Held here entire — 603 passages across 20 chapters, set down from the first word to the last. The colour shifts with the film’s own mood as each chapter plays.
- 0:00quiet, reflectiveEyes Wide Shut & The CabalIan Malcolm introduces Dr. Michael Rectenwald and his book, 'The Cabal Question', setting the stage for a deep dive into societal issues.
- 14:17guarded, evenIntroducing 'The Cabal Question'Dr. Michael Rectenwald discusses the premise of his novel, 'The Cabal Question', and its unique approach to controversial topics.
- 20:45warm, expansiveReading: Chapter 1 'Seduction'Dr. Rectenwald reads an excerpt from Chapter 1, 'Seduction', introducing Paul and Seth's unsettling conversation.
- 34:59cool, analyticalCrafting Controversial NarrativesDr. Rectenwald explains his method for writing fiction, creating inescapable problems to explore controversial themes.
- 38:49raw, woundedReading: Jesus is a Jewish PsyopThe reading continues with Seth's provocative claims about Jesus and the Jews, leading to a police intervention.
- 46:36bleak, drainedLunatic Becomes RightIan and Dr. Rectenwald discuss how the 'crazy' character in the novel becomes increasingly accurate in his observations.
- 58:50cool, analyticalReading: The Surveillance StatePaul is interrogated by Europol, who accuse him of being part of an 'anti-Semitic network' due to his associates.
- 1:05:48disillusionedDystopian InfluencesDr. Rectenwald shares the dystopian authors who influenced his work, including Dostoevsky, Orwell, and Kafka.
- 1:20:02urgent, incendiaryReading: Red's JQ RantDr. Rectenwald reads an excerpt featuring 'Red', a character who delivers a fiery rant on Talmudic ethics and historical events like the USS Liberty and 9/11.
- 1:32:05measured, soberWithdrawing from the StateDarrell asks Dr. Rectenwald about positive Christianity and withdrawing from the state, which is a key theme in the novel's conclusion.
- 1:55:07charged, alertThe Organizing Power of ASAPACRaed shares his perspective on the importance of organizing, drawing parallels to historical resistance movements.
- 2:01:40dry, matter-of-factAcademia & Intelligent DesignRaed questions Dr. Rectenwald about the suppression of intelligent design discussions within academia.
- 2:14:52sombre, searchingReading: Seth's Suicide RantDr. Rectenwald reads a dramatic scene where Seth, on the verge of suicide, rants about Jewish supremacy to Paul and the police.
- 2:28:20grim, scorchedReading: Jewish Subversion HistorySeth continues his rant, detailing his views on Jewish history, the Bolshevik Revolution, and Solzhenitsyn's observations.
- 2:36:40unsettlingThe Judaization of the ChurchDancing in Heaven and Dr. Rectenwald discuss the historical Judaization of the church and its implications.
- 2:44:50hard-wonArmenian Genocide & FreedomEl Jefe shares his family's experience with the Armenian Genocide and connects it to the fight for freedom against oppressive forces.
- 2:58:49conflicted, dividedUniting Against SatanistsCasey shares a controversial perspective on the 'Black Awakening' and the need to unite against Satanists, linking them to various groups.
- 2:59:49hard, unyieldingThe Jesuit Conspiracy TheoryA speaker claims the Jesuits control everything, including Trump and Biden's cabinets.
- 3:04:47calm, distantChristianity as a Moral FoundationIan Malcolm argues that Christianity is feared by power structures due to its antithetical moral ethos.
- 3:10:23tentative, hopefulWorldview Distinction: Morality vs. ImmoralityA speaker contrasts the moral code of Christianity with what they perceive as an 'excuse book to be immoral' in other ideologies.
The Transcript
A voice is named only when we can verify it — by voiceprint, an @handle present in the room, or the Space’s own title. Anyone we can’t confirm stays “Speaker,” on purpose.
@joann_marieI've heard it before. I think it's in a movie. I don't know. I don't know. Ian, why did you do this to me? Oh, no. It is from a movie, JoAnn. Wait, is it... Oh my god, wait, Eyes Wide Shut? Is it from Eyes Wide Shut?
Ian MalcolmIt is from Eyes Wide Shut, JoAnn! JoAnn, are we at four or five in a row now? You're crushing it!
@joann_marieWell, David helped me yesterday and I think we should only say the song and not the artist because I'm like really...
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, that is certainly, yes, that is a song only and exactly correct. That is out of Eyes Wide Shut, a very basic piece of music. I actually, I looked for like a orchestral version of it and they have no such thing because, well, it's designed to be simple. It's designed to be very straightforward and in that straightforwardness to be a little bit unsettling.
Ian MalcolmAnd I thought given that we discussed that song, A little bit with foundering the other day in the JQ party that we had. I thought I would bring that out because obviously we are going to be discussing this idea of the cabal question with the one, the only, Dr. Michael Rectenwald, who has so kindly and generously offered not only to walk through some of the ideas and the concepts of his book, but to take us through specifically the first chapter and to utilize that.
Ian Malcolmto discuss what has been going on. Where are we right now? How are we banding together? And for those individuals that might suggest, well, you're discussing an issue that we're slowly becoming aware of right at a larger level. Well, this can be treated in two ways. Number one is a precursor for those that are newer to these ideas, right?
Ian MalcolmDr. Rectenwald is going to very academically walk through this idea of the cabal. We're also then going to be able to discuss what can we P.S.
Ian MalcolmWe are essentially disciples of the Jewish question and its awareness, right? So just as those disciples of Christ, once upon a time, they went out and shared the good news of Jesus, his death, his resurrection, et cetera. We are sharing ironic given who killed Christ, right? We are sharing the awareness, which is the good news of this illness in our system.
Ian MalcolmAnd I say that because at day's end, the rising awareness to this issue. It's almost like the evil empire. It's the Sith if you're the Star Wars fan. It's he who shall not be named in the Harry Potter lineage. It's Moldor and what is it? Sauron if you are a Lord of the Rings fan. That evil has taken over our society. If you need any better explanation, look at the absurdity of housing prices.
Ian Malcolmthat will just say, well, I got nothing else to live for. Might as well just make some money off of my body because after all, it's the only thing worth a dime. That is, of course, until AI gets to the point that that makes that obsolete as well. And so what will you then have? Well, that even won't be economically viable, right?
Ian MalcolmSo now those young women that have done that, well, now they're going to be unable to find a suitor because after all, who's going to want to marry somebody that the entire world can watch have their most intimate of moments, right?
Ian MalcolmThank you very much.
Ian MalcolmRevolution, but a spiritual one, right? A cultural revolution, a renaissance, if you will. So we are going to discuss both the past through the pages of that book to discuss the present, including perhaps a little bit about that absurd debate that we all witnessed that, in my opinion, Candace Owens absolutely demolished the Jewish supremacist that is Andrew Wilson.
Ian MalcolmI call him that because he won't call out Jewish supremacy. How do you go around and espouse Christian values while defending Israel? while defending and being oblivious to Jewish supremacy. Come on, it's obvious, right? So Candace Owens absolutely mopping the floor with that individual. And I discuss it because we're getting to a point where the debate is essentially over.
Ian MalcolmWe have won. We just got to get more people that are evangelizing this good news, right? We are going to have that resurrection, that Renaissance of our civilization, of our culture, of our people. And so without further ado, I want to first and foremost, of course, check in. Not only first and foremost, but the co-host with the most is Mrs. JoAnn.
Ian MalcolmAnd make sure nothing that we left out at the top of that. And then we will go promptly to Dr. Michael Rectenwald and to Lori to introduce some of the things that they're going to be discussing here.
@joann_marieHey! Thank you so much for hosting, Dr. Michael. I started reading your book today and I was so surprised. I wasn't expecting that at all. It's such a great book, guys. I've only read a part of the first chapter, but I was expecting, I don't know, like boring history, I don't know. But it's kind of like Sophie's World, that it's like fiction and like a thriller.
@joann_marieThank you very much.
@joann_marieGuys, please repost this space. And if you guys go to it, I will also repost it and bookmark it. It helps so much with the algorithm. And follow Ian and Dr. Michael and Lori, who is down there. And no, I'm just really happy to be here. So, Dr. Michael, welcome.
Speaker 1Hey, JoAnn and Ian, thank you so much for having me. It's great to do this. And I really appreciate this. I just mentioned this to Ian and he was, I said, look, I don't know if I ever sent you a copy of this novel. I wrote this novel called The Cabal Question. I published it in April of 2025.
Speaker 1The book is about a guy that notices and what happens to him from there. Like what are the consequences of this? So I started off with it. Well, let me just read you some of the first chapter and then I'll pause and come back. I'm not going to read the whole thing, the whole first chapter. It'll take 35 minutes according to time estimator.
Speaker 1So let me just start with chapter one unless Ian wants to say something else first before I...
Ian MalcolmNo, the only thing I would say is just that to JoAnn's comment there, I absolutely love the format of this book. What I would love to ensure is that for those that are listening in, Dr. Rectenwald, that they have an idea where they could pick up a copy to, of course, support the work that you're doing and anything else they can do to support you and ASAPAC in general.
Ian MalcolmAnd also to comment on the fact that I love this approach because again, it's delivered via essentially entertainment. Right. And we have been so subverted because all of the things that entertain us have these subversive elements. And we could look at everything from the Odyssey to mainstream television and keeping up with the Kardashians.
Ian MalcolmRight. And so your approach here of taking this novel. Right. This is something that we could give to individuals that are not aware of what's going on in the landscape. and perhaps just say, hey, this is a really interesting thriller. You might want to give it a read, right? And the next thing they know, they might come over your way and say, hey, by the way, I feel like maybe there's some kind of allegory here, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd so I love us taking back any way we can the idea of entertainment. And so whether it's this book or the music of the legendary foundry, right? I just love when we're able to kind of mix entertainment with information and create infotainment that isn't controlled by the you-know-whos.
@joann_mariealso it's it's very witty and and very funny so yeah no like it's i mean i don't know if you were trying to be funny but i was like this is amazing i don't know like i cannot wait for you guys to hear it because it's it's so good guys okay thanks that's great that's a good entree and uh yeah your your reactions are correct i mean i mean the reader can respond any way they want but yeah that's how it's uh
Speaker 1There's humor built in here. And let me just start off. The first chapter is called Seduction. And it begins with this character, Paul. And it's happening in Groningen, the Netherlands. That's where Paul is. He's in the Netherlands. Paul paid seven euros to see the Martin Kirk bell tower. But the second he reached the top of the stairs, his phone rang and the bells tolled.
Speaker 1Shattering His Brief Ruminations. It was Seth. He answered the call, waited for the bells to stop, and walked down the spiral staircase to the church nave. Hold on, Seth. When he reached the ground floor, he was struck side-long with regret and wondered why he'd let them drive him out. Shouldn't he have stayed and fought?
Speaker 1Why had he become a historical revisionist in the first place? Why hadn't he contented himself with variations on a theme? He took a deep breath and spoke wearily. Hello Seth, how are you? Seth straddled the sill of an open seventh floor window with one leg hanging out, he told Paul. He had a noose around his neck with the other end of the rope tethered to an exposed pipe inside his loft apartment.
Speaker 1Paul hurried out of the church onto the plaza but couldn't help but noticing the art exhibit entitled Queer Resilience. He looked at the nearest painting, perplexed. It featured a bearded, sex-ambiguous figure lounging in a hammock and grasping genitalia in its right hand. The hammock was tied to two small posing trees and bent under the weight.
Speaker 1Androgynous children in short skirts and leafy headwreaths reeled around the Bacchanalian figure. This, Paul thought, had to be satire. Although he knew it wasn't. They've created a total dystopian nightmare with no escape, Seth lamented hopelessly. Paul looked at the painting. But I'm not sure how much of this dystopia is external and how much Paul began before Seth cut him off.
Speaker 1Don't give me this shit. This is not all in my head. You see it too. You know who's behind this. This is all they're doing. They've destroyed the society. There's nothing left. I'm outside of Martin Kirk, Paul said. There's this painting. I think you've seen it before. I know which one you mean. It's a travesty, utter perversion.
Speaker 1Paul, listen, Seth said, growing more desperate. I'm not going to give these parasites, these war criminals, these blood money lenders, these pornographers, these counterfeiters, I'm not going to give these demons the satisfaction of watching me suffer. I don't care if you live or die, Paul said, thinking he hadn't made a tragic mistake.
Speaker 1No, they'd rather I die. Paul pictured Seth perched on his windowsill, his balding head with short black hair and cropped beard bisected by the rope. He recalled the time they took ketamine capsules in his apartment. Looking out of the trees in the grassy courtyard, Paul told Seth that he felt like he was part of the vegetable kingdom.
Speaker 1Seth, he remembered, had sobbed uncontrollably. Paul did not yet know why. Exactly, Paul said finally. Why give them the satisfaction? He heard a thud. He thought Seth had either dropped his phone or carried it with him to his death. Seth, what's going on? Seth, answer me. Just then, an attractive woman passed by Paul.
Speaker 1Maybe Seth would answer him if he engaged this woman, he thought. Maybe he could try the pick-up artist maneuver Seth had told him about. Surely this would interest Seth. He remembered the instructions. In cases like this, the approach would be to catch up with the woman, pass her by, then turn around to say hello. He would point to where he first saw her.
Speaker 1Stopping and turning to where he pointed, she would be complying with his commands without knowing it. He would pay her a compliment for her style or for something she was wearing. The objective was an instant date, like getting a cup of coffee. Seth told him the moves were informed by evolutionary psychology and would prove irresistible.
Speaker 1Seth, you should see what just walked by me. Seth, are you there? Seth finally answered. Yeah, I'm here. How does she look? He asked in disgust. She's blonde, 5'11", 125 pounds, Paul answered. What are you waiting for? Seth screamed. Maybe his life depended on this woman, Paul thought. Okay, I'm doing it. You can listen and help me, okay?
Speaker 1Yes, Seth answered. Paul started walking at a brisk pace. He soon passed the woman, turned around, veered to his left, and stood directly in front of her. Hello, I was standing outside the church back there, and I couldn't help but notice you when you walked by, he said, pointing to Martin Kirk. Hello, she said, and turned her head to the church and back.
Speaker 1Paul noticed her t-shirt. It figured a graphic depiction of Jesus talking on a cell phone. Then he noticed the pearl choker that looked too tight around her long thin neck. I love your necklace. Your style is amazing. Oh, thank you. It's not real. Enough with the compliments, Seth yelled in his ear. Jesus Christ, ask a question.
Speaker 1Ask her if she's from Groningen or if she's a student or something. What's your name, Paul asked. No, it's over. Forget it, Seth yelled again. You can call me Eva. What's yours? I'm Paul from America. Are you from Groningen? Yes, she answered. Nothing was coming from the earbuds, and Paul didn't know what to do next. He put the phone on speaker.
Speaker 1Seth? What's Seth? It's a person, a friend of mine. He's threatening to kill himself, Paul said, pointing to his phone. What kind of sick joke is this? It's not a joke. I'm dead serious. Just then, Seth's miniature voice screamed through the speaker, They're destroying your country! What's he talking about, he asked. He's talking about the immigrants here.
Speaker 1Yes, they're infiltration of everything, Seth screamed through the speaker. Everywhere you look, you see a non-Saxon, Blacks, Muslims, women in hijabs, Dutch women mating with Africans. You're in Northern Netherlands, for Christ's sake. What are these people doing there? Your genetics have been debased. Muslims are raping your women.
Speaker 1The Jews are behind the mass immigration and the degradation of the Western world. The Jews want to destroy the Aryan race. The Jews want to destroy Europe. The Jews want to destroy civilization. The Jews want to destroy beauty. Seth spouted his staccato delivery sounding like a military drum. Okay, so that's the setup of the story.
Speaker 1The pretext is simple. You get this guy and put him in a suicidal situation. Such that the only thing he wants to do is to scream about the Jews. Likewise, you give a pretext for him to give these extended soliloquies that come later in the text where he's talking about the Jewish problem as he sees it. And since he's suicidal, the text has to give him the space to speak, otherwise he's going to kill himself.
Speaker 1That's the pretext. So let me see if anybody has any questions or thoughts.
Ian MalcolmWell, just, actually, I'm not sure, JoAnn, did you jump in?
@joann_marieOh, no, I'm loving it. A bit after this, they arrest the friend. Like, it's just so ridiculous because of hate speech. So, no, no, I'm loving it. I don't have... How did you begin writing this, Dr. Michael?
