 18a lot
Speaker 18All over that region. Anyway, that's an aside. You go back further, and before that, they had been, been the Phoenicians. Before that, they had been the Canaanites. The Canaanites disappear from history largely and blend into the Phoenicians. Just in two minutes,
Speaker 15we are losing everyone. I need-- I mean, I know
Speaker 18that you can't keep up for more than sixty seconds, but like you've spoken a lot more than me. You're spoken a lot more
Speaker 16than me. Yeah, hold on, just to pause here. So we are the Stalin and Hitler
Speaker 16Determine who's losing who, so go ahead and finish what you're saying, my friend.
Speaker 18Yeah, thank you. He, he always does that. Okay, so basically, you follow them back in time, they are the Biblical Edomites, the Biblical Amalekites, the Red Shields or the Rothschilds literally translates in Hebrew to "shield of Edom." The Jews brag about being of Edom in their own encyclopedias and other texts, they just tell you they're God's chosen, but in fact they're Satan's literal children, not even human at all.
Speaker 18Look at Amalek, look at Israel, see who's who, and you will look at the descriptions that are all white of Israel, the prophecies that only white people did, like spread the word of God to the world. You will look at the descriptions of Amalek, the baby eaters. Amalek means blood liquors. They've been kicked out of a hundred and ten countries a thousand thirty times for that, for grooming and eating children. Now, HT grooms them, I don't know if he eats them, but he definitely like dresses in- No, come on now
Speaker 16Understand that we're talking about different people exploiting a religion, don't you think that? I mean, this is really disingenuous, right? Because there's nothing spiritual, religious about that. But if we historically, if we go back in historical record, even the Babylonians and Hammurabi, who wrote the, was the first one to codify,
Speaker 16innocence until proven, guilty, I, I really, it seems like you're missing that part of history. Is that, am I getting you wrong here?
Speaker 15No, I reject everything Jewish, and I just wanna ask you a A question real quick, okay, do you mind? Sure. Were the first Christians ethnically Jewish and was Christianity a form of Second Temple Judaism, yes or no?
Speaker 16Oh, that's the question for our friend here. The
Speaker 17early Christians were ethnically Jewish. Christianity initially emerged as a form of second temple Judaism.
@uncutspeechWhat are we doing here, bro? Like with something else? Like what are we doing? Yeah, let's, let's, yeah, let's, let's, let's don't, let's don't keep doing that. My
Speaker 15point is, my point is, is just
Speaker 18what I,
Speaker 15what guys,
Speaker 18the answer is no. What Paul states
Speaker 15in Romans fifteen twenty-seven is that if you are a Gentile Christian and you have been given your, your spirituality To give Jews your material blessings. That's in your Bible. No, it's not.
Speaker 18H-H-HI, I have a question. Put the words in the context
Speaker 15of that.
Speaker 18You don't understand. And also, Judaism is based off, it's a, it came later than Christi-- It's older than Christianity, first of all. Yes. It came in response to Christ. It's younger than, and it's in response to. And secondly, they invert everything. Thirdly, while-- But you know, they're-- I
Speaker 15point about Jesus fulfilling
Speaker 18the law. Sorry, No, it isn't. He came to bring it back. The word was "pleru," they changed the word. The word was not "Jew." He wasn't teaching in the sense of there are, there are thirteen different tribes, you know that, right? They're not all Jews. Jews were supposedly based on Judah, one of the tribes, one of the thirteen tribes. Did Jesus celebrate
Speaker 15Hanukkah?
Speaker 18They all practiced the same religion. Now, was the tribe of Benjamin practicing the tribe of Judah religion? Did Jesus celebrate Hanukkah?
Speaker 15That
Speaker 18doesn't make any
Speaker 15sense.
Speaker 18Hanukkah, Hanukkah is a fucking made up Jewish religion. The, the ones in the Bible, like Passover, those are absolutely white man religions. Jews don't keep them, and they don't want-- they want to make it illegal for you to keep them if you are white. HBC's not-
Speaker 15Real quick, real quick. Okay, yeah, I'm a Jewish Mexican fed. So how many of the Christians here actually believe in being a white Jew? That's what I would like to know, because you guys, you guys are saying, you got, hold on real quick, Now, I know Colin isn't believing that, I know Grimm isn't believing that, I know Wolf isn't believing that. Just appeal to popularity. It doesn't matter if they like it or not. I'm saying that your stuff is absolutely- I mean, here, here's the
@uncutspeechthing though, HT, it doesn't matter if you like it, it's true. He's appealing to something that, like, I'm, I agree with Dustin more than I agree with you on this one. My position on this has always been to, that I separate, if we're gonna make a genetic They were taken as slaves by the Babylonians and then the Assyrians before that. Like, these people aren't genetically the Israelites, they haven't been since like way before. Yeah, yeah. So like, and we know this is historical, we know for a fact that this happened. so it's like, you know, whether or not we look at them as Ashkenazi Jews, Talmudic, rabbinical Jews, like, they weren't genetically, they also weren't culturally, they weren't spiritually, they weren't spiritually.
@uncutspeechSo don't, so don't, so Arguments and let them hold on. I've got another argument for you to hold on. Ask your audience the question he always
Speaker 18pawns me for. Other than
Ian Malcolmtrusting
Speaker 15the Jews, other than trusting the Jews, what evidence do you have?
@uncutspeechGuys, guys
Speaker 15If it's, if they were Sephardic or if they were Mizrachi, I don't know the difference. So you, so, so I'll answer for you. No,
@uncutspeechnone of them trusted the Jews. No, those are the main
Speaker 18evidence other than trusting the Jews that they are God's chosen people instead of the white people who did all the work of the prophecies, who fit the descriptions, and who built the world.
Speaker 15I don't believe that. No,
Speaker 18the hunchback, the hunchback baby eaters aren't God's chosen people, clearly. They don't fit
Speaker 18Where you said it's old news. He is white, he definitely existed. Name one contemporary, doesn't everybody know in history. Name
Speaker 15one contemporary that proved that Jesus was alive.
Speaker 18there's, an any historian will tell you that Jesus
Speaker 15existed. Name one. Name one contemporary. Okay.
Speaker 18Every biblical or historical scholar- Oh, please. This, this
@uncutspeechargument's not this argument is just boring. Like honestly. Many others. Many others.
Speaker 18You can't- There's almost no seri-serious historian, almost no serious historian who can claim Jesus was not real. Almost none of them will.
Speaker 15Okay, We hate Jewish people, but we are believing in a messiah that they reject. No, you, you, you
Speaker 18are believing them when they tell you, "God's chosen." You're just trusting the Jew, HT. You're just trusting the Jew because you are one. You're trusting us, you're telling us to trust the Jew as well. You trust the Jew, and they tell you, "God's chosen." They scream, "God's chosen," and you say, "Hate Jesus." You're a fucking idiot. No,
Speaker 15what I'm saying is that you, with, with Jesus
Speaker 15People existed forty thousand years pre-dating Christ, and there was no- You think they chewed off his dick? No. Listen, they didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They didn't
Speaker 18do it that way. They didn't do it that way. They Point. Even the Jewish geneticist, my friend, let, let him make a
Speaker 16statement and we'll come back to you. No, no,
Speaker 15no, just let him finish. My point is this, okay, that Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day, it was part of, part of the custom, okay? Why culture? No, that's not because forty thousand years predated the price, and it hasn't been ever since. No, it doesn't stop, bro. Stop doing that, dude.
Speaker 19Yeah,
Speaker 20Dustin, we'll come back to you, my friend.
Speaker 19There's no proof of our ancestors touching wieners like that, that predate that. This was a Middle Eastern and a, African, trait to chop off the foreskins of, of boys. Our ancestors didn't do that. That's what I'm saying, it's different. It's not part of us.
Speaker 21False. And they've been doing it for thousands of years, and there's a clear-cut history of doing so. You need
Speaker 19some examples. Where's your source? Christian,
Speaker 21I'm circum
Speaker 21Because Christians still do it today, because Christ did it, because we're Christians and we're white like He was. I know that,
Speaker 19I know that, but even if- No, you trust
Speaker 21the Jews, they said their God's chosen, they changed the word in the Bible, and you believe that. Stop
Speaker 19arguing, stop- I think they're gonna stop. Like I read your buddy, I don't get to talk.
Speaker 21You're not letting me speak. Adam Green tried this for two hours and I'm done too. Go ahead. Let's go in circles about the word Jew being put in the Bible
Speaker 19No, it's circumcised unless you're non-white, unless you're
Speaker 21non-European, and then it's not required.
Speaker 19You're not supposed to check, dude. It-- Is there a Christian that's gonna back me up on this? It's four
Speaker 21Europeans. The Bible says white people everywhere talks about Europeans. Wait, H-D, H-D, H-D, H-D. Here's the problem, right? Is that first of
@uncutspeechall, you-- first you argue against the purity of the snow. Or is there a-- Remember that? Do you understand that? Dustin, I don't want to mute And you're like, it didn't fulfill the old law, and then on the next hand, now you're like, but don't Christians believe that it fulfilled the old law? So it's like, whenever the argument benefits you, you wanna go with what Christians say, and you wanna use this to help benefit your arguments, right? But whenever it doesn't benefit you, you don't. So hold a consistent logical stance, otherwise, no one's gonna chime in and fucking help you or anything like that, because why would anybody? Why would anybody, whenever you're just using
@uncutspeechthe
Ian MalcolmThat's the thing, and you don't
@uncutspeechunderstand the fact that you say you guys are inconsistent, but Dustin, Dustin's a unique sect of Christianity, right? Like, and he wouldn't say that he's even a sect, but he is like a, he's closer to like a Unitarian, you know, kind of Christian than, than, you know, what I am or what Graham is or what you would call, quote, Christian today, which is typically, you know, you're, you're Trinitarian, believes in the divinity of Jesus Christ, et
@uncutspeechI don't agree with Dustin on everything that he says. Like, who does?
Speaker 19Well, my point is this, this is easy. When it says not to circumcise your kids, and that's removed as Christians, and you guys can't even agree on child mutilation. Like, this is, this is like laughable that you guys are okay with child mutilation when even your book tells you from Paul that you're supposed to circumcise the heart, and you guys are allowing him to push circumcision to Jewish. Okay. Alright. So,
@uncutspeechso I guess we'll bring this, ' That I wanted to make to you, because you always say that you're, you're like with Christianity to argue for white people, and that we need to be looking inward, right? Well, let's look at circumcision, for example, okay? So Christian countries banned it, you're right, okay? And Europe didn't have it for a long time, and most of Europe still doesn't have it, okay? This was because of Christianity. You, you're right about that, right? But then secular, non-Christian America, okay? most people here, most white men are circumcised
@uncutspeechBy Jews. It was a, you know, a, a, a Protestant form of Christianity that came over here. It was one that was already weak, and then this, this secularism spawned out of it, and all of these different forms of Protestantism, which created a lot of the issues that we're in today. You know, and this goes back to the other arguments that I've made to you a thousand times, it's like, okay, well, I'm, I'm targeting Christianity 'cause it's a blight on white people. Well, okay, my biggest problem with, w-w
@uncutspeechWhenever I look at the only people that are above replacement rate in the white race in the United States, it's Christians. White Christians are a two point two further fertility rate, whereas the non-Christians, just all non-Christians, are between one point six and one point eight, depending on what data you look, you know, what data you look at. So, and this is according to Pew Research and basically every other fertility rate data that you wanna look at, right? So if we're looking at what's good for white people or what's-- we can quibble all day about whether or Degeneracy, how did low birth rates, how did all of this mor-- immorality come, how did child mutilation come to white people, right? Whenever the Catholic Church had it banned for fucking a thousand years. W- why did all of this happen? Well, it was because Christianity was taken away from the West, and as we degenerate and get farther and farther away from Christianity, more of this immoral degeneracy pops up, and then people like you, right, who are immoral and degenerate, who have gynecomastia surgery and who have all-- and then you just It's, it would be good for you to get away from Christianity. And so then this moral degeneracy per-per-per-perpetrated by people like you is just gonna continue in a society like this unless you have a big change in Christianity or at least some sort of moral standard. Hold on a second, I have a question for
Speaker 20you. Are you- One second. Are you saying that people that aren't Christian cannot be moral and that they are automatically- No, no, and if you'd have met me, David, I would
@uncutspeechhave finished there. I would have said, "You need at least
Speaker 20Did we lose you?
@uncutspeechSorry, double mute, double mute, double mute. Yeah, some sort of, mor- and I'd go also a step farther than saying that we need a moral contract, I also think that we need institution to enforce it as well. it doesn't necessarily need to be Christian, but I would say that as far as evidence goes, the Catholic Church just holds the top spot, and there's no one even close whenever it comes to the European peoples.
Speaker 20Well, both the Christian and the Deist and the enlightened pagan thing to do now is to retweet the space, and I wanna bring it back to the broader discussion that was happening when I came in here, and that is, whether or not these things have undermined Western civilization, where the locus of our problem is some sort of fatal flaw in the religion or that sort of thing, and I would say, Tito, that I disagree with you. By the way, I, I think that the concept of original sin, where the moral deck is stacked against someone, that is something that is exploited. And I think that it was bastardized by the Marxists in the idea that self-interest itself was a bad thing. It was your one defense against a Marxist regime, a communist regime, which is your individual rights, the sacrosanctity, the sacrosanct nature of your individual rights, and, the standard of good in a rational society is the life of the individual. You, it's inviolate.
Speaker 20Socrates had this problem because there was a different, mysticism and religion over every hill and into every valley, and there were so many, there were thousands, that he simply departed from all of them and decided in logical and rational space, what is the good? And this was the, the charge of his life. He was doing this almost contemporaneous from when Confucius invented the golden rule and changed the world where he lived. He was born into a bunch of warring, ridiculous tribes And by the time he was done, they all found this incredible equanimity and, really had achieved some state of equilibri- equilibrium that the Chinese Communists kind of destroyed and killed all those Confucianists. But I really want to-- I disagree with you that that is the locus of our problems. I, I believe in the divine spark, which by the way, I do want to renounce when I came in the room, someone making pejorative terms about black people. You know, I think that you're falling for the, Jewish supremacy trick. Because divide and conquer is their game, and when you've decided to hate another group and outgroup, you're playing their game. But just think about this, and I'll, I'll put this to you, Tito, if I had a magic button and we had absolute freedom, we had no welfare state, none of this, wouldn't we spontaneously order in the way that you want? Wouldn't that occur anyway? We see this in society now. We see people-- Of course, we know this is true. Racial realism is now getting us to admit this. Black people like to hang Around black people, why people like to hang around with black people. It's the forcing of us against each other. Same with immigration. Immigration is the bio weapon of the Jewish supremacists. If we didn't have that bio weapon and we let, let's say Islamists trickle in to the degree that we thought that they're good and nice and worthy of joining us, we wouldn't be We wouldn't be, we wouldn't be concluding that, oh, they're the vast enemy. So don't you think that the problem, the locus of the problem is Jewish supremacy and not any of these other things? Don't you think it's important that we all band together as a globe? That doesn't mean that we all live in together. Just because we can't be good roommates doesn't mean we, we can't be good neighbors. Can I answer? Sure,
Speaker 19sure, go ahead. It's not Tito, it's HTO. It's
Speaker 21like HTO.
Speaker 19Sorry. H T Yes, peyote boobs. Okay, so really what I wanna ask you, man, is that if you just think I have a gripe with Christianity, it's beyond that. It's all Abrahamic faiths, okay?
Ian MalcolmI believe-- Ht, can I ask you a follow-up question to David's, which is if, if the white race's best shield against Jewish global supremacy was Christianity, you would want that to succeed or you would celebrate the demise of Christianity under Jewish supremacy in spite of the consequence it would have?
Speaker 19If I thought it could win, yes, I would be with it. If I thought it could win, but I do believe that the foundation of it is weak. If you look at what took place with Hitler, right? He was pretty much got conquered by white people, wouldn't you agree? Hitler got conquered by white people.
Speaker 21No, Hitler was divide and conquer, Jew.
Speaker 19No, no, no. Oh, come on. I, I
Ian Malcolmdisagree with that. This isn't what I'm talking about. But no, no, Hitler was taken out by-
Speaker 21Oh,
Ian MalcolmHitler
Speaker 21wasn't Jew. Okay, can we
Speaker 19unmute
Speaker 21him?
Speaker 19All right. Yeah, Dustin, please And here's why. The trajectory of Christians is the same with these Islamists, okay? They both agree in the end times. If we are complacent as a race, and there's a lot of Christians that believe in end times prophecy, then what is the point of fighting? What is the point of-
Ian MalcolmBut, but HT, you would agree that the end time prophecy is Jewish subversion of Christianity,
Speaker 19right? No, I think that it's all Jewish. The Islam, the Christianity, and the Judaism.
Ian MalcolmBut, but HT, how can it be Jewish if the Christian doctrine teaches that- The Jewish, let's say, resurrection of their Antichrist according to Christianity, like you're basically saying that Christianity is subverted because it has been subverted. So was it subverted originally or is it subverted now? It
Speaker 19was a subversion from the beginning. It was, it was Second Temple Judaism. But then why
Ian Malcolmwould it teach the antithesis of the Jewish doctrine?
Speaker 19Well, because you had a bunch of people that were fighting for power in this time in, in Judea that were fighting for who was gonna be the Messiah, and of course, the Jews, they do hate Christianity. I'm not arguing that they do hate Christianity, because Christianity is universalism, meaning anyone can become Christian. Same with Islam, anyone can become Islamic. Now predominant, now you're seeing that in the UK with white people joining in Islam and stuff like
Ian Malcolmthat. But, but actually, you do realize that the construction of the third temple and what would follow is the arrival of the Christian Antich
Speaker 19yeah, I was supposed to. Hey, just, just, can I ask you some real quick out of, just to be fair?
Ian MalcolmYeah, it's, it's just, it seems utterly antithetical to what you would pursue. Hold on, hold on. I, I
Speaker 19really want to give you guys, like, I'm not the smartest guy here, obviously. Everyone knows that. But I do have a lot of good common sense, which replaced, Christian replaced common sense. But my buddy Headless, who is a very smart guy, has been trying to get up here, and
Ian MalcolmHumor. I don't even know which would be more entertaining. If you
Speaker 19guys want a serious like, decisions,
Ian Malcolmdecisions. If you--
Speaker 19No, because you guys talk about- Yid. You talk, you guys talk about like-
Speaker 20I vote Yid.
Speaker 19Okay. So this, come on, man, if we're gonna have-
Ian MalcolmI'm actually trying, and, and David, for what it's worth, I don't know if you guys can, it, it seems like we do have a slot, but if I click on it, it doesn't allow me to add anybody else as a speaker.
Speaker 19He's a, he's a, he's a nice guy, and he's got a lot more information than I, I do, and he's not gonna be calling your names. And I'm
Speaker 20gonna try and build it up here.
Speaker 19I think the panel
Speaker 19Have you heard of the delta, what is it that-- He's gonna come in here and say it. 'cause you always, the art- No,
@uncutspeechthe Delphic maxims. Yeah. This is, I know how, how to, yeah, how to, oh, I guess, well then, we were talking about this the other day. Yeah, yeah, these good conversations. Yeah. The Delphic maxims, here's the issue with the Delphic maxims, and even the Greeks brought this up later, contem-more contemporary Greeks talked about this, like, the Like medium term ethics around family and, and work and stuff like this. The problem is, and the Greeks talked about this, Plato talked about it in the Republic, Aristotle talked about it as well,
@uncutspeechDiogenes talked about this, was that this is just an very incomplete moral system. Like it's good for day to day like rights and wrongs, but as far as like a moral system, it's philosophically incoherent for a few reasons. Like it doesn't have objective grounding, it doesn't have any grounding at all for that matter. Like you can go look at what
@uncutspeechThis isn't Christians like subverting it or anything like that, this is other Greeks. Now the Christians had plenty of issues with them as well, you know what I mean? But again, it's like, yeah, they're, they're great day-to-day things, but it's not a good complete moral system, and it's one of the issues that like Alatis sort of- What
Speaker 20do you mean that it doesn't have objective grounding? Help me out with that one.
@uncutspeechWell, it doesn't appeal to any sort of objective grounding, that's the thing. So whenever we're
Speaker 20looking-
@uncutspeechOkay,
@uncutspeechWell, I wanna answer David's question real quick, and then I guess you can go if you want. To your question, David, it doesn't appeal to any objective grinding for truth. So if-- What I mean by-- Hold on, hold on, hold on. What I mean by this is that--
Speaker 20Okay. Come on, man. No, let him talk.
@uncutspeechYeah, what I mean by this, right, is that if we're gonna have any sort of objective- Okay. I'm gonna drop the headless chicken. Keep jumping in. Objective- Then there has to be a
Speaker 20grinding for it Example of an objective grounding for truth.
@uncutspeechGod. That's-- there is only one.
Speaker 20So God is objective?
@uncutspeechYes.
Speaker 20In what way is God is objective?
@uncutspeechWell, I would just follow-- Are you familiar with the tag argument?
Speaker 20Hold on, no, I think God's objective. Okay, well, I
@uncutspeechguess we'll go through your opinion. I'm only asking
Speaker 20your opinion. What is, tell me, give me the objective, give me the objective grounds proof of God, give me that.
@uncutspeechOkay, so do, do you accept that there are objective- My friend,
Speaker 20don't ask me questions. Give me-
@uncutspeechOkay, okay, David, relax, then I guess I'll do what the tag argument since you want the very objective to lay out the tag argument for you since you don't want to ask any questions. So simply put Rationality are universal, which they are obviously, and since you don't want to qu- answer that question, I'll just po- leave it for you. They are. If we accept that rationality and logic is, and other things, these other metaphysical ideas are universal, then they must have an objective grinding and a rational intellect that created them. Ergo, there must be an objective truthful grinding and uncaused cause, ergo God.
Speaker 20Okay, well, first of all, that is by definition subjective, but in philosophy we do, we do understand the concept of logical space. We do understand that the base of a person who claims to be rational and reasonable, is that they have the pleasure of being objective. Hold on, hold on, hold on, time out, time out. Listen, my friend, my friend, I let you talk. You interrupted me. Do I need to mute you? Okay. Fine. Fine. I will mute you. Fine. So here's the way discussion works. It's where you don't talk and I talk, and then I don't talk and you talk. So I don't know if you've picked up on that. The Greeks
Speaker 20Language, of course, is a simul-simulacrum of reality, right? Because there is objective reality, and it's filled with objects, so we have nouns and ob- you know, nouns and objects in terms of our words. It's, everything's in motion, so we have verbs, and then we have all these relational words because all those things are interacting and bumping into each other. So that is language. So language is inherently built to be logical, right? Because of what we experience in phenomenal existence. And so logic is a product of- Consciousness's desire to, to achieve obviously some implicit end, which is to conform to reality in order to help the human promote, prolong, sustain his, his existence and make him more livable. Yeah, no, no, that's, that's, that doesn't make sense. Hold
@uncutspeechon. I
Speaker 20wanna get to your point, but the counter argument is, first of all, first of all, hold on. Well, well, well. This isn't gonna be back and forth, I don't wanna continue with the debate. Well, it's not gonna be an interrupting back and forth. Literally nonsense. You can't tie it back to the senses. That's what nonsense is. And what I'm saying is just how reason and logic work. I can disambiguate between that which is objective and that which is tied back to the senses. So if you make a logical claim, let's say Isaac Newton's claim about gravity, if you make a logical claim, it's your responsibility to tie that back to the senses and tie that back to reality. The greatest empiricist that ever lived, Isaac Newton, he didn't- Even begin with a presumption. He just began looking at data and then allowed his, his presumption to arise out of it, and then he, of course, went through the dialectical process of proving it out. So I just want to, to this idea of objectivity, by the way, it doesn't necessarily obviate your point. Oh, okay, I can respond to David at
@uncutspeechthis point. You just
Ian Malcolmobviate it. Sure, you may go, go right
Speaker 20ahead.
Ian MalcolmSo anyways, so, and I just
@uncutspeechwant to say I love both of you and Colin, and I'm excited for your
@uncutspeechLike David, you, you can, that's
@uncutspeechokay. Again, there's the
Speaker 21door, my
@uncutspeechfriend. I'm speaking. No, hey, no I didn't say that. Which can only be sen-sense based. Well, it has to be logically. You can only interpret data from the objective reality of the physical world through your senses, so therefore it must be sense based. So whenever we look at what is logical, okay, whether or not all logic can come from our sensual interpret-- our, our conscious interpretation, well, that doesn't seem to make sense because, well, if we look at whether one plus one equals one anywhere in the universe according to anyone's, you know, whether or not people exist, whether or not a conscious being interpre Yes, A is A, period. Okay? The same goes for the other, hold on, hold on, hold on, David,
Speaker 20the other,
@uncutspeechthe other, if you didn't wanna do it, why would you think what I-- Listen, David, if you're gonna shut me up and mute me when I wanna have a back and forth, why would you interrupt me, you ignorant old-- Yeah, why would you interrupt me, right? And expect the same level of respect that you couldn't grant to me? Exactly, right? So, anyways, this idea that all of our, all of our logic comes from conscious experience, it doesn't make any sense because there's clearly rational and logic exists outside of any conscious experience, unless David wants to admit that somewhere in the universe somehow one of the laws of logic doesn't contradict, or that they are-- that it does contradict rather, and that it is reliant in some way on conscious experience, which it's not clearly, unless David has an argument for that.
Speaker 20I-Interesting point, my friend. Guys, guys, guys, guys, guys,
Speaker 19guys. Dave, real quick,
Speaker 20real quick. Hold on, one second. Interesting point, my friend, and I would address it in this way. So, you're right that Locke was wrong in the idea that, in his founding of epistemology or modern epistemology with his essay concerning human understanding, he was wrong in this idea that consciousness is just passive wax. And his, in his Tabula Rasa thought, which is genius by the way, his, he, he was wrong, you know, Immanuel Kant really, you know, after Bishop Berkeley and Hume sort of fleshed this out, Immanuel Kant was the one who said, well, wait, there's some a priori things about consciousness. And I, I think that's incontrovertibly true, and again, I think it exists in logical space. The, the consciousness is pre- predisposed to understand and grasp reality in the same way as your hand is predisposed to grasp a coffee mug, okay? So is that what you're getting at? Because I agree that consciousness is an active state of awareness and has a predisposition to be an active participant in reality and understanding truth. Is that what you're getting? No,
@uncutspeechI'm not arguing at all that consciousness is required for truth to exist, right? I'm saying that if truth- I wasn't saying that. Well, con- I'm sure consciousness may be, may be required for us to understand what truth is, sure, right? But as far as, us understanding truth outside of conscious experience, again, there are transcendentalists that don't need to have conscious experience to exist.
Speaker 21Can I have a turn as well? You guys are taking up all the time.
Speaker 19No, can we have a headless go? I
Speaker 21mean,
@uncutspeechit's been Christian, Christian, Chris- Can the headless get in here? I'm not making This, this
Speaker 19becomes ridiculous. Going against, this, this would help you learn a thing or two, Yeah, literally, David and HP are on the same fucking side. HP is really
Speaker 21terrified. Exactly. All of HP is terrified. Awesome, you
@uncutspeechgot, you, you got
Speaker 21that. HP two plus two equals four. Anyway, so facts. Look at, look at my debate with Adam Green. They have nothing but trust the Jews that the Jews are God's chosen, but they're not. Can, can you
Speaker 22mute him? He's not gonna stop. They're just gonna
Speaker 21filibuster. It
Speaker 21Now can I speak, hosts?
Speaker 20Yes, please go. Thank
Speaker 21you. anyway, so, you know, they keep saying that, so just ask these guys and shut it down quickly. Other than mocking the Jews or the Jew-antipholies, like the Maseretik Hebrew, what evidence do you have that Jesus was a Jew or the hunchback baby eaters or God's chosen people? They have nothing. Also, I can absolutely prove God, and we'll just start here. Love debunks logic-only universes. It's logical- To abandon your child to survive another day if ice or an alligator comes for them, but it's obviously evil to do so. So it's not just logic, love shows that there is something more to it than evolution. Evolution, by the way, is debunked with things like,
Speaker 21irreducible complexity or lack of biogenesis or the ability to create life from non-life. It's been disproven. They've admitted that it's been disproven. You need the creator to create. Anyway, this with hundreds of thousands of pages On alchemy, who died drinking mercury, and most of the famous so-called scientists were. And Biblical Earth is proof of God. we can prove God with genetics. His name is literally on every human cell, unless you've taken the mRNA vaccine of every person on Earth, like the artist signing his creation. we can continue. I mean, in fact, I'm actually gonna post an image for you guys in just a second on some of the historical evidences proving, for example, Sodom and Gomorrah. They really got nuked. Stone buildings melted, people got turned into stumps like they were cut in half, and the
Speaker 21pillars of salt really happened. Brimstone that's unnaturally pure, shotgun blasted into the mountainside. The flood really happened. There are whale bones on mountaintops all over the world. Giants were real. We have bones. We have the elongated skull grandpas of the Jews today.