Speaker 1I thought about the scenario where I thought, you know, how could I set up a situation where a character gets to spout off all of this very, you know, unacceptable, controversial and extremely, you know, pejorative and toxic stuff, so-called. You know, how do I get him to be able to say this stuff without, you know, Without it looking like that's what the novel's about.
Speaker 1The point being that you can't shut the guy up because to do so will end his life putatively. So that's it. I started with the scenario. So what I write in fiction, what I do is create a scenario where it looks like an inescapable problem and then I find ways out of it. That's how my fiction usually works.
@joann_marieBut it's so smart because I've only read a couple of pieces, but I was like, excellent, you know? At some point he's explaining about the Bolshevik revolution and stuff like that, but it's kind of, it's all sneaked in there so that the reader starts learning about all of these things, but not in a, I don't know, in either a boring way or in a, I don't know, it's just...
@joann_marieIt's amazing. I cannot wait to read more about it. But I think Laurie wants to add something.
Speaker 2Yeah, hi. No, I'm just chomping at the bit because I know factually how great this novel is because Michael was there with me when he wrote quite a bit of it. And not that it needed the help because it didn't, but my love of grammar, I did a final proofread of it. You know, I do editing, but he's a wrestler, right? Didn't need any editing.
Speaker 2I just love this book and it's a really good one for people to enjoy.
Speaker 2It was great hearing Michael read it in a space. And by the way, a lot of the predictions, we sometimes talk about his novels and I'll say to him... Oh, it's way worse than in your book, you know, at this point with the suppression of the free speech and all that, especially in the UK, like I'll go, oh, it's much worse than that now.
Speaker 2And we've outbooked your book. Like we say this all the time.
Speaker 1So I just wanted to... That's the problem with writing dystopian fiction is, you know, sometimes you underestimate the horrors that are waiting. And, you know, so in any way, let me jump back in unless somebody else... I see Raed has his hand up. We'll go to Raed first and then...
Speaker 3No, no, no, no, no. Please, please go ahead. I'm here to listen to you. I just, I had a question, but I can ask later. Please go ahead.
Speaker 1Okay, yeah, let me just jump back in a little bit. So they, he meets this girl, you know, with his pickup lines, this PUA, this PUA thing, you know, pickup artists, it's a routine. And then she takes him to this restaurant where her friend is working in the back as a Barista, there's a coffee shop connected to the restaurant.
Speaker 1And she's the owner of the coffee shop, as it turns out, he finds out. And starts off with Seth, starts telling them how horrible everything is. They get him back on the phone and all that. And he starts to rant now to this woman. Her name is Eva. And then Annalise, her friend.
Speaker 1Paul, of course, they have him on speaker. So anyway, he's on speakerphone and he's ranting about how horrible his life is. And this is what the manager of the coffee shop starts off by saying. Have you considered surrendering your life to Jesus Christ? The manager interjected. He is the only way out of hell. Paul noticed
Speaker 1Paul noticed the manager's silver crucifix and wondered how he could have missed it. He knew what would be forthcoming from Seth and tried to derail him. Seth doesn't believe in God, he said. He thinks God is just a projection of ideal human qualities onto an abstract entity that doesn't exist. Seth, he knew, had never said this.
Speaker 1I'm familiar with this thesis. It's Feuerbach, the manager said. It's worse than that. Much worse, Seth yelled through the speaker. Jesus Christ is a Jew production. The Jews invented Jesus and his Jew testament. They spread it to the goyim to get the goyim to surrender their will. Turn the other cheek, love your neighbor, die to yourself, render unto Caesar.
Speaker 1It's all about making the goyim subservient to the Jew. Jesus is a Jewish psyop. Jesus Christ, Paul said. No, there is no God, Seth yelled derisively. It's a total fantasy. So is the chosen people. Take it easy. These people haven't heard this before. I don't give a fuck. I don't care what the Jews think. But they're not Jews, Paul said.
Speaker 1Paul noticed Eva returning to her store. He hadn't seen her leave. That's correct, Annalise interrupted. They're the synagogue of Satan. A third woman walked in from the back room and stood beside the manager. Paul recognized her as one of the waitresses. What do you hear? The manager barked at her. You have no business being here.
Speaker 1I came to borrow spoons, the waitress answered. How long have you been there? The manager demanded. Too long, the waitress answered. I heard everything. What's the synagogue of Satan? Never mind, the manager answered. You obviously don't know. I don't know what, the waitress asked. Revelation 2, verse 9, Revelation 3, verse 9, the manager said.
Speaker 1You act like the Bible is a reliable source of information, the waitress scoffed. Steph started screaming, but only the word Talmud could be heard through the pounding on the cafe door. What's that? Paul asked. It's the police, the waitress answered. So now the cops come and subject him to scrutiny. They arrest... Annalise, the manager, for allowing him to broadcast hateful rhetoric and speech in a cafe because they played it through the speaker.
Speaker 1So now this is a crime. They tell Paul he might be arrested, but not right now. So let's open it back up and I'll pick up the story later.
Ian MalcolmWell, I find the delivery, of course, it's entertaining, right? Because in some regard, Dr. Rectenwald, some of this sounds like the rantings of the crazy person, right? But then at the same time, we look into some of it and it's like, well, this is all accurate. And so it's an interesting mechanism.
Speaker 1Here's the other thing about the novel. As it goes on, the crazy guy becomes more and more right. And that's the scary thing epistemologically. It's the lunatic. That everybody starts saying, oh my God, this guy's absolutely correct, as it turns out. Or Paul himself starts thinking this, yeah. So, yeah.
Ian MalcolmWell, in the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king, right? And I suppose you could be crazy, but if you see the world for what it is, you can be far more sane than those that are swallowing the lies. And so it's an interesting mechanism. So we've heard about the mass migration piece. We then heard there about the Christ concept, which, I mean, I personally push back on that notion that Christ is a psychological operation, all that other kind of stuff.
Ian MalcolmI think it seems to me anyway, like he's the thing that they fear above anything and everything else, but that's just my own personal religious bend and everybody's welcome to theirs, right? But it's interesting seeing some of these different pieces Jeff Plummer
Ian MalcolmNo, my avatar is not me in sunglasses looking at dinosaurs. It is fiction, but so is the book. And not to go long-winded, instead I'll put it into the purple pill. But I did a long write-up once upon a time on how I think Ian Malcolm's actually a very interesting... Thank you so much for joining us.
Ian MalcolmSo in a sense, Hammond could be used. Isn't it ironic? The only person that supports Hammond at the end of the movie, or halfway through anyway, is the lawyer. So a field dominated by a certain group of people that also are the capital class, and they want to own essentially nature and change natural law. And by contrast, Ian Malcolm is out there saying, before you knew what you had, you were messing around with genetics, the most powerful force the world's ever seen.
Ian Malcolmand the idea of weaponizing biology and nature against humanity and all sorts of other things. And so it has been a very interesting character to dabble in. He's got lots of great gifts and memes, but no, that is, sorry, Laurie, that is not my handsome mug with sunglasses in a Jeep looking at dinosaurs in the avatar.
Speaker 2It's just, I was so foolish. I didn't know, like for so long, I'm like, oh yeah, Ian. And he's like... Oh, that's a different avatar. That was a great homage.
Speaker 1The best-looking Jew on the planet, actually. He could be the best-looking Jew alive. When he was in his heyday, let's put it that way.
Speaker 2I think it's great that you adopted that in Pay the Hama, as you explained it, and I think it works really well. Definitely. Absolutely.
Ian MalcolmI just love it, Laurie, because I'll get in the comments, you, you anti-dirty, anti-Semite, you have a Jew as your avatar. And then I'm like, so doesn't that mean that I have some kind of, you know, favor for the movie that is... Directed by a Jew with a character that is played by a Jew. And oh, by the way, Ian Malcolm, according to Michael Crichton, is a Jew, right?
Ian MalcolmLike every aspect. Curiously, though, Dr. Rectenwald, you know who's not Jewish around Jurassic Park is Michael Crichton, who wrote it. And not only is he non-Jewish, but he's also, if you look into his biography, the man's clearly just obviously brilliant. Thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 1Indirectly the other night because he wrote The Andromeda Strain as well.
Speaker 2You should mention that again in this space.
Speaker 1And that 1970, what is it, 78 version or what was it later?
Speaker 2No, the 2008 two-part miniseries on A&E and they never let it air again even though it was the second highest rated thing in their history. But tell them about what you said.
Speaker 1And what happens is there's this force that they really can't, the whole movie is about them trying to figure out what the hell it is. And eventually, It's like forming like this kind of like a swarm and there's this Star of David that displayed. That's its insignia. So very, very wild criticism. It's like the evil force that's about to ruin, destroy the world is Zionism.
Speaker 1It's the Star of David, the Star of Repham or whatever the hell it is.
Speaker 2Yeah, it becomes incontrovertible. But let me add one tidbit to that. The whole two part, so it's like four and a half hours or something like that. The end of it, the NSA guy makes sure that that Star of David, it's a world-killing, absolutely, almost 100% lethality virus, and they make sure they save it. So the end, the government secretly, the president doesn't even know, but the NSA guy, he's saving the virus, which has the Star of David that locks into its place up above in the satellite.
Speaker 2But yeah.
Speaker 1Should I jump back in or are we going to take some questions?
Ian MalcolmYeah, and I love that, and especially getting to honor that individual, his literary work, and also to tie that into the idea of Dr. Rectenwald, what you've done here, right? Taking literature, taking back the arts, and putting something out into the ether out of nothing. So let's continue, and just always humbled, of course, to hear from you.
Speaker 1Yeah, the other thing Crichton did was he wrote this essay about, Science, which was really amazing, where he refutes this idea of consensus science. In particular, the way climate change has been dictated to us as a fact, as a scientific fact, when in fact it's very shaky. And he points out that the truth doesn't depend on consensus.
Speaker 1I mean, you could have one person be right and everybody else saying they're wrong. So the consensus is oftentimes exactly wrong. So anyway, he wrote a great essay to that effect. Let me get them back in here. So let me just take it here. We're going to pick up where the guy... So this woman, Eva, tags along with him to his hotel.
Speaker 1And they get there and they're... The Europol is in his room already, going through his effects, so let's pick it up there. Okay, he says, you sure have some suspicious associates, Mr. Becker, the investigator began after the door latched behind Eva. What are you talking about, Paul asked derisively. As if you didn't know.
Speaker 1No, I have no idea what you're talking about. You have no idea? No, I don't. Well, your girlfriend here, Miss Eva DeWitt, is a member of a group called Gusenbond. That's a far right-wing extremist group based in the Netherlands with ties to Germany and the US. Did you know that? Your friend, Anneliese Helvig, is a Christian nationalist and former member of the same radical right-wing group.
Speaker 1She quit Gusenbond because it wasn't radical enough. As for your American friend, Seth Fisher, that's another story. We're still working on that one. But at first glance, it doesn't look good, the investigator said and stopped. Okay, wait a second here, Paul stammered. This is all nonsense. Give me a second, he said, raising his voice.
Speaker 1To begin with, Eva is not my girlfriend. I just met her today. And this Annalise woman is not my friend. I just met her. I knew nothing about either of them. They were just helping me with my friend Seth. These are mere coincidences. As for Seth, I have no idea what you're referring to. What does your friend Seth do for a living, the investigator asked.
Speaker 1What's the difference, Paul demanded. Anyway, we haven't talked much about that. So you have no idea what he does for a living, is that what you're saying? He deals in commodities, Paul answered. Did he ever tell you what commodities he deals in? No, he hasn't talked about that, if at all, and I never asked. How did you two meet?
Speaker 1He came to a talk that I gave and introduced himself to me afterwards. We exchanged phone numbers. Then he called me about a week later. It might have been a couple weeks or even a month. I'm not sure. We became friends. I've only met him in person twice. What? Why? What was the topic of the talk? Oh, what talk? My talk?
Speaker 1What was the topic? I don't know why that matters, but let me think. Probably something to do with the surveillance state. You know... The role of social media, Google, Palantir, etc., and the AI digital panopticon? I think the title was Precrime and the Big Tech Deep State, or something like that. You have a problem with surveillance?
Speaker 1Who doesn't? People with nothing to hide. The problem with surveillance is that the state can always, the investigator, cut them off. What do you do for a living? Research and writing. Have you ever wondered where Seth gets a seemingly endless supply of money? How is it that he travels all over the world without the least of constraints?
Speaker 1Have you researched that? I haven't thought about it much. Well, you might want to think about it. Why? What are you trying to tell me? I'm trying to tell you that you are, shall we say, enmeshed in a broad anti-Semitic network. The only question is whether you know it or not. So let's stop there.
Ian MalcolmAnd that idea of the network, so Dr. Rectenwald, it actually brings me to a question around some of the inspiration that you might have had for this work, because obviously you have the brotherhood that's referred to in 1984 by George Orwell. When you think back on some of those works, whether it's Orwell or Huxley, or any of the other kind of dystopian authors.
Ian MalcolmAre there any that kind of influenced your work here? Or did you try to go into it, you know, kind of with a fresh slate or as much so as you were able to?
Speaker 1Well, I read a lot of, you know, I've read a lot of dystopian fiction. Primarily, my favorite authors are Dostoevsky, Orwell. This is fiction now.
Speaker 1and probably Kafka, frankly, even though we know Kafka was a paranoid Jew. But he was a good writer, and I can't help but enjoy some of his novels, like The Trial, and The Trial particularly, and I think it's The Castle. I forget, but The Trial. Metamorphosis is all right, but it's The Trial that's a great piece. uh that is you know the the guy wakes up with the police knocking at the door that's that particular scene like really has been embedded in my consciousness since i read it and it's like it informs a lot of what happens in my novels uh there's all there's always a cop at the door at some point
Speaker 1Because some of the stuff, it's not just about the cabal, it's about the state that the cabal wields. And it's a run-in with the state. I mean, I'm a libertarian, largely anarcho-capitalist, so the state is not my friend as I see it. It's the only entity on earth that's able to commit murder without consequence. It's the only thing that can initiate force without any...
Speaker 1I'm loving it. Thank you so much, Dr. Michael. Ian, did you want to say something or should I go to a couple of questions? No, let's go to Darrell. Okay.
@joann_marieDarell?
@darelllemailvcOh man, so I want to read one thing real quick. It'll take just one second. This is Acts chapter 7, and this ties directly into Dr. Rectenwald, what he had to say in Acts chapter 7. This is the stoning of Stephen, if you're not familiar with the scriptures. And then we go to verse 42, Acts chapter 7. Then God turned and gave them up to worship the hosts of heaven, as it is written in the book of the prophets.
@darelllemailvcO ye house of Israel, have ye offered to me slain beasts and sacrifices by the space of forty years in the wilderness? Yea. 43. Yea, have ye took up the tabernacle of Malak, and the star of your god, Rimthan, figures of ye made to worship them, and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.
@darelllemailvcRectenwald here. Concerning the deep state and the elections and everything, flat cameras and all of that, what is concerning to us?
@joann_marieWait, wait, wait, hold on, hold on. Ian, you're having connection issues. And if the space does drop, Ian will open right back up. And guys, please, again, follow him and put your notifications on. And I don't know, maybe he's back. Ian, are you back?
@joann_marieNo.
@joann_marieOkay, yeah. He will open right back up, though. Okay, go for it, Darell. I don't know.
@darelllemailvcOkay, did everyone hear the scripture I read in Acts chapter 7? And I wanted to ask Dr. Rectenwald about concerning the deep state, plot cameras, everything Sam Altman and the whole thing going on. Do we think we can vote our way out of this? And also, too, I want to say, I want to add in like positive Christianity and having the personal will to withdraw from the state and being willing to separate ourselves as being what the scripture says, sanctified, which is cutting away from if you're a Christian.
@darelllemailvcAnd that's all I want to say.
@joann_marieExcellent. Thank you so much, Darrell.
Speaker 4Ian, are you back?
Speaker 4Hopefully that's working, JoAnn.
Speaker 4Hopefully this is working. If it's not, I don't know what to tell you guys. JoAnn, is that working?
Speaker 4JoAnn, can you hear me?
@joann_marieYes. Sorry, I was sending it to Dr. Michael. Yeah, it did crash. I'm sorry. But you're back now. Michael, does he still sound a little bit rubber bandy? A little bit.
Speaker 1In fact, I'm hearing some sort of background, too. I don't know what it is.
@joann_marieWeird. It's clear, but it's kind of like... I don't know.
Ian MalcolmI don't know what to tell you about that. I'll try resetting the thing now that I got you up here as co-host, JoAnn.
Speaker 2I thought you sounded good, but I understand if some people didn't hear you properly, but I didn't think there was a problem.
Ian MalcolmWell, I'll try resetting on this side the app and JoAnn, we'll see if it works. But you can take the reins for a second.
@joann_marieIt's just, I mean, it's still clear, but it's not as clear as you're normally. I don't know. But maybe it's just me. I don't know. But again, guys, please repost this space. And if you guys go to it, I will also repost it. Bookmark it. It helps so much with the algorithm. Follow Ian, put your notifications on. Follow Michael, follow Lori, who is in CLG News.
@joann_marieAnd also, where is the other account? I'll post it in the purple field in a little bit because I forgot. It's the Cabal... The other account. I don't know. I'll tell you guys in a little bit. But yeah, guys, please, let's get more people in here. Yeah, no, I'm loving it so far.
Ian MalcolmIs that any better, JoAnn, or still no?
@joann_marieYeah, you sound a lot clearer now.
Ian MalcolmAll right. Okay, there we go.
@joann_marieAwesome. All right. Yeah. Okay. Go for it, Dr. Michael.
Speaker 1Okay. Yeah. Thanks for coming back, people. I'm thinking that something glitchy is going on here with these IOs maybe after us. I don't know, but maybe. So let's see now. So the novel, there's a dream sequence that I don't know if I'll get into, but okay. We'll go to this character named Red who comes up in chapter 9 of the novel.
Speaker 1So Paul's basically being introduced to this network that they accused him of being in in the first place. So he's accused of being in this broad antisemitic network and to escape their clutches, he has to basically join this broad antisemitic network, so-called, to get out of trouble, to stay out of trouble, to keep from being arrested.
Speaker 1So that's the premise here. Anyway, so he gets introduced to this podcast, this live podcast that's going on with this guy named Red. Now, Red is like this kind of guy wearing, he's a bulky guy with a mohawk haircut and real muscly and so forth and so on. So take your guess of who this character is based on. There was another character named Rowan Unterman in the novel.
Speaker 1You might take a guess who that's based on. He runs this underground network that facilitates people's movement throughout the world. And that's how Paul gets out of Europe. So he's in New York now and he's at this guy's place or this place. And Red's talking in an interview. The host says, We're back on the edge, streaming, live to all you truth-seekers out there.
Speaker 1Red's in the house tonight, bringing his usual fire. Okay, Red, enough with your sexual exploits already. Let's dig into some of the deep cuts on the JQ. What's the angle you're hitting us with tonight? Red, let's start with the root, Talmudic ethics, the shit that's baked into their whole playbook. and maybe even their DNA through epigenetics.
Speaker 1You ever read the Talmud? Gittin57a says, Jesus is in hell burning in a vat of excrement and semen. That's their take on Christianity right there. Pure contempt. Then there's Sanhedrin54b laying out their twisted morals. Fucking little kids, loopholes only for their own perversions and rape. It's a fucking twisted mindset, man.
Speaker 1Power through deceit, asymmetrical, Particularistic Ethics, Hatred of the Goy, and Supremacism. And it's all over their history. Host, you're saying this ethic drives them? Is that the play? How does that play out in real events? Great question. Take the USS Liberty, Red says. June 67, Israeli jets and boats hit our ship, 34 dead, 171 wounded.
Speaker 1The official story is that it was a mistake, but the survivors say those fuckers knew it was American. Radio intercepts, recon flights hours before. Johnson buried it. No inquiry. First of all, he's a crypto-Jew. But Jewish pressure, man. Couldn't risk pissing off Israel's backers in stateside or the state of Israel, the headquarters.
Speaker 1The cover-up is proof. Wow, that's a bold claim, man. Does it tie into something bigger? Fuck yeah, Rez says. I mean, just look at what's right before your very eyes. Look at what these Israelis are doing to the Palestinians. blowing kids' heads off, blowing up hospitals, schools, refugee camps, destroying 90% of the infrastructure, protesting for the right to rape prisoners.
Speaker 1Then you're calling you an anti-Semite if you object. Look at 9-11, five Israelis caught dancing, fucking celebrating while the towers burned. Newark cops nabbed them, cameras, maps, cash, and a van from Urban Moving Systems, Mossad Front. shut down fast afterwards. The FBI held him for 71 days, then deported the fuckers.
Speaker 1Cheney's crew pushed the Saudi angle, but those dancing Israelis never explained. The Jewish Hollywood hand steering the cover up, protecting their own, bamboozling the American public. Host, you're on fire. Keep it going. What else? and then he goes on about JFK and so on and so forth so um yeah it's a it's a bit of a rant that goes on there's just an example that he gets introduced to these various characters each one of them has a new has a different angle on the jq as it were and so he gets the whole you know bibliography in the course of the novel anyway let's open it back up
Speaker 2Real quick, is it possible to do an edit while a space name is up, just putting this up, because you have the canal question. I don't know if you can do a fix without removing the promo, though.
Ian MalcolmI sure can, yeah.
Speaker 2Oh, okay, I'm sorry. Hey, man, it's the Panama Canal. I'm sorry. I didn't want to sound like a jerk or something.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, and Dr. Rectenwald, you know what's interesting is while you were reading that passage, what I'd be very interested in seeing if at some point we can do, and maybe there's a way to do some of this with AI to Reduce the Manpower. But the possibility of having this audio ultimately put onto not only this book, but maybe perhaps a site in which it would walk you through the evidence to all the things that are being presented, right?
Ian MalcolmAlmost like a crash course for somebody that's never heard of these ideas to go and listen to this story. And as they're listening to it, they can say, wait a second, what is this urban moving thing? And then have the same way that you might cite certain other works, you could say, You know, you can either have a link to that or you can just have it directly on the exact same page so that as somebody's following along and hearing some of these claims that, you know, to many might sound completely ridiculous, but here's the information.
Ian MalcolmHere's the urban movie, guys. Here's the connection to Michael Chertoff.
Speaker 1All of this sketchiness there, you know? Yeah, there's a lot of it. The novel, frankly, though, I got to say, just so everybody knows that it doesn't take a stand on any of it. This is the narrator's plausible deniability. The narrator does not really take a stand. Although, look, the evidence gets presented and it's left to the reader to figure out what they believe, what is true about this.
Speaker 1Is the cabal real or is it this fucking hallucination? You know, and the reader has to determine that for themselves. So I just wanted to make that clear that that is kept kind of like in epistemological limbo, as it were.
Ian MalcolmWell, it's certainly very, very well done. I know that Darrell has a question, so let's go back to him.
@darelllemailvcYeah, when the space crashed earlier, I wasn't done. I'm sorry the space crashed. I'm not going to read Acts chapter 7, verse 42 and 43. You guys can take that up on your own. But I wanted to ask Mr. Dr. Rectenwald about positive Christianity and having the personal will to withdraw from the state. and being willing to separate ourselves from Israel and their influence and to be basically sanctified, which is converted in sanctification means separating away from oneself.
@darelllemailvcSo how do you feel about that, Mr. Rectenwald?
Speaker 1Well, that's amazing that you're asking that question because that's what happens in the novel, okay? The character in question, Paul, and... The woman he met, Eva, ended up getting married and they ended up creating a covenant community in rural Pennsylvania around the Amish and the Mennonites. Particularly, they buy a farm from an Amish community and they start a covenant community.
Speaker 1It's called Covenant Rising. It's not communist, it's actually based on private property. Private property is what allows you to exclude other people. Because that's what property is. Property is exclusion of others. And private property was basically running a parallel society, withdrawing from the Judaized society and creating a society based on
Speaker 1A Christian Covenant
Speaker 2No, I know. It's an important point that he was making. I just felt badly for those who want, you know, but yes, it's really important.
Ian MalcolmIn one ear, out the other. Spoilers out the window, guys.
Speaker 1I mean, it doesn't really matter. The thing still has suspense. There's a lot of suspense in the novel. Everybody that's read it said it's actually a suspense novel with all this philosophical and JQ material interspersed in it. The more the guy learns, the more danger he gets into. He's in more danger. So knowledge, I call it dangerous knowledge.
Speaker 1He has dangerous knowledge. And that's, you know, knowledge can be very dangerous. Let's think about that. Knowledge makes you culpable in some sense. It makes you, if you know, then you're guilty in a way.
Speaker 2It's the Alexander Pope. Quote that I used in my high school yearbook, a little learning is a dangerous thing.
Speaker 1Well, no, no, no, not from that standpoint. It's not like that. No, I know what you mean. He thinks he knows everything. No, what he's talking about here, what I'm talking about here is knowledge as, you know, having dangerous knowledge, knowledge that gets you in trouble for knowing it based on the, you know, Based on the fact that it countervenes the powers that be.
Speaker 1But anyway, where do we want to go from here? Should I read some more or should we open it up and keep talking to the listeners? What do you think, Ian?
Ian MalcolmWell, let's go to any thoughts. I'd be curious if IQ or Raed wants to jump in.
@amirkahhhhhhReally quick, I was just going to tell CLG that, you know, don't blame yourself for thinking that that's actually Ian. When I first met Ian, I thought the banner was him. I was like, man, he's bold and just putting himself out there. That's not really who we're dealing with. He remains a mystery, man. He's more mysterious than that part of the book that just got spoiled.
@amirkahhhhhhBut don't worry, there's so much information overload that we're bound to forget it.
@joann_marieI cannot watch Jeff Goldblum's movies anymore. I literally think he's my friend and it's crazy. He is your friend. Yes, he is. I'm like, I know him. I talk to him all the time. Oh my God. Okay, sorry. Go for it. Thank you.
@amirkahhhhhhNo, that's funny. But no, I just wanted to make that comment. I'm enjoying this. Definitely interesting. I think, Ian, you had that idea of connecting the facts to this. I can even imagine, you know, there's a lot of YouTube videos that are just audiobooks. And really, there's not much to do with the visuals, right? You're just maybe going to put the captions or something.
@amirkahhhhhhBut for a book like yours, which is kind of all-encompassing the JQ situation, right? It's a fun way, definitely a funner way to kind of Get the gist of what's going on, so then connecting the facts on top of that. You'll get views, you'll get book sales. My idea for one of my books is I was going to put the audiobook out there, like half of it, just out there available, and then the other half, if people are interested, they would just purchase it.
@amirkahhhhhhBut I could see that taking off. I would definitely watch it.
Speaker 1Yeah, this is a good idea, I think. I mean, to have a companion with the book. maybe even some of these discussions canned you know and put in there and uh you know some commentary and uh connections to the history yeah let let people discern from the and connect it back to real history and you know in some cases some of the characters are make a mistake like for example there's a chapter on the bank uh the city of London and the bank of England and the
Speaker 1There is a story about Cromwell, of course, that he was funded by these Amsterdam Jewish bankers, and that the English Revolution, the first one, where Cromwell basically takes over after the king is beheaded, that that was a Jewish plot. But in that story, there's a relationship to one character called, I think it was Pratt.
Speaker 1Something Pratt. And this character, as it turns out, is mythological. But there was no correspondence between Cromwell and this Pratt, Ebenezer Pratt. But nevertheless, the story, see, this is how they do this, is discredit one element of a story and then say, oh, the whole thing is a hoax. No, there probably was a plot, a Jewish banker's plot.
Speaker 1to overthrow King Charles to have him removed and replaced by Cromwell because Cromwell, after getting in power, let the Jews back into England for the first time since 1290 when they were banned for coin clipping and usury. And if you don't believe that's true, look it up. And also look at the Magna Carta, clauses 11 and 12 specifically in the Magna Carta itself address the question of Jewish usury and banking.
Speaker 1So, I mean, look, this was real and really people were really concerned about things like this. It's just that you're not allowed to be concerned anymore. This was common. And, you know, something happened, of course, that changed this, where it became, you know, you read all these passages from historical figures, famous authors, famous political figures, famous this, famous that, and the things they've said.
Speaker 1This didn't disqualify you from decent civilization. This was just what you thought, and it was just part of your thoughts. It didn't disqualify you. But now, this makes you like everything you say now, and you become morally worse than the people committing genocide somehow. This is the amazing thing, that you become somehow, they try to peg it as you being more...
Speaker 1The most immoral being that exists on the face of the earth because you have said something about them. That's stunning. And that they are able to like undertake a transvaluation of values in the Nietzschean sense that is to take the value systems and convert it into their own and make that the one that supersedes all values.
Speaker 1And so that means that you now, as the lowest moral being on Earth, are execrable. You deserve to be desecrated. Anyway, what I'm getting at here is that it was common amongst the intelligentsia to talk about this stuff. And it didn't lead to your excommunication from civilization as it's supposed to do now.
Speaker 2IQvia had such a great idea. Oh, I'm sorry. I just was saying it's a great idea to have the companion because even when I was with him with a lot of this book writing and kept reading as he was going, I learned quite a bit. I did not know so much about the JQ. So I just want to comment that it was a good idea that you had.
Speaker 2That's all.
@amirkahhhhhhWell, thank you. And I'm writing off of Ian's idea, but it's definitely worth trying out. Yes, and Ian said it. I'm sorry. I mean, no. And when I was in a space for Azapac, you were recommending that book specifically, Kabbalah Question, because I wanted to purchase one of your books, Dr. Michael, and I saw that you said the first three to show up would get a free book, and I was number 10, so I'm not gonna, but I'm happy to support, so I'm definitely gonna purchase this and read this.
@amirkahhhhhhI'm sure there's stuff I haven't. I actually also checked out, this is kind of a sidetrack, but just really quick, On the Jewish Question by Karl Marx. Very interesting read. I was actually hosting a space just because I was reading it out loud. I thought, you know, maybe someone wanted to join, at least it'll be recorded.
@amirkahhhhhhAnd halfway through, I was like, damn, this is some important stuff. But you know what I thought was so weird is, and it's something that Rabbi [guest] always talks about, where, you know, basically I was trying to find the actual book, The Jewish Question by Bruno Bauer. And there's only like a German version and there's barely any English translations.
@amirkahhhhhhI couldn't find one. I kept searching. But there's, of course, on the Jewish question, just widespread on the internet, it's like what Rabbi says, where it's like, you always have critiques of anti-Semites being widely available, but the anti-Semites themselves, like trying to get their books is a challenge, and I experienced that with this one.
Speaker 1Here's the thing, Marx was, that essay, his on the Jewish question is technically anti-Semitic. Absolutely, he says... Michael Rectenwald Ph.D., CLG News, Darell Lemaire, El Jefe, IQviaJQ2, AmirKAHhhhhh, Spacesdashboard
Speaker 1and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1His purse, Angles, was the first woke capitalist. He had a manufacturing plant that his family owned, and they supported Marx. Marx was a kept man by the capitalist class.
Speaker 1Ironically, but I mean, not really ironically, once you know that what Marx was about was getting power into the central bankers, of course, and away from the productive capacities of society. Anyway, Reid.
@amirkahhhhhhAnd one last thing about that is, I could have sworn he wrote hand rubbing in there. I might have hallucinated it, but... You mean, like...
Speaker 1Let's go to El Jefe. El Jefe, welcome. El Jefe? Yeah, I'm here, I'm here.
Speaker 4Sorry, I had to unmute.
Speaker 5Fascinating conversation. I was reading the back of your book, and I'm wondering, you were a professor at NYU, so when you wrote this, did you, I know it's not autobiographical, but did you lean on any experiences that you had as a professor or in your life in general in the book?
Speaker 1Well, As Virginia Woolf said, all autobiography is fiction, and all fiction is autobiography. Okay, so where does that leave us? It's, yeah. Of course, my experience at NYU, I was run out, not for this Jewish question stuff, but I hit the third rail of social justice or woke ideology, as it's called later. and that was it I mean they really came after me the whole administration came down on me like a ton of bricks so they tried to destroy me and they tried to wreck my academic career get rid of me from academia blackballed me across the whole country uh for criticizing their social justice fucking shit like the the whole uh you know woke brigade uh
Speaker 5They're protecting themselves. You know what I call it? Sensitive Jews. I mean, they're so freaking sensitive. You know, I had some clown, some transvestite that calls herself the chosen one on this platform, you know, a Holocaust survivor, whatever, sending me a cease and desist on Twitter. I just laughed. I said, yeah, right, you're really going to cease and desist my ass on Twitter.