Speaker 20Okay, my friend. Well, thank you very much. Listen, I will say that was a strong man, that was a strong evidence, that was a-- That was
Speaker 21awesome. Hold on.
Speaker 20There's, that was a strong man shot at Isaac Newton, but let's go to Headless, thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. So,
Speaker 22I, I just wanna just, ask a real quick logical question. Is, is good even possible if you don't resist evil? can I throw that to Colin? Is good even possible
Speaker 20if
Speaker 22Yes, yes, it is possible. Well, you're saying,
Speaker 20you're saying if you don't resist evil, you're claiming this existence in the context of your question. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But we're talking about objective
Speaker 22morality, right? We're talking about objective morality, so we gotta start from a place that actually makes objective sense. You've gotta resist evil for there to be
Speaker 20objective morality. Okay, but it's like saying, it's like saying, does, does the flu exist if you don't resist it? Yeah, it, it exists,
@uncutspeechyeah. But
Speaker 22you're not making a Man, do not resist an evil man. There's your objective basis for your morality. Do not resist an evil man, present
Speaker 22your cheek. Okay, look,
Speaker 22Okay, you, you posed a question to me, can
@uncutspeechI answer this now? Okay, so here's the thing, all right. You're just talking about, I mean, like, look, you're-- When we're asking for the objective, you're not understanding something. When we're asking for like the grinding and the morality, that's completely different than giving us a descriptor for what we should do in the face of evil, right? It's too late. Right? I don't-- Who's even talking? Is that you talking headless?
Speaker 22No, I mean, we're, we're talking about objective morality. Was that you saying it's too late though? Was that you saying
@uncutspeechit was, was that you saying it's too late though over and over and over again? From the word
Speaker 22of God. I'm asking you a question. Was that you saying,
@uncutspeech"Hey, Hedlist, Hedlist, if we're gonna do this, control yourself, stop chimping, alright, bro? Alright. So here's the thing. Okay. Like, do, do you wanna talk about the objective grinding or do you wanna talk about which one's
@uncutspeechYou were the one, you were the one that came up here and held your hand up. Why don't you pick? I mean, I, I'd rather not talk about either of them, right? Like, this is no conversation that, oh, you know, the church fathers already bullied you on, but like... Headless, headless, headless, headless, headless,
Ian Malcolmheadless. For your own benefit, I'm gonna ask, take a deep breath and try when asked these questions just to calmly present your thoughts on it.
Speaker 21And remember, H. T. said he was calm and collected and knew his shit.
Speaker 22We're, we're, we're calm, we're calm and collected, but we, we gotta address the fact, we gotta address the fact that the objective morality you talk about from the Bible, coming from this source, which is God, which is grounding for all of the rest of it, it says, "Do not resist evil," as opposed to the thirty-first Delphic maxim, which says, "Shun evil." So these are two different perspectives. One is useful, one is not useful. One is What is painfully not what's going on
Speaker 23in that passage? What's going on in that passage before just like picking a verse, right? When does he say, "Do not resist evil"?
Speaker 23When Jesus is taken, being taken to be executed, that's when he says, "Do not resist an evil man." That's what's going on, alright? So like this idea, if there's some goal of, "Oh, I need to be killed," right? If that's, if that's the plan, right? And then he's saying that, much different Than like what you're trying to make it out to be. But go ahead. Oh, and by the way, by the Bible,
@uncutspeechreal quick, there's like, as far as since we're cherry-picking everything and everything, right? Ephesians six eleven, put on the whole armor of God that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. Ephesians six thirteen, take up the whole armor of God that you may be able to withstand in the evil day. So this idea, right, that there's no,
@uncutspeechthere's no prescription out, not this idea that there's
Speaker 20One second. I, I do agree, and I'll unmute, that I understand you're citing that passage, but I think it's clear, and I think I'm an objective observer here, it's very clear that Christianity is not only a moral philosophy, but a moral philosophy that people used as, to, in a, in a moral fight. So the idea that Christians were just rolling over and the Christians weren't making their stance and even dying for what it is they believe Believe in, it's just how they die for what they believe in. They were castrating
Speaker 19themselves, and it was addressed in the Council of Nicaea to stop castrating yourself for Christ. Okay, can you- Yeah, the baby
Speaker 21sacrificers were saying, "Don't do this for Jesus." So Christians were
Speaker 19chopping off their balls for Jesus.
Speaker 21H T.
Speaker 19Alright, so, so
Ian Malcolmhang on for, for some, for some entertainment, we are going to make a quick little pivot while everybody catches their breath, and we're going to go in an unusual direction to Mr. Yitz, and we will get the perspectives of a Jew on the disagreement that has been had here, and we'll allow this to go on rather, rather briefly, and then we will come back and get back into the, the boxing match here.
Speaker 23My bet is Yitz in,
Ian MalcolmH T. They're gonna align on everything.
Speaker 24He wrote your Bible
@uncutspeechfor you, you retards. I'm gonna take Yitz on the over, anyone wanna get me on?
Speaker 24Hey, Yitz, sounds six million to one. I'll take it. He wrote, you, you wrote their Bible for him. The apostles were Jewish, Jesus was Jewish, and this is Jewish mysticism.
Speaker 25They're not even the real Israelites.
Speaker 24Oh, you're, you're a white Jew now, Wolf? This is interesting.
@uncutspeechNah, he's not even a white Jew guy. He's saying, he's saying the same genetic argument. He's,
Ian MalcolmYou're mocking Wolf for doing the antisemitism what you did, right? oh.
Speaker 24Me and Wolf, me and Wolf talked in the back channels, and he said Christianity was Jewish and fake. And now he's doing it to me. Oh, that's a lie. No, that's Wolf.
Speaker 25When did, when did you last record? You want the record? Me and Wolf have talked way more in the back channels. We spoke
@uncutspeechone year ago. Me, me, me and Wolf have talked way more in the back channels than you fuck, way more than I ever wanted to. I fucking have Like he's, he's one of full, basically, like he still needs to get in the church and stuff like that, you know what I mean? But he, yeah, alright, you, you literally got your titties cut off, you're, you buy a brown man, but, you know, it is okay. You're, you're a literal, you're, you're, like, we wanna talk about who's a cuck, you got your, your, your like, but anyway, out, it's pronounced
Speaker 24out, not "ut."
@uncutspeechYeah, exactly. See, that's the thing, mocking European accents is hilarious, right? Whenever, whenever you claim, whenever you--
Ian MalcolmOh no, oh no, oh no! Okay, so everybody, hang on. We're gonna go to Yitz. He's, he's-- What do you know? The politest of everyone. He's got his hand up, he's calm. Dustin, I don't know if it was Sharon or David or your internet connection that keeps dropping you, but if you do jump in, I will have to just remove you from the space and probably say this
Ian MalcolmBut ple- you just left again. But if you do come back, Dustin, please just don't spew out, it's not helpful. But let's go to Yitz, I'm very curious to get this, the Jewish perspective here.
Speaker 26it's just simply that, Jesus, what's, what's Yitz, is not Hungarian or, Slovakian or anything like that. And, the, the Torah's morality is, one of the best moralities in built Western civilization. And, I would just add that, if you want, if you're searching for proof of God, and I don't believe you can ever prove God per se, but if you're searching for proof, just look no further than, Ecclesiastes, 45, which talks about the land blooming again once, we return to it as well. It's very, interesting that for nineteen hundred years it was desolate, you know, Mark Twain famously walked around Jerusalem within fifty minutes in 1867 because of how desolate it And the Arabs, and Ottomans totally spoiled the land. They, they removed,
Speaker 26they removed, three feet of the topsoil, and, yeah, it just, they deforested seventy-five percent of the trees. So you can call it coincidence, you can call it self-fulfilling prophecy, whatever you wanna say it, from a rational perspective. But I think it's pretty obvious that, the land was, barren and deforested, nothing going on, no population, no cities, nothing, until the Jews returned. The center of Malaya Was, taken away and everything, you know, the desert began to bloom. So that's all I have to say. Thank you, Ian, for having me on.
Speaker 26Of course, Ian. And, and Wolf, quick question for you, Wolf. I don't know if you still plan on doing the debate. I see Key is listening and me and Key and Bosco were all ready for that debate. do you accept it, Wolf? Well, I, I, I will, I will
Speaker 25reach out, I will reach out to Santino, I told him that. Dude, I've been busy, I have family things, so I need to talk to the boys that are helping, right? So let me get this figured out when I'm not on X, because I don't live on X, I will reach out to Santino by next week. So next weekend is most likely we gonna do it, yes? Most likely next weekend. I just, I've been really, really busy, very busy,
Ian MalcolmIL, you
Speaker 25Well, I wanted to, so real quick, I have my hand up, I just give me just a minute. Go, go ahead. I wanted to reach out, I wanted to reach out to Ian. I wanted to let Ian know I also wanna talk to him, and I wanted to let you know I can't DM anybody, I'm trying to DM you, on JQ, we'll- It's Ian, it's Ian, not Ian. Okay, okay, okay, H-H Not because of this debate, because of something else, and I will reach out to you with the JQR account, with my other burner account, 'cause I can't DM anybody here. But then when you guys are done arguing and fighting and making the juice very happy about how we acting, I wanna have a just, you know, man to man with Ian, because there's been things I've been doing, and I wanna just talk to him. HT, you had titty surgery. It's
Speaker 24not Ian. All right. It's not Ian. All right. It's Ian. I, Because you're not European. I call him here. I love Wolfboys for what it's
Speaker 25worth.
Speaker 27I
Speaker 25call him for two years. I call him for two years, same thing, and I, and I love
Speaker 27it, brother. I'm glad you're here. We all know Jesus is Jewish, bro. But listen, man. Wait, when, when did he become Jamaican? I'm so good with Colin and Jesus being not Jewish, bro. Just, oh, stop now, bro. Hailing
Ian Malcolmeveryone. Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
Speaker 24The
Speaker 26album is, is John Paul and Wolfman, I'm just playing. That actually sounds very natural for you, really. That was pretty
Ian Malcolmgood,
Speaker 28yeah, that was pretty good actually. Wolf's got a unique voice. I like his voice, man. yes, before I go, Ian, 'cause I do have to go momentarily,
Speaker 26like in a minute, but before I go, I wanted to ask David, you always have to leave. I, I, I'm, I'm disappointed. Dude, that's, that's a trick, you know? Hey, wait Isaiah 36:35, which says the land would bloom once the trees were torn. I mean, that's incredible proof for the, for the idea of the existence of God. And I don't know why any Christian would want to try to debunk it. I mean, do people want to enjoy atheism instead? It sounds pretty much- I honestly
Speaker 28would have to understand what it is that you're saying first. Isaiah
Speaker 26chapter 36 verse 35, which says the land, it was a prophecy that the land would bloom and, trees and everything. Responding to its people wanting to return to Israel. Do you have like a- I got a question
Speaker 29for you, real quick.
Speaker 26Okay, but then I do. Okay.
Speaker 29Is it anti-Semitic not to follow Isaiah sixty twelve, where it says, "All the nations of the world will serve you, or else they will be fully destroyed"?
Speaker 26The nations, no, no, no, you can, you can read the Rambam, there's nothing about, the nations serving anyone. the nations and, and including Israel, will serve God.
Ian MalcolmDavid, do you enjoy rum buns with your coffee? I'm sorry, yes, every time you say rum buns, that's where my head goes.
Speaker 26Do, do, do you have a comment on that, on that, passage, David?
Speaker 28Well I don't know what, what is it that you're asking, because when I talk about, look, and I didn't go down the epistemological road because I thought it was just too much for people, it's, it's way deeper than we, than the discussion we had. But when we talk about how we know things and what's objective and what's subjective, I was only taking umbrage with someone's definition of that which is objective. By the way, we always get these things confused, or people do. I'm only interested in how it helps us towards the truth.
Speaker 28So I I'm anti-schematic for everyone in the room, but as far as what you're saying and, and the dogmatic claim of the Bible, no, I don't have any problem with that at all. But it's-- you can't call it objective, right? If you have to read it in a book, it's not objective.
Speaker 26Well, no, no, I would say it's objective. I would say that it is, objective because it's pretty clear, the text is very clear, the land is well maintained. Oh, yeah, the
Ian Malcolmtext is clear. The text is objective. You're right. Yeah. You have to print
Speaker 26words on the page, yeah, you're right. And, and history, history, spelled it out. History is clear as well. And, let me, let me ask you this. So, so, so-
Speaker 28Well, ye-yes, let me ask you this. so, Moses, re-reputedly came down from the mountain with the Ten Commandments, right? And there were some really universal ones in all cultures, which is lying, cheating, stealing, murdering, these sorts of things. Do you think the day before everyone was liars? Do you think the day before-- Do you think everybody was like, "What? Don't cheat? Don't lie?" Don't murder? Do, do you think that the- I know that, no, of course not.
Speaker 26No. Okay, no. okay. But, but I, but, but I want to clarify that, for all the anti-Semites in the space, and there are plenty, you have to consider Israel is thriving, we're being very victorious against the enemies, like Iran, for example. Well, let me ask you this, are you- Yeah, let me ask you.
Speaker 28Hold on, my friend. Are you an anti-Semite?
Speaker 28I hope I didn't double mute you. Are you yet an antisemite?
Speaker 26No, no, of course not. Okay, so, hold on,
Speaker 28hold on. So, you, do you support Israel?
Speaker 26Oh, yes, of course I support. Okay,
Speaker 28so you support the one country in the world that is killing all the Semites around them, and somehow it makes me an antisemite to object to your killing all the Semites? How, explain to me logically, and now we're talking about the concept of logical space, thank you, Vixenshine, please explain to me logically how it is that I'm an antisemite for wanting you to stop mass exterminating Semite children, Semite women, Semite old people, Semite people in hospitals? Hospitals, some of my people in the schools, please explain to me how it is anti-Semitic, to want you to stop killing all the Semites. Help me with that one. Yeah, so number, number one,
Speaker 26the term Semite, the term Semite concerns languages, it was, inappropriately applied to ethnicities. That's not okay. Number two, number two, as well as not killing all the, we're not, you know, twenty-one percent of the Israeli population is Arab, I mean. To say that Israel is killing Arabs, I mean, Christian Arabs in Patagalo, they score the highest on cognitive, cognitive exams, all kinds of things. So just, I
Speaker 24don't want to get
Speaker 26into
Speaker 24that, okay?