Speaker 5You know, full New York law firm letterhead, the whole nine yards. I took it as a badge of honor, you know, and I've never been served with anything. It was complete bullshit. But you know what? I didn't engage anymore. I blocked her. And, you know, I also... Wrote a nice reply because she said, have a nice evening. So I was like, oh, I will, and I hope you have a nice evening too, the chosen one.
Speaker 1This is why I never get into arguments. I try to stay out of the people battles. Even with the celebrities back and forth between this one and that one, I don't want to get involved. Here's the reason, because we have real shit to deal with. It's not about personalities and... I mean, look, it does help to get clicks and getting across certain things that are truths, I think, that have to be expressed.
Speaker 1You know, they have to be put out there. But I don't want to get into these battles between people online. Then you get sued. Then you get this shit coming at you. Right. I don't know. So far, I've evaded that. Eluded, I should say. I have eluded that consequence here. But, I mean, I had to sue NYU because they were just...
Speaker 1The content and structure. The what?
Speaker 1Is that not beyond human belief? They accused me of wrong things and they condemned me for it. They said I was guilty for the content and structure of my thoughts.
Speaker 2Lawsuit then arrived shortly thereafter, as well it should.
Speaker 1Yeah, so I mean, and then I found out that the people behind this whole thing were the board members. They were people like Marty Lipton, this Jewish lawyer who was like super powerful. And I stood across from him three feet from his face and said, this is the most corrupt institution I've ever been involved in in my life.
Speaker 1That's why I think they had it out for me. That was before I started to criticize the social justice. Now, you know, they're probably looking at my career arc and saying, ah, we knew it. It was that all along.
Speaker 2Didn't the son of the president of NYU, and I may have the title wrong, own a huge apartment? NYU owns a lot of property in New York, for those who don't know. Wasn't there something with the renting?
Speaker 1What they were doing is this. NYU was lending. They created a bank and lent administrators, top administrators, and some faculty, very few, top faculty. and they lent them money to buy second and third homes. Then they forgave the loans. So they effectively were giving second and third homes to their favorite people out of the tuition and out of the cold kitty of NYU.
Speaker 1It was outrageous. And I wrote an essay about it. And then I got in front of the president or the board of directors, I'm sorry, the chairman of the board, Marty Lipton at the time. And I told him this was the most corrupt institution I've ever been involved in. And he said, he just gave me this look like, I'll remember you, motherfucker, because they came after me hard when I criticized the social justice shit.
Speaker 2You forgot one of the things, Michael was originally elected when he first got on board with NYU as the chair of the English- What was it? There was an election.
Speaker 1The English department.
Speaker 2Right. He was elected and they went in a room and said he can't have the position. They overturned an election. That's when I knew his goose was cooked.
Speaker 1Yeah, because I won and I was a white male and it was my first year on campus. That couldn't stand. They couldn't have that. But anyway, let's open it back up. Ian, did you want to call on some people or should we just...
Ian MalcolmYeah, Mr. Rectenwald, where do we go from here? We obviously know we're not voting our way out of the Jewish supremacy. We look at our politicians.
@darelllemailvcRight now we see who controls what, and there's no way we are able to vote ourselves out. So what would you recommend? What is the example for good law-abiding citizens of the United States of America who resist the infiltration? of Israeli influence. And when you look into that, you look into also the Save America Act and the NDAA 219.
@darelllemailvcSo where do we go from now? How can we rise against this in a peaceful, not kinetic matter? If it needs to go kinetic, we can go kinetic. But I'm just asking as a matter of, like, where do we start?
Speaker 1Okay, I'll just jump in then. Well, you know, obviously electoral politics are extremely flawed. First of all, there's no system of counting the ballots that is trustworthy, really. That's one thing. And then, of course, there's... The PAC money that's involved in the elections, thanks to Citizens United 2010, argued by a Zionist law firm for a bunch of proto-Zionists working, you know, so they could have endless pro-Zionist advertising and spend endless money on campaigns.
Speaker 1That was Citizens United. It was a Zionist PSYOP. It was decried by the left, of course. and ignored by the so-called right. But it was something that should have been paid attention to by everybody. And the right diagnosis of that problem was it was a Zionist PSYOP to get endless AIPAC money into our elections. That's what really it came down to, plus corporate money.
Speaker 1But the corporations are owned by the same people. So, you know, that's what that was. So we need, of course, They wouldn't have tried to control elections if they didn't matter. So I want to throw out that black pill, which I think is mistaken, because look, they're spending billions of dollars on elections. Why? Because they know who is in control of the levers of power matters.
Speaker 1That matters. Who's in control of the levers of power matter. That matters. So we need to try to wrest control away from them. and I don't think voting is the only mechanism by any stretch. We need other things altogether. And in the short term, I established as a PAC as a kind of demarcation device so that you could tell the difference between who is supporting, who is basically operating for Israel and who is operating for the American people.
Speaker 1And we, you know, We've had a rough time getting the right people. And we've had trouble finding the right candidates. And they've had trouble finding us in a sense. Because look, we think that the right people are people like Dan Bilzerian, for example. And the people that have guts, that have principles and guts and money, frankly, that doesn't hurt because then you have,
Speaker 1The freedom to stand up to these people without concern as much. If you have some independence financially, they can't hurt you as much as quickly anyway. So that's Dan. I'm not saying we stand behind every kind of utterance Dan has ever made. I mean, I may say things differently than that, but I totally back Dan, as a fact back Dan.
Speaker 1Dan is the kind of person we need. He's the tip of the spear. And so, like him or not, and I hated the sort of Groeper war with Dan and the Groeper war. I wish that had never started. That's the kind of distractions that I mean derail us from the task. So we need to look at what kind of things are actually counterproductive.
Speaker 1And if this is revolution, then counterrevolutionary in a way. Now, when I say revolution, I don't mean violent uprising with our swords and stakes. You know, I'm talking about a thorough, you know, maybe what they call a, what's called the changing of the elites or a new elite coming in, replacing the Zionist elite. I don't know.
Speaker 1That's a top-down revolution. People talk about that. Then people say that they're more interested in bottoms up. Maybe we need a pincer movement from the top and bottom at the same time. A working class or, shall I say, more like people versus the ruling class Zionist state.
Speaker 1That's really the kind of opposition that we have. And so what can we do? Well, I do think that the electoral part is important and we should not abdicate that aspect. We have to fight for that because that's still going to be how our elected so-called officials aren't getting in power. Now, what are those people? Those are the people that pull the trigger for the masters behind them, okay?
Speaker 1for the ruling cabal but they are important because they still have to decide to pull the trigger and they do it under pressure perhaps or they do it under blackmail or bribery or ideological induction whatever they do it so those people are important so we need to try to get the right ones there and that's why i found it as a fact to make a demarcation platform that shows you who's who
Speaker 1And so that's that. And then there's, you know, of course, other things. I think in the end, ultimately, I believe in establishing parallel structures.
Speaker 2Speaking of ASAPAC, if anyone, can I just do a shameless promo real quick? If anyone can kick in and they're a U.S. citizen, I'll put, I'll reply to this thread under this. Space, the address, but it's www.aza-pac.com. If you're a U.S.-based address or U.S. citizen, I'm the treasurer of Azapac, by the way. I should have added that.
Speaker 2But, yeah, so shameless plug. Sorry. Go back to what you're doing.
Speaker 1Yeah.
@joann_marieNo, I love it, Laurie. Please don't plug it all the time. People need to hear about it.
Speaker 1We could go back to entertainment. I could read a little bit more from the novel or what. What do people want to do? Or open it up for more discussion? I'm fine with either, and it's up to Ian and JoAnn ultimately, but what do you guys think?
@darelllemailvcWell, I just simply asked the question because we know what we are up against, like in the considerable form of Florida. If you will, Dan Blazarian against Randy Fine right now Randy Fine is an open Jew, he's kissed the wall And we do not need that in our government We do not need wall kissers in our government And that's why I kind of like proposed the question Like, not going kinetic, not doing anything...
@darelllemailvcMr. Rectenwald, Ra does, he's had his hand up for a minute. So, yeah, I'll land there.
Speaker 1I think that we can do it peaceably. And it's all of the things at once. There's many prongs to this. There is the electoral political prong that we are trying to address with ASAPAC. There's intellectual work that has to be done. There's cultural work. There's rhetoric. There's political activity. There's grassroots organizing, et cetera.
Speaker 1What I think that I would say ultimately is that we need a parallel society and parallel structures. We need parallel structures. And so this is peaceable. It's a kind of, basically we're opting out of your system and we need to do this in mass. And now I'm an advocate of what's happening in Arkansas with the, I don't care what their politics is.
Speaker 1The Arkansas, the back to the land movement there. Other attempts to basically create intentional communities, I agree with. And on whatever terms people want to have them. And I think the bottom line is on property rights terms. And that is you have the right to exclude people from your property. Just that's what property is.
Speaker 1I mean, the reason your house is your house is because That's sort of a libertarian aspect which Michael and I were both part of until they kind of...
Speaker 1It's a kind of libertarianism, but it's a particular type, and it's not all libertarians at all. Most of them are very tepid, like, oh, we need a smaller government. The government's too big. You know, these kind of menarchists and these other kind of tepid bullshit artists. This is a pretty radical libertarian framework.
@darelllemailvcYeah, I wouldn't consider it radical. I would consider it common sense, if you will, because you have your property, you have your home, you have your homestead, and then your text on it. So it's not really quite radical, if you will. It's common sense.
Speaker 1Yeah, I mean, I'm saying like that's how it would be. I'm drawing from Hans Hermann Hoppe largely. He's a libertarian. He advocated for covenant communities. And he's written about this. He wrote about it in the book, The Democracy of the God That Failed. And he talks about this and these communities in their right to exclude.
Speaker 1And it became a meme on X. Of course, the meme is physical removal. and because Hoppe said basically people that don't abide by the ethics or you know of the of the society will be physically removed so it sounded though so that turned a lot of libertarians off because it sounds authoritarian now but it's not because you can go do whatever you want somewhere else it's just not on this property it's very you know so it's just a property rights argument you're right it's very basic and actually I don't think it's radical but they
Speaker 1Every time it's referred to in the media or anywhere, it's called radical. Just like me, I'm called radical all the time by these people.
Speaker 2Thank you, JoAnn, for sharing the video in the nest. I just saw that there. Everyone who was, if you didn't get a chance to see it, it was from November. It's gotten almost like 2 million views. I've liked it, and they remove my like on X sometimes, of course, goes without saying. But if you want to check it out.
Speaker 1It's not a property rights argument. I think that the Palestinians have been robbed. That's the first thing. Their property and their persons have been violated, but their property itself too, their external property also violated. That's what the whole thing is, is a huge property violation in Gaza and the West Bank and, of course, what they call Israel too.
@darelllemailvcYeah, and landing there, Mr. Dr. Rectenwald, Rod has his hand up, and so, Mr. Rod, go for it. I think you should interject here, being that you're from that area.
@joann_marieHey, brother.
Speaker 3Hi, thanks, JoAnn. Yeah, yeah, I'm happy to do so. Thanks, Darell, and thanks, Ian, and Professor Recten, JoAnn for sure, Professor Rectenwald. Look, when I saw Azapac, I didn't know you, I didn't know anything until I saw Anti-Zionist Pack, and I was so happy to see something because it was the first sign to me that you guys are organizing.
Speaker 3You know what I mean? And I do hear when people say, you know, we're not going to vote our way out of this. And, you know, they're thinking like the whole democratic process is not going to yield to anything. My story would be along the lines of this. In 1982, when we found, I was a child, but when we found ourselves...
Speaker 3Occupied by the real deal. Not them running around Washington. It's like the Jewish nation itself with its own military might, right? Occupying from the southern Lebanon up until almost a large size of Beirut, right? And back then, you know, individuals, just people. And we were not... We didn't have anything remotely suitable to fight back.
Speaker 3But people, individuals took responsibility and they started this kinetic resistance. And there's one story about a guy. I think he was still a university student or in that age. He went, he found a pew-pew and...
Speaker 3So he found himself a pew-pew, and then he walked down the street. There was an Israeli general and two soldiers sitting in a coffee shop called Wimpy, really in their arrogance and ignorance, and he did what he needed to do. Did he back then think that... It's going to yield results and, you know, Lebanon will be freed of the Israeli forces?
Speaker 3I'm sure no. But he still did it. Why did he do it? Out of personal responsibility as a citizen. And this is the same spirit that I would say for people, you know, when you see Azerbaijan. Well, it is one's responsibility to... to work and push and promote and support. And even if you're not very sure about the democratic process or whether you should work from within it or dismantle it and rebuild it, whatever it is.
Speaker 3So that's my answer to that. And the other one is, in a selfish way, Professor Rectenwald, I've, through my research, to prove or disprove God, I remember looking into, you know, American academia, right? And you were a professor at NYU, and I always wanted to pick someone's brains regarding that. It was very clear to me that there is a divide, there's, you know, the intelligent design, as they call it in academia, meaning there is God.
Speaker 3and there was you know the theories big bang darwin whatever the science says and it was clear i can't remember the name of the professor or the professors that got in trouble just for mentioning intelligent design in their thesis and their papers and it was clear to me that you know the the Talmudic tribe with its control over academia and higher education
Speaker 3I remember seeing that these people do not want any academic, any professor to just put the thesis out that there is God. And it was very clear to me.
Speaker 3What are your thoughts regarding what I'm saying as a professor that used to work in NYU about that thing?
Speaker 1That's a great question, man. I'm just like, I'm wetting my lips with that question. Let me tell you why. Because first of all, I was a scholar, and I still am, of 19th century British science and culture. So actually, the Darwin, the whole evolutionary debate, all that argument, that's Thank you very much.
Speaker 1are very instrumental in bringing about the Darwinian revolution, I argue. That Darwinian revolution, which was sponsored by scientific naturalism, as it was called, that was coined by T.H. Huxley. I was a scholar of this very thing. I was a Darwinian, of course. It was like, oh, no, there's no question about this. You don't have to be retarded to think it's not true.
Speaker 1But never really even looking at the questions raised by intelligent design theorists and so forth, like Stephen C. Meyer, who I think is really good and has some arguments about information science and, frankly, Geological and morphological science that just make a lot of the claims of Darwinism quite probable. I mean, quite improbable.
Speaker 1They're quite a problematic theory. It's amazing. I think the theory of macroevolution is quite problematic. If you look at some of these intelligent design theorists, that's where I stand now. When I was at NYU, it was not even, I would never entertain these ideas. In fact, all of these kinds of ideas came to me and I thought to myself, if I started talking about what I'm thinking, when I started thinking, you know, what I'll call deviationist thoughts from the, you know, deviationism as they called it in the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1When I started having deviationist thoughts, I thought to myself, if I start expressing these thoughts, I'm going to be like, it's going to be like a cause celebre. It's going to like, it's going to blow up. And so I did. I started expressing these thoughts. And sure enough, that was on national TV in no time. It was ridiculous how easy it was to know exactly what they were going to do if I started saying this shit.
@joann_marieIs that the one you shared? I'm sorry, I'm back. I don't understand why I'm the only one hearing the rubber banding noises, but I still can hear everyone. So, no. Was that the one you shared, Dr. Michael?
Speaker 1What's that?
@joann_marieThat when you were on TV, that it was with the hexes. Yeah, that's one of the times I was on it.
Speaker 1I mean, yeah, they pumped my book, Springtime for Snowlakes, like crazy on Fox News. I mean, it was it was like featured like three times. The book was in the top 50 and out of all 15 million books on Amazon because of Fox News, because they love this shit. And I mean, they thought, oh, my, here's a defector from the left.
Speaker 1Let's blow them up. And that's what they try to do. I kind of screwed it up a little. I wasn't as good as as an actor as I could have been. But. Yeah, it did pretty well.
@joann_marieWhich book was this?
Speaker 1I'm sorry.
Speaker 6It's not this one, right?
Speaker 1You have like 15. This was Springtime for Snowflakes.
@joann_marieOh, awesome title.
Speaker 1Postmodern Parentage. In that book, I argued that the social justice creed was a creature of postmodern theory. and that it mutated from this kind of postmodern theoretical abstraction into real world consequence and that's that it was becoming a prevailing dominant ideology that was unassailable and you would get basically it became the dogma of the university if you didn't abide by it you were not allowed to teach there anymore effectively if you didn't believe in this
Speaker 1Social Justice Dogma, you were out. And that's what happened to me. I went up against it. And then they blackballed me all over the country. Luckily, I got a job in academia. I just can't say where.
Speaker 2And unlike Mark Levin, who called it the Franklin School, he actually referred to the Frankfurt School.
Speaker 1Mark Levin wrote a book called something like American Marxists. And he referred to the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, you know, from Frankfurt, Germany, you know, Adorno and, you know, what's his face? You know, the whole crew there, Horkheimer.
Speaker 2The ones at CAI all pushed over there now.
Speaker 1What's his name? Anyway, these guys immigrated from Germany to America, of course, in the beginning of the rise of the National Socialists. But here's the thing. They were these Marxists. Why didn't they immigrate to the Soviet Union? Instead, they came here. Why? That's what I want to know. Nobody ever answers that question.
Speaker 1Why did they come here if they were socialists? Why did they come to the United States? I'll tell you why. They came here to subvert it in comfort.
Speaker 7And to leech off of it as well. Why subverting it? They can leech, right?
Speaker 1Exactly. They lived a high life, smoking cigars in Beverly Hills and sitting beside the pool. I mean, there's pictures of them. And then writing all this subversive shit, like the United States is a totalitarian dictatorship, while the Soviet Union, they barely mentioned. So, I mean, it's interesting. So, yeah.
Speaker 2But Levin referred to the wrong name because he considers himself a top scholar.
Speaker 1Maybe he came from Ben Franklin, the pragmatist. Yeah, right.
Speaker 2He considers himself a scholar. And Michael, when we found that, we had fun, got a lot of views on the replies. We enjoyed that one.
Speaker 1But the thing is, his books probably have sold like 50 times or 100 times more than mine. So, I mean, that's the thing. This is how these complete con artists, these complete scoundrels really, complete bullshit artists, he knows nothing about shit. Nothing. And they put a book out by him and it sells 50 million copies because he's on Fox News and Sean Hannity calls him the great one.
Speaker 1I mean, it's sickening. And it's...
@joann_marieSo he quoted that in his book or like in an interview he just said the wrong name.
Speaker 1It's in his book.
@joann_marieIn his hard copy book.
Speaker 1He said the Franklin School. He called it the Franklin School.
Speaker 2So we had fun with that. That is so funny.
Ian MalcolmSo Dr. Rectenwald, I'd be curious if it's the only time in the book that it's mentioned. And if so, if that is not specifically done by design so that if his readers go and look up that school, that they can't find anything on it and just move on rather than actually looking into the Frankfurt School and going deeply into it.
Ian MalcolmAnd as subversive as this group of people, I mean, let's not forget, am I wrong in that Mark Levin, I think he wrote, or not Levin, who was it? Not Hannity, Bill O'Reilly. Wrote books about the death of Kennedy. I think he wrote one on the death of Abraham Lincoln. You know what kind of weird connections I bet are completely absent from both of those assassinations, right?
Ian MalcolmI wouldn't be surprised at all if these are just done by design like everything else where it gives you the half-truths just like the JFK movie that, of course, was done in terms of the press for the movie by the same guy that campaigned for Bobby Kennedy and told him to go out the back door, which resulted in his death.
Ian MalcolmAnd oh, by the way, it was produced by Arnon Milchan, a billionaire Israeli spy who helped none other than Benjamin Netanyahu steal the nuclear switches after the Apollo affair. and essentially thieve the nuclear capabilities to Israel because, guys, they're so smart over there with their 93 IQ that they're creating all these things, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd then they just got to steal them from us because they can't build them because perhaps they're intellectually deficient in addition to being just morally reprehensible, right?
Speaker 1But all this stuff that you pointed out, which are all factually based, okay, they got it all bracketed as conspiracy theory, okay? So... It's just amazing how, you know, you can't ever, like, make an assertion that you can actually show the evidence for, and it's a conspiracy theory no matter what. Like, for example, October 7th, there's a guy that, you know, he testified before the Knesset, an Israeli Galani Brigade soldier, that in fact his unit was told to stand down for six hours and not go to the border wall, okay?
Speaker 1And then you have the head of the military itself, what's his name, Yuval Galant. He says, yeah, we put the Hannibal Directive in play. So they admit to shooting their own people. In fact, if you look at the cars and the houses that were shot at, these were coming from Apache helicopters. They had a vertical. They weren't coming from some hand gliders.
Speaker 1I mean, come on, dude. These were coming from Israeli helicopters and tanks. So that's what they did. They killed a lot of their own people. Then, of course, they had the plans for it a year in advance, according to the New York Times even. And then they were warned by Egypt three days before. And then they moved the festival to the border wall.
Speaker 1And you wonder. But noticing these concomitant facts, is very bad, very bad. That's a bad thing. It makes you bad.
Ian MalcolmWell, and Dr. Reginald, let's not forget that, of course, conspiracy theory invented to basically mock and belittle anybody that questioned the JFK narrative. And we, of course, have that note from Bill Casey, right? We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American people believe is false.
Ian MalcolmIt's literally one of the guys from the intelligence agency who happens to also, of course, be in bed with this exact same group of people, right? Think about this. I mean, not only do we live in the Matrix or in the Truman Show, but we live in a Truman Show where the directors and the producers of the show not only hate us, but they openly mock us while creating terms to define us as X, Y, or Z, in this case, conspiracy theorists, when we question and challenge the narrative.
Ian MalcolmIt is unbelievable. And then they, of course, go out, they create films. I'm very curious about the one conspiracy that of all people includes the wonderful Mel Gibson. Almost feels like they put him in that role to perhaps mock him as the conspiracy guy because he said certain things about the Jews, right?
Speaker 1And it's like- It would be like if the novelist was to write a novel with a plot, okay? And then the people, then somebody reads it and writes back, somebody writes a review and, you know, details the plot and exactly. Exactly. And the author would then say, you're a conspiracy theorist, you're out of your mind, or you're an anti-Semite, because they followed the exact plot that the author wrote.
Speaker 1I mean, look, the plots are all written, and the crimes are on the surface. You don't have to be some sleuth to get to these crimes. I mean, everything's right on the surface, man.
Ian MalcolmWe see the latest slop that's put out. It doesn't matter if it's a New York Times bestseller who runs the New York Times or if it's the latest thing in Hollywood. And it's going to be celebrated by all of the journalists and rotten tomatoes that basically lock down their platform so you can only contribute to it if you're an approved, you know, reviewer.
Ian MalcolmAnd how do you get the approval? Oh, that's right. You just say the things that are positive about the slop, right? So they built this entire feedback loop where the only way you advance...
Ian MalcolmJust nepotistic system where everybody on television, everyone that wants to be in the New York Times Bill Zeller list, all the way to Lucas cocked out of his mind Gage that's willing to just bend over and say the most preposterously ludicrous things because then I'm going to get some tickles and they're not going to call me mean, nasty names, right?
Ian MalcolmThe whole thing is so insane.
Speaker 1You could also become an AI philosopher, don't you know? You could have some papers written by AI and put your name on them and the Jews will say, that's great, you're now a philosopher, you made it.
Speaker 2But in some of these shows and movies, there is, it's in very little bits, it's like, you know, dribs and drabs, but there's tiny amounts where truth does seep out. And, you know, I just wonder, I guess sometimes, once in a while, something seeps through and it reaches and it's like, oh my God. And, you know, it is lucky.
Speaker 2But Michael has a term if he wants to say it in the space.
Speaker 1Reality slips it in or else, you know, somebody slips it in and gets it through.
Speaker 2Your term for Hollywood, if you want to say it in the space, you can. Something gate, you can say it if you want. Why only certain things happen.
Speaker 1I mean, you can imagine what I might say.
Speaker 2Yes, just a blank gate, three letters before the gate.
@darelllemailvcHey guys, guys, guys, Dancing in Heaven has her hand up. So I would like to hear from her. Hubbard would be next, so let's go.
@nikola1teslaHey, hey, it's really good to be here. Hello to the space. I just wanted to mention Max Weber is somebody who was a sociologist who was...
@nikola1teslaRevolutions Fail and Why Do the Oligarchs and the Capitalists Succeed? So in terms of why the people in the critical theory schools and the Frankfurt schools would kind of diverge into some people are really buying the idea of Marxism and buying the idea of working class revolution and whatnot, but the people who are leaders, the people who are powerful, the people who seek to uplift their ego by making enormous amounts of money could literally see from Max Weber's philosophy and study that if you are a Machiavellian, you can be somebody who just exploits everything that he wrote about, like exploits the dynamics between the working class.
@nikola1teslaand the upper classes, the people that want to use capitalism to embezzle. So, you know, my ideas on Max Weber, like starting this whole thing, it looks like the Jews said, oh yeah, this guy who's our friend, this Shabbos guy, is basically showing us a roadmap on how to get people to support the working class and put all of their money into it and fund all of these different things.
@nikola1teslaAnd we can just embezzle if we get into the right positions of political power. There weren't enough checks and balances put into play to keep that from happening. And our government doesn't allow that to happen, doesn't enable that to happen. It actually does the reverse. And then also in terms of universities blackballing people, when I was young, I was part of a study that Arthur Jensen did at the university I went to when I was in high school.
@nikola1teslaAnd we had a class of kids that were just taking university classes. And so what he did is he decided to use his Jensen box to try to figure out if there was a relationship between IQ and speed. And I participated in that. My whole class participated in that. But what happened at my school was there were this enormous protests erupted because...
@nikola1teslaThis guy had the idea, the accurate idea, that there is a relationship between IQ and race. And he had a huge problem with basically people attacking him for what are scientific views, whether it's through natural selection or through some kind of... Other, you know, godly plan. There is a difference between races and it's measurable.
@nikola1teslaAnd, you know, for people to say you can't use science, you have to use critical race theory. Like you have to throw every study that you've done out the window. That is, you know, so antithetical to education and research and what universities are for. So I just I hate to see people getting blackballed for doing real research and having real
@nikola1teslaThank you for joining us.
@nikola1teslaThank you so much for joining us.
@nikola1teslaI really appreciate all the information here and I just started listening so I'm going to listen to the recording later to catch up with what I missed. But I'm really glad that I'm here and I'll pass it on to the next person. Thanks.
Speaker 2I'm sure you hear part one because there was a technical issue so this is the second part.
@joann_marieThey are suppressing this pain so much. Wait, am I still here? Yes, I am. Yeah, no, they crashed the first one. And I am hearing everybody kind of clear, but still Robert Bundy. I don't know what's happening. But yeah, no, this space and the other space were amazing. So again, guys, please repost this space. And if you guys go to it, I will also repost it.
@joann_marieLet's get everyone here and bookmark it. It helps a lot with the algo.
Speaker 1Can I... Can I get a sense of whether people would like to hear more of the novel or are we done with that?
Speaker 1So Paul is in the cafe with the manager, the restaurant manager, the coffee shop manager. I mean, this woman, Eva, this waitress who popped in. And now the police are there. The police come, three police officers. And so... The manager said something Dutch to the lead officer. Paul thought she was telling the blonde officer everything, except that he didn't hear the dreaded word, Juden.
Speaker 1Meanwhile, Seth called again. Paul sent him the voicemail. The manager continued speaking to the blonde officer in Dutch. But Seth called again. This time, Paul thought he'd better take the call, even though he knew it might strengthen the case against him. I have a problem, he announced. I need to accept this call. It's a suicidal friend.
Speaker 1Answer it, the blonde officer said without hesitation. Seth, I'm in the cafe. The police are here, Paul whispered into the phone, walking toward the front door. What do they want, Seth demanded. They're investigating a hate crime. Don't say anything, but are they suggesting that what I said on the phone was a hate crime?
Speaker 1Yes, goddammit. Put me on speaker, Seth insisted. Are you out of your mind, Paul snapped. Listen, this proves unequivocally that the Jews run everything, don't you see? If you so much as mention the word Jews, the police show up. That's Jewish supremacy right there. That's what I'm talking about. Let me talk to them. If we don't stand up to them now, we're going to lose all our freedoms.
Speaker 1We'll all be sent to the gulag. What are you trying to do to me? I don't want to go to jail right now, Paul whispered. I'm trying to save you, that's what. Can't you see what's happening here? The Jews have made it illegal to criticize them. This is your big chance. If you get arrested for exposing the Jews now, you'll be a hero.
Speaker 1You're falling with triple in a matter of hours. Look at what happened to Letitia Jones. She blew up overnight. She's making over a million dollars a year now, and only because the people will pay for the truth. I'll pass, Paul said. No, put me on speaker, Seth Yeldick in his ear. Then they'll arrest me for sure. They're going to arrest you anyway.
Speaker 1If not now, it'll be tomorrow, next week or next month. You're already on the list. What are you talking about? I thought you were going to kill yourself, Paul said. I am, but just not yet, he answered, reassuring Paul that indeed he was going to kill himself. Oh, you want to ruin me first, that's it? You're already ruined.
Speaker 1We're all ruined. Everything is ruined. Do you realize they're arresting reporters and podcasters and anyone else who criticizes them? You're in line, buddy. If not next in line, you may as well get it over with. I've never written anything about the Jews, Paul insisted, scouring his memory. You don't have to. Well, yes, you have, accidentally, but it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1They know who you are. They're coming for all of us. It's better now to name them now before it's too late. Hold on, Paul said, erasing his voice. Paul recalled the reports and videos of journalists and political dissidents hauled to jail for nothing but speech. He looked through the window of the door and briefly considered trying to make his escape.
Speaker 1When, after another minute, he turned around and faced the police, he saw the manager, Annalise, handcuffed to the bar railing. This must be a joke, Paul yelled across the room at the lead officer. We're trying to keep my friend from jumping out the window and you're arresting us. Don't you understand? I let him rant and rave because that's the only thing standing between him and death.
Speaker 1Who exactly has been harmed? But if I shut him down, he may harm himself. In fact, he's still on the line. You can listen for yourselves. Yes, let us hear from your friend, the lead officer said after a momentary consideration. Paul put the phone to his right ear. Seth, did you hear that? Are you there? They want to talk to me, Seth asked, perking up.
Speaker 1Yeah, well, this is insane. Why? Because I'll be precipitating my own arrest on purpose. That's why. No, don't worry about it. I'm going to get you out of this, Seth said. How exactly? You'll see. I'll have them apologizing to you and leaving with their tail between their legs. Right. Paul put the phone on speaker and laid it on top in resignation.
Speaker 1All right, Seth, he announced. Now there's three police officers plus Eva and Annalise all listening. Annalise is already in handcuffs. I'm next, go ahead, shoot. Okay, so first I'm Jewish, Seth began. Anything I say about the Jews is from personal firsthand knowledge, okay? This again, Paul thought. I was raised by Jewish parents.
Speaker 1I went to Hebrew school. I've been circumcised and bar mitzvahed. I know exactly what happens in Jewish Religious Ceremonies and Holidays. My father was a trial lawyer. He traumatized me from an early age with his constant probes and cross-examinations. That's what others in my family say anyway. I've had to give him the benefit of the doubt as the memory started to surface.
Speaker 1Let me just say this here a little. My son helped me with this text. Some of this is actually his. I just co-opted it and he gave it to me. My father was a trial lawyer, beginning in that paragraph. I was told regularly of my supreme abilities in athletics and in my studies, yet I never caught up with my supposedly enormous potential.
Speaker 1He was never satisfied. This was confusing because part of me suspected even at my young age that my father must have been compensating for something. A friction was born out of these early observations. In this sense, the abuse was psychological. Now again, I feel like a puppet repeating what others in my family have told me.
Speaker 1But I'm not the only person he had a problem accepting, Seth said, as if reminding himself. He couldn't accept the outside world, or for some reason he felt the outside world had a problem with him and he needed to go on the offense. Dealing with my father's paranoia was a slow-motion car accident. I guess I was supposed to fix the chip on his shoulder, but I must have been a disappointment.
Speaker 1So he berated and criticized me constantly, undermining my self-respect and my will to live. My mother did nothing to intervene. Together they destroyed whatever belief I may have had in myself. I'm 41 years old and to this day I have no real sense of self. I have no idea who I am or what to do with myself. I don't know how to live.
Speaker 1They ruined me. At this, Seth broke off and began sobbing. He looked to the lead officer. Paul looked to the lead officer to see her reaction. She did not appear to be moved. Anyway, Seth continued, somewhat regaining his composure. I was taught that Jews are superior to all other human beings in every way that matters except physical prowess.
Speaker 1But we don't care about that because we got others to do our physical labor for us. In fact, I was taught that Gentiles are beasts of burden. Less Than Human. Belief in Jewish superiority is embedded in Jewish scripture and rabbinical commentary. I was taught this while also being told that I personally was a piece of shit.