Speaker 26It's unfounded. But, but just to end with, 'cause I, I do got a, lead. But, for everyone out there who believes that Israel is evil, all the divine prophecies in Tanakh, oh, they're true. We return to the land, the land is blooming, powers of the enemy. The land
@uncutspeechis on fire and, and smoke right now. Can you guys worship the same God of Israel? All of you.
Speaker 28Hold on, hold on. So, Yitz, you believe in good and evil, right?
Speaker 28Is that right, Yitz? Do you believe in good and evil? Yes. Okay. So, you said that because we think that Israel is evil, it's fulfilling a prophecy. Now, logically, and I'm just asking you to reason through this with me So even if it is fulfilling a prophecy, one of two things could be true. Israel, let, let's just assume it is fulfilling a prophecy, right? The first thing that could be true is, is that it's fulfilling the prophecy even though Israel isn't evil, and the second one Wait for it, is that it's fulfilling a prophecy because Israel is evil? So you could still be-- Isn't all your work ahead of you to still prove or make the case that you're not evil? Don't you think it's sort of a weak straw man to say, "Well, no, no, no, no, no, no, yeah, we murdered all these kids, and we're committing genocide, and we're killing everybody around us," but- If you're calling that out, it's because you're fulfilling a prophecy. Doesn't that seem a little disingenuous to you? Don't you still have to defend whether you're being evil or not?
Speaker 26David, name me the biblical prophecy in Tanakh that says, "We're evil." But look,
Speaker 28but hold on. I don't, but hold on, I don't really care about that, right? Because I care about whether you are evil, right? In this world, evility comes at the expense of innocence. And if you're gonna kill a bunch of people, hold on, hold Kill a bunch of innocent people. I would like you to stop doing that. That is quintessentially, that is the apotheosis of evil, okay? And for you to come in and, by the way, it's kind of an admission of guilt, I'm kind of embarrassed for you in this way. You're basically saying, okay, witness is indefensible, we're exterminating lots of people, but you know what? It's making the prophecy come true. Doesn't that kind of make you evil? It's like you're raising your hand and going, "I'm evil, I'm
Speaker 29I, I answered for him. He asked for a biblical passage. It's Isaiah forty-five, seven. It is, "I formed the light, create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster, I, the Lord, do all these things." So that's, that's the, talking about the storm, that's
Speaker 26talking about God.
Speaker 29Yeah, exactly. Talking about
Speaker 26God. Talking about God.
Speaker 29And you guys think you're God?
Speaker 26But, Because, you know, we believe everything comes from God, there was no Satan, there was no, you know, Judas and the betrayal. So, so, yes,
Ian Malcolmyes, let me ask you a question. So, in your belief structure, because the Jews are destined to bring about good because of this insane prophecy, is therefore anything that you do that is evil inherently good, even if demonstrably evil, merely because it advances Jewish causes?
Speaker 26No, that's not what I said. No, they, everyone is confusing and conflating. You know, the killing will stop, David, when the terrorists stop killing us. How about that? So,
Ian Malcolmso, okay, so just to be clear, so, so genocide is evil when the Israeli Jews do it, even if it brings about something that's of benefit to them, is that right?
Speaker 26I don't believe, the, the conflict in Gaza could have been avoided. I don't think that anything to do with- Would, would you, would you
Ian Malcolmdefine the, the mass murder of tens, if not hundreds of thousands, of Palestinian women and children, would you say that that is evil?
Speaker 26If that's what Israel was doing, yes. But that's not what we're doing. All right, we're
Ian Malcolmgetting somewhere, David. Look at that!
Speaker 26Well, I don't think that's not what we're doing. What about
Speaker 24Jack's, but then he says that's
Ian Malcolmnot what we're doing.
Speaker 24Yeah. What about Jack's alone? He's got his hand up.
Speaker 28Yeah, yes, you said that the conflict in Gaza was unavoidable. Well, now that's a logical statement. No, I said it
Speaker 26was avoidable. It could have been avoidable. It was not to pursue terrorism, could have been avoidable.
Speaker 28Okay, so let me ask you this. Would any of this happen, have happened, would, wouldn't the ultimate way to avoid this, would be for the Ashkenazim to never go invade Palestine? Wouldn't that be the best way to avoid all of this?
Speaker 26well, David, I wouldn't, I wouldn't dispute that, because first off, we Ashkenazim, we are all actually Jews. You can see, you can study the DNA, we are the ones who preserved Hebrew, the tradition and everything. Yada yada yada. So that's number one.
Speaker 28Number
Speaker 26two, we need to go
Speaker 28home with our families. But you could have not gone there, right? But you could have not gone there, right? It was our
Speaker 26ancestral homeland, it's where we belong. Okay, wait, hold on, hold on, hold on,
Speaker 28hold on. I am, I am Scottish, right? So I live in a part of America where there are lots of Scottish people, right? Now, if, if all of us got together, and I'm just going under your presumption, I don't necessarily agree From a DNA point of view, but if all of us got together and we went to Edinburgh and we basically through terrorism murdered a bunch of people and pushed them off their land and took their houses, it would still be wrong, right? I mean, you do understand the concept of right and wrong, that would certainly be wrong for us to do that scenario. It's our
Speaker 26heritage. So yes, David, yes, in that scenario, it would be wrong, but that's not what the Jews did. We didn't go and terrorize everyone, we came back to our homeland 'cause people persecuted us Americans aren't going
Speaker 28to
Speaker 26do this. And I would imagine if Scottish Americans returned to Scotland, they'd be embraced with open arms. So it's kind of a false analogy. I would call it a fallacy. Of course
Speaker 28it's not a false analogy. That's exactly what you think you want. Thank you for having me on.
Speaker 26And you took their homes out. What's false about that? Come on. Well, I, I do have to go. Thank you for having me on. Alright, Yitz. And, I'll reach out to you. I'm gonna
Speaker 25reach out to you, Yitz. And good, David, good, good, good conversation. He has to run away though, so too bad. He's a deft Jew. And, and David, just,
Speaker 30I- May I say something real quick, David? Being Scottish myself, I think that-- Well, hold on a second, please. Being Scottish myself, I think that-- No problem. I think us Scottish people kinda need to go back and reclaim it 'cause it's pretty bad back there. I have family back there still. It's, we gotta get-- Maybe you can. We gotta get the-- Well, you Jews fucking brought all the people in, so-- I'm not gonna go back there and display a Scottish pipe
Speaker 26that I've loved there forever. I can't believe you didn't know that. But There you go. I would say, you're good. You're, you're taking the right, the right, the
Ian Malcolmright, the right, the right. Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. I will do, yes, I, I will do your obligation a favor and I will remove the microphone so that you can go on with the rest of your day, and that way you won't be late to your function, and I sincerely appreciate the, stopping by, and I say that with all sincerity. I like to have differing points of views, and it's always wonderful to
Ian MalcolmThe evil, which, is why I brokered the question to you, it's on that, let's say, objective, not subjective, belief structure, right? It was defined as a genocide by various organizations, some international ones. The World Court said, "Hey, Netanyahu, you are conducting an open genocide, you need to be held to account for it." And the United States said, "How dare you, World Court? We will have to, we have to come in and intervene," which they did, which is just baffling until you recognize States is also compromised by the exact same subject, which is utterly ridiculous, I suppose, if this is the world we live in. HT was saying, "Why don't we get Jack Stone in the conversation?" I don't know if his hand is up or not, but if it is, Jack, please jump in.
Speaker 31Yeah, I appreciate you letting me up, guys. the conversation's kinda went, A bit of ways from whenever I originally requested and asked up here, so I'll try to do this. But, I got a quick question, for the Christians, and I want you to ask, I want you to tell me who the Jew is in Zechariah 8:23. In that passage, who is the Jew in that verse? Do, do you wanna read it
Ian Malcolmout?
Speaker 31Yeah, I'll read it out real quick. because the Jews interpret this in the Talmud, this is where they interpret it to get their twenty-eight hundred servants. Okay? So I'm gonna read the verse right now. Thus says the Lord of hosts, In those days it shall come to pass that ten men shall take hold of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the corner of the garment of him that is a Jew, saying, "We will go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."
Speaker 29Yeah, who is that? Who's the Jew in that, in that, thing? Is that us?
Speaker 31Or is it, because the, the common Christian interpretation would be that that Jew is Jesus, and since he's a rabbi, that's them holding onto his tassels of the tzitzit that he wore.
Ian MalcolmSo your suggestion here is that the Jews are holding on to the Rabbi, as you define him, as Jesus, as, they're riding his coattails. That's the, the suggestion?
Speaker 29No, no, no, I'm saying, we are the nations.
Speaker 31We
Speaker 29are the nations holding onto Israel. Yeah.
Speaker 31That's the-- no, the Jews interpret that verse in the Talmud as to being all Jews, or like a representative head Jew. Okay, so out of curiosity,
Ian Malcolmso are you of the mindset that there is no Jesus, and that Christianity is a Jewish larp? I just wanna understand your frame of reference here.
Speaker 31that's
Ian Malcolmirrelevant to my life. Well, no, no, no, it's not. It's not, 'cause I think it, it would
Speaker 31I think there is a lot of, questioning in the historicity of Jesus. Okay, so, okay, that's,
Ian Malcolmthat's totally fine. But do you think that Christianity is a Jewish LARP and is, uses a control mechanism, for a large chunk of the world? Is that your frame of reference? Yes. Okay, so now here's why I asked that question. You're pointing to the Talmud, right?
Speaker 31No, I'm pointing to the Old Testament. No, I under- I understand
Ian Malcolmthat,
Speaker 31but you referenced the Talmud, right? Yeah, because I'm, I'm telling you how the Jews interpret it. Okay, and now here's my question. So
Ian Malcolmthe, the, the belief structure that you have is that there is no Jesus, right?
Speaker 31That, that's, that's the way I'm leaning.
Ian MalcolmOkay. Okay. And hang on, hang on, because we'll, we'll go through a couple questions. So you believe that there was no Christ, you're now referencing the Talmud. Are you familiar with the Talmud's suggestion about Christ? Dude,
Speaker 31you, you are totally full of bullshit. Jack, The Jew in that passage, so you have to understand, but Jack, oh
Ian Malcolmman. Jack, Jack, Jack, take a deep breath, take a deep breath, and can you answer the question? You're familiar with the Talmud that you just referenced, right? Yes. Okay, are you familiar with what the Talmud says about Christ?
Speaker 31Yeah, it says he's boiling in excrement, and because he's a Jewish sinner, even in that excerpt, they specifically called Jesus Jewish.
Ian MalcolmCorrect. Okay, so now here's my question to you. So if the Talmud-- well, actually, let me ask you one more question. According to the Talmud, what should they do when it comes to the Christians or other non-Jews seeing the Talmud?
Speaker 31that, that, that verses are kind of taken out of context and implied to mean that, "Oh, we gotta, we gotta kill them or whatever." No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, it doesn't
Ian Malcolmsay anything about killing them if they try to read the Talmud. What does it say about the Talmud?
Ian MalcolmEnlighten me. Jagged says that the Christians aren't supposed to read the Talmud. So if that's the case, can you tell me who is it that is reading the T
Speaker 31You're not making, you're not making any point. No, I'm making a very good point. I'm leading you down a very- This is the point. This is the point.
Ian Malcolmno, Jack, I'm leading you down a very obvious set of yes and no questions, or, or let's just say basic answer questions that are going to arrive at a very, let's say, embarrassing point for you. Why are
Speaker 31you reading the Talmud?
Ian MalcolmWhy are you reading the Talmud? Well, because we're trying to understand a lot of the world. But
Ian Malcolmso the question
Ian MalcolmYou just said. No, I didn't just say. What the, what the Talmud says is that non-Jews shouldn't read the Talmud, that you should lie about the Talmud, and that they shouldn't be aware of the material that is in it. Now, if that's the case, okay, hang on, Jack, my point. If your frame of reference is that Christ never existed, that it is a Jewish larp that is used as a psyop, well, then let me ask you the question, why would the Jews in their book that non- Jews aren't supposed to ever be able to read. Why would they reference the person that supposedly is the LARP? Why would they lie to other Jews? That's a polemic.
Speaker 31That's
Ian Malcolmthe polemical. No, it isn't. It's a very obvious question. Why would they lie to other Jews,
Speaker 31Jack? It's a polemic. So, so, so Jews wrote something mean about Rabbi Jesus five hundred years later. Why would
Ian Malcolmthey do that if he was fake? Why wouldn't they say, "Ha ha, we cre- We
Speaker 31tricked the Christians." Because as a pole
Ian MalcolmIn their book that nobody else is supposed to read. They do. Okay, so if they do mock the Christians, why would they not-- Why would they not mock the Christians for falling for the LARP? Why would they perpetuate the LARP to other Jews? That makes no sense.
Speaker 31I'm pretty sure, I'm pretty sure in the Talmud, yes, you, they do. They say that Peter was sent to, take away Christianity, from Judaism, and then they also say that Paul the Pharisee was a double agent. They said Paul, okay,
Ian Malcolmso, I understand how this makes no sense.
Speaker 31Hold on, would, would you let me get this? No, he doesn't. Jack, Jack, you're miss-- You're missing, you're missing a very obvious line of reasoning. No, it's not.
Ian MalcolmJack, a filibuster would maybe to speak over top of you and to not let you speak. I'm asking you, no, I'm not diverting. I'm asking you direct, Jack, I'm asking you direct questions, and then you're running away from them because the line of questioning-- I'm not running away. Yes, you
Ian MalcolmJack, can you define non sequitur?
Speaker 31It's not following the point. It doesn't make any logical following of sense from the line of questioning that I- Okay, but Jack, I'm
Ian Malcolmasking you direct questions, and you're suggesting that I'm obfuscating and that I'm filibustering. What does fil- So what does filibustering mean, Jack? Dude, this is getting- No, Jack, can you define the word? Jack, Jack, define the word filibustering. You have to
Speaker 31admit that Jesus is a Jew, Jack. Can you define the word filibustering? If Jesus was white, can you define the word Philamust? Reject him. If Jesus was white, and that means white people rejected him. Jack, are you filibustering me
Ian Malcolmright now? Do you know the answer to that question?
Speaker 28if I may, Jack, so you need to be able to submit yourself to cross-examination if you're a reasonable and rational person. So he's asking you this question. There seems to be a contradiction in your claim that the historicity of Jesus, by the way, is clear, because his enemies, including Tacitus, basically wrote about him. So I think the obvious- That wasn't
Speaker 31my first-
Speaker 28Hold on, hold on. My first point was just to ask you, "Do you think Jesus- Hold on, hold on. What I want you to do though- You're getting very I want you to be cal- I want you to be calm, and I want you to be willing to be cross-examined. By the way, I'm willing to be cross-examined, and, and Dustin and I were doing it earlier. So I want you to do this. I want you to let him ask you a question, because there seems to be a contradiction which you need to defend, because you're the one who has posited this to be so. And he's asking, why would the Jews who wrote the Talmud only for themselves, why would they be writing about him
Speaker 28Let him pick up that question again and just be calm and be short-winded and just answer the question. Don't avoid it, don't ask him a question back. So go ahead, Ian, ask the question again.