Speaker 1So I knew something wrong was wrong about Jewish culture from a very young age. The Jewish ethos struck me as a kind of criminal code, a code of deception, manipulation, and organized wickedness. I realized that the top Jews must be psychopaths, only psychopaths with a license. And it all derives from intergenerational trauma, but that's another story.
Speaker 1So beginning around age 14, I began to do some digging into Jewish history. And what I found was nothing less than world shattering. Paul felt increasingly uncomfortable. He thought Eva's disaffection had turned into hostility, and given the circumstances that she was chained to the wall, Annalise was less amused with Seth's autobiography.
Speaker 1The lead officer seemed impatient for Seth to get to the point. She apparently wanted evidence, and the other two officers weren't listening. They looked restless as they milled about the room, itching for an arrest. Tell them what you learned, Paul interposed. You mean about the Jews? Seth asked. I guess so, Paul said.
Speaker 1Oh, there's so much. I don't know where to start, Seth continued, already exasperated. But the history of the last hundred plus years is nothing less than the history of Jewish subversion of Eastern Europe, Western Europe, the United States, and even Asia. For example, anyone who knows anything about the Bolshevik Revolution
Speaker 1knows it was engineered and financed by Jews. Jews made up less than 4% of the population in Russia, yet they constituted over 85% of the Bolshevik leadership. Three of London's potential successors, Trotsky, Zivanov, and Kamenov were Jews, major political figures of the time. Winston Churchill recognized the Bolshevik Revolution as a Jewish plot.
Speaker 1Jacob Schiff was a representative of the Rothschild Banking Empire and America's leading Jewish banker. Well, he helped finance the Bolsheviks to the tune of $20 million. That's the equivalent of $2 billion today. And many Russians noticed the prominence of Jewish Bolsheviks, including the Nobel Prize winner, Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Speaker 1In fact, let me find what he wrote. Hold on. And then he goes on. So, I mean, right there. At this point, he reads Solzhenitsyn's passage, and I don't know if we want to continue. It's pretty lengthy. I mean, there's more to this, but I don't want to keep going unless people want to hear it.
Ian MalcolmNo, I think people do.
Speaker 3I say yes, please.
Ian MalcolmIt's kind of been interesting, Dr. Rectenwald, to kind of walk through this and to get kind of little snippets. It's almost like... You must understand the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred,
Speaker 1The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators. That's it.
Speaker 1And who do you think controls the global media? The Chinese? He laughed. He said and laughed derisively. He would have kept on, but the lead officer had heard enough and interrupted his oration. What's this man's name and where did he find these conspiracy theories? Hold on, Seth. The police officer is asking something, Paul said.
Speaker 1Are you asking what Seth's name is or what the name of the writer that he quoted is? Paul asked the blonde officer. I'm asking for your friend's name and where he found these ideas. Seth jumped in. My name is Seth Robert Fisher, checkmate. As for where I got these conspiracy theories, you can find them for yourself using a little-known Russian search engine.
Speaker 1You might call it, let me think, you might call it All the News the Jews, All the News the Jews Refuse, Seth said and cackled. With this, the lead officer signaled to Paul to hang up the phone. Paul thought that she looked disappointed, even somewhat dejected. She clearly wasn't concerned about the possibility of Seth killing himself.
Speaker 1In a subdued tone, she issued a command to the second officer, after which he and the third officer stepped toward Annalise, released her from the bar railing, recuffed her, and escorted her from the room. I'm not finished with you, Mr. Becker. She cautioned Paul and followed the three of them out the door.
Speaker 1I know this. This is not the narrator. This is the author. There's so many layers removed from me in that character.
Speaker 2You did a good job with that.
@joann_marieI absolutely love it, Dr. Michael. I love how you combine fiction with actual history and you guide the person through it. It's just brilliant. It reminds me a lot of Sophie's World, and it was one of my favorite books when I was little, and that's how I got my love for philosophy. So it's such an incredible way to do it.
@joann_marieSo it's amazing. Good job. Would you like to read some more?
Speaker 1Thank you much. Let me look around. Why don't you guys talk a second while I look around and see what else I might read real quick here.
Ian MalcolmIan, feel free to come up if you have questions for Dr. Rectenwald, either on the work itself or the process of putting it together. And Dr. Rectenwald, again, I just wanted to ask for anybody who might have joined more recently, places where people could go to support your work, to pick up a copy of this. What would some of the easiest options be?
Speaker 1Okay, well, I have... Michael Rectenwald Ph.D.
Speaker 1and I have a list of books there. There's 15. The Cabal Question is the next to the last book I wrote. You know, I was looking at some, you know, pretty prodigious authors of history. You know, take Dostoevsky, take, what's his name? Of course, the guy I just quoted, for God's sake. Solzhenitsyn, take Martin Luther. What do these guys all have in common?
Speaker 1Their next last book is about something in particular, something very similar to each other, almost all of them. Look at that. Martin Luther on the Jews and their lies.
Speaker 1Then there was Solzhenitsyn. Henry Ford, Charles Southwell, The Jew Book
Speaker 1for which he was put in jail. But the thing is that he wasn't put in jail for saying anything about Jews. He was put in jail for blasphemy against the Bible. They didn't care what he said about Jews at all. The popular anti-Semitism was very prevalent. There was no poo-pooing it. You didn't go around saying, you're an anti-Semite.
Speaker 1It was just like, oh, that's your opinion on that. I see. But there was nothing to it other than that. But he went to jail for blasphemy, for blaspheming the Bible and God. So that's why he went to jail. There were blasphemy laws at that time.
@joann_marieThat's crazy. I didn't know any of this. Isn't it insane how much propaganda they made to make everybody forget?
Speaker 1There's still blasphemy laws. It's just a different tribe is now protected by them. There were blasphemy laws that protected Christianity and the Anglican Church, which was the state, is the state church, but was more powerful in that era than it is now. And, you know, they wielded tithes and they wielded tithes and other, you know, they lived on sinecures based on taxes and tithes.
Speaker 1So it was a state church. and the radicals were against it at that time anybody that was wanted freedom and uh liberty and self self-expression and and so on they were usually opposed to the to the uh church the anglican church at least um because it was a part of the state it wasn't just some sort of religious body
@darelllemailvcDr. Rectenwald, I'm sorry I misspelled your name. I posted your substack down in the purple pill, and I apologize for misspelling your name. But it's down there if you guys want to see if you're on substack, I encourage you to be so. But yes, Dr. Rectenwald's substack is down in the pill. and I did misspell it, but the link is still there.
@joann_marieAll right, thank you, Darell. El Jefe, go for it. Welcome back.
@joann_marieEl Jefe? All right, dancing, go for it.
@nikola1teslaHey, I was interested in the fact that you mentioned Martin Luther and the things that he had in common with those other people. When he wrote... The treatise about the Jews, he was very angry and very upset, and he was feeling very betrayed, I suppose, because I wanted to get your thoughts on the fact that he had a circle of friends who were Jewish scholars before he wrote that book, and he was trying to convert Jews to Christianity, and he was feeling very betrayed because they
@nikola1teslaThank you for joining us.
@nikola1teslaThank you so much for joining us.
@nikola1teslaI don't know. That's a good question. I mean, that's a good question that I would look into. I don't know the answer, but, you know, there's a lot of evidence for the Judaization of the Judaization.
Speaker 1of the church itself, even before then. I think it's probable there was some hand. There's some agency, but it's not like they're all controlling at all times here. You've got to admit that here's the thing. In the Middle Ages, you had kings. The kings were in control. They were the ruling class. They had the power. They had the land.
Speaker 1They had the subjects who worked for them, etc. And the aristocracy also went along for the ride.
Speaker 1I'm not sure where I'm going with this. How did I get that? I'm sorry. The point was, I guess, that... What was the topic?
@joann_marieThe church has been Judaized.
Speaker 1Oh, yeah, the church was Judaized. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So, yeah, there's a lot of evidence that that happened and that they've had a hand in a lot of things. This is what I'm sorry. Like the Cromwell issue, like, you know, the beheading of Charles I, like, you know, William of Orange, like the establishment of the Bank of England, you name it.
Speaker 1All these things they had a hand in. It's not like they controlled everything. That's what I was getting at here. At this point, you're talking about any kinds of ways into the state that they could find they took, including collecting taxes for kings and things like this. And oftentimes, that's why they became hated, because they were the king's snitches and tax collectors and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1This puts them in a bad place. So it caused enmity between them and the Goy, or the Gentiles, as I prefer to call them, I guess. But they didn't do everything because they weren't the ruling class. But I do think they are now. And I do believe that democracy was the vehicle of subversion. It was the way in.
@joann_marieIn their latest version, did you see this, Dr. Michael, that the Catholic Biblical Association appointed Professor Amy Jill Levine, and it's a Jewish scholar. Like, I don't understand what we're doing. Like, it's crazy. It's insanity. We need to, like, restore all of our...
Speaker 1Some of these Catholic apologists are saying, oh, that's not the church itself. That's a private organization. They're not really Catholic. They're Catholic, but they're not the Catholic this or that. Well, it's still a Catholic organization who appoints a Jewish, basically anti-Christian woman into service as the director of biblical studies or the Bible.
Speaker 2It's got to be weird because it was trending for more than one day on X. I mean, some people, you know, and some things you go over there and see some trends, some news that's mind-blowing. Some of it's mind-blowing.
Speaker 1That was. They've been threatening to boulderize the Bible for some time to shred it of anti-Semitic rhetoric, as they would call it. and there's you know and they would think some of that is rife you know that that's rife in the bible and i would say if in fact they were going that way they would have to put a lot of those words in jesus's mouth because that's where they came from so we're talking about uh the fact that they've been after the bible for some time and to try to judaize it and get rid of any anti-semitism so-called in the bible in other words to change the theology of christianity of course they
@nikola1teslaThey added a Freemason, Umberto Longo, to the Vatican committee as well. So it looks like they're just adding people to literally create a new Schofield Bible. So you're on the right track, for sure.
@joann_marieIt's absolutely insane. All right.
Speaker 8El Jefe, are you back? Sorry, I missed your call.
@joann_marieAwesome. Welcome back. Go for it.
Speaker 8So one of the things that I like is, you know, you're pro-Bilzerian and you like Kasparian, and I happen to identify as an Armenian. My mother was 100%. I'm 50. My father was a mutt. And there's a little Jew in there, too, on my father's side. So, you know, I'm not purebred, but I will say this. I studied it a lot. You know, I wrote probably the best paper I ever wrote about it in boarding school by going into a hope chest that we had at the house because I think we had a great uncle or something that was there during the Turkish Inquisition.
Speaker 8And, you know, what they did to my people... They had to sneak Pop Pop out through Constantinople with a French passport. He was able to come to America and live to 101 years old. But nobody else on that side of the family, as I know of, made it out of there. But when we met other Armenians, we immediately, you know, they were family.
Speaker 8We all felt like we were related. So, you know, when you say nice things and respect For Bill Zarian and also Anna. You know, I've noticed that here is a persecuted people that, you know, Noah's Ark landed on Mount Ararat. We're considered some of the first Christians ever. And, you know, we were besieged by the Turks and they murdered us because, you know, we were artisans with, you know, oriental rugs and we knew how to trade and we knew how to farm.
Speaker 8You know, we did well, and they just wanted to come in and take all our, you know, just kill us all and take whatever we had. So, you know, we're persecuted. Now, the Jews supposedly are a persecuted people, but isn't it interesting that you see Armenians like myself, Bilzerian and Kasparian, that just absolutely go after the Jews, the Zionist supremist Jews.
Speaker 8We know what truth is. We know what justice is. And it's not what's going on. We're living in an occupied nation. And I still have to unravel all the history that you guys all know. I haven't even Googled Rothschild yet to go all the way back to that. But they do like to control the shekels. And we'll do all right, though.
Speaker 8We'll stick together. And the Armenians are strong people. We'll fight alongside. I think we'll see changes in two years. We'll see some form of change here in this country, at least, in two years. Thanks a lot.
Speaker 1Yeah, man. I got a chapter in the book on the Armenian genocide. You might want to check it out just for that.
Speaker 8Yeah, I definitely will. It was horrible. They would come into the villages and they would take like, you know, the priest and they would tie his arms and legs to one side of him to a team of horses and the other side. And they would just tear the priest in half, you know, they would draw and quarter them, they call it, I think.
Speaker 8And, you know, they'd also go for the strongest people, you know, and kill them in front of everybody. And I guess that was... Before they would send everybody off on the walk of death. I guess when people were growing up in my parents' age, it was like, finish your plate, don't forget the starving Armenians. Much like when I grew up, it was Biafra in Africa, the starving Africans.
Speaker 8And we went through hell. But the ones that made it out of there, if you notice, We don't take no shit. We're like gangsters. And we believe in freedom. The government can be the worst thing in the world. So we believe in what we believe in. We believe in what we think is right and wrong. And we decide what we want to do versus the other way around.
Speaker 8We are not sheeple. And we will not be let off the edge of a cliff like lemons. And that's what I'm afraid this country, you know, when you fly from New York to California, you fly over a lot of sheeple, a lot of people that just are led around by Fox News and whoever wants to, like, pull their chain. You know, my father used to say, and he's not Armenian, have an original thought.
Speaker 8A lot of people don't have original thoughts. They can't think for themselves. So, you know, I'll land there.
@joann_marieExcellent points, El Jefe. Thank you so much. And also, guys, please repost this page. Follow Ian, Dr. Michael, Lori, Raed, everybody here. And also, if you guys go to it, I will also repost it and bookmark it. This helps so much with the algorithm. And in the Jumbotron, there is the link to the Amazon store to get Dr. Michael's book, or you guys can just look for it in Amazon.
@joann_marieAlso, the link for ASAPAC. So, guys, show them some support and also repost it. Thank you so much for that, Julie. Thank you so much, Lori. You guys are doing the Lord's work. It's just absolutely amazing. You guys need all the support that you can.
@joann_marieWould you like to read a little bit more, Dr. Michael?
Speaker 1Oh, sure. I mean, I'll do whatever you... I'll do some, yeah. Let me see if I can find the juiciest thing here.
Speaker 6It's so juicy! I was reading it, I swear, and it was really, really good.
Speaker 1All right, let me just see here if I can find something. There's this chapter on the city of London. Let's see, I'll jump into the section on this. They get off this boat because they leave the Netherlands taking a boat. Now, there's three of them traveling. Paul. Eva, and Annalise. Don't get any ideas. There's no threesomes developing here.
Speaker 1Annalise is kind of at least asexual at the most, and really that's not happening there. There is something going on between Paul and Eva, but it's not really that prominent here. So they're heading to... They're heading to London. They get on the boat. They take a boat across the channel, and they're in London now.
Speaker 1They go up. This guy picks them up. His name's Albion. He picks them up at the dock, and he's a British guy and kind of a conspiracy theorist. So let's jump right in here. Albion's apartment door opened to a long, narrow loft. Paul scanned it. Three wainscoted rooms stacked end to end. High ceilings, hardwood floors, windows overlooking a garden in the living room.
Speaker 1A leather sofa faced a glass table scratched with use, and a single cot sat by a bookshelf packed with old books. Albion was an antiquarian, Paul thought. Paul's eyes snagged on familiar spines at a glance. Carol Quigley's Tragedy and Hope, Nesta Webster's Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, and John Robeson's Proofs of a Conspiracy.
Speaker 1Settle in, Albion said, tossing keys onto the table with a clank. Rest up. I'll wake you at six. He lit a joint, and with the smoke curling up, eyed Paul. Paul wondered what was coming. Unterman says you're a sharp one. History's your thing, eh? How'd that boat ride hold? Paul sat on the sofa, back stiff, while Albion leaned on the bookshelf.
Speaker 1Glancing at the window, Paul refused Albion's offer to hit the joint. Sparse, few passengers, worn-down remodeling job in the cabin. I'd rather have the old look, he said, thinking of the hideous room. And the steward watched us too closely. Eva joined him on the couch, her posture remarkably steady, and waved off Albion's joint.
Speaker 1Not much company, she replied. Midweek, I guess. He kept us mostly out of sight, at least. Annalise took the cot and leaned on her side. Her silence was heavy, her eyes on the garden. Albion blew out the smoke.