Ian MalcolmWell, well, actually, just for, for laughs, David, could you define the word filibustered for Jack since he didn't wanna do it.
Speaker 28Talking forever in order to not let the other person talk. Well, because you're losing.
Ian MalcolmAnd, and Jack, was, was I doing that or was I asking you direct questions?
Speaker 31You was off-tee skating and you was diverting from my original point. I, I, I'm asking the question, you want to do that, and you want to do that. I'm asking the hard question. Okay, guys, we got an ambush. Big whoop, I misspoke, but like my original question that you couldn't answer and that you didn't wanna answer was just specifically, "Who is the Jew in Zechariah eight twenty-three?" Okay? And then you let it in, you didn't directly answer my first question, and then you went into all this other stuff and trying to strawman me like that way you could find the
@uncutspeechtruth
Speaker 31that you could easily try to, try to take away at Hold on.
Speaker 28Hold on. Hold on. It's not a straw man, obviously you don't know what that is either. It's not a straw, a straw man argument. To challenge the-- You're trying to, no, you,
Speaker 31you, you diverted away from the original question, and you didn't even answer it. And then now you're trying to, to pick--
Speaker 28John, John, let's just imagine there's a whiteboard and we're all looking at it, okay? And that whiteboard is, "I do not believe in the historic-- historicity of Jesus. I don't
Speaker 31But that's the claim that you made. You literally made the claim that he never existed.
Speaker 28You literally made the claim that he never existed. And I have,
Speaker 31and make it about that. That's what you're trying to make this conversation
Speaker 28about. Okay. Did Jesus ever live? Did Jesus live? Was there a person named Jesus that lived in your-- Do you, do you think that's so?
Speaker 31It is highly likely that he didn't even exist.
Speaker 28Okay.
Speaker 31There are no contemporaries for him. Josephus is a forgery. Tacitus is way late. Okay.
Ian MalcolmJack, Jack, curiosity,
Speaker 31There, there's tons of people. I, I don't
@uncutspeechlike- Jack also doesn't believe in Socrates or Plato or Aristotle, obviously, for the same logical reason. No, this
Speaker 28is, this is a con- It's, it's, it's funny that you should say that, whoever just chimed in. That's a great point, because- I've made this point on historicity before, and so does Will Durant, the historian, which is the same challenge of proving Socrates existed is the same proving Christ existed. And listen, I'm happy to accept the evidence in either direction. I am absolutely like, you can't love the truth without loving the truth that doesn't love you back. And the record is really clear. The idea that there were a whole bunch of Christians and no Christ is pretty ridiculous. It's sort of like saying, you know, there's all this smoke but no fire. No, I'm sorry, there, it's I, I,
Speaker 29I believe, Jesus was a myth. Can I take a whack at those questions?
Speaker 28Go right ahead.
Speaker 29Alright, do you guys believe in the divinity of Jim Jones?
Speaker 28Hold on, w- you, you believe that Jesus is a myth or his divinity is a myth? I don't believe
Speaker 29in the divinity of Jim Jones, was he a prophet and a teacher? Okay, hold on, hold on.
Speaker 28These are two different things. We're not talking about right now the discussion we're just having, so just try to follow along, my friend. The discussion we're having is the historicity of Jesus himself, right?
Speaker 29And so you're not, you're not- No, no, I'm saying, let's say, let's say Jim Jones is a cult Right?
Speaker 28Okay. Okay, so good. So look- Oh brother. It, it, it's a wild
Ian Malcolmintellectual
Speaker 32Why, why is it, why, why don't you say that Jesus was a, a Jewish cult leader, right?
Speaker 33he, he had a Jewish cult, right, in, around the first century, and whether he existed or not, that was the threat to the Jews.
@uncutspeechOkay, so like prove it though, that's the thing. This is-- But you kind of missed the point,
Speaker 34though. Hold on, hold on. I'm okay if we go down this road, but we were talking about whether the historical Christ existed, irrespective of your opinion about him. So you may proceed forward, but Of changing the discussion here.
Speaker 33Okay, was, Plato a con-
Speaker 34Go ahead.
Speaker 33Was Plato a contemporary of Socrates?
Speaker 34W- What's the point? Tell me where you're going with this.
Speaker 33Well, where's the contemporaries of Jesus that wrote about him? If Plato was a contemporary of Socrates, then he wrote about him because he knew he existed. Then there's a little bit more historicity behind the existence of Socrates than there is for Jesus.
Speaker 35Okay, okay, so explain, the Jeff guy and, the LDS, please, sir. explain, what's his name? sounds like Joseph Smith. Jeff K. D. Myers. Joseph Smith
Speaker 34with the magic glasses? Yeah, I mean, like, do you believe, do you believe Joseph Smith
Speaker 36met Moroni? I just, I just love how they're distracting from Ian Marco, I'm getting them down that road where Ian would have completely cooked them, and now we're going completely different roads. He, he did get voted for what it's
Ian Malcolmworth. e-everybody thought firsthand it was spectacular, but, but I was just filibustering him by asking more questions. You
Speaker 33weren't, you weren't, he didn't bring up the history. It was, it was like an, it was like an
Speaker 37FBA debate. I didn't, yeah, I didn't, I didn't bring up historicity, you did. I, I may, I may not have the correct term of what you were asking, but you were asking me to, in the future, just don't use words that you don't know
Ian Malcolmhow to describe. Why don't you,
Speaker 37why don't you answer the first question? Why don't you answer who's the Jew inside the white people? You gotta say something,
Speaker 38too, Jack. Yeah, you gotta say something. Who's the Jew? Jack, I just wanna say, Jack, real quick, real quick, real quick, real quick, real quick. I'm, I'm pro-white as you And you start sparring, it's not gonna help your case in any way. So he's asking you pretty logical and easy questions, just answer his, and then he's gonna allow you to reciprocate and you can ask him questions. He didn't
Speaker 37answer mine first, buddy. I made a simple question. This is what I said, fair though. Is what I said fair though? And Zechariah eight twenty-three, and three, and three. Do you agree with me that you would have to
Speaker 38be aligned with somebody before they would have any type of willingness to even entertain what you're saying?
Speaker 37No, he didn't. He asked me what my question was. I was brought up on the panel to ask the question. I asked what Zechariah eight, two of the Jews, and Zechariah eight twenty-three, and he couldn't answer. And instead, he went on to ask me questions. Okay? What is that called? Whatever you wanna call it. That's what he did, okay? So Ian, can you please answer the first original question that I had, who is the Jew in Zechariah 8:23?
Ian MalcolmYeah, I'll, I'll look into the exact passage
Speaker 36right now and I'll give you a, a set of thoughts on it. And you did, and you did ask Colin that question, not Ian at first,
Speaker 37remember that? I, I asked any Christians in the room. I was like, "Colin, Ian, any Christians? I said, any Christians. Now, Wolf, Colin, any of you, tell me who the Jew is in Zechariah 8:23."
Speaker 35Yeah, I, I can tell you who the Jew is in John. I can tell you who the Jew is in many other passages. Uh-oh, you're stumbling. Yeah, John 4:22. In John 4:22.
@uncutspeechI was gonna, yeah, yeah, yeah. Who are those
Speaker 37Jews? White people? Are the Jews, are the Jews and salvation is of the Jews in John 4:22, are those white people? Because if they are, then that means that Jesus came into his own, and his own received him not. That means white people killed and rejected Rabbi Jesus, not Jews.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, listen, listen, listen,
Ian Malcolmno,
Speaker 37And then, and then Jesus was a Jew, just like the Pharisees. Now, because he wouldn't have been allowed to, hang on, hang on, hang on, pause. He wouldn't have been allowed to have debates with the Pharisees. Oh, Jesus,
Ian Malcolmthat is what philotheaturing is, Jack, for what it's worth. We're gonna help you with the definition of the word. Now, let's ask you the question, Jack. Define Jesus' Jewishness. Can you do that for me? Yes. I, I think that's double muted, Jack, for
Speaker 37Yes, he was both ethnically and religiously Jewish. He was ethnically Jewish.
Ian MalcolmNow, at the time of Christ, how was Judaism passed to a child?
Speaker 37through the, through the father. Okay, okay, okay, okay, hang on. Through the father. That is correct.
Ian MalcolmNow, Jack, who is, who is Christ's father? Guess
Speaker 37what? And Mary is also a Jew. Yahweh. Yahweh. The Jewish God of Israel. So was,
Ian Malcolmwas the immaculate conception a thing or is that not a thing?
Speaker 33Jewish God of Israel.
Ian MalcolmYeah, Jewish. Hey, listen, if he wasn't Jewish, so the Jew isn't God. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Yeah, yeah, now you're clearly, you're clearly misdefining what it is to be God, and you're doing it in a rather laughable fashion. Now you just admit, look, that Jesus' father wasn't
Speaker 37God. If
Ian Malcolmhe wasn't Jewish, then he wasn't the Messiah. If he wasn't Jewish, he wasn't the Messiah. That's- Wait, so, so Jack, out of curiosity, so Jesus, okay, so
Speaker 33We're playing by your terms. If you want the story, no, no, no, we're not.
Ian MalcolmWe're playing by your terms. I'm trying to look at your definition of things.
Speaker 37Was Superman from Kryptonian? Was Superman from Kryptonian? Yes, and Superman was a fictional character. It's a Jewish superhero. Yes. Yes. I don't think anyone would understand. That's
@uncutspeechexactly right. The point that Ian's making here, right, is that you guys, the reason, ostensibly that you hate Christianity is 'cause it's bad for white people, right? That
@uncutspeechIt's all fucking, it's all a propaganda like media marketing thing, right? the, it's designed to, so it's like, okay, did he exist? Alright. Because if he, if in order to subvert white people, he needed to exist, right? So you kind of need to subscribe to one of these two things, okay? Because if he didn't exist and you think that he, that he somehow, he somehow subverted white people, you've got a huge problem and a lot of logical holes in your argument, and it looks very bad for Europeans and white people as
Speaker 37Well, like, look, man, it, it is what it is. Like, if, if, if this religion got white people and white Europeans to worship the Jewish God of Israel through the Jewish Messiah, Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach, turning you into inward spiritual Jews, circumcised of the heart and grafted into the Jewish root, is exactly how Paul the Pharisee did. That's why I hate Christians just like you do. 2
Speaker 39Corinthians 2:9, 11. You're more Jewish than anyone else on the planet. Mute him.
Speaker 33Why do you let, let him cut him off? He was just about to finish his thought and you let him go on because I
Ian Malcolmcan't. No, no, no, no. so Jack, here's my question to you. Because, because they're, hang on, Jack, no. So Jack, here's what I'm hearing from you, is that the stories are all fables, that it's all a larp, it was all designed as a mechanism for control, and yet the group that is the villain in said story is the group that tends to just be
Ian MalcolmActually, the arrival of the Antichrist. So they're now perverting the very thing that they made from the offset as the perversion in the larp. So I guess your suggestion here is that two thousand years ago, they came up with the ruse, they put it into writing, but instead of doing the obvious thing that you would do as the larp, which would be to say, "We are the chosen people. We need to make the third temple. We will then do all these things. Help us." Do them. Instead, the brilliant Jews of the era, they wrote the text out in a way that was antithetical to their very aspirations, which they have now tried to subvert in the latter portions of the last hundred and fifty or so years, so that they can fix the errors that they made two thousand years ago. Just out of curiosity, is that your understanding of the story of Christ?
Speaker 33Why don't you worship Jim
Speaker 35Jones? Oh man. You
Speaker 37might be on the wrong Donald Trump. Ian,
Ian MalcolmIan Christ who said, "You are the synagogue of dot dot dot that we can't even say on this application without getting banned." You're
Speaker 37mistranslating that. Those who say they are Jews, those who say they are Jews and aren't. Those are people like Dustin Nemos and the Christian identity faggots that think that they're the real Jews and shit. Don't you think that maybe, don't you think that lends more credibility? That wasn't
Ian Malcolmwhat you're doing, Jack. What you're doing is you're debating the authenticity of something while then also debating the content of it. That wasn
@uncutspeechYou're picking the lane. Well, here's the thing, you're, you're messing up the timeline though, right? It seems like to me that that was written much earlier than this, like, Justin or Dustin Nemo's era of Christianity. Hold on a sec, let me, let me finish the argument real quick. Hold on a sec, you can relax, you'll be alright. So if it was written earlier and he was already warning about it, it seems like maybe he was warn-warning about the, these fake Jews, right? Maybe,
@uncutspeechmaybe these fake, maybe these fake Jews came
Speaker 36Jack, stop and feel about
@uncutspeechthree people. Yeah, you're acting very non-white right now. Just saying. Anyways, don't you think that maybe it's-
@uncutspeechCan you guys speak? Colin? Double mute, sorry. So don't you think it's more likely that this verse in Revelation might be referring to something like, I don't know, the inbred, you know, Second Temple Jews that were inbreeding with the Canaanites that were no longer like, you know, Israelite genetically because they were all inbred from being slaves from the Babylonians and stuff? No, that's not what I was talking
Speaker 37about. It was two specific churches in Philadelphia and Smyrna at that time, okay? It wasn't even two- It was, it's not even supposed to be a future thing, and it was actually talking about people that were, it was, it was proto-replacement theology. You just said about how, about how, about proto-replacement theology. Shut the fuck up, headless. That's what he was talking to. He was talking to proto-replacement theology, those who say they are Jews. No, he, he wasn't. Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake,
@uncutspeechCan you substantiate what you're saying though? You're just saying that he, that this is the way it was, but you're not making any actual coherent argument.
Speaker 33Biblical references, biblical references. I don't understand why you guys can't look at your Bible.