Speaker 1Paul, his hands restless on his knees, nodded. He wasn't sure what Albion's question meant. Oh, I'm sorry, I missed something. Quiet's the play, fewer gawkers, less hassle. Now, you've dug into Oliver Cromwell's mess, have you? Albion asked Paul. Paul, his hands restless on his knees, nodded. He wasn't sure what Albion's question meant, but ventured an answer.
Speaker 1In graduate school, he answered, taking a breath. and a Milton course, which reminds me of your name, you know, Blake's reading of Milton. And anyway, yes, the English Revolution, Civil War, the Rump Parliament, Charles I's execution, the Commonwealth, I know the skeleton of it. He thought he saw Eva frown slightly. And the Jews coming back, she interjected.
Speaker 1Manessa, Ben Israel had a hand, didn't he? She asked Albion. Albion grinned wryly. As ash dropped from a tray on a shelf, he offered Annalise the joint, which she also refused. That's part of it, love, Albion replied, speaking through a cloud of smoke. But not the whole story. Cromwell's no saint, whatever he likes to claim.
Speaker 1He rises in the early 1640s, gets Charles' head lopped off, and it's no accident, it's a plot. How so, Paul asked, his scruples crossed. He noticed Albion's dark eye sockets and taut, strained face. He strikes a deal with Jewish money barons through their chap Ebenezer Pratt. Hand over the cash or take out the king, says Cromwell, and I'll let the Jews back into England.
Speaker 1It's those Amsterdam blokes, Jewish bankers with proper deep pockets that are propping them up. They've been itching to come back ever since Edward kinged them out in 1290 for clipping coins, et cetera, after usury got banned. Oh, and here's the tidbit. There's two clauses in the Magna Carta itself, 1215, dealing with the problem of Jewish money lending.
Speaker 1Clauses 10 and 11, to be precise. Right, Paul said, they've chalked it up to religious persecution and anti-Semitism, of course. Surely, Albion agreed. Anyway, back to these Jewish bankers from Amsterdam. They're led by a financier, an army contractor for Cromwell's New Model Army, fellow by the name of Ferdinand Carvajal.
Speaker 1They jump on the chaos Cromwell's stirring up in 1643. Back then, England's a proper Christian society, you know. All ancient traditions tying the real monarchy, church, state, nobles, and the people into a sacred bond. But Cromwell's Protestant uprising throws the whole lot into a right mess. The Jews in Amsterdam see their chance and move fast, getting in touch with Cromwell through Pratt in a series of letters.
Speaker 1So you're saying the revolution and civil war were results of a conspiracy, Paul asked? They clearly were, Albion resumed. Parliament versus the king. New model armies got the edge thanks to the network of Jewish infiltrators and British traders who always knew the movements of Charles's armies. By 1648, pride's purge eliminates the moderates who voted for a settlement with the king.
Speaker 1Otherwise, Cromwell couldn't get the banksters money, you see. The conspirators can't find a proper English lawyer who'd write the criminal charges on a king, so Carvajal gets one Isaac Douralas, Manessa's agent in England, to draw up the indictment. Charles is accused and found guilty by international Jewish moneylenders, not the English.
Speaker 1So yes, the trial's a farce. Charles is done in by a rigged court, Jewish influences, and cash. Carvajal, and others keeping Cromwell afloat. The regicide finally behead the king. Cromwell's open pen openly, absolutely convicts him of conspiring in the Jewish revolutionary plot. Annalise's voice cut in firm. That would be a vile bargain then.
Speaker 1Cromwell trades a king's soul for their gold, spitting on God's will, just like Judas. Spot on, Sister Alvionic. She gets it. Charles won't play their game, keeps the crown straight, so they fund the bloodbath. Getting to your point, miss, he continued after hitting the joint and glancing at Eva. There's Manessa Spez Israeli, 1651, a pamphlet to Parliament, written in Latin.
Speaker 1It leans on Leviticus, God's promise that the Jewish Messiah would appear only upon the Jews spreading throughout the world. England was the final frontier. The Puritans, mind you, are mad for their Judaized Christianity, a sort of early version of Christian Zionism, if you will. Only it's not hyper-focused on Palestine at all.
Speaker 1In fact, the opposite. It's about advancing the diaspora. So the Puritans are game, some imagining they can convert the Jews. The Whitehall Conference in 1655 debates the Jews' re-entrance.
Speaker 1It flops with merchant pushback, but Cromwell opens the door anyway. Cash, trade, Puritan dreams, practical moves. By 55, Manessa's at Whitehall buttering up Cromwell. Cromwell lets him in by 56 against the crew's own gripes. Paul leaned forward. He glanced at the window again, wondering how one might validate such claims.
Speaker 1How do we all know all this, he asked. It's in the letters between Cromwell and Pratt, and the rest is history, or so they say, Albion replied.
Ian MalcolmI wonder, I sincerely do, I wonder what the appetite will be for those that are brand new to these ideas, right? And I know we talked a little bit earlier about this idea of pairing this with kind of online material that walks through and kind of evidences each of the claims that are made. But can you imagine just your average individual, I mean, Dr. Recton, when you work in academia, right?
Ian MalcolmCan you imagine your average student that might have zero idea about any of this, and if you gave them this book, What their experience would be going through it, reading some of these very uncomfortable, you know, perspective truths, going to this theoretical website, realizing that they're irrefutably correct. What do you think would be the average experience for somebody that's never seen or thought any of this and having to read their way through it?
Speaker 1I'm not sure. It depends, you know, how it's prefaced to them, you know, because nothing else is going to come to them unmediated. They're going to get it mediated somehow, usually through the press or, you know, social media or something is going to mediate that experience. So, you know, depending on how that's presented, like, oh, here comes a conspiracy, you know, like the way it was treated, for example, by The Intercept, they said basically it was an anti-Semitic book.
Speaker 1You know, the thing is, though, the book has some characters that are anti-Semitic, OK? or not really. I mean, they're mostly, except for Seth, who's a Jew, there's no real anti-Semites in the book. The only anti-Semite in the book is Jewish, as it turns out. And the other people are just like looking at analyzing power.
Speaker 1Paul was into power elite analysis. That's what he's about. And he writes an essay in the book called and so forth. He runs the article and it blows up and this gets Paul in more trouble and now they really want to arrest him for anti-Judaism. This is where he gets
Speaker 1Charged With, eventually, Anti-Judaism.
@joann_marieYou should turn it into a movie, Dr. Michael. Someone with AI should help you and turn it into a movie. I think it would be a nice movie.
Ian MalcolmWait, so JoAnn, I was actually thinking, I wonder if either Dank or Volek or Tito or Forbidden HQ, who I'm sure people have seen the clips of Andrew Wilson returning to his wife, right? He's making unbelievable video work that looks I mean, it's hyper-realistic. It looks like something out of Hollywood. And I can't imagine, I wonder what it would cost, I have no idea, but to crowdfund perhaps something rather nominal in the event that it does have a price tag to it.
Ian MalcolmBut I wonder what it would cost to have AI take essentially the book that Dr. Rectenwald has written, and not only to put it into a movie, but Dr. Rectenwald, can you imagine, I've got a question for you on it, who would you cast, if you could pick anybody, As the lead of your story, who would you envision? I've got an idea, but I don't want to lead the witness.
Speaker 1Okay. Let's just say it's not going to be Jeff Goldblum. No, he's a Jew. Why not? No, that's not who I had in mind.
Ian MalcolmBut maybe for the Jew, that would be a good one. Yes, exactly.
Speaker 1There is another character that could be. We don't want this washed up Goldblum. But Seth is not really as attractive as Goldblum. He's balding and short. Who would play Seth? Is it Costanza?
Speaker 1That's a really good question. Oh, that'd be interesting. Yeah, because he's like super depressive, ready to kill himself at all times. And yet he wants to rant, rave, and whine endlessly. You know, that's the thing. So they hold him over a barrel. This poor guy right now, you know, Paul is getting drug into criminal goddamn shit because of this Seth's suicide bullshit.
Speaker 1You know, I'm almost getting pissed off as the author of it.
Ian MalcolmHa ha ha! Well, I was thinking either Jim Caviezel or the one and only Mel Gibson, perspectively, as the main character, just because lots of love for Mr. Mel. But I can understand he's perhaps of a different demographic these days, but that's the beauty of AI. We could do the Mad Max rendition of Mel Gibson, perhaps. Maybe a young George Costanza and a younger Jeff Goldblum.
Ian MalcolmAnd Joanne, I'll never forget when we talked with the one and only Mr. Yitz. about if an army of space alien George Costanzas came down to Earth and identified as Jewish, if he would stand with humanity or the Jewish George Costanza aliens. And he said the aliens. It was just so perfect about this whole idea of Jewish supremacy.
Ian MalcolmRight? Because after all, I mean, Dr. Rectenwald, it's such a strange thing that we are intellectually in opposition here, too, because if space Christians came down and they said, we represent Jesus Christ, but we're going to destroy all of you, I'd be like, well, I mean, I think you guys are going against the word of Christ there, and obviously I'm in opposition, but if it was Costanza Space Jews, it was like, sign me up, give me my space yarmulke.
@amirkahhhhhhBut Ian, since he's hundreds of pounds, are they going to be able to get him in the UFO? I mean, that's the question.
Ian MalcolmI don't, yeah, you know, weighing hundreds of pounds, we would have to figure out the weight limit. Lots of love to Yitz, wherever he was. And true story, Dr. Rectenwald, I sent JoAnn a note, or maybe she sent me one. She was like, I haven't seen Yitz in a while. We were actually scared. Well, scared's the wrong term. But I was saddened because there was no Yitz, and I looked up his handle.
Ian Malcolmand I found it had been deleted on X and I thought, no! And don't worry, he came back with a vengeance with a different one. But nonetheless, he's still around and we were excited to talk to him yesterday and he gaslit everybody as he normally would and eventually we had to move on.
Speaker 1This relationship should come to the attention of a humanitarian organization. I mean, you're treating him like a Jewish little pet. I mean, come on, this is really...
Ian MalcolmDr. Rectenwald, could we have Yitz featured? Is he perspectively Seth or another character in the show?
Speaker 1Oh, that would be great. Yeah, I mean, if he had Yitz's speech, shall we say style, to be nice, if he had Yitz's stylistics, that would give him a reason to perhaps have the suicidal ideation that he does engage in.
Ian MalcolmWell, lots of, we have nothing but fondness for Yitz, despite all his madness. And if nothing else, he serves as a great foil for our discourse, right? Because if we say, hey, we've noticed these patterns, and he comes in here and essentially performs the patterns, it lends credence to our side. And I can't, I think it was either or.
Speaker 1You gotta love him, really.
Ian MalcolmYeah, no, gotta love him, even when it's maddening. And... I can't remember if it was Raed or TruthTeller or maybe Rabbi [guest], but one of them said, there's nothing that will convince a new listener more to our side of this kind of narrative than just letting a Jew speak, right? And Yitz comes in and demonstrates the supremacy and all the other kind of things that we would...
Ian MalcolmLove to him and his hundreds of pounds. And we are excited that he is out walking more and trying to get healthy. So lots of love to you.
Ian MalcolmAnd Dr. Rectenwald, that is why we are going to win. Because even on the island of misfit toys, we want them to be happy and healthy and to just stop genociding their neighbors. Thank you, Ian. This is excellent space. The topic is just amazing. And Michael,
Speaker 9I just bought your book and it sounds very interesting. I talked a little bit with you on your post on Dr. Amy Jill Levine about the history of the infiltration of the Roman Catholic organization and certainly, like I had said, it goes back further than Vatican II, and there was in some conversos, I believe they were conversos, I'm still researching, but a couple of Jesuit theologians in Spain, Francisco Ribera and Manuel Lacunza, who famously wrote this apocalyptic work to try and dissuade
Speaker 9Protestants from calling the Roman Catholic Church the Antichrist, and so they wrote this apocalyptic work under a Jewish-sounding pseudonym, which was Juan Josaphat Ben Ezra, who identified himself as a Hebrao-Cristiano, which I wonder if that's the start of the Judeo-Christianity false teaching.
Speaker 9But it goes way back and so I was wondering a couple of things. One, would you do a part two cabal where maybe you would go back into history and take a look at some of these stronger connections where even back to scripture where Paul identifies Judaizers, sorry, infiltrators.
Speaker 9but then it kept happening all through history and you really have to dig for this information and so like a part two cabal but maybe in history where another type of Paul would be digging through this and my second question would be are you linking up like in your book do you and do you provide links to Historical Documents as an add-on to the fictional book.
Speaker 9Thanks.
Speaker 1Oh, yeah, all good questions. Yeah, I mean, no, I don't have any, you know, like the novel is deliberately fiction because I'm trying to investigate some questions. And so I left it as fiction and I don't have any companion yet, but we were talking about that in here. Perhaps putting out like a companion document to it.
Speaker 9That would be great.
Speaker 1That would, you know, validate, tie down, you know, validate and verify some of the claims. And maybe some of them will be dispensed with, you know, like the Ebenezer Pratt bit, which I mentioned before. From what I understand, that is apocryphal. So I don't know that that really happened. But there was definitely... Some, you know, something going on with the bankers there.
Speaker 1I mean, that happens. So Cromwell was definitely, you know, propped up by these bankers.
Speaker 9It just seems that would be really valuable to have a companion because so many people do not study history and do not study particularly church and religious history. And it's all kind of intertwined, as you pointed out. And so I think a companion would be excellent to allow them to at least begin to dig into a historical perspective.
Speaker 1Oh, yeah, absolutely. And on that, along those lines, just on a more broad point, you know, I think that we must really understand the religious dimensions of what's going on, because this is the way people frame reality. And whether it's, you know, ontologically true or not, It's almost not the point in this case because this is a religious confrontation I believe we're in and we need to understand the religion.
Speaker 1We need to understand all the aspects of religions, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and we need to know in the case of Judaism, which by the way has the most violent imagery of any major Any major religious document. It's by far more violent than the Quran and New Testament.
Speaker 1And actually, the New Testament is more violent than the Quran, according to what I've read. In any case, I really don't want to get into all that. And I'm going to remain ecumenical on a religious front in the sense from the Azapak standpoint is that I'm trying to unite people Some of them may not share the exact same creed, confession, or sect, denomination, or even religion entirely.
Speaker 1So I don't want to get too much into that part right now, but I do think it is a religious struggle that we're under, though. It really pays us to know about it, to know about the religious aspects of all this.
Speaker 9Exactly. And, you know, just as they have developed the Us Against Them, Black Against White, BLM, they develop all of these situations in which we're fighting amongst each other to get to the truth and history. There's even the fight about, you know, as previously referenced in this space, about Protestants versus Catholics.
Speaker 9And really, it's about the infiltration. I hope you do write a part two that's on more maybe even a historical because you've written kind of a present day but more of a historical fictional book that will take some of these things that happened in the past into account so that hopefully people will take a look at them and study them and
Speaker 9because not everyone wants to do all of the academic work to dig through all of this. So, but I thank you for the space Ian and JoAnn and Michael, thank you so much for writing your book and I look forward to reading it.
Speaker 1Michael Rectenwald Ph.D.: Thanks. Yeah. Oh, there's a lot of history in there. I think you'll find that to be true. I mean, I did go through a few of the historical episodes, but the thing, the book treats the, you know, The City of London, Bank of England Foundation, Cromwell Revolution, Orange Revolution, you know, with William of Orange.
Speaker 1It treats the Armenian Genocide, it treats the Bolshevik Revolution, it treats the... some other episodes, historically, I can't think of off the top of my head, but it's a pretty good panoply of... Do you deal with the British Israelism at all? Oh yeah, definitely. Oh yeah, it goes to the root of it. In fact, it goes back to the root of it with the Puritans.
Speaker 1That's where it starts. The English Judaism is coming out of Puritanism.
@joann_marieDefinitely there's some nuggets in there to learn from. It's been a while. Sorry. Sorry, go for it, Laurie. No, I'm sorry.
Speaker 9I'm just saying there's different... I try to catch you guys as often as I can, but I really enjoy your spaces.
@joann_marieHi, God bless you. Yeah, Ian and I remember you. It's been a while, but you've come a long way, so good for you.
Speaker 2No, just saying the history, there's definitely nuggets in there, here and there, and I really learned a lot about the Bolshevik era in that book when I was... Thanks.
Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And as we get ready to kind of wind things down, I know that we got KC who wanted to ask a question to Dr. Rectenwald. and then to Chadwick who just came up here. And so we'll go through these two questions and then we'll go to Dr. Rectenwald for some final commentary on the book, the incredible piece that he's put together, where you can grab that and garner a copy as I just want to give a mass amount of gratitude to Faithful for supporting Dr. Rectenwald along with anybody else.