Speaker 37Yeah, and you still don't have a Bible that you can actually, my Bible is the one that I have. Every single one of you cannot answer who the Jesus is. The worst thing that ever
@uncutspeechhappened to us giving Protestant Christians the worst thing, worst
Speaker 38thing
Speaker 37I know Gen Z. The largest Zionist organization in America. Jack, Jack, Jack,
Ian MalcolmJack, Jack, I'm gonna try and help you. If you're trying to be convincing to the audience that is listening, you're doing a very, very poor job. Sitting there and going, "No, I'm gonna jump on the bus." No, it's not helping your cause, and I'm trying to, to debate this in good faith. I'm trying to give you the opportunity. The challenge is that you're taking two different tacks. You're simultaneously saying that this was written as a subversion from the get-go, and you're then going to essentially claim that it has been subverted in its present to fit a totally different end, which would again beget the very obvious question, if it was a subversion, why not just make the obvious subversion? From the get-go, why not make the Jews the heroes? Why make the Pharisees the obvious villains? Can you please fill it like, explain at fifty thousand feet that very obvious lack of dis-or, I guess you'd call it a disconnect in your logical progression, 'cause it doesn't hold any water if you can't address that basic point.
Speaker 37Are you familiar with Nietzsche talking about, I, I think David's currently in the chat. I'm right here. Okay, do you know, do you know the passage where Nietzsche calls, Jesus the bait? Would you like me to read that for you real quick?
@uncutspeechYou should read the other passages from Nietzsche that talk about how much he loved Jews.
Speaker 37What happens? Oh, Colin, you won't let me finish, will you?
@uncutspeechAww. Well, I was just get to that one next, but don't cry, alright? I just want, well, not
Speaker 34that one, yeah But this doesn't answer the point, the question that, that Nietzsche just asked. By the way, I noticed when you get cornered, you seem to retort with a question. So again,
Speaker 37you mean exactly what Ian did as soon as I got up? Hold on. Again,
Speaker 34ask me, I'll come. Again, answer the question that he just asked. Why would they make themselves the villain in their own story?
Speaker 37Explain that. The Nietzsche quote is directly addressing that.
Speaker 34Okay, well, hold on, let-- You go ahead and finish it then. Tell us why they- Would make themselves. I understand the concept of Nietzsche saying, "Who can resist the lugubrious figure of Christ?" I understand that. But why is it that they would make themselves the villain? Help me out with that one.
Speaker 37Well, here we go. Nietzsche saw that successful promotion of Christianity depended on a pretense of reciprocal hostility between Christians and Jews. It depended on making the Jewish cult, when peddled to the Goyim, seem non-Jewish and even anti-Jewish. Was it not, he asked, a necessary feature of a truly brilliant politics of vengeance, a far-sighted subterranean- Slowly,
Speaker 37Saturian slowly and carefully planned vengeance that Israel had to deny its true instrument publicly and nail him to the cross like a mortal enemy so that the whole world, meaning all of the enemies of the Jews, might naively swallow this bait.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so the suggestion here, Jack, and I'm, I wanna ask you, and you can reference Nietzsche if, I suppose, if you think that it's gonna support the opposition. I mean, this is exactly
Speaker 37why all the Jews, like Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Benjamin Netanyahu, Rose, and Rabbi Soli, and about a half million Christians, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, Jack, you think all rabbis fully push in Christianity? Go to
Ian Malcolmchurch, read the Bible. You're filibustering again. Do you think that Rabbi Shmuley promotes Christianity via his sale of dildos through his daughter's company?
Speaker 33It's a double mute, Jack.
Speaker 37Yeah, are you familiar with Rabbi Smolensky's book Kosher Jesus?
Ian MalcolmI am. You think that that is, mocking or you think that that is going to further Christianity? Isn't that funny? All these guys have the same views. It's not mocking. All of them, every single Jew, every
Speaker 37single Jew pushes Christianity. You wanna ask yourself why they do that? Oh, and every Jew pushes Christianity?
Speaker 34I just wanna stop and say, have you ever heard of the, have you ever heard of the civil, Anti-Civil Liberties Union? I'm sorry, the ACLU. All they've done is spent forty years chasing Christians around the country. It's just a Jewish organization running nativity scenes out of the public square. Nobody asked for this, nobody wanted this. They've just spent their entire existence going after Christians. And then when we have the biggest, biggest civil liberties violation since slavery What did they do during COVID? They say, "Yeah, inject 'em, hold 'em down, don't let 'em out of their house." They took the mask off and said, "Tada, we weren't ever for any of this stuff. We just hate Christians." And here you are saying that all the Jews, all the Jews who support Christianity isn't that hard to
Speaker 36un-antichrist. Just, I wanna, I wanna, I wanna make a point
@uncutspeechabout Nietzsche since, since we're making an appeal to Nietzsche and Jack's a white nationalist, apparently, I wanna read just a Living in Europe, they know how to prevail even under the worst conditions. How about another passage from Beyond Good and Evil? What Europe owes to the Jews? Many things, good and bad. Above all, a grand style and morality. We artists among the spectators and philosophers are grateful to the Jews for this. Nietzsche also mocked the antisemitic movement. The antisemitic movement is nothing but the resentment of mediocre people. Oh
@uncutspeechAnd how does that, how does that make anything
Speaker 37else of what he said about Christianity less true? I don't know, does it? No. You, you're trying, you're trying to disprove it. So, so what he says
@uncutspeechis true. Do you also believe the other things he says? Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. Do you believe his perspective on Judaism and Christianity? Do you also believe the other things, like the things that he says here? Do you just pick and choose?
Speaker 37See, I, I don't think it's all like pick and choose whatever you like. Right. I don't think it's all black and white. I don't think you're picking, the catechism
@uncutspeechof the Catholic Church and you're only-- You guys just don't like the answer, but you're not answering for this. Do you guys pick and choose? I don't know where you have an answer for this. Not everybody is
Speaker 37right on a hundred percent of everything.
@uncutspeechSo you don't have an answer for why you're agreeing
Speaker 37with the Catholic Church? You just agree with the
Ian MalcolmCatholic It's an appeal. Hang on. Since you couldn't define filibuster, I'll give you another one. It's an appeal to authority. You're trying to point to a prominent mind and say, "Look what this guy thought," and then Colin pulls out a bunch of quotes that would perhaps, maybe, lend against the very argument that you're trying to make, or maybe give you a color as to his emotional state or spiritual state when those things were written. And then you say, "Oh, well, of course you wanna point to that." No, you were the one that went there in the
Ian MalcolmDid you see how ridiculous that is?
Speaker 33I think I can answer the question about, why would they hate and, and get rid of the Jews, right? Or, the- Now
@uncutspeechyou wanna answer that.
Speaker 33No, I, I can answer it very well. You guys know about the Book of Maccabees, have you ever read that? Alright, we'll
@uncutspeechget back to the Nietzsche quotes in a minute, I guess, since you're fucking dancing. Like, you look at your-
Speaker 35But
Speaker 37you never answered my question. Yeah, what about Maccabees
Speaker 3523? All We want to talk about Pope Pius. We want to talk about all the other popes. Are you, are you a spiritual dude, Colin? Let's pull up some Pope quotes. You bring
@uncutspeechsome, and I'll bring some. Let's see how many we can get. Hey, Colin. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey,
Ian MalcolmJack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack. Hey, Jack Five direct quotes from the Pope's, and then Colin will read you five that would be antithetical or antagonistic towards that. Ready? Go.
@uncutspeechNo, no, no, no, don't bring that up again. Yeah, that worked out. That worked out. That worked
Speaker 37out. No good. Pope Pius, Pope Pius XI. It is not possible for Christians to take part in antisemitism, for we are Semites spiritually. Okay? Let me pull up another one. Give me one second here.
Speaker 37And here's, and this is, and that's pre-Vatican II as well. Let's do, let's do Pope Pius the Twelfth and what he said about the National Socialists. the satanic scepter of National Socialism was in reality the arrogant apostasy from Jesus Christ, the denial of, of his doctrine and of his work of redemption, the cult of violence, the idolatry of race and blood, the overthrow of human liberty and dignity. Okay? Give me one second here.
Ian MalcolmI don't, I don't think that helps your cause for what it's worth. No, that one wasn't a good line. Yeah,
Speaker 35yeah, Ian, Ian, Ian, Ian, if, if you want to go, I'll go with the more- Yeah, because they, the, the Pope rejected, he's pulling out more votes,
Speaker 37they reject the nationality. See, 'cause it's universal, universal messianic Judaism for the glams. Okay, alright, I'll, I'll go with the few quotes
@uncutspeechthen. Since, since I don't know, it, it seems maybe you can pull them up while you're waiting. It's quicker if you just, you know, I don't know, if you type slow or whatever. Yeah, let's
Speaker 37do, let's do, let's do Pope Leo. Okay. Okay. Let's go with the Catholic, because of the, because of the Jewish roots of Christianity, all Christians have a special
@uncutspeechPost sixteen hundred, every single one of these are post Rothschild banking loan popes. Let's get into some popes and see if, and let's see, oh, oh, let's get back to the, oh, be quiet, you'll be alright, you'll, you'll be alright, you'll be okay, hold on a
Speaker 33second. He's got more quotes. Let's get, let's get into, let's get into
@uncutspeechsome of the other pope quotes and let's see how they stack up to those ones, of one of which wasn't even anti-Semitic, from what I can tell
Ian MalcolmAnd it's so comical, it's like you and Headless, it's like two women watching one another in an argument of, "Oh, yeah, why don't you jump on him? Just try to have a masculine conversation, be calm, and let one another go back and forth." Now you, Jack, were taking uncomfortable pauses that seemed like you weren't prepared, and that's totally fine. It's an unreasonable ask for me to say, "Give me five direct quotes." Colin said, "Let me give them to you because I can rattle them off rather quickly." You then got very
@uncutspeechYou don't,
@uncutspeechdon Pope Innocent, the Jews, and this was at the Fourth Lateran Council, so this one's a dogmatic statement, right? The Jews are condemned to perpetual servitude because they crucified the Lord. Pope Gregory, remaining under the curse imposed upon them for the death of Christ. Pope Benedict, the Jews must remain separated from Christians as a sign of their guilt. Pope Clement, Jews are a blind and stubborn people. Pope Urban, enemies of the Christian name. We could keep going. Pope Martin talked about this, like fucking ten popes talked about this. We can go, but what? But Pope quotes that are anti-Semitic for every one pro-Semitic, for every one pro-Semitic quote that you can give me. Now you can respond, now that I'm done talking.
Speaker 37Hold on, do you think that any of those are relevant to what we're dealing with right now in modern, the modern-
Ian MalcolmAll right, I'm going to mute you and ask you a question here, Jake or Jack. So here's the qu- it's, it's kind of funny actually, because Colin just rattled off a ton of quotes that were very direct with their friction and animosity towards Jews. Your pivot is to say, "Do you think those are relevant today?" as you look around at the culture, which is demonstrably antithetical and antagonistic to Christianity. Christianity, obviously, and you guys want to sit here, well, Ben Shapiro says that he likes Christianity, it's such a larp, right? That is the very point that we're pointing to. We are saying that Christianity has been subverted, the media has been subverted, everything in society has been perverted. It's been perverted by Jews. Now, the reason that you have to look at modernity is because prior to 1600 and those loans from the Rothschilds, oh, by the way, pretty much all of the posts were very antagonistic towards the Jews. There was none of this nonsense subservience to the Jews. Oh, we're spiritually Jewish. Not at all. And we could go to Martin Luther, we could go to Tassitius, we could go to a whole bunch of folks in between those two people, and we could find things that run antithetical to your worldview, which is both that Christianity is subservient to Judaism, which is ridiculous, in its current form, I could, I suppose you could say that it is, but only 'cause Jews like Joel Osteen have megaphones because they're given them by Jewish supremacy. But then also, it negates the reality that this was a LARP from the get-go, and what you're now going to suggest is, well, in recent years, Christianity isn't subservient to the Jews, and if you ignore everything prior to the 1600s, well, then it was to the benefit of the Jews. So what does that mean? That means 80% of the timeline here, in which this has been a thriving religion, it has been antagonistic to Judaism. Which would negate the notion that it was created as a larp for the benefit of Jews. So you look ridiculous on both fronts. Christianity was created as a bulwark against the insanity of Judaism and Jewish supremacy and Baal and the worship of all the idols and of the child sacrifices and all the other insanity. And you're trying to suggest, no, there's a one and the two's same things. Christianity is that, it's downstream from it, it's of the benefit to it, even though we just got a bunch of quotes that are obviously antithetical to that. So please try to present your theses, present your quotes, present whatever you want, or suggest how Christianity for sixteen hundred years was used as a ruse, it's all a deception, and just wait, sixteen hundred years down the line, we're gonna somehow ensnare them with global fiat banking under the Rothschilds, and then we'll, we'll grab the snare, and then we'll trick them. It's utterly ridiculous.
Speaker 37Okay, if it was, if it was created as such antitheticalness to Judaism, then why- Do you know about the Theodosian Code?
Ian MalcolmCan you please answer the question, Jack?
Speaker 37You didn't have a question. No, it isn't. I, I gave you a, I gave you a very direct question, Jack. Can you follow? The church, the church has always protected the Jews all throughout history. It's protected the Jews all throughout history, although, yeah, because they have, they have, they have, they have, they have all, all pagan religions, oh my god, and any other religion except Christianity and Judaism with the Theodosian Codes. So if you don't know about that, then you don't know what it is. So for,
Ian Malcolmso Jack, And it's, it's monotonous, and it is, it's, it's kind of infuriating because it's, it's, you are running away from the obvious while trying to just throw in inflammatory nonsense. At least that's the way that I perceive this. Now I'm gonna ask you a question again. It's gonna be very direct. Hopefully you can follow the bouncing ball here. The suggestion that you made is in its present form, Christianity isn't antithetical to Judaism, which I would concede because of who controls literally everything. But Colin rattled off a massive amount of quotes and said, "Look at all these prior to the Rothschild banking scheme with the Vatican." Now, for the sixteen hundred years in which Christianity was at odds with Judaism, was that also part of the LARP that you suppose that Christianity has been? Can you answer that?
Speaker 33The only reason the Rothschilds own the bank is because Christians handed it to 'em. Leviticus verses about usury is exactly why they have the world banking system today. You guys handed them the banking system, you filthy, worthless Christians. This whole thing, wait, okay, okay, so
Ian Malcolmfilthy, worthless Christians. That one is curious. Okay, so the suggestion is that somebody took a loan from somebody else to give them something. Is that, that's your low IQ suggestion?
Speaker 33Leviticus says, "You shall not, you shall not offer usury to your brothers, you shall only offer it to strangers." That's why they gave them the global banking system. Yeah, who Who runs usury? Christians who believe in their book.
Ian MalcolmYeah, so you're saying filthy Christians, which, oh, by the way, for everybody listening, you are. You are. Stop that. Hang on. I know. You are, you're a filthy Christian, says the guy who claims that he's having a reasoned discussion around these topics. You're not. You are emotionally unhinged. I don't know why you are so antagonistic towards Christians, but it is unreasonable to suggest that you are here and basing your worldview on merely logic and reason. I haven't sat here and said, "You filthy heathens," 'cause I don't need to, because I'm calm and collected, as are the people on this stage, even when we disagree with you. "You filthy Christians." And with that, by the way, for what it's worth, I'm absolutely removing you from the panel, 'cause that's ludicrous. You are effeminate. That was an effeminate response. You filthy animals. You know where I hear stuff like that? When I went into the FBA spaces, and I was like, "Hey, blacks are disproportionately violent." Oh, white boy, ba ba ba ba, because they can't debate the topic, because they can't reason the conversation. Now, Jack, you and Headless have both gotten utterly annihilated on this conversation. At least that's my perspective. Now, I don't normally do this, but I will put a poll into the purple pill and I will ask the audience for their votes. You can send it off to your little crew if you want to try and rig it as best you can. You're still gonna get owned because you haven't been able to address the obvious. Christianity, if a larp from the get-go, would have been set so that it would be of benefit to the Jews. It wouldn't have been so
Ian MalcolmHundred years, the Christians could be at odds with the Jews 'cause that way later on, oh, guys, I got a time machine. Don't worry, in the future, these people, the Rothschilds, are gonna give a loan to the Vatican. They're gonna subvert pop culture because of the television. That, I guess, that was done by Leonardo da Vinci, the time traveler, right? Or was it maybe Donald Trump's uncle, when he went to Nikolai Tesla and took all the things from his library? And yes, that actually happened. Is that how this all came to be? For sixteen hundred years, they were like, "Yeah, we're gonna be the villains and be loathed and called out for what we are, but it'll ultimately work out in the end." That's insane. If this was architected as a subversion, it would have been subversive from the get-go. They also wouldn't, in their own Talmud, that other people, non-Jews, aren't supposed to see. They would write About how evil Christ was. They wouldn't have written about him at all, except to say, "Oh, by the way, we tricked all the goyim into believing this." And they might have written it right next to, "Even the best of the goyim shall die if of benefit to the Jews," that's also in the Talmud. What a psychopathic, narcissistic set of people would not do is say, "Look at this man, look at this story. We Jews are the evil people." That makes no sense! A paranoid set of narcissists would present themselves as the hero. They would use the LARP to get everybody at their back to support it. Now, you could say that, sure, way down the line, at the first Zionist conference, they could say, "We will use antisemitism as our weapon. We will, we will use it for all these political purposes." That argument makes sense. But to suggest that this was a ruse two thousand years in the making, that for the first eighty percent, that they were the villains? That is a laughable suggestion. You made a laughable presentation. You weren't-- you used words you couldn't even define, and then ironically, you did the very thing that you accused other people of doing, which was to filibuster. Something, again, you didn't even know what the word meant, but you threw it out as your headless friend uses, "You Christian heathen, blah, blah, blah." That is what people do when they're losing an argument. So again, I'll put a ball. Maybe I'm wrong, but Jack, I'll give you the final words, and then we're probably gonna wrap up the space after letting a few other people share their opinions.
Speaker 37a lot of touching. and, you know, the Theodosian Code protected Judaism, and then from then on, they, they protected the Jews in different ways. and, and regardless if, if the church is totally cooked now, I thought the gates of hell wouldn't prevail against the, the church, okay? But that has obviously happened because you're never, you're never gonna reverse Vatican II or Nostra Aetate, and if it wasn't for Christianity and Christians, the Jews wouldn't have the power and control that they do today. That is without a doubt a fact. Without the hundreds of millions of Christians thinking Jews are God's chosen people and- Israel's the holy land that has to be blessed or else we'll be cursed, just like all our politicians repeat. Eighty-seven percent of Congress is Christian, majority of Trump's administration is Christian, Heart Sailer Act Hart was a Catholic, okay? And the largest Zionist organization in America is Kufi, Christians United for Israel. That is the only reason the Jews in Israel have the power they do is directly attributed to Christianity. And just like Paul the Pharisee Jew says in Romans nine twelve, "The Old Testament served the New Testament." Wait, wait, wait, hold on, hold on,
Ian Malcolmhold on, kid, you're going to suggest that, that Jews have power because Christians have power in the United States, that's the suggestion?
Ian MalcolmI think the Lord is trying to intervene with the stupidity of the suggestion, but Jack, no, the Christians
Speaker 37gave the Jews the power that they had. They gave it. Did JFK,
Ian MalcolmJack, did JFK give the power to the Jews or did they shoot him?
Speaker 37That, that's, that's non sequitur again. No, you're not. Did the Christians
Ian Malcolmgive the Federal Reserve to the-- Do you know, Jack, did the Christians give the Federal Reserve to the Jews, or did the Jews threaten blackmail and levy death threats against the president that signed it?
Speaker 35Yeah, just ask, ask, ask this dude about Matthew twenty-three. What does Matthew twenty-three say? So
@uncutspeechreal quick, you, you meant, I want-- Before you get away from this, you mentioned the Theodosian Codes, right? Whenever you came in and you, you started that little monologue, I wanted to call you out on that before you go into more Bible verses that you misinterpret, right? The Theodosian Codes, the prosomatic stuff you're talking about in that, is where the synagogues were legally protected and
@uncutspeechthey were allowed to, like, they, like,
@uncutspeechThey weren't pro-Semitic. They actually, like, they barred Jews from public office, they barred Jews from o-owning Christian slaves, they prohibited Jews from converting Christians to Judaism, and they banned intermarriage between Jews and Christians, and it placed Christianity above Judaism legally. This is going back all the way to Constantine. Okay, this is before, and, and you brought it up, right? Again, you, you made it illegal. But they still made it illegal. They didn't abolish it. Like, like, like you brought up the Theodosian Code. Let You don't, you brought up the Theodosian Codes as if it backs up your argument, but when you actually look into them, they,
Speaker 35again, they point the Jews out,
@uncutspeechsequestered them away from society and prohibited them from practicing the things that we want to prohibit them from doing, like politics and things like this. But you, I asked, I asked, I asked this question, so I'll ask it to you, right? Because you sit here and you,
Speaker 37you
@uncutspeechact like the old, the old, the
Speaker 37old, the old, the old, the old, the old, the
Speaker 34old Just try to have some impulse control, buddy. Let him finish, and then you can respond.
Speaker 37No,
Speaker 34he's, he's going-- No, no, no. Doesn't matter what he's saying. I'm sorry. Jack? Jack? Calm, deep breaths. No, I'm just,
Ian MalcolmI'm just ending, ending this, insanity. It's, it's absurd. Okay. You gave him a fair shot. We gave him many fair shots, and, by the way, there's a poll up in the nest. People are welcome to-- You're welcome to Questions look, silly, and so all love, hate, and everything in between is certainly welcome. Colin, back to you.
@uncutspeechYeah, I was, you know, I think that was a good call to boot him, 'cause I don't think I would have gotten an answer to the question, but I, you know, I was just gonna pose him the exact same question that I'm sure everyone noticed that HT completely avoided to answer, which is that like, okay, even if you grant that it's all Jewish, right? Let's look at whether or not it's bad
@uncutspeechThey never have this argument. They never have a, they never have a counter to this. They never have any sort of answer to this. You know, and this is before we get into any of the historical stuff we're talking about today, right? You know, we, we can talk about how Christianity helped the, you know, Europe defend itself from, you know, potentially certain destruction from Islam. We can talk about all of this historical stuff, but they disregard it, you know? So I like to bring that up because this is what is happening today. The whites that are Christian, you 2.2 to 2.2, but, you know, these are the only people having children in the entire white race. But these guys, somehow, they're saying that they're anti-Christian because they are pro-white. But it seems to me that, you know, they're just anti-Christian, and I think those kind of showed there whenever the, the whole filthy Christian shit came out, you know, came out there, that was a little, you know, a little telling, I think, obviously.
Ian MalcolmYeah, it was pretty, it was pretty wild. And for what it's worth, I only hear that type of banter from individuals when they know that they've been intellectually, kind of leg swept, right? It is a, an emotional reaction to insecurity, especially in a public setting. And again, it's one that we see all the time, from these, let's say these high emotion, low, what would you call it? High friction conversations, the FBA space. Yeah, can I
Speaker 39say something real quick too? I was- I was trying to talk, I guess, I guess my mic wasn't working at all. Holy shit. before you close it up, dude, let-- just, just remember what you guys just saw, right? And that's, that's why I joined my brothers on the other side when it comes down to the Christian bros, because what is the solution, right? Colin made the perfect point. These guys, first of all, either single Or childless. They don't have children, they are single, they're not promoting white Chris- they're not promoting any white identity. Anything that is pro-white, which they claim that they are standing for, what are you really standing for? You're not, you're not pro-white if you're not producing children, right? If you're not getting married, if you're not, contributing to the future of the race, right? You aren't, right? But not only, not only that,
Speaker 39What have you just said this week? Ian Malcolm said, David said, Colin said, everyone in this panel, I see so many familiar faces. "Christ is King" is anti-Semitic. The Jews are now working on, the Jewish lobby, and I'm telling you right now, working on banning for you to speak about Jesus Christ in public. This is what the Jewish lobby is working on. So you wanna tell me the Christ haters, that, Jesus Christ is so Jewish, yet the- Jews hate him so much that they go against people even speaking about him or calling him Christ's King. So you are literally contributing to be-- you more Jewish In your belief and how you're acting. And not only that, sorry guys, a-and I love you, a-and I love my bros, but you guys acting, not just act, you're not acting white, first of all. You guys are chimping out on stage. Ian Malcolm made good points, Colin made good points, everybody here made good points. Just to sum it up, chimping out Acting actually very Jewish, you're standing against your white pros that are actually producing children in this world, and they're actually dads, and they're married, and they're actually doing what you guys aren't doing. So really, like
Speaker 39no respect at all. I have no respect for that. You guys aren't standing up for what is white, what, what do you guys even call themselves? What do they call themselves? White community? A, a white power? I don't even know anymore. You guys are shitting on your own brothers because they're Christian, because they're the original, they believe in the traditional Christianity belief, the, the guy that flipped tables, the first antisemite, the one that said that God isn't someone that looks down On you and told the Jews, "You aren't chosen, " because there's nobody looking down on you, telling you that you're chosen. God is in, within everybody. God is within sight of you. That's what Jesus, that's why they crucified him. Like, how can they, talk bad about Jesus when he was the first major anti-Semite, anti-Semite that ever lived? Like, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. And to Ian, Ian, I wanted to, you know,
Speaker 39Look, we might have, between you and I, and I, I wanna do it talking to you, because I feel like DMing is, it's super, game feminist. You know, there was things I totally disagree with, right? with things that were, the way you were standing for and what you were promoting and stuff, but that's you, and that's okay, and that's what you do. I just wanna say, you know
Speaker 39My apologies for bashing you in the background without you being there, right? I wanna say that I'm just not with this pro-Muslim kumbaya stuff, and I'm, and I'm open about it, I really am. And, and I just wanna tell you from man to man that no matter what you do, that's what you do. I don't hate you. We've been, we've been getting along for two years. I don't wanna ruin what you and I did have as friends on this platform. And I, a-and, and, and I just wanted to say that out loud because I don't wanna send a dumb DM. I just wanna make sure that you know why I'm standing. I'm still gonna talk about that this isn't gonna work for the, for the people in, in the United States
Speaker 39Fine. And I just wanted to make sure that you know that, and I wanna reach out my hand again, I wanna say, you know, sorry, for coming at you from the back there, a-a-and doing this behind your back. And so that's all I wanted to say, brother. So.
Speaker 35Yeah. And I'm, I'm gonna say, remember your fourteen words. Yeah, hang on, let me just
Ian Malcolmrun a loop here, just real quick. Wolf, so, just a few things. Number one, so much love and respect, I, I think it takes a real man to just approach something head on, is what I always try to do, which is while let anybody bring up any world views, whether it's anti-Christian, anti-white, anti-JQ, anti-anything, and I know that you're very like-minded, and so lots and lots of love, for that, and always here to, to support. And look, when it comes to that issue, 'cause I know the, the big one is the, the Kumbaya piece, and I really do think it's, it's critical to Who would see it either or of the two ways I'm about to suggest. But, I, I want the West to remain Christian. I think the East, or the Middle East in particular, should remain Muslim. And I think that Europe is part of the West. It should remain absolutely Christian. It shouldn't be overrun by migrants. It shouldn't have its culture, its religion, its identity, its demographics completely subverted by Jewish supremacy, and that is what they aim to do. And unfortunately, the thing that you and I both love, which is the white Christian West Is squarely in the crosshairs of that system, which is ironic because the argument that we were just having is that Christianity is what they, they seek to, to propagandize. It's like, isn't that weird? Because it's the Christians who are clearly under assault from this machine, in particular the white Christians, for what it's worth. And so I will always stand with my, my white Christian brothers, along with anybody and everybody that will stand in opposition against the JQ, which is the one that is aiming those crosshairs at our Our people, as well as the rest of humanity, I really believe that, and it's, it's unfortunate that this is the reality. But for anybody that's listening, if you aren't a Christian, if you're not white, if you're not whatever, it doesn't really matter. If you celebrate the demise of the largely white Christian West that as of thirty years ago was almost exclusively, across many European nations anyway, was white Christians. If you celebrate their demise because it makes you feel good, 'cause you're getting back at, whether it's the Christians or the white people People or the straight people or whatever is your demographic, if you celebrate that, just know that you're basically carrying on the sinking of the boat that we are all in. That's the thing to keep in mind. They seek to destroy the West and the whites and the Christians, because once they have them, the rest of the world is under their thumb. And if you don't believe that, and I might have disagreements even with Truth Teller, who I obviously associate with very closely, you know, he would look at China and, and look, they're very nationalistic, and they've done a lot of things that have been to the benefit of their people, and, and so I can't take away from them that piece of the puzzle. But it's also worth just noting that the CCP at its origin was Jewish. There's no two ways about it. It was Russian Jews that were part of the Komsomol that went out and helped essentially with
Ian MalcolmBecause yes, they're doing things that are, that are definitely of benefit to their nation and to their citizenry, which I have to applaud. But at the same time, there is a part of me that worries. Well, if they destroy the West and if they already have some, a degree, let's say, of control over the East and are in bed with China, then we all lose, and we all find ourselves in a future in which we live like some of the Chinese in these fifteen minute cities, where their rights are very oppressed, they're surveilled at all times. That is For everybody. So it doesn't matter if you're South or Central American, if you're African, if you're Australian, if you're in the Middle East, if you're in Asia, you should stand with the opposition to Jewish supremacy in particular in the United States and Western Europe, because the way they go, so too does the rest of the world. I really believe that. The United States is the last bastion of unbridled free speech, and if these psychopaths are able to criminalize the act of saying, "Hey, you Jews, I think you have too much power." Well then the game is over for everybody, and that is a terrifying future. So stand with everyone, stand with all of us that are willing to stand with truth against the supremacist system that is Israel and the Jews. It doesn't mean that it's only them, there are of course others. Are the Mormons or the Scientologists involved? Yeah, I suppose they probably are. People like Mitt Romney, a big pro- Dominant Mormon, they'll say, "Look at all the power of the Mormons." You wanna where Mitt Romney got his money, people? Was it literally the same guy whose daughter ran Epstein Island? Is that kind of weird that Robert Maxwell was the money behind Mitt Romney? So who has the power? Is it the Mormons? Was Mitt Romney funding Maxwell? I think not. So we need to be honest about these things. There are alternative people, there are, there are the Shabbos goy and all that stuff, but it's Jewish supremacy, folks. If you need any further proof, look at where a third, if not half, of your navy presently is, if you're an American. It's over, firing off the last of its missiles for the benefit of Israel and for the detriment of your own citizenry. So stand in opposition, be honest about the problem, call it out, and recognize that whether or not you are a white Christian Western person, you should be cheering on the fight intellectually and spiritually that those people are taking on because they are at the brunt end of this, and it was the Jews, the rabbis in fact, who said Muslims will be the broom of the Christians. The Jews said that. I can give you a video of the rabbis saying we are going to use the Muslims against the Christians. That doesn't mean that we should be at odds with one another, and that was the question that I asked HT earlier. Can you band together with somebody for a specific cause that is a mutual benefit? I believe the people can. Wolf might have a disagreement, but we can be men enough to stand in a room and to calmly discuss that without slurring one another. And anybody that can't do it, the guy that came in here, "Oh, you're a bunch of weak Christians," well, what does that say about their argument? Probably that is pretty effeminate and might not be based in reality or fact. So with that, let's go to some final hands. I wanna make sure everybody gets a chance to speak that didn't, see Looper, you and Malachi, if you guys wanna jump in, certainly feel free to, and then we'll wrap up the space.