Ian MalcolmSo we'll hear from where you can grab a copy of that to support his work, his site and all the things that they're doing at ASAPAC. and also just some words of positivity and affirmation because as far as the eye can see, I feel like the group that have been in opposition to Jewish supremacy and have been calling out this idea of the Jewish question, we are irrefutably winning.
Ian MalcolmI just wanted to note, I was not aware of this, but apparently after the debacle that was Andrew Wilson trying to debate Candace Owens, the king of the Groypers has had to cancel his show. I don't even watch much.
Ian MalcolmNot a huge supporter of not the content, but I don't tune in all that much or any of those things. I just recognized that on this one, she certainly was in the right and as a result was going to righteously support as best I could. But that being said, let's go to JoAnn. We'll go to Dr. Rectenwald. We'll go through these questions, though, with Casey and Chadwick.
Ian MalcolmAnd then, like I said, go to those final words from Dr. Rectenwald.
@joann_marieExcellent. Thank you so much. And this has been such a great space. I'm so happy that it was impromptu, but a lot of people show up. So it's amazing. And Dr. Michael, I love your book. I'm going to read all of it. And yeah, no, it's pleasantly surprised about it. Lori, I love that you're always here and you're such, you guys are a power couple.
@joann_marieSo it's just so amazing and you guys are wonderful. And guys, again, please repost this space. Let's get more people in here and also for more people to listen to the recording. And yeah, the link for the book is in the Jumbotron and also for ASAPAC. Guys, ASAPAC is doing really important work. So yeah, show them some support and check them out.
@joann_marieAnd yeah, excellent space. Casey, welcome. Go for it.
Speaker 10Thank you. Happy Saturday, you guys. You know, I think, you know, the only thing that I can say to those of us humanity at large is we need to unite against the Satanists. They have really dominated everything. So, yeah, are the Jews wicked? Yeah, but you have to ask yourself, why have they identified themselves readily as being Jewish?
Speaker 10It's because they're Satanists. They're Zionists. Satanist. And they are here for many, many generations to bring us into submission. So as a person that was trafficked throughout my childhood, Hollywood, Satanic, all of the, I'm good friends with Kathy O'Brien, Laura Worley, these people were all part of the MKUltra, which is the, you know, the process of torturing children.
Speaker 10Trauma-based mind control is something that we're dealing with. So we are currently in the Black Awakening. So I've been providing free support to survivors for 31 years. And many of them are programmed individuals for such a time as this. So I'm just going to say everything. I'm going to say this one thing for everybody in the room, that we're in the Black Awakening.
Speaker 10This is the takedown of humanity by the satanic network. They're going to tell you that they're Jews. And you're going to be like, oh, kill the Jews, kill the Jews. But, you know, what do you do? How do you kill the Jews? Nobody's saying to kill them. No, no. It really is the Vatican. The Vatican's at the top level. And the Mormons, they control the bloodline records.
Speaker 10The Jews are definitely involved, but they're not the real Jews. They are evil Zionist Jews. And so are the Bethel Christians. So I'm just going to, I just want to say to this room on a Saturday, unite against Satanist, and I'll end there. Thank you guys.
@joann_marieCool. Well, I disagree with all of it, but thank you so much, Casey.
@joann_marieMichael or Ian, and I'm sorry about what happened to you. I really am, Casey. Do you guys have anything else to add?
@joann_marieNo. All right. Thank you. Yeah, go for it.
@amirkahhhhhhYes. So, wait one sec. Alright, I'm ready. Yeah, just to respond to what Casey said, I don't want to be insensitive.
@joann_marieWe always go through this, she's never gonna, like, get it.
@amirkahhhhhhOh, really? Yeah. I mean, you said that you were...
@joann_marieIt's fine that she has that opinion, we can just, like, agree to disagree, but go for it, thank you.
Speaker 10That's not true, I provided 41 years of evidence, so, like, that's not true at all.
@amirkahhhhhhWell, here, let me ask you something. You said you were MKUltra'd, right?
Speaker 10Yeah, my mother was a verified individual that was in the MKUltra. She was processed with electroshock, iridium, lithium, and thalidomide, and that's a factual document. In fact, in the FBI declassified report, she was handled by Frank Sinatra personally.
@amirkahhhhhhOh, and I'm not doubting anything you said, but you didn't go through it yourself, right?
Speaker 10Yes, I was sold into the program. And I spent my childhood being molested and raped. And my brother is a professional comedian to this day. He edited The Aristocrats, which his name is Emery Emery. He edited The Aristocrats. His best friend was George Carlin. So, yes, we were actively in the MKUltra program.
@amirkahhhhhhGeorge Carlin. I'm a big fan of George Carlin.
Speaker 10He was a wonderful human being. I'm going to tell you that he loved all five of my children. He knew all... He knew their names, and he was highly motivated. He and his wife were highly motivated to write children's books to expose the satanic network that was controlling the governments, and he was my brother's best friend.
Speaker 10His name's Emery. Emery, I can bring facts.
@amirkahhhhhhOkay, and so this MKUltra thing, this is a government program. It's not a satanist program, is that correct?
Speaker 10It is a government program, and our government is satanic, yes.
@amirkahhhhhhAnd when you say satanic, it's kind of like an adjective, like they're evil, right?
Speaker 10Oh, 100%. It's all about controlling the masses, yes. 100%.
@amirkahhhhhhBut I don't know if I would call Jews primarily satanic other than as an adjective, you know? And what is the distinction there? What's the difference between a Jew and a satanic? I'm just trying to understand.
Speaker 10Right, they pretend to be Jews, but they're actually Khazarian Satanists. And they identify themselves as Jews.
@joann_marieThere is a lot of them who are not from Qasariya, that is Sephardic and Mizrahi, and there's a lot of them who are not Ashkenazi. So it's not only the Qasariya ones, it's literally their ideology.
@amirkahhhhhhAnd I agree with them, and that's my issue is, you say those aren't the real Jews, they're the Satanists, as if the real Jews are like a redeemable people. I mean, there's nothing about their doctrine and their culture that is redeemable. I would say their culture is Satanic, so... Calling them satanic as an adjective, I understand.
@amirkahhhhhhBut acting as if, oh, these are not the real Jews, because if they were the real Jews, they would be good. That's where I find... No, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 10I don't suggest by any stretch of the imagination that Jews are good. I'm just saying that the Vatican is above the Jews. They control the Qazari. No, it's not. Oh, my God. And the Mormons control their bloodlines. Yeah.
@joann_marieNo, no, Casey. So, who controls the Holy See? Casey, who controls the Holy See in the Vatican? The Great Pope, Orsini.
Speaker 10No, it's the Rothschilds. Well, yeah, the Rothschilds absolutely control the Great Pope.
Ian MalcolmWait, so the Rothschilds control the Vatican, but the Vatican's above the Jews, right, Casey?
Speaker 10Well, the Jesuits actually control everything. The Jesuits control everything. The Jesuits?
Ian MalcolmOkay, so tell me the Jesuits that are in Trump or Biden's cabinet.
Speaker 10Oh, there's so many. You can't even imagine. Oh, yeah, there's so many. Trump is swimming. He's swimming in them.
Ian MalcolmCasey, give me three.
Speaker 10Yeah.
Ian MalcolmCasey, give me three.
Speaker 10All right, well, I'm going to tell you that J.D. Vance, he was involved with...
Ian MalcolmOkay, who's funded by Peter Thiel.
Speaker 10Peter Thiel, which if you rearrange his name, it also spells a reptile.
Ian MalcolmPeter Thiel is funded by who, Casey?
Speaker 10Peter Thiel is funded by the network of... The Rothschilds. Yeah, and the Rothschilds.
Ian MalcolmJeffrey Epstein, which are both Jews.
Speaker 10100%. Rothschilds, Rockefellers.
@amirkahhhhhhOkay, so... Casey, if you rearrange my name, it says I'm Roth, but I'm not the Egyptian god, I'm pretty sure. So I don't know if rearranging letters is evidence.
Speaker 10Well, they're basically just letting you know that Trump is having to dance with the demons to bring us all into this awareness, yeah.
Ian MalcolmSo what's the connection to J.D. Vance and the Jesuits, Casey?
Speaker 10J.D. Vance, Ambrosia, Youngblood, and... Also, he is closely tied to Peter Thiel, also the reptile.
Ian MalcolmPeter Thiel is funded again by Jeffrey Epstein. We just talked about this.
Speaker 10Yes, and they have a history of child rape.
@joann_marieWas Jeffrey Epstein a Jesuit or a Mormon? What was he?
Ian MalcolmOf child rape, so we can talk about Jeffrey Epstein. Reptile.
Speaker 10Jesuit Mossad. He was a triple agent. We'll call him a triple agent.
Ian MalcolmHow can you say this nonsense?
Speaker 10Oh yeah, he was a fucking Jew.
Ian MalcolmCasey, Casey, in all sincerity, do you get paid for this?
Speaker 10No, you know what? I have gone bankrupt telling the truth for 41 years. I get nothing.
Ian MalcolmYou won't even call out the Jews, Casey. It's such a shill.
Speaker 10I do, but I'm just telling you that if we go balls to the walls against the Jews, you're going to miss the fucking target.
Ian MalcolmWhy am I going to miss the target?
Speaker 10You're going to miss the target because they're deep involved in the Bethel Christians. They control the Vatican. They control the Mormons. We're talking about the Satanic Order.
Ian MalcolmNo, you're talking about the Jews and the Rothschilds.
Speaker 10Controlled by Freemasons, which is the Rothschilds.
Ian MalcolmThe Freemasons are controlled by the Jews. What am I missing here?
Speaker 10Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. It is the juice. However, they've been filtering everything.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so it is the juice. Alright, thank you for the question. With that, we're going to move on. No, no, no. With that, we're going to move on to the last question. Thank you for playing. That'll make a wonderful clip.
@joann_marieEvery time, but I admire that she keeps trying. With your first person. She gets to go on and the topic is...
Speaker 2I mean, of course, people go on tangents because that's life and part of spaces, but the topic is Michael's book. I mean, not that I'm... I mean, of course, we go into other things, but it's just so far down. But I've come to... I just kind of say one quick thing before you toss. I did this news compilation, the legit gov, you know, it's on Substack.
Speaker 2But in all of the years, I've done this for years, and what I've come to see is this a battle of good and evil, and I'm coming to see who the evil components are. and it's kind of a lot like what Ian just said, the componentless Anne-Joanne. Thank you.
@joann_marieThank you so much, Lori. No, it's such a great space, so thank you and sorry for that little vignette.
Speaker 1Can I say something about the Jesuit thing, though? It's confusing because what does it mean to be a Jesuit? That's an order within the Catholic Church.
Ian MalcolmThe Jesuits are very liberal, highly focused on education and essentially the mission or the sending of Christianity across the world via education. And there's certainly subversion within. And you can look at some of the most prominent Jesuit schools. Anywhere in the country, in the world, take your pick and you're going to find a similar power structure that is moving in that direction.
Ian MalcolmSo you can look at, in fact, you can look at most of the Jesuit schools, which at this point, what do they push? LGBT acceptance and all the other stuff. Who's at the root of all of that, right? It's all just mind numbing. You can say that the Catholic Church is undermined, sure, but then we need to look at who is it that financially bailed them out, and what do you know?
Ian MalcolmIt's the same group that's been behind all the other subversion, and so it's just a LARP, and at this point, if anybody wants to play that game, go for it, but just don't bring it into my space, not because I intellectually push back on any kind of rhetoric. You're welcome to share whatever you want, and I let her go on for a couple minutes, but to sit there and talk about child trafficking when we have left to whore, to hear her talk about the abduction and the sexual assault on children and minors when we've
Ian MalcolmHarvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein
Ian MalcolmI think Chadwick had one final question for Dr. Ektemad.
@joann_marieOh, I don't even see Chadwick on the stage. Okay. Go for it. Sorry, I'm super glitchy. Go for it. Welcome.
Speaker 11I didn't have a question. I just wanted to say thank you for speaking. I appreciate you in space quite a bit. And I know I've tuned in over the last couple of days hearing you. Hadn't known you before that, but thank you for everything you've shared.
Ian MalcolmWell, let's go! And Dr. Rectenwald, the craziest thing is that I do feel like we get obviously some dissenters here and there. They'll try and come in and share some nonsense. But we have basically built an impenetrable layer or moat around this worldview. And it's not because we hate anybody. It's just because the common root cause is pretty obvious.
Ian MalcolmWe can pick apart all these other problems of modernity, and it seems to go back to a similar situation. Then we look around, and again... Personally, I think Christianity is a thing that they fear more than anything and everything else. I think it's just because at the end of the day, that is essentially an ethos of morality that basically runs antithetically to all the power structures, the paradigms, and the end games of the system that we see clearly has control.
Ian MalcolmSo we're going to continue, again, trying to be in good faith. We'll try to have these conversations. Anybody is welcome to do so. And I'll hold a monthly space where people can come in and they can share anything and everything as argumentatively as they would like to do so. But in a space, Dr. Rectenwald, any parting words?
Speaker 1Well, let me just say this. You can get my books on my website, MichaelRectenwald.com, and then I have the Substack Rect. You were talking about the Jesuits, right? Like, well, why was she talking about, like, the Jesuits were infiltrated. We know that, right? The Jesuits got infiltrated, and then they infiltrated, you know, the highest echelons of the Vatican, but...
Speaker 1The Jesuits are the issue there.
Speaker 2If you delve into that, a lot of Hollywood players and other professions are definitely part of the Masonic Cabal. I believe it is a Cabal. And if you go deeper, it's Lucifer, and then there's certain religions attached to that, and I'll leave it at that.
Speaker 1Lori's going deep, man. She's going for a long bomb here.
Speaker 1Thank you so much for coming.
@joann_marieIt was really a pleasure to share some of the work with you. It is work, but it is really my passion, so I really appreciate that.
Speaker 1People would share that with me because I resonate with your appreciation very much. And look, for me, going back to Ian's point about I think the moral basis of our movement is that for me, Christianity is a radical rupture from what became Judaism or whatever it was at that time. And I see it as a complete distinction.
Speaker 1I see a radical change in the outlook, and it moves from this kind of tribalistic, ethnocentric belligerence, paranoia, and hatred to a whole new ethic. It's an amazing shift. I think we should acknowledge that shift. It's what makes us different. It's what makes us so appalled by the behavior that we see. Because we have a decent moral fabric.
Speaker 1We have a real moral foundation. And when a Christian is first exposed to this wickedness, they're so astounded they can't believe it's true. For the most part, they don't want to hear about it because they can't believe that this kind of wickedness actually exists because they operate according to a different operating system.
Speaker 1to one with, we have a system that has a certain moral ethics code, a code to it. It has a moral fabric in the code. The code is a moral code. Where theirs is kind of like, no, it's not exactly what I would call a moral code. It's more like an excuse book to be immoral. I mean, that's a whole different thing. So that's the kind of distinction and why I say we do need to understand religion and that, and fundamentally, and I don't mean this like,
Speaker 1Fundamentally, this is a worldview distinction that we have and that we need to draw and make clear. And that way, we also show that we're actually the people that are trying to espouse moral principles. We're not the degenerates. They are. I mean, this is the thing. They flipped this on us. It's amazing. But it's the inverse of the truth, and we need to get that across.
Speaker 1So I really appreciate everybody for coming and it's been my pleasure to share with you tonight and God bless you all.
Speaker 2Before you close, somebody texted me, Amanda from Frequent Spaces. She said, if people could please leave a review on a book, it really helps the book and you don't have to buy the book. So I'm just sorry to cut people off. I just want to make sure because I didn't think about that. And if a bunch of people leave some really positive reviews, it would help the book sales.
Speaker 2Thanks.
@joann_marieAmazing. I'm going to do that right now. Thank you so much, Lori. And this was an amazing space. And also, I mean, again, I was very pleasantly surprised and I am going to read all of it. And yeah, no, I hope that you guys join us for more spaces. And I'm going to... On Monday, we have a space with Iana Believe that she is a really, really cool doctor.
@joann_marieAnd she... The Natural Order Book Reading with Mary Fagan Oliver Janich The Son of an FBI
@joann_marieThank you. Thank you. Thank you so much, guys. And God bless you all.
@joann_marieThank you so much for having me and you're absolutely brilliant.