Speaker 35Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, Ian, I, I wanna jump in and say, everybody, my white sisters, my white brothers, whoever you are from another mother, I don't care, remember your fourteen words and remember your eighty-eight precepts, and that's all I have to say.
Ian MalcolmWell, very well stated. And let's go to Malachi. And for what it's worth, I, I, I intended to, close up the space literally hours ago, but the other thing I don't wanna do, I don't want to banter on with like-minded individuals that are of a Christian persuasion, and I say that because I don't feel that it is fair for the other side of the argument. For what it's worth, the people that are down the purple pill, why didn't you let us speak? That are referring to those that are antagonistic of Christianity. I did, for two hours. Isn't it always so weird how that happens when we arrive at a point where we say, "Look, we're not gonna find middle ground," and I'm not gonna find middle ground with somebody that slurs the fact that I'm Christian. That seems like an utter waste of time. But apparently, I'm indebted to sit here forever and listen to somebody just bash everybody with this low IQ emotional rhetoric. And if I don't, then I'm fearing a debate on a subject. What a larp.
Speaker 40no man, no, I have nothing further to add, but I just wanted to say, thank you for always dealing with people fairly, you know what I mean? I think that's important to have when you're discussing topics, is to always, deal with people fairly and give them a chance, you know? And you do that, so thank you. Yeah.
Ian MalcolmYeah, of course, I, I, I try to. And look, that's the best part about this, right? Is that we can have debates on all sorts of things, and I will always, if somebody asks a question and I don't have an answer, I will own that. If I feel I need to look into it before being able to provide one, I will state such. And if I do have an opinion, I will try to deliver it free, where I can, of any kind of slurs or emotion. And for people that aren't willing to do that, and if anybody wants to say in the purple pill that we are in that camp, well, then I laugh at you, 'cause we invited up three different
Ian MalcolmRight? That's what men should do. Ironically, it resulted in people spurring out with the emotional rhetoric and the slurs towards us, which might say something about the statement on their argument. And I will ask again, because I can't get a single good answer for it, if the Jewish Talmud isn't supposed to be available to non-Jews, that their eyes aren't ever supposed to witness it, and that this group of people was willing to literally put into that text, we should even kill the best of the goyim, if they are that brazen. To write that into the book, under the guidance that no non-Jews should ever see it, why lie about the existence of Christ? I've not gotten a single good answer to that question, not once. And I've asked it to Adam Green, I've asked it to the people that were in here, I've asked it to a couple others. So go noodle on that, if that is your suggestion that Christ has always been a larp. Why in the Talmud doesn't it not just say, "Ha ha, we tricked the goyim, look how smart we are"? That seems like an obvious, obvious question, and I can't get an answer.
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm not being antagonistic when I say that I asked it even to Adam Green, 'cause I did. And I go find the recording, it was on a recorded space that I did with him, which I was willing to do 'cause I will always entertain other ideas from individuals that I believe bring to the table in good faith and with good research. And Adam Green does, for what it's worth, he's put out this position along with CJB Books for a long time, so they're welcome to that point Perspective. I won't mock or slur them because we have a difference of opinion. That would be weak, it would be effeminate, it would be, in my perspective, rather Jewish. Instead, we will address these issues. Like men, we will try and discuss them, like adults. And when individuals aren't capable of doing so, we will say, "Okay, we're going to move on, 'cause this isn't productive." So we'll always try to do that, Malachi. I will let all the Jews, all the anti-Christians, all the anti-white people,
Ian MalcolmTechnically, what it ultimately ends up doing is showcasing how correct, at least in my assertion, our worldview is, right? We will let the Jews come up and try to suggest that the media's not controlled by Jews, and then they will look foolish. They will say that the United States isn't compromised by Israel, and then we will show otherwise. We'll try to do these things like mature adults, and in doing so, we often find ourselves strengthening not only our arguments, but also defeating those of the alternative, and in doing that, we arrive at a better tomorrow for everybody. But with that, I see David has his hand up, let's go to him really quickly, and then we'll close out the space.
Speaker 34Well, it's been a great space. I will say that it's very important for us to know what the, who the enemy is, and this idea that we, we should put our morals on trial. And our moral suppositions on trial isn't the answer. If you think that the answer is to deracinate Western civilization from the faith and morals that underpin it, then you would be like a person who sits in a tree on a limb and saws the limb and expecting a good outcome. It's of course comically ridiculous. It is our morals, and oddly, those people that were most devoutly Christian were the ones that were standing out in the town squares objecting being locked in their house. Houses. They had the strength of their morals, and they drew on those in order to object, because they didn't think that the state was all powerful. They didn't believe in what the Jewish supremacists do, which is that there are no morals. I mean, really, they use all of these ideologies like a monkey uses a radio for a hammer, very, very imprecisely. They don't really care. And so when we, when we think that it's our morals that are the problem rather than them, then you've kind of missed the plot And by the way, it really plays into their hands. So I just, I just wanna warn people against that. I like the discussion about how we conduct ourselves in terms of humanity and other races. And Wolf, I'm happy to carry that conversation on with you, 'cause I think there's, I think there's an, there's something synthetic, something underneath That sort of transcends both sides of that issue. I think if we get rid of the problem, if we look outside the koi pond, pond and say, "Well, where would we be if we didn't have these people constantly undermining our civilizations, using immigration as a bioweapon? How will things turn out if we can voluntarily, create our own societies and live with whom we wish?" I don't think those two ideas are mutually exclusive. So for another day, we kind of got away from that. I thought we were going in that direction early in the conversation, and it became Religious in nature, but I'd love to have that conversation in the future.
Speaker 39Yeah, I'll be, I'll be welcome to. also, yeah, that'd be fantastic, David. And, you know, I'm, I have a really firm stand on Dings lately, and I'm gonna not change that, but I also wanna tell you and Ian about, a space that, Dings, Dings happen in Santino space, right? And I wanna reach out to you guys as well about, it's gonna be very interesting.
Speaker 39It's gonna be, it's gonna be like three other, you know, I guess heavy hitter Jews that wanna go against the quote-unquote antisemites, and they wanna talk about, the Jews, and they wanna talk about all these things that we stand for, and they wanna debate us. So I already reached out to Colin and Uncensored, and I wanna, you know, also talk about, maybe if Ian does have time to be there and be present, 'cause Colin and Uncensored really said that. I mean And, and I agree. the biggest and heaviest hitter we could have on board with us would be Ian, but also have, because they're also bringing other guys with them, so I wanted to see if David wants to come hang out as well. It's gonna be very interesting, and the concept will be Santino reached out, he said, "Listen, 'cause obviously Ian and David and me and Colin and Censored and all of them cannot host or co-host," so,
Speaker 39Santino will be co- will be hosting the space, and he will be the medium for all of us to mediate it, for all of us to go talk, with those guys. And I think it's gonna-- Listen, if it gets out of control, we can call it quits, right, and all that. But I think it's gonna be really interesting. I also wanted to be like my last JQ kind of debate with these people, 'cause it's like, it's laughable, what ideas they have and what ideas we have, and
Speaker 39it's just like, And maybe we can make a fantastic space out of that, just to like, literally, just to like, put the bow on that, that, the, the present. And it's a different audience, because Santino is gonna be a medium, and you know him, Ian. I mean, he, he will be a good mediator. Honestly, when it
Ian Malcolmcomes- Is, is the debate on the existence of Jewish supremacy or that it is detrimental to the world?
Speaker 39Oh-
@uncutspeechYeah, I, I would need prompts, you know, that would be the, 'cause they're gonna, they're gonna pull
Speaker 39JQ, pretty much. It's gonna be all about the JQ, but I won't figure out what I'll be really getting into. I mean, there's, it's such a big history, like what are we gonna focus on? Are we gonna get into World War One? Are we gonna get into World War Two? Are we gonna talk about... What are we gonna really talk about? The Holocaust, you know, I want-- You know, that's a good question, actually, I need to ask.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, and, and, and Wolf, just as Through the ownership and control of all of the things that define the world around us. And if these individuals are incapable of acknowledging that, yes, the media is overwhelmingly, if not almost entirely, owned by Jews, if they can't acknowledge that, then you're, you're arguing in bad faith right off the, the, the break, right? And so that's the way to approach these things. It's almost just like with an individual in an FBA space, if you wanna talk about race realism and race realities, it's like, do blacks commit disproportionate degrees of crime? Yes or no. If they say no, then you know you're not debating with somebody who's gonna be honest about the subject, right? So just be very straightforward. But, but yes, I, I love Santino, love to support his spaces, don't always agree with all the panelists and the co-hosts and all that, and I've been in those rooms and felt, at times very ganged up on, but happy to
Speaker 39support. Yeah, that's why I like to be there though, because then-
Speaker 35Yeah, it sounds like a
Speaker 39pina-to-space. Well
Speaker 39Jews, they actually agree with a lot of things we do say, but then there, then there is still like Mitch and, and, and other people, and they're gonna, you know, and then there's Americans in there listening to them presenting their points, and then nobody's standing against those points, and like, you know, G's in there, you know, you know the, you know the whole panel, Ian. Sometimes you just gotta have, you know, some, some, someone in there to call it out, right? It's just what it is. But,
Speaker 39for But
@uncutspeechhe's gonna make us look
Speaker 39awesome. But for medium, I think it will be a mediator, goodness. I think it will be good to have him, instead of any of us hosting, 'cause then it's gonna be like, oh, but you guys are muting us and blah, blah, blah.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. So let's get the format of that. Happy to support any which way I can. Shoot me a note, Wolf, always. And, and thank you so much for the words. And I, I say that with all sincerity. Look, we are all-
Speaker 36I mean it to you, I mean it to you, Ian. I mean-
Ian MalcolmOh, I know you do, my brother. And look, we're all in this together. We are up against the machine that controls about everything and is clearly destroying the things that we love. We should speak directly about that. We should speak I know the last half of the conversation was very much on Christ, his existence, and the prospect that it was a Jewish LARP, which I still find ridiculous, but always welcome to the debates on the subject. But I do wanna reiterate, the very top of the space, if you do find this of interest, go back, listen. Speaking of Christ, listen to the words of that gospel. It's on the idea of Christ opening the eyes of the man who was blind. You know who hated that? Was the Pharisees, the Jews. How curious that we find ourselves in a world where everybody is blinded by lies and propaganda, and when you try to speak the truth, you get called all kinds of nasty names, you get thrown out of conversations, just like in the Gospel that man did, thrown right out of the synagogue by the Jews because he dared to say, "I was blind and now I see." So we'll continue trying to open the eyes of everybody that comes into these conversations. People can try and deny Jewish supremacy, the data suggests otherwise. If they try and say that the Jews don't control things, or maybe they don't- We do slightly control them, but things are getting better. Well, I've got a mountain of data that argues the opposite. Things are getting worse. The country is getting poorer. It doesn't matter if you're the United States or Western Europe, your world is clearly in decline, your society is falling apart, crime is on the rise, drugs, alcohol, SSRIs, everything is going the wrong direction, and it's happening because the people that control everything are offshoring all of your opportunity, all of your wealth, all of your military So they can build up the greater Israel, and in the process, they can leave behind the United States that, just like Netanyahu said something like twenty years ago, is gonna be just a corpse and a vassal that they will control. Those are his words, supposedly anyway, on pretty good merit that that's a real quote that talks about leaving it behind, because that's what they do to people they hate. That was the comment. It does seem like Christ was also very hated by these people. They say He's in a vat of hell, but I'm also told that the same Jews that said He's in a vat of hell created Him as a myth! Really weird that they wouldn't view him as a hero for their cause if he was a myth. That's probably what you would do if you had actually constructed it as such. So I continue arguing, I don't think it's a remotely a myth. I think that Christ is the thing they fear above anything and everything else. And while I disagree with lots in terms of the Muslims and their culture, that's just little disagreements in the grand scheme of things, right? Those people have reverence towards Christ and towards Mary, and so if they'll stand shoulder to shoulder with me in different garb, with different color Different attire against a common enemy, spiritually speaking, I will stand there with them. Others might not, and that's totally fine. But we gotta take any and every avenue that we can to make the world a better place, and if we do, we can all rest one day with our eyes closed to be opened again in a different place, in a different pain perhaps. It'll be a good one, it'll be a better one, 'cause we will have used our time on this plane to make it as better as we can. And so as always, to everybody that's out there, good morning, Wherever you are in the world, God bless for everything that you are, God speed on everything that we will do trying to take out this totalitarian machine, and I wish everybody the most blessed of Sundays. So God speed, God bless, and good night